Recurring concern

Failure to conduct timely, appropriate clinical assessments

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 28 Aug 2013•Latest report 17 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to conduct a clinically required assessment or full clinical review promptly and appropriately when the assessment is needed to identify or evaluate a patient's condition and guide safe care, including the anchor's delayed full review and delayed assessment of a patient's condition.

Not included

  • Excludes specialised assessment pathways with a distinct named subject or established safety concern, such as full mental-health assessments, VTE risk reviews or post-procedure complication assessments, unless the assertion also directly supports the same general clinical-assessment failure.
  • Excludes failures limited to the location, documentation, communication or handover of an assessment where the assessment itself was timely and appropriate.
  • Excludes delays in treatment, medication, escalation or referral when the required clinical assessment was completed appropriately and the remaining failure is downstream.
  • Excludes routine reassessment or review where no clinically required assessment or full clinical review is identified.
Reports
25

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
28

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
38

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England5
Care Quality Commission2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Bedford Prison1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Family of Julia Macpherson1
Glebelands1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
HCRG Care Coventry LLP1
Marine Lake Medical Practice1
Ministry of Justice1
Monkstone House1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Edward James HANDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edward James Hands, known as Eddie, died in his cell at HMP Bedford on 16 February 2024 after consuming methadone and developing aspiration pneumonitis. The inquest identified failures in follow-up care, monitoring, escalation, and the implementation of the Under the Influence protocol, with confusion between prison and healthcare staff about their responsibilities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange follow-up medical assessment when a prisoner's condition is not improving

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence at the inquest revealed that the (primary) prison healthcare provider (within the prison) and prison staff are working to different policies and protocols in relation to those suspected to be ‘under the influence of illicit substances’; there is confusion and lack of awareness of those working in the prison as to the role and responsibilities and expectations about how to alert and manage a concern that a prisoner may be under the influence. In this instance this confusion resulted in Eddie not being observed; had these checks and monitoring taken place, it would have been clear Eddie was not improving and that a follow up medical assessment was required. This meant his clinical deterioration was not recognised and escalated. It is understood that the NHFT policy is designed to cover the entire Trust and may well, therefore, have relevance beyond Bedford prison. However, it is essential that the policy is clear on what happens when the individual institutions have their own local protocols. Eddie’s inquest has revealed how clarity on steps and paperwork required under the policy is essential amongst frontline staff to ensure the safest possible environment for prison residents at Bedford Prison. ”

    Source location

    Edward James HANDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a single agreed UTI protocol standardising responsibilities, observations, escalation routes and handover expectations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the conclusion of the inquest HMP Bedford and NHFT carried out a joint review of the UTI policies and protocols in place. This review resulted in the removal of any previous conflicting guidance and implementation of a single UTI protocol with standardisation of responsibilities, including observation requirements, escalation routes, and handover expectations. This protocol has been agreed by both parties and is to be followed by both operational and healthcare staff at HMP Bedford.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide staff guidance on recognising UTI signs, initiating the protocol, completing observations and undertaking follow-up checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff have been given guidance on recognising signs of being UTI, initiating the protocol, completing observations, and ensuring follow up checks are undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assure documentation and observations, record improvement needs, and escalate issues concerning timescales or procedures to senior leaders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Assurance of documentation and observations is completed to ensure compliance of timescales and escalation procedures. Where this identifies areas requiring improvement a record is made and the issue escalated to both prison and healthcare senior leaders to be addressed as appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gloria Simon moved into a care home for respite on 9 September 2025 and died there from natural causes on 20 September after her condition deteriorated. Concerns included missed opportunities to obtain timely clinical input, the GP’s failure to undertake a face-to-face assessment after misreading oxygen saturation results, and insufficient attention to her medical history and care-home setting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure face-to-face clinical assessment of vulnerable elderly patients

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The GP to whom this case was allocated told the court that he did not know that Gloria Simon was in a care home setting (as opposed to a nursing home setting), which had no clinical staff of any kind, despite having previously visited the premises and despite the clerical assistant's note on a Consultation Report that this was a request from VCH’. He indicated that it was as a result of this misunderstanding was that he did not visit the premises to make a face-to-face clinical assessment. The court is concerned that a recurrence of this situation could leave vulnerable elderly patients with inadequate care. The court would like to know whether measures are being taken to ensure that those in the practice are properly informed about the nature and status of resident institutions with whom they have contact. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily died at Bassetlaw DGH on 6 May 2024 after developing unrecognised dehydration, acute kidney injury, ileus and sub-acute small bowel obstruction following bowel surgery for Crohn’s disease. She experienced vomiting, aspiration pneumonitis and cardiac arrest, with the report identifying concerns about inadequate hydration assessment, fluid-balance recording, recognition of deterioration, clinical assessment and escalation, and response to family concerns. The report also raises concerns about clinical assessment in the Emergency Department before mental health referral or discharge home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clinical assessment before discharge home from the Emergency Department

