Recurring concern

Failure to ensure staff competence in conducting and interpreting clinical observations

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Oct 2013•Latest report 2 Jan 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of training, induction, guidance, competence assessment or supervision that leave staff unable to conduct, understand, interpret or appropriately escalate required clinical observations, including physiological, neurological, enhanced and procedure-related observations.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to perform or record observations where staff competence is not the identified unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic staffing shortages, documentation failures or equipment defects unless they directly cause inadequate staff competence in conducting or interpreting clinical observations.
  • Excludes failures of named early-warning, triage or condition-specific observation systems when the system itself, rather than staff competence, is the supported concern.
  • Excludes failures to act on correctly performed and understood observations where the observation competence process was adequate.
Reports
10

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
10

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Cardiff & Vale University LHB1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Frimley Park Hospital1
Ludlow Street Healthcare Group Limited1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust1
North London NHS Foundation Trust1
Nursing and Midwifery Council1
Revon Healthcare Ltd1
South London Healthcare NHS Trust1
South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust1
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King's Lynn1
Welsh Government1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West London

    AI-generated summary

    James Stephen KEEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Stephen KEEN was found deceased in his room at supported accommodation on 8 December 2023. He had a history of severe mental ill-health and substance abuse, and the inquest conclusion recorded a drug-related death involving the cardiotoxic effects of methamphetamine and sildenafil. Concerns included confusion and inadequate documentation about physical health observations by untrained support workers, a broken thermometer, and a lack of evidence of appropriate training or competency checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide and verify support workers’ training and competence for physical health checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the inquest the court was advised that the untrained support workers at the supported accommodation would conduct physical health checks including taking a temperature, oxygen saturation readings and pulse. The evidence was unclear as to whether blood pressure readings were taken. It was apparent that there was considerable confusion regarding what readings were being obtained, whether or not the readings were within normal limits, and what (if anything) the staff did with the results. The court was advised the thermometer at the home was broken. (2) There seemed to be a real risk that the observations could give either falsely reassuring information and miss evolving ill-health indicators or be needlessly alarming for residents, by suggesting normal results were in fact abnormal, given the paucity of understanding of the support workers and lack of documentation. (3) There was no evidence of induction or annual training or checking support workers understanding and ability to effectively carry out this quasi-nursing role, or that the qualified staff appreciated the lack of knowledge displayed in the evidence at inquest. ”

    Source location

    James Stephen KEEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Nuliyati BUSINJE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nuliyati Businje was an inpatient on a psychiatric unit when, after abnormal observations and worsening hyperglycaemia during her admission, she suffered a cardiac arrest. Post-mortem examination found a massive pulmonary embolus due to deep venous thrombosis. The concerns included limitations in VTE risk assessment for patients with risk factors other than reduced mobility, insufficient recognition of increased DVT risk among psychiatric inpatients, and inadequate awareness of how clot-related observations may normalise.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training and awareness that clot-related abnormal observations can normalise

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Based on the evidence of the expert physician, a common presentation of a clot can be a derangement in observations such as respiratory rate and heart rate, but these can normalise as the clot furthers on and the blockage eases. I am concerned that this does not appear to be widely known, is not part of training at least in the Trust in this case due to the lack of awareness, and I am told is not something which is taught nationally. There is a risk that a clinician without this knowledge would, as in this case, be reassured by the improving observations and the clot, and risk of a further more serious clot, would be overlooked. ”

    Source location

    Nuliyati BUSINJE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Romeo Miles Esposito · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Romeo Miles Esposito was found unconscious at home, where emergency staff stopped resuscitation and assessed him as dead, although he continued to make respiratory effort and his heartbeat returned before resuscitation resumed. He later died in hospital from a brain injury consequent upon his cardiac arrest; concerns included the failure to recognise the respiratory effort as requiring further assessment and the absence of evidence that staff had been warned or trained against dismissing it as “a release of air”.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of warning or training for clinical staff on interpreting respiratory effort

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Romeo was making respiratory effort for about an hour after ROLE at 0952 hours and resuscitation being resumed at 1049 hours; (2) His family raised their concerns regarding this with SWAS clinical staff on a number of occasions thoughout this period; (3) Staff repeatedly ascribed the respiratory effort to “a release of air”, as opposed to a change in Romeo’s clinical condition which required further clinical assessment; (4) There was no evidence to confirm that clinical staff have been warned or trained not to use “a release of air” as an explanation for respiratory effort or a reason to avoid further clinical assessment. ”

