Recurring concern

Failure to provide sufficient GP involvement in patient care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Jan 2014•Latest report 26 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to provide, maintain or act on sufficiently active GP involvement in a patient's care, including minimal involvement, failure to conduct requested GP reviews and failure to provide necessary GP oversight of changing or abnormal clinical circumstances.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication, referral, staffing or documentation deficiencies unless they directly result in insufficient GP involvement in the patient's care.
  • Excludes failures of specialist, hospital, mental-health or nursing involvement where GP involvement is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes isolated failures to act on a specific test, prescription or referral when sufficient GP involvement was otherwise provided and the issue belongs to a narrower clinical process.
  • Excludes routine care in which GP involvement was not clinically indicated or requested.
Reports
17

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
17

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
17

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Recipient name withheld2
A & B Healthcare Limited1
Beech Dene Residential Care Home1
Brighton and Hove City Council1
Care First Homes1
Care Quality Commission1
Churchgate Surgery1
City & Hackney Integrated Primary Care C.I.C.1
Cornerstone Family Practice1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Droylsden Road Family Practice1
East Riding of Yorkshire Council1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester Police1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Melanie Ruth Pinnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Melanie Ruth Pinnell had a history of depression and recently described suicidal thoughts and ideation. No follow-up was arranged by the GP practice after February 2025, and a psychiatrist’s recommendation to start Sertraline was not actioned. Melanie was found hanging at home on 4 May 2025. The report identified these matters as significant risks to patient safety.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP practice follow-up for patients describing suicidal ideation or suicidal thoughts

    Wider context from the report

    “No follow-up was offered to Melanie by the GP practice after February 2025 despite Melanie describing suicidal ideation and suicidal thoughts ”

    Source location

    Melanie Ruth Pinnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a system-based Patient Safety Incident Investigation into the incident and its contributing vulnerabilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this incident, we commissioned a comprehensive Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) in accordance with the NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF). The investigation utilised system-based analytical tools, including the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and the Yorkshire”

    Source location

    2026-0185 - Response from Unity Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce formal practice and mental-health-team caseload reviews covering care plans and safety-netting actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Based on our PSII findings, we are implementing the following safety actions with specific oversight and timelines:”

    Source location

    2026-0185 - Response from Unity Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Define and reinforce clear ownership for prescribing actions and follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ Defining Ownership and Escalation: The PCN MH Clinical Lead and GP Clinical Lead for mental health are defining and re-enforcing clear ownership for prescribing actions and follow-up, as well as introducing a formal escalation SOP for incomplete actions.”

    Source location

    2026-0185 - Response from Unity Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a formal escalation standard operating procedure for incomplete actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ Defining Ownership and Escalation: The PCN MH Clinical Lead and GP Clinical Lead for mental health are defining and re-enforcing clear ownership for prescribing actions and follow-up, as well as introducing a formal escalation SOP for incomplete actions.”

    Source location

    2026-0185 - Response from Unity Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response
  2. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Danielle Monique Christina JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Danielle Jones was found unresponsive at home on 13 May 2025 and was confirmed deceased by paramedics. Post-mortem toxicology found high levels of amitriptyline, excess zopiclone and recent substantial cocaine use; the recorded cause was combined multidrug toxicity. The principal concerns were that, despite reported prescription overdoses and concerns raised by a drug and alcohol service, her repeat prescription medication does not appear to have been reviewed and was continued in large quantities at 28-day frequency.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct medication reviews after overdose disclosures and related concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Although Miss Jones was signposted to Mental Health Services by her GP, her prescription medications do not appear to have been reviewed and the GP surgery continued to prescribed repeat medications in large amounts at 28 day frequency without any further review subsequent to her appointment on 25/2/25. 6. She was issued with repeat prescriptions on 3 occasions subsequent to her appointment on 24th and 25th February 2025 when she self-closed an overdose of prescription medication. 7. On 6/3/25 despite a recent self-reported admitted overdose of prescription medication of ████████ ████████ ████████ Miss Jones was prescribed 8. On 27/3/25 despite a recent self-reported admitted overdose of prescription medication of ████████ ████████ Miss Jones was prescribed Amitriptyline ████████ Diazepam ████████ lamotrigine ████████ mirtazapine ████████ pregabalin ████████ zopiclone 9. On 28/4/25 despite a recent self-reported admitted overdose of prescription medication of ████████ ████████████████████████████████████████ Miss Jones was prescribed ████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ 10. Miss Jones died on 13/5/25 from the combined toxic effects of a fatal level of amitriptyline along with an excessive amount of zopiclone. 11. The clinical lead at Cranstoun had previously had discussions with the GP about reducing Miss Jones prescription for zopiclone. 12. No medication review appears to have taken place after Miss Jones self-reported overdose of prescribed medication nor after concerns were raised by Cranstoun. 13. GMC Guidance requires a practitioner to prescribe drugs or treatment including repeat prescriptions, only when they have adequate knowledge of the patient’s health and are satisfied that the drugs or treatment serve the patient’s needs and to keep clear, accurate and legible records, reporting the relevant clinical findings, the decisions made. 14. There is no clinical rationale recorded for the continued prescribing of Miss Jones’s repeat medications in terms of managing Miss Jones’s risk of overdose given her recent disclosure e.g. reducing the frequency to 7 days rather than 28 days. 15. There is no evidence of any medication review having taken place after Miss Jones’s disclosure of overdose of prescription medication or prior to her repeat prescriptions being issued on 6/2/25, 27/3/25 or 28/4/25. Her last reported medication review was on 23/8/24. ”

