Recurring concern
Failure to obtain clinically indicated microbiological samples
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 3
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 0
What this concern includes
Includes failures of the dedicated microbiological sampling process where a clinically abnormal fluid, wound or other specimen should have been sampled for culture, swab or comparable microbiological analysis, including failures arising from absent or inadequate guidance.
What is not included
- Excludes delays or errors in laboratory analysis after an appropriate sample has been obtained.
- Excludes generic diagnostic, documentation, staffing or communication deficiencies unless they directly result in failure to obtain a clinically indicated microbiological sample.
- Excludes routine sampling failures where no clinically abnormal specimen or infection-related indication is identified.
- Excludes non-microbiological testing, including histology, unless the report also explicitly identifies a microbiological sampling failure.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to obtain immediate microbiological analysis of unusually discoloured amniotic fluid
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- British Maternal And Fetal Medicine Society
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
British Maternal And Fetal Medicine Society
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is responsible for considering the recommendations in guideline revision and website guidance.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to undertake timely urine testing for legionella
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Lack of microbiological sampling from open blister wounds
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Guy'S and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Guy'S and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
The records show no open blister or pus on 17 August 2012, so there was nothing to swab.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026