Recurring concern

Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jul 2013•Latest report 3 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in medication review, reconciliation, prescribing or screening that concern recognising the clinical significance of a medicine, contraindication, interaction, toxicity, side-effect or existing medication.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to administer, monitor or supply medication where the concern is not specifically the identification of medication-related risk.
  • Excludes illicit or general drug-use hazards not tied to a medication-safety control.
  • Excludes generic failures to recognise symptoms or deterioration unless the report explicitly links them to medication-related risk.
  • Excludes generic communication, documentation or staffing deficiencies that are not dedicated to identifying medication risks.
Reports
54

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
58

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
100

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
NHS England6
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board5
Care Quality Commission4
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency4
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board3
Royal College of General Practitioners3
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
General Medical Council2
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership2
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust2
Nursing and Midwifery Council2
Royal College of Psychiatrists2
Adelaide Medical Centre, London1
Alvaston Medical Centre1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Jack Horace BURTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Horace BURTON, who had schizophrenia and was prescribed Clozapine, died of Clozapine toxicity after stopping smoking while on holiday in North Yorkshire. Concerns included inconsistent medical accounts about the relevance of reducing smoking and a lack of standardised guidance for asking and recording information about possible medication side effects.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of standardised guidance for asking questions about possible medication side effects

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence revealed that there is no guidance on any standardised practice available to practitioners relating to asking questions and recording answers given when discussing possible symptoms of side effects of the medication. Practitioners can therefore make no record if no information is provided, which does not indicate whether questions were asked. ”

    Source location

    Jack Horace BURTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the Clozapine Clinic standard operating procedure and GASS to monitor and record clozapine side effects in electronic patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care Trust have a standard operating procedure, Community Mental Health Team’s Clozapine Clinic Guidance and Promotion of Health & Wellbeing, this document is in date and available on the Trust intranet. Please find the document attached.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Re-issue the Clozapine Treatment Guidelines and clinic guidance to the mental health clinical workforce.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In further response to the concerns raised by the Coroner, the Trust has re-issued both documents to the mental health clinical workforce. Follow-up actions will be undertaken to ensure that both newly appointed and existing staff are aware of, and comply with, the guidelines.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake follow-up to ensure newly appointed and existing staff are aware of and comply with both clozapine guidance documents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In further response to the concerns raised by the Coroner, the Trust has re-issued both documents to the mental health clinical workforce. Follow-up actions will be undertaken to ensure that both newly appointed and existing staff are aware of, and comply with, the guidelines.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response
  2. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roman Louie Barr suffered an asthma attack on 14 December 2023 and died after no ambulance was available for several hours, leading his family to transport him to hospital. The principal concerns were limited awareness and follow-up of excessive salbutamol use, ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability, risks to families transporting critically unwell patients, and unclear NHS Pathways triage wording.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited awareness of the significance of salbutamol overuse in patients and families

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Limited awareness of salbutamol overuse Evidence showed that patients and families may not appreciate the clinical significance of increased use of the blue (salbutamol) inhaler or its association with poorly controlled asthma. ”

    Source location

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Avery Jake Hall died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 13 November 2024, aged four days, after developing global hypoxia and diffuse alveolar damage following his birth. The report was concerned that his mother continued taking Candesartan during pregnancy because she was not given clear and definitive advice to stop it, and that the medication remained available on repeat prescription without warnings identifying her pregnancy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide specific advice to stop Candesartan and identify its pregnancy risk

    Wider context from the report

    “Following a positive pregnancy test in April 2024, Avery’s mother sought advice from her GP about which of her prescribed medications were safe to use during pregnancy. During the telephone consultation with her GP on 11th April 2024 she was given specific advice to avoid using 3 of 6 prescriptions. I am concerned that the evidence highlighted that Avery’s mother was given only generic advice that it was best to avoid all medication during pregnancy but was not given specific advice to stop using Candesartan, and the risk of continuing to take this medication in pregnancy was not identified during this consultation. ”