    Source location

    Danielle Monique Christina JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the self-harm follow-up policy to require medication review and consideration of reducing prescription quantities where ongoing risk exists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will amend our follow up policy to specifically mention the need for medication review at the time of pro-active follow up, and in particular to consider reducing the amount of medication per prescription if there is any ongoing risk of further self-harm and especially with high-risk medications.”

    Source location

    Response from Your Health Partnership Regis Medical Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the self-harm risk-assessment template to record medication review discussions, stockpiling, medication safety, prescription quantity, and medication supervision options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will amend our risk assessment template to include a mental health medication review code and free text advice regarding the following with a free text box to record discussions.”

    Source location

    Response from Your Health Partnership Regis Medical Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand the annual proactive self-harm follow-up audit to record medication reviews and discussions about prescribed medication quantities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will re-launch this amended policy in January 2026 with our clinicians and add the recording of medication review and recording of consideration of reducing amount of medication on each issue as part of the annual audit program.”

    Source location

    Response from Your Health Partnership Regis Medical Centre
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE Quality Standard 34 does not specifically require medication review following self-harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “QS 34 states people who have self-harmed have an initial assessment of physical health, mental state, safeguarding concerns, social circumstances and immediate concerns about their safety. However, it does not specifically state they require a medication review.”

    Source location

    Response from Your Health Partnership Regis Medical Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 October 2025

    Open published response
  3. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Brown Townend · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Brown Townend, who had diabetes and other comorbidities, developed an infected foot wound that progressed to sepsis despite hospital treatment, and she died on 15 October 2023. Concerns arose about the care provided by carers, including brief visits, failure to escalate poor nutrition, sickness and early warning signs, inaccurate records, and failure to follow up or escalate refusals of care and medical intervention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow up on intended GP support

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the evidence a number of concerns arose as to the level of care Ms Townend received from the carers employed by A&B Healthcare. These include: a) Carers at times spent no more than 15 minutes, on one occasion 8 minutes, with Ms Townend. Bearing in times the tasks, document keeping and care to administer and considering Early Warning Signs have there was no attention to detail; Their duties when there included to prepare meals, conduct personal care if required and talk to the service user. 8 to 15 minutes is not an adequate time to conduct these tasks; ; b) Carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was not eating. As Ms Townend had comorbidities and was at risk of infection nutrition was very important; c) Carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was unwell with sickness. There were a number of times Ms Townend presented with having been sick and this was not considered as a concern; d) Carers did not accurately record concerns regarding Early Warning Signs (EWS) or escalate when they were present. The EWS were always recorded as no concerns. This was not correct as there were occasions where Ms Townend was displaying signs that were Early Warning Signs which should have been escalated; e) Carers did not follow up with Ms Townend when she had indicated she was seeking GP support as she was feeling unwell. This was recorded in the Observation Log that Ms Townend said she would contact her GP however the proceeding carers did not enquire whether this had been done; f) Although Ms Townend was deemed to have capacity carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was making unwise decisions to refuse personal care, decline food and decline medical intervention. This meant that she was sitting at times in her own faeces and becoming weak and it was not considered whether she needed to be reassessed regarding her capacity. ”