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That there continues to be a risk that no clinical assessment will be undertaken, in patients attending the Emergency Department at Bassetlaw DGH, prior to referral for a mental health assessment , and that there continues to be a risk that no clinical assessment will occur in Emergency Department prior to a patients discharge home ”

    Source location

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clinical assessment before referral for mental health assessment in Emergency Department patients

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That there continues to be a risk that no clinical assessment will be undertaken, in patients attending the Emergency Department at Bassetlaw DGH, prior to referral for a mental health assessment , and that there continues to be a risk that no clinical assessment will occur in Emergency Department prior to a patients discharge home ”

    Source location

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate the requirement for medical review before Emergency Department referral to mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Divisional Director, has formally communicated via email to all Emergency Department (ED) medical staff the requirement that all patients attending the ED must undergo a medical review prior to any referral to mental health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit compliance monthly with medical review before Emergency Department referral to mental health services and report results through governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This process is subject to monthly audit, and the most recent audit demonstrated 100% compliance, with all patients referred to mental health services having received a documented medical review. This audit is part of an ongoing quality assurance initiative and is reported through the Audit and Effectiveness Forum to ensure sustained oversight and continuous improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response
  4. Oxfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Oscar Michael Thomas Keenan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Oscar was born with a pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction and later developed a bacterial infection after prescribed antibiotics were not received. On 26 June 2024, he was taken to hospital after a call to NHS 111 about breathing difficulties, was found to have sepsis, and died the same day. Concerns included inadequacies in the algorithm for assessing ill newborns, reliance on the algorithm without early clinical input, and delay or lack of direction in obtaining clinical assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays and lack of direction in obtaining clinical assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) The apparent inadequacies of the present algorithm in assessing ill newborns/infants, particularly in identifying significant respiratory problems that require early clinical assessment (2) Total reliance on the algorithm which does not appear to direct early clinical input. (3) A delay/lack of direction in obtaining clinical assessment. I have concerns that this is widespread and could occur in other areas. ”

    Source location

    Oscar Michael Thomas Keenan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Administer monthly knowledge quizzes covering shared learning, procedure changes and NHS Pathways triage principles, with re-quizzing where results indicate insufficient understanding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further gauge understanding and comprehension of the content within any shared learning materials issued, there is a monthly Quick Quiz for both service lines (111 and 999) comprising of 10 true / false and / or multiple-choice questions. The questions are drawn from any recent Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Change Notices, shared learning materials, existing SOPs, and general triage principles for the NHS Pathways system. The quiz is facilitated via MS Forms which allows staff who submit incorrect answers to see explanations of the correct answer with sign posting to the source reference materials. Quick Quizzes have included questions regarding assessing a patient’s breathing in July 2024, August 2024, September 2024 and April 2025 and regarding when and how to pass a call to a clinician every month since December 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly end-to-end 111 case-review meetings to identify learning and implement necessary process or system changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “111 End to End Review Meetings”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 8 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local services manage the availability of services matched to the NHS Pathways recommended outcome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Health advisors using the NHS Pathways system must have access to clinical support and supervision. They are trained to use probing questions to better understand caller responses. If a call is complex, uncertain, or includes three “not sure” answers, advisors are expected to seek clinical input. This support should be available immediately through a ‘warm transfer’ to a clinician, as required by the system’s Licence. To encourage this, NHS Pathways promotes the motto: “If in doubt, shout.” The system generates a recommended outcome (disposition), which is then matched to services commissioned locally. The availability of these services is managed locally.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust found no inherent or recurrent problem with staff failing to seek clinical advice when appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, our Clinical Coordination Centre (CCC) Quality Improvement Team have considered points 2 and 3 of the concerns raised and they are satisfied that there is not an inherent or recurrent issue of staff not seeking clinical advice when appropriate to do so within our call centres.”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response
  5. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Anne Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anne Taylor sustained a head injury after banging her head on a bedside cabinet and falling from a bed during a holiday. After initially leaving hospital before assessment because of waiting times, she returned the next day and was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury involving bilateral acute subdural bleeding and midline shift; she deteriorated and died on 31 July 2024. Concerns included the lack of consideration of investigations during the waiting period, the absence of evidence that her capacity to leave was assessed, and uncertainty about a new procedure for patients leaving before clinical assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in clinical assessment resulting in patients leaving hospital before assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During evidence, it was heard that the deceased had elected to leave the Hospital on Friday 19 July because of waiting times, before being clinically assessed. ”

    Source location

    Anne Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and implement the two-year delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the significant pressures on all NHS services and, in January 2023, published a two-year Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care (UEC) services. The plan prioritised improvements to four hour performance in Emergency Departments and outlined key actions to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services. Despite significant challenges, including higher than anticipated demand, there has been a marked improvement in the headline ambition, with over 2.5 million more people completing their Accident & Emergency treatment within four hours in 2023/24 compared to 2022/23.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support regions and providers to eliminate longer-term crowding in emergency departments and improve patient flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is working to support its regions to support providers to eliminate crowding in Emergency Departments in the longer term. Improvements are being demonstrated through NHS England’s operational planning guidance where health systems were asked to focus on areas to deliver improved patient flow and this has included increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute hospital services, improving flow as well as clinical outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use operational planning guidance to direct health systems toward improved patient flow and clinical outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is working to support its regions to support providers to eliminate crowding in Emergency Departments in the longer term. Improvements are being demonstrated through NHS England’s operational planning guidance where health systems were asked to focus on areas to deliver improved patient flow and this has included increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute hospital services, improving flow as well as clinical outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and obtain approval for a Standard Operating Procedure governing patients leaving the emergency department before assessment or treatment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, it was highlighted that at the time of Mrs Taylor’s attendance there was no formalized Standard Operating Procedure within Salford Royal’s Emergency Department defining the actions to take when a patient leaves before clinical assessment. Salford site has an electronic self-discharge checklist designed for ward-based use, but no guidance or policy to describe the appropriate completion of this, or relevant steps to take, in the emergency department setting.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the approved Standard Operating Procedure across urgent and emergency care areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for patients who leave the emergency department whilst waiting to be seen has now been drafted and is going through NCA approval processes, with an estimated approval date of 6th February 2025. We append the working draft for your information. This guideline sets out the responsibilities of clinical and nursing staff when an adult leaves an emergency care setting prior to being assessed or receiving treatment, so that the patient is safeguarded appropriately with the aim of:”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the NHSE Acuity Tool for initial assessment and routing of patients attending Salford Royal’s emergency department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, as of 25th November 2024, Salford Royal Hospital has become an early adopter of the NHSE Acuity Tool, an initial assessment model which aims to standardize the measurement of acuity in Emergency Departments and Urgent Treatment Centres. Patients who attend the ED at Salford Royal now receive an initial, primary assessment to identify patients with an acuity 1, 2 or 5 which will allow them to either be directed immediately to a receiving location or be directed to an alternative provider such as primary care. Acuity 1 patients are those with immediate life/limb threatening illness/injury, acuity 2 are those with imminent life/limb threatening illness/injury and acuity 5 denotes no threat to life or limb, no ED specific resource necessary. Patients who do not meet an acuity 1, 2 or 5 will then go on to receive a secondary assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue work to achieve the 15-minute target for secondary assessment and enable early intervention and frontloading of essential investigations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The target time for secondary assessment is 15 minutes, Salford Care Organisation are on track to achieve this. Progress of the early adopter programme is being shared with NHSE at regular intervals. Patients receiving a secondary assessment can be identified for early clinical intervention and front loading of essential investigations such as, CT scan. Work is ongoing to meet the NHSE secondary assessment target to provide the significant benefits it offers of reducing the risk of patients with serious conditions sitting in the waiting room for a long time undiagnosed. In addition, the new acuity tool, has a specific question regarding mental capacity assessment relating to a patient’s decision to leave the department.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Salford Royal Hospital Foundation Trust is the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note that your Report has also been sent to Salford Royal Hospital Foundation Trust, who are the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. NHS England has asked to be sighted on the Trust’s response to the Coroner and will review this once received.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 November 2024

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Ernest Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ernest Smith died in hospital from sepsis associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia and an infected haematoma, which developed after prophylactic anticoagulation. Concerns included delays in medical and consultant reviews, delayed antibiotics for the infected haematoma, and failure to follow the Sepsis Protocol.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in medical review of acute clinical deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “a. Medical review requested on 10 March by nurses due to concerns about the acute development of bilateral bruising on Mr Smith's legs. This request was chased by nurses on 11 March and was not conducted until the evening of 12 March. b. A further medical review was conducted in the early hours of 13 March as Mr Smith was in pain and had developed a leg haematoma. c. It took 3 days for consultant review of Mr Smith. On 13 March Mr Smith was reviewed by a consultant from another ward and prophylactic anticoagulation was discontinued. ”

    Source location

    Ernest Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in consultant review

    Wider context from the report

    “a. Medical review requested on 10 March by nurses due to concerns about the acute development of bilateral bruising on Mr Smith's legs. This request was chased by nurses on 11 March and was not conducted until the evening of 12 March. b. A further medical review was conducted in the early hours of 13 March as Mr Smith was in pain and had developed a leg haematoma. c. It took 3 days for consultant review of Mr Smith. On 13 March Mr Smith was reviewed by a consultant from another ward and prophylactic anticoagulation was discontinued. ”

    Source location

    Ernest Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use Nervcentre task lists to communicate outstanding patient tasks between day and night teams during clinical handover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We agree that there was a delay in conducting a medical review for Mr Smith from Friday 10th until Sunday 12th March. Since Mr Smith’s admission, the doctors on call now have an additional formal ‘tasks’ list using an established software tool called Nervcentre. All”

    Source location

    Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide out-of-hours patient-care coordination through a dedicated Hospital at Night team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “outstanding ‘tasks’ relating to patients are now articulated between day and night teams during the clinical handover of patients using this list. Coordination for the care of patients out of hours is the responsibility of a dedicated Hospital at Night team.”

    Source location

    Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 March 2024

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Marianne Erika Oldham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marianne Erika Oldham was admitted to Tameside General Hospital with vomiting and abdominal pain and was diagnosed with a perforated sigmoid colon after a prolonged delay in clinical assessment and imaging. She deteriorated, was treated conservatively, and died from peritonitis. The report identified concerns about delays linked to Emergency Department demand, staffing shortages, and shortages of radiographers and radiologists.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Emergency Department capacity to provide timely clinical assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that the very significant delay for Mrs Oldham to be seen by a clinician was due to the demand on Emergency Department Services. The inquest was told that delays of this length (9 hours) for patients who had been triaged to be seen within 60 minutes were not uncommon throughout the winter period across Greater Manchester and more widely. The demand was due to the volume of patients and the number of staff available to see and treat them. The delay was compounded by the shortage of radiographers and radiologists nationally meaning that even when a decision is taken for a scan it can take some time (9 an hour in this case) for it to take place and then reported on. In the time that Mrs Oldham was waiting to be seen she deteriorated very significantly meaning that by the time it was understood what the issue was she was very unwell and did not respond to conservative treatment which was all she was well enough for by that point. ”

    Source location

    Marianne Erika Oldham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve patient flow through hospitals to reduce emergency department delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care (UEC) services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through the workforce, improving flow through hospitals, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Speed up hospital discharges to reduce length of stay and improve flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care (UEC) services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through the workforce, improving flow through hospitals, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Address unwarranted performance variation in the most challenged local systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care (UEC) services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through the workforce, improving flow through hospitals, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Long Term Workforce Plan to improve training, staff retention, workforce reform and sustainable staffing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nationally, there are clear requirements placed on NHS Trusts to ensure that the right skill mix of medics and other professional groups are in place to respond to the anticipated demand throughout a day. This includes the expectation that senior decision makers are available to support more junior doctors and that diagnostics can occur in line with best practice and clinical standards set by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and other bodies such as Royal Colleges and Faculties. It is, however, acknowledged that resourcing remains an issue across the NHS, with local services reporting over 112,000 vacancies. In June this year, the NHS published its Long Term Workforce Plan, setting out how we will ensure that staffing is put on a sustainable footing over the next fifteen years to improve patient care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish national winter operational-resilience guidance addressing emergency department waits, crowding, flow and hospital length of stay.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In July 2023, we also published a letter to Integrated Care Boards, NHS Trusts and Primary Care Networks titled Delivering operational resilience across the NHS this winter. This includes focusing on reducing waiting times for patients and crowding in A&E departments, improving flow, and reducing length of stay in hospital settings.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS Trusts are responsible for ensuring appropriate staffing, senior clinical support and diagnostic provision for anticipated demand.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nationally, there are clear requirements placed on NHS Trusts to ensure that the right skill mix of medics and other professional groups are in place to respond to the anticipated demand throughout a day. This includes the expectation that senior decision makers are available to support more junior doctors and that diagnostics can occur in line with best practice and clinical standards set by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and other bodies such as Royal Colleges and Faculties. It is, however, acknowledged that resourcing remains an issue across the NHS, with local services reporting over 112,000 vacancies. In June this year, the NHS published its Long Term Workforce Plan, setting out how we will ensure that staffing is put on a sustainable footing over the next fifteen years to improve patient care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer, who had oesophageal cancer and poor swallowing, was discharged with a catheter after treatment for acute urinary retention. He developed symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection, was prescribed antibiotics he could not swallow, and later collapsed and died while being transferred to an ambulance; post-mortem examination confirmed urosepsis. Concerns included the lack of a system to identify the need for liquid antibiotics, difficulties with the ASK MY GP communication system, and the absence of a face-to-face GP assessment before his deterioration was recognised.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide face-to-face GP assessment when deterioration may be present

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The inquest heard that he had not been seen face to face by a GP and that meant that the full extent of his deterioration was not recognised until he was seen by a paramedic from the practice who called an ambulance. ”

    Source location

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review systems for recording and prioritising consultation and home-visit requests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind reception staff to record every home-visit request in the clinical system for clinician assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce home-visit request recording requirements through reception staff orientation and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress the Greater Manchester access action plan to increase general-practice capacity and appointments, expand face-to-face GP access, reduce avoidable demand, and improve healthcare inequalities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Greater Manchester integrated care system has completed an action plan with further steps to support improved access and address healthcare inequalities. The plan includes how each of our 10 local systems will tackle variation in general practice, which is our utmost priority. This will continue to be progressed following the establishment of NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care and the closure of local clinical commissioning groups on 1 July:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the balance between remote and face-to-face consultations across Greater Manchester general practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In October 2021, NHS England set out a plan for improving access for patients and supporting general practice. This sets out how we will increase and optimise capacity, address variation, encourage good practice, and improve access, including face-to-face appointments with GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing digital systems provide clinician-triaged access to telephone, video, face-to-face consultations or home visits, with alternatives for patients unable to use them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The adoption of AskmyGP during 2020 was planned as part of the NHS Long Term Plan to improve digital access for patients. This was expedited during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the advantages it offered in remote working. 70% of our practices in Trafford use this system which has enabled patients to access their practice without the need to physically attend on site which was encouraged during the pandemic where possible. The remaining 30% of our practices use similar digital systems with the same capabilities. These digital systems do not mean that that face to face appointments are not available. Each request on these systems are reviewed by a clinician and a decision is made on the method of consultation, which could be by telephone, email, video consultation, face to face or a home visit.”

    Source location

    Response from Tafford Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CQC and NHS England will make required improvements across practices that do not meet patients’ reasonable needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this we are also working with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which will work with NHS England to support systems in this process and to make the required improvements across those practices which are not meeting reasonable needs of patients. The CQC is rapidly developing an inspection methodology with a particular focus on access to GP services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response
  9. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Josephine Celia BARKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Josephine Celia Barker suffered an unwitnessed fall and serious head injury in an Aldi car park on 15 February 2019. She waited over two hours for an ambulance after five 999 calls, and later died from her injuries on 3 March 2019. The principal concerns included inadequate triage and re-triage, failure to use clinical information from paramedics at the scene, lack of callbacks and clinical review, and the diversion of an allocated ambulance to a welfare briefing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of ongoing clinician input and clinical assessment during prolonged emergency call handling

    Wider context from the report

    “5. At no point did a clinician have any input into the calls after the initial question from the call handler of call 1 as to whether this was major trauma or not and therefore there was no clinical assessment by SECAMBS of Jo’s condition over the following two and a half hours: she was vomiting for over two hours after the fall, she had fluctuating consciousness and was rousable to shaking and not to voice. She had had a tonic-clonic seizure and had potentially been injured by being hit by a car. She was unable to open her eyes. ”

    Source location

    Josephine Celia BARKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 8 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Jack Gordon Liffen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Jack Gordon Liffen, who had dementia and other chronic illnesses and was taking anticoagulants, fell at his sheltered accommodation on 10 March 2019 and sustained a head injury causing subdural bleeding. His condition later deteriorated, and he died in hospital on 11 May 2019 after developing recurrent pneumonia. The concerns identified were the need for clinical assessment after falls and when staff observe deterioration in frail residents at Glebelands.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek clinical assessment when staff note deterioration in residents' health

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That clinical assessment be sought for persons at Glebelands whose health is noted to have deteriorated by staff. ”

    Source location

    Barry Jack Gordon Liffen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek clinical assessment for frail residents following falls

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That clinical assessment be sought for frail persons resident at Glebelands following falls. ”

    Source location

    Barry Jack Gordon Liffen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026