    Source location

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and apply an SOP covering pregnancy-related safety checks for new medicines, including stopping or replacing medicines unsafe in pregnancy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An SOP has been implemented in relation to prescribing medication to women of child bearing age (15-55 years old). I attach the SOP. A clinical practice meeting has been arranged for 26 February 2026 at which the SOP will be discussed and laminated copies distributed.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use reception tasks to trigger pregnancy coding, midwife referral checks and medication reviews, with duty-GP cover when unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Any patient who advises that they have become pregnant will be alerted to myself via a task from reception so that I can; a. Code that they are currently pregnant, b. Request referral to our Community Midwife and c. Conduct a medication review. If I am unavailable the task will be sent to the on/call GP, all clinicians have been briefed as to the dangers of Candesartan.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 5 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Warn women taking Candesartan or other ARB medicines about pregnancy risks and the need to stop immediately if pregnancy occurs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Opportunistically all women taking Candesartan or any ARB of childbearing age are verbally warned as to the medication dangers and are advised to stop immediately if they become pregnant.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 5 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a mandatory prescribing assessment within GP specialty training that assesses prescribing for pregnancy and other special groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To give context to the family, The Royal College of General Practitioners works to improve patient care by encouraging the highest possible standards in general medical practice by supporting members, setting standards, providing education and training, promoting research and advocating and representing the College and its 56,000 members.”

    Source location

    Response from the Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide pregnancy-prescribing information resources and links through the RCGP Women’s Health toolkit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the RCGP Womens Health toolkit, the breadth of information resources on prescribing in pregnancy are provided with links, including the Specialist Pharmacy Service, (SPS) https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/the-risks-and-principles-of-prescribing-in-pregnancy/”

    Source location

    Response from the Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley was found deceased at home on 16 March 2023 and died from multiple drug misuse involving a fatal amount of morphine and concomitant prescribed medications. She had deteriorating mental health, increasing suicidal thoughts and plans, and repeatedly requested mental health assessment and a medication review. The report identifies failures to complete required assessments and medication review, inadequate communication and record keeping, and insufficient exploration of information she sought to share about her risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to scrutinise medication and medication changes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Beasley was seen at home following a call to the mental health crisis team and required a full V4 mental health assessment that did not take place and instead an SBAR review was completed, and the nurse did not scrutinise the medications and medication changes that had been previously made and made errors about the doses. Mrs Beasley was informed she was discharged back to her GP, but no actions were sent by the mental health Trust to the GP. ”

    Source location

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Abu RAHMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abu Rahman, aged 88, suffered a traumatic fall causing a fractured hip and underwent hemi-arthroplasty before deteriorating with pneumonia on a background of end stage renal failure. Concerns included delays in obtaining Naloxone when supplies ran out and limited awareness of opioid toxicity or accumulation in patients with kidney impairment or failure.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of awareness of opioid toxicity and accumulation risks in patients with kidney impairment or failure

    Wider context from the report

    “Firstly, I heard evidence from the family that nursing staff were frequently unable to administer Naloxone as it had run out. They had to obtain more Naloxone from the pharmacy, which led to delays for “hours and hours” on multiple occasions. Secondly, I heard evidence concerning a lack of awareness or appreciation concerning the risk of opioid toxicity / accumulation in patients with kidney impairment/failure, even where the “correct” dose may have been given. I am concerned that if there is no proper or properly implemented system for obtaining medication in a timely manner, and limited awareness of the matters canvassed above, then this gives rise to a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Abu RAHMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and distribute local adult opioid-toxicity management guidelines, including interim advice based on national best-practice guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is recognised that the process of initiating Naloxone in Dr Rahman’s case was not in line with available best practice guidance. Bolus injections of Naloxone are recommended, to assess the response from the patient and an infusion is commenced thereafter with the dose titrated according to the amount required to achieve an initial response. It is acknowledged that awareness of this process should be shared amongst the medical team in the Acute”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expert review concluded that the patient was unlikely to have experienced opioid toxicity, contrary to the concern raised.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Considering Dr Rahman’s diagnosis of end stage renal failure the half-life (the time it takes for the amount of a drug’s active substance in your body to reduce by half) of oxycodone in patients increases by up to 1.7 times compared to patients with normal renal function. A review by a Consultant Nephrologist and Lead Renal Pharmacist confirmed that the final dose of Oxycodone administered at 10:04 on 11 November 2024 would have been expected to have been metabolised that afternoon. From the information gathered, following a review of the patient’s medical records with input from an expert panel, it was concluded that the patient in this case was unlikely to have opioid toxicity.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 April 2025

    Open published response
  6. London South

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia and was taking Clozapine, developed persistent vomiting, dehydration and an ileus before suffering a ruptured oesophagus and dying in hospital on 2 January 2021. The report identified concerns about clinical staff failing to recognise the potentially fatal gastrointestinal side effects of Clozapine and about the inappropriate use of a community treatment order instead of continued detention under a mental health section. The inquest narrative also described failures to recognise the need for face-to-face psychiatric assessment after his deterioration following discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clinical staff awareness of Clozapine's potential fatal side effects

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of awareness by a series of clinical staff of the potential fatal side effects of Clozapine ”

    Source location

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raised clinician awareness of clozapine side effects by communicating associated risks to mental health chief pharmacists and health communities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has undertaken considerable work to highlight to clinicians and colleagues the importance of keeping people safe from the side effects of Clozapine, which are well-recognised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clozapine product information and consider whether warnings for healthcare professionals, patients and carers can be clarified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continuously review the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, we are reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year, and we will inform you of the outcome.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage relevant stakeholders during the clozapine product-information review to ensure regulatory documents meet patients’ and prescribers’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continuously review the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, we are reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year, and we will inform you of the outcome.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commenting on clinical decisions in specific cases, including those concerning clozapine, is outside the respondent’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have considered the evidence provided and the circumstances leading to Mr Worrell’s death and acknowledge that your concerns relate to lack of awareness of clinical staff of the potentially fatal side effects of clozapine, and clinical decisions. Unfortunately, we cannot directly address these points, as it is not within our remit to comment on the clinical decisions in specific cases.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye, a psychiatric inpatient at St Pancras Hospital, died on 13 December 2023 after receiving an Olanzapine depot injection and developing Olanzapine toxicity. The report identified concerns about inadequate pre- and post-injection vital-sign monitoring, unclear staff responsibilities, insufficient escalation and contingency planning, and failures to obtain required approval and provide adequate information about risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess the suitability of Olanzapine depot injections for in-patients who refuse vital signs checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(d) In cases where psychiatric in-patients are known to have a history of refusing vital signs checks, careful consideration and scrutiny should be given as to whether an Olanzapine depot injection is a suitable medication for such patients, especially in view of the crucial post-injection monitoring requirements. ”

    Source location

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Imogen Heap · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Imogen Heap, aged 17, died after ingesting a very large quantity of propranolol, with smaller amounts of fluoxetine and paracetamol, and subsequently suffering propranolol toxicity, bradycardia and cardiac arrest. The principal concern was that propranolol remains widely prescribed, including to young people with anxiety, while the risks of overdose may be under-appreciated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Under-appreciation of the risks posed by elevated propranolol medication levels

    Wider context from the report

    “My concern is that Propranolol continues to be a drug which is widely prescribed, and often to young people reporting symptoms of anxiety, but that there continues to be an under-appreciation of the level of risk posed by an elevated level of propranolol medication can be. ”

    Source location

    Imogen Heap · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a surveillance review of current evidence and discuss the findings with GP advisors regarding propranolol guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also outlined that our guidance surveillance team would review any current evidence and consult with topic experts to consider whether an update to CG113 was required, we have now had a surveillance review and discussed with our GP advisors.”

    Source location

    Update from NICE 10 June 2025
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The guideline will not be updated at this time because MHRA found no need for a safety communication and noted widespread safe propranolol use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) have told us that they will not be issuing a drug safety update (DSU) for propranolol. The MHRA stated that ‘The issue of whether or not a DSU was warranted was considered within MHRA in Autumn 2024 and then discussed at one of the monthly DSU planning meetings where a decision was taken not to issue a safety communication. One of the concerns with any communication was inadvertently raising the profile of propranolol overdose. A couple of factors which were taken into consideration are that (i) quite a lot of overdoses with propranolol are mixed overdoses of more than one drug, and that (ii) propranolol is used very widely with millions of items prescribed and used safely each year’. Therefore, our conclusion is that we will not be updating CG113 at this time.”

    Source location

    Update from NICE 10 June 2025
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 November 2024

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Michael Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Michael Clark was found unresponsive at home on 12 May 2024 and died from drug toxicity; the inquest concluded that the death was accidental. The principal concern was that opioid painkillers were prescribed despite his documented previous heroin addiction, without evidence that the risks of reintroducing opioids were considered or monitored, and he subsequently became addicted and took increasing amounts, including non-prescribed opioids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider the risks of prescribing opioids to patients with former opioid addiction

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that Paul Clark had previously been addicted to heroin. He had been successful in treating his opioid addiction and had remained opioid free for many years. His previous problems with opioids and the risks of opioids for him were well documented within his medical notes. However despite the risks opioid painkillers presented to him he had been started in primary care on opioid based painkillers for reported pain. He had become addicted to them and took them at increasing levels topping them up with non-prescribed opioids. There was no evidence before the inquest that the inherent risks of reintroducing opioids to someone who had previously been addicted to them were considered or monitored. It was accepted in evidence that whilst opioid painkillers can be helpful for treating some patients the risks of treating a patient with a former opioid addiction with opioids were significant and that there needed to be a very well thought out rationale with careful monitoring to avoid increasing the chances of a patient relapsing into addiction through GP prescribed medication and that it was essential that GPs considered this when prescribing. ”

    Source location

    Paul Michael Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver opioid-prescribing masterclass training to Stockport GPs and clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to support our wider GP population, a Masterclass presentation on the subject of opioid prescribing was delivered to Stockport GPs and clinicians on 12 September 2024. The session title was ‘Pain Transformation, IMPS and Opioid Stewardship’. A total of 62 clinicians attended the session which was delivered by Dr Thomas Walton, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create, disseminate and use a seven-minute briefing based on learning from the Regulation 28 report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Regulation 28 report and our response will also be shared, in January 2025, for system learning with the GM cross-sector medicines safety group - the IPMO Medicines Safety Group. This group reports to the Greater Manchester Medicines Management Group (GMMG) and is co-chaired by NHS GM and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT). The intention is to reflect on any learning from the Regulation 28 report and create a 7-minute briefing to be produced, disseminated to clinical staff and used for shared learning.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and maintain continuing professional development updates on opioid use disorder, medicine dependence, withdrawal symptoms and opioid reduction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Continuing Professional Development”

    Source location

    Response from RCGP
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop, launch and widely circulate a repeat-prescribing toolkit supporting safer, collaborative prescribing processes and addressing opioid-prescribing safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clinical Policy”

    Source location

    Response from RCGP
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response
  10. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    David Charles Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Charles Martin, an 83-year-old man with progressive heart failure, was admitted to hospital, underwent PCI, collapsed later that day, and died in hospital on 17 September 2022. The principal concerns were inadequate induction for a locum doctor unfamiliar with the Trust’s DAPT policy and multiple missed opportunities to identify and act on the fact that he had been prescribed Aspirin only.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise when patients are receiving Aspirin only

    Wider context from the report

    “2) There were multiple opportunities where the fact Mr Martin was receiving Aspirin only was not recognised. This included the completion of a WHO checklist intended to identify issues of this nature. Of greater concern is that a Deputy Sister who completed the cardiac cath lab pack did recognise the oversight but this was still not acted upon by medical colleagues. ”

    Source location

    David Charles Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement revised PCI pack wording clarifying provision of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The wording in the PCI pack has been reviewed in order to make the provision of Dual Anti-Platelet Therapy clearer to both the medical and nursing team. The proposed revised wording was first agreed by the Cardiology team and was then sent to the Safer Surgery Group (SSG) for ratification and approval. SSG approved the changes at a meeting on 15 November 2024. The revised wording was also submitted to the Forms Review Group on 13 November 2024 and they were ratified and agreed by this group on 18 November 2024. The updated forms have been sent to the publishers and are currently awaiting return. The Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedure (LocSSIP) will be updated and will be available on the intranet for staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 October 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026