    Source location

    Romeo Miles Esposito · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Eliot HARRIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eliot Harris, who had schizophrenia and diabetes, was admitted to Northgate under the Mental Health Act after his condition deteriorated. His food and fluid intake remained minimal, he was last seen conscious on 9 April, and he was found unresponsive and declared dead in the early hours of 10 April 2020; the inquest recorded the medical cause of death as unascertained and an open conclusion. Concerns included inadequate observations and staff training, unclear allocation of night-duty responsibilities, incomplete records and care planning, reluctance to enter his room when concerned for his welfare, and uncertainty about ensuring requested physical health checks were completed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff training and competency assessment for carrying out observations

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Substantial evidence was heard at the inquest with regard to observations which were not carried out in respect of Eliot Harris in accordance with NSFT’s Policy and with regard to staff not undergoing training and assessment of their competency to carry out observations correctly. Quality audits undertaken following Eliot Harris’s death, show that observations are still not being carried out and recorded in accordance with NSFT’s most recent policy – more than two years following Eliot’s death. Not all staff have completed training with regard to carrying out of observations or have undergone and assessment of their competency to carry out observations ”

    Source location

    Eliot HARRIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver ward-specific Safety Day training on clinical risk, care planning, incident learning and therapeutic observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, within Great Yarmouth Acute Service the team have implemented a Safety Day, which is training specifically developed for the ward and includes sessions on clinical risk assessment, care planning, learning from incidents with a detailed focus on therapeutic observations policy. To date, 19 of the 27 staff have attended the day with two further days planned. In addition, the Matron is leading on refreshing staffs understanding of the therapeutic observation policy by re-completion of the competency assessment.”

    Source location

    Response form Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refresh staff understanding of the therapeutic observations policy through competency reassessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, within Great Yarmouth Acute Service the team have implemented a Safety Day, which is training specifically developed for the ward and includes sessions on clinical risk assessment, care planning, learning from incidents with a detailed focus on therapeutic observations policy. To date, 19 of the 27 staff have attended the day with two further days planned. In addition, the Matron is leading on refreshing staffs understanding of the therapeutic observation policy by re-completion of the competency assessment.”

    Source location

    Response form Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Therapeutic Observations Policy to consider strengthened training, documentation, ward controls, staff guidance and assurance processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The goal of improving the application of therapeutic observations is important with a continuing improvement and monitoring focus. Training and audits form parts of the system to manage the safety and quality. The Trust is commencing a planned review of the Therapeutic Observations Policy, examining options to strengthen all areas including training, documentation, ward controls, guidance for staff and assurance processes. In addition, the ward has reviewed and significantly enhanced their local induction process which is overseen by the Clinical Team Leader.”

    Source location

    Response form Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 October 2022

    Open published response
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    John Preece · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Preece, who had early onset dementia and was prone to seizures, suffered a witnessed seizure and fall on 9 September 2015, sustaining a serious head injury. He was not closely monitored and received incomplete and inappropriate physical and neurological observations before being admitted to hospital, where he died in the early hours of 10 September 2015. The principal concerns were inadequate falls management and neuro-observation knowledge and training, lack of forward planning and monitoring, and delayed medical assistance for medically unwell mental health patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff training and knowledge in conducting neuro observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was a clear lack of knowledge amongst all staff, both registered nurses and support workers as to how to conduct neuro observations despite the evidence showing that guidance in the form of health board policy and also a “wall chart” was available to be consulted. (3) There was no forward planning for the continued observations of Mr Preece throughout the day on 9th September 2015 and as a result he was simply put to bed and not closely monitored as the circumstances required. (4) The evidence revealed that none of the registered nursing staff were trained either during their basic nurse training or subsequently upon employment within the health board, on how to conduct neuro observations and that together with a failure to appreciate an obvious head injury meant that not only observations conducted but that no medical assistance was sought for at least ten hours. ”

    Source location

    John Preece · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver rolling falls-management training covering risk reduction, post-fall care, unwitnessed falls and neuro-observations to mental-health nursing staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mental Health Clinical Board run a bespoke falls training programme which has been developed by the Practice Nurse Educators within the Mental Health Services for Older People (MHSOP) Directorate. The sessions specifically include training on falls risk management (to identify measures to reduce the risk of a patient falling), post falls management, responding to an unwitnessed or witnessed fall and performing neuro observations. This training is delivered on a rolling programme and so far, approximately 75% of nurses (both qualified and unqualified) within MHSOP”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a falls-simulation training suite providing workshops on falls prevention, post-fall care, unwitnessed falls and head-injury response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The UHB has recently opened a falls simulation training suite in the University Hospital of Wales (UHW) and there are plans for a further suite to be sited in University Hospital Llandough. All qualified and support staff are encouraged to attend simulation workshops on falls prevention management and post fall care. The training covers the management of an unwitnessed fall including how to respond to a head injury.”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a new neuro-observation chart and restrict neuro-observation performance to registered nurses under UHB policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A new neuro observation chart was introduced in August 2018 and it is now UHB policy that only registered nurses perform this task.”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include neuro-observation procedures in the undergraduate nursing curriculum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2015 undergraduate nurse training did not cover how to perform neuro observations but this task has now been added to the curriculum and as mentioned above, training on how to perform neuro observations is now included in falls training within the UHB.”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pursue appropriate regulatory concerns concerning the nurses through fitness-to-practise procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In appropriate circumstances, we enforce the standards set out in the Code through our fitness to practise proceedings. Depending on the seriousness of the case, our fitness to practise (FtP) proceedings can result in us providing advice or a warning, accepting undertakings, imposing a caution or conditions of practice order or suspending or removing a nurse from our register.”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-NMC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The health board is responsible for explaining nurses’ relevant training and any steps taken to learn from the incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We note that you have also written to the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. They will no doubt explain in their response the relevant training, if any, which nurses in this unit had received, and any relevant steps they are taking to learn from this tragic incident. I can confirm that we will be drawing the concerns you have raised to the attention of the Healthcare Inspectorate Wales, so that they are aware of the issues (if they are not already) and can take any appropriate action.”

    Source location

    2019-0019-Response-by-NMC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response
  6. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Stephanie Cave · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephanie Cave had a history of deteriorating mental health, self-harm and attempts to end her life, and died after being found with a ligature around her neck on 17 August 2017 while in hospital care. The concerns identified included inconsistent enhanced observations, lack of training and written guidance for conducting and recording observations, and failure to routinely record precise observation times.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training on completing and recording enhanced observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The evidence also revealed that there was no training provided and no written guidelines on how such observations should be completed and how they should be recorded in the observation forms. ”

    Source location

    Stephanie Cave · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trial amended enhanced-observation documentation with guidance, actual observation times, staff coaching, monitoring and evaluation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Introduce amended recording documentation for 2 week trial commencing 22 January, 2018 with provision for coaching of staff, monitoring and evaluation”

    Source location

    2017-0361-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the training package with instructional video and completed-documentation exemplars.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Update current training package to include: video that clearly shows the correct way to complete the documentation; exemplar copies of completed for the finalised documentation record”

    Source location

    2017-0361-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response
  7. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    James Charles MALLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Charles Mallett, aged 93, was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and later sustained a fatal head injury in a further inpatient fall. Concerns included delayed medical attendance, unclear and untimely neurological observations, inadequate contemporaneous records, insufficient falls prevention, and nursing staff training and experience that were considered inadequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of hospital systems to identify nurses lacking the competence or training for basic observations

    Wider context from the report

    “5) There do not appear to be systems in place at the hospital which are sufficient to recognise when nurses are so inexperienced and/or lacking in training that they cannot undertake basic observations on a patient following an injury of this kind. ”

    Source location

    James Charles MALLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Trust-wide neurological-observation training for registered nurses, including competence testing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A training programme has been devised for Registered Nurses on the undertaking and interpretation of neurological observations. A pack and the slide presentation (teaching tools) has been shared with the teams in the Emergency division with Trust-wide training that commenced on 10th April 2017.”

    Source location

    2017-0075-Response-by-The-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Peter John Keep · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter John Keep, an 82-year-old man, was admitted after a fall and underwent pacemaker insertion for Mobitz type 2 heart block. During the difficult procedure he received several sedative and analgesic doses, lost his airway, and suffered cardiac tamponade from perforation of the right ventricle; he later had a cardiac arrest and died in intensive care. The principal concerns included inappropriate and inconsistent sedation, inadequate sedation policies and training, and a lack of action plans for procedure intolerance, airway loss, or difficulty placing the pacemaker wire.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding of required observations during the procedure

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Lack of understanding as to what observations are taken and are required during the procedure e.g. belief that the pulse oximeter measures respiratory rate ”

    Source location

    Peter John Keep · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a cardiology guideline for intravenous conscious sedation covering dose titration, monitoring, observation frequency and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Contrary to the evidence heard at the Inquest, the Cardiology Department does have a guideline for intravenous conscious sedation which was in place at the time of Mr Keep’s procedure and which addresses many of the concerns raised through the Inquest including titration of drug doses, monitoring expected to be used, frequency of observations and training (copy enclosed).”

    Source location

    2016-0362-Response-by-Frimley-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and revise the Trustwide guideline for intravenous conscious sedation across clinical settings to standardise processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also used your letter and Regulation 28 as an opportunity to relaunch the Trust Safe Sedation Committee which will be chaired by ████████ Deputy Medical Director and Chief of Service for Anaesthetics. The Committee are currently reviewing and revising the Trustwide Guideline for Intravenous Conscious Sedation of Adults addressing intravenous sedation in all clinical settings standardising the processes followed. The policy is in draft and going through the Trust’s internal ratification processes together with the draft terms of reference for the Sedation Group (drafts of both attached).”

    Source location

    2016-0362-Response-by-Frimley-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A cardiology intravenous conscious sedation guideline existed at the time and addressed many concerns raised at the inquest.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Contrary to the evidence heard at the Inquest, the Cardiology Department does have a guideline for intravenous conscious sedation which was in place at the time of Mr Keep’s procedure and which addresses many of the concerns raised through the Inquest including titration of drug doses, monitoring expected to be used, frequency of observations and training (copy enclosed).”

    Source location

    2016-0362-Response-by-Frimley-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2017

    Open published response
  9. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sarah Anne Shepherd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Anne Shepherd, a patient detained under the Mental Health Act, was found in her room with a plastic bin liner over her head on 12 September 2011 and died in hospital the following day. The report identified concerns about unclear referral processes to the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit, failures to attempt resuscitation in accordance with guidance, and uncertainty and misleading materials concerning resuscitation training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include required observations and recording in resuscitation training

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) It was apparent from the evidence that the nursing staff who found the Deceased in an unresponsive state on the 12th September 2011 did not attempt to resuscitate her in accordance with the guidelines of the Resuscitation Council. They understood that resuscitation should be started if the patient was not “breathing” whereas the Council states that it should be started if the patient is not “breathing normally”. The evidence heard as to what training the nursing staff had been given concerning when resuscitation should be started was unclear and confusing. It remains unclear whether the resuscitation training now being given to clinical staff (a) is fully and clearly in accordance with the current guidance of the Resuscitation Council and (b) includes training as to what observations should be taken and recorded. Further, it was apparent from the evidence that the resuscitation bags used by staff contain a laminated aide memoire which is itself misleading as it refers to the use of resuscitation when the patient is not “breathing” rather than “breathing normally”. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Anne Shepherd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    John Frank Henry LANSDOWNE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Frank Henry Lansdowne, who had schizophrenia and a history of serious suicide attempts, was admitted to St Pancras Hospital under section 3 of the Mental Health Act after talking about taking his life. He was found submerged in a bath on 18 May 2012 and died shortly afterwards. Concerns included unclear observation timings, an unrecovered observation sheet, inconsistent staff understanding of observations while a patient was bathing, and the use of baths rather than walk-in showers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of consistent nursing staff understanding of intermittent observation requirements during patient bathing

    Wider context from the report

    “3. At inquest, there was a lack of consistency in the understanding of nursing staff on Laffan Ward at St Pancras Hospital, as to the exact requirements of intermittent observations when a patient is bathing. ”

    Source location

    John Frank Henry LANSDOWNE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026