    Source location

    Janet Brown Townend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake an unannounced assessment covering visit duration, nutrition and hydration, health monitoring, escalation, record keeping, governance, safeguarding and decision-making.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both inspections of Bridlington found no concerns regarding the deployment of staff and the published reports include positive feedback from people about the support they received. In response to the concerns raised by the coroner concerning the death of Janet Brown, the CQC has received an action plan from the provider addressing the duration of staff visits. We intend to undertake an unannounced assessment of the service which will include staff having adequate time to meet people’s needs. CQC only neglects the carrying out of personal care, however, adequate”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Neither inspection raised concerns about staff failing to escalate health concerns, and the earlier inspection found appropriate healthcare referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Neither inspection of Bridlington raised concerns about staff not escalating concerns about people. The inspection of Bridlington in January 2020 found staff supported people to access health care professionals and referrals were made when required. (Appendix 1). In response to the concerns raised by the coroner concerning the death of Janet Brown, the CQC has received an action plan from the provider addressing how staff will monitor people’s health and well-being. We intend to undertake an unannounced assessment of the service which will include how people are supported to live healthier lives and how the provider will monitor peoples care (Appendix 1, Appendix 2).”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The January 2020 inspection found no concerns about staff supporting people to access healthcare services and support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The inspection of Bridlington in January 2020 found no concerns regarding how staff supported people to access healthcare services and support (Appendix 1). In response to the concerns raised by the coroner concerning the death of Janet Brown, the CQC has received an action plan from the provider addressing their systems for monitoring people’s health effectively within the staff team. We intend to undertake an unannounced assessment of the service which will include governance processes and oversight of people’s care.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 November 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer, who had oesophageal cancer and poor swallowing, was discharged with a catheter after treatment for acute urinary retention. He developed symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection, was prescribed antibiotics he could not swallow, and later collapsed and died while being transferred to an ambulance; post-mortem examination confirmed urosepsis. Concerns included the lack of a system to identify the need for liquid antibiotics, difficulties with the ASK MY GP communication system, and the absence of a face-to-face GP assessment before his deterioration was recognised.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide face-to-face GP assessment when deterioration may be present

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The inquest heard that he had not been seen face to face by a GP and that meant that the full extent of his deterioration was not recognised until he was seen by a paramedic from the practice who called an ambulance. ”

    Source location

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review systems for recording and prioritising consultation and home-visit requests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind reception staff to record every home-visit request in the clinical system for clinician assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce home-visit request recording requirements through reception staff orientation and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the frustrations that the family of Mr Shearer experienced in trying to arrange a home visit. We have reviewed our systems to make sure they are appropriately robust with respect to recording and prioritising of requests for consultations and home visits. It appears in the case of Mr Shearer there was a failure to record the family’s request in the system for a home visit on 17 August 2021. We have reminded all reception staff of the importance of properly recording all requests for home visits in the clinical system so they are referred to clinicians for assessment. This requirement will be reinforced by the office manager in orientation and training sessions for reception staff.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress the Greater Manchester access action plan to increase general-practice capacity and appointments, expand face-to-face GP access, reduce avoidable demand, and improve healthcare inequalities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Greater Manchester integrated care system has completed an action plan with further steps to support improved access and address healthcare inequalities. The plan includes how each of our 10 local systems will tackle variation in general practice, which is our utmost priority. This will continue to be progressed following the establishment of NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care and the closure of local clinical commissioning groups on 1 July:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the balance between remote and face-to-face consultations across Greater Manchester general practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In October 2021, NHS England set out a plan for improving access for patients and supporting general practice. This sets out how we will increase and optimise capacity, address variation, encourage good practice, and improve access, including face-to-face appointments with GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing digital systems provide clinician-triaged access to telephone, video, face-to-face consultations or home visits, with alternatives for patients unable to use them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The adoption of AskmyGP during 2020 was planned as part of the NHS Long Term Plan to improve digital access for patients. This was expedited during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the advantages it offered in remote working. 70% of our practices in Trafford use this system which has enabled patients to access their practice without the need to physically attend on site which was encouraged during the pandemic where possible. The remaining 30% of our practices use similar digital systems with the same capabilities. These digital systems do not mean that that face to face appointments are not available. Each request on these systems are reviewed by a clinician and a decision is made on the method of consultation, which could be by telephone, email, video consultation, face to face or a home visit.”

    Source location

    Response from Tafford Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CQC and NHS England will make required improvements across practices that do not meet patients’ reasonable needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this we are also working with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which will work with NHS England to support systems in this process and to make the required improvements across those practices which are not meeting reasonable needs of patients. The CQC is rapidly developing an inspection methodology with a particular focus on access to GP services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response
  5. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Darren John Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren John Lawrence had a history of suicidal thoughts, plans, previous attempts, mental ill health, disengagement from services and medication noncompliance. He was found dead at his home on 29 August 2020, and the inquest conclusion was suicide. Principal concerns included inadequate communication and follow-up between mental health services and the GP practice, failure to ensure that prescribed venlafaxine was issued and collected, insufficient escalation when direct contact with him was unsuccessful, and inadequate systems for managing correspondence and medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of planned CMHT/HBTT involvement with the GP in overall management and treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “g. There was no CMHT/HBTT planned involvement with the GP in the overall management and treatment of the deceased apart from simply requesting that they issue repeat prescriptions. This meant that opportunities to develop other lines of communication and information sharing as well as support were lost. ”

    Source location

    Darren John Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit CMHT care plans and CPA reviews to verify GP contact and contribution to reviews, sharing findings and any action plan with divisional leadership.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Team Manager for this CMHT will carry out an audit of a selection of the teams care plans and CPA reviews to provide assurance that the Trust CPA process is being followed and that the GP’s are being contacted and requested to contribute as part of the review. This audit will take place by 31st January 2022 and the audit, and any resulting action plan will be shared at the Divisional Senior Leadership Group.”

    Source location

    2021-0349-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 21 October 2021

    Open published response
  6. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mavis May Lawrence, who had severe dementia and required full nursing care, was admitted to hospital with dehydration, deep ungradable pressure sores and a buttock abscess, and later died on 28 February 2019. The inquest concluded that she died from natural causes exacerbated by infected pressure sores. Concerns included gaps in pressure-area checks and care documentation, a pressure mattress being turned off, lack of escalation and pain-relief evidence, insufficient GP involvement, and district nurses not involving tissue viability nurses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient GP involvement

    Wider context from the report

    “(7) There was no evidence that the deceased had been provided with any pain relief and the GP had not been sufficiently involved. . ”

    Source location

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise multidisciplinary-team awareness of involving GPs in ongoing patient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(7) There was no evidence that the deceased had been provided with any pain relief and the GP had not been sufficiently involved. Records show that pain assessments were done at each wound assessment but they do not document pain management in a way that we would expect. It is expected practice that any deterioration in the patient’s condition would be addressed with the appropriate intervention by the relevant practitioner, for example, the General Practitioner. We have identified an action to improve our processes to ensure that GPs are sufficiently involved and in addition to strengthen documentation associated with pain management (Please see action plan below - actions 3 & 4a, 4b, 4c & 7.).”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response
  7. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Karl James Willis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karl James Willis was found deceased at home, with toxicology showing amitriptyline at a concentration within the reported fatal range and morphine sufficient to increase its toxicity. The inquest recorded the medical cause of death as aspiration pneumonitis and amitriptyline and morphine toxicity, with a conclusion of misadventure. Concerns included online access to amitriptyline without adequate checks, the ability to provide inaccurate information, and the option not to inform the patient’s GP.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that the GP is informed

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Permitting the patient the option of not having the GP informed removes an otherwise effective safeguard. The GP had worked with extreme care and supported the patient over many months to try and reduce his excessive reliance on polypharmacy. ”

    Source location

    Karl James Willis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The provider could not share consultation details with the patient’s GP because there was no legal justification to breach confidentiality.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You finally highlight the concern that Karl was given an option to refuse to have the details of his consultation with the private on-line provider to be shared with his own GP. We have checked the website for the provider which has been involved in this case and note that it is recommended that information is shared with a patient’s own GP. As you will appreciate, whilst most often in a patient’s best interest information to be shared, the bar at which it is appropriate for confidentiality to be breached is set high and in the tragic circumstance of Karl Willis, there would have been no legal justification to have breached his confidentiality and informed his GP or anyone else involved in his care.”

    Source location

    2018-0256-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 September 2018

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth Longley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth Longley died at Tameside Hospital on 9 September 2017 after treatment for acute coronary syndrome and severe aortic stenosis led to an upper gastrointestinal bleed. The report identified delays in sending a cardiology referral letter and a lack of action by the GP practice after the letter and echocardiogram results were received.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct requested GP reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “The letter from ████████, which was received by the GP surgery on the 7th August 2017, referred to an echocardiogram on the 16th May 2017 which confirmed severe aortic stenosis. It asked the GP surgery to arrange for Mr Longley for a specialist cardiology opinion and for him to be reassessed by the GP regarding any further syncopal episodes. The concern is that no action was taken by any GP at the practice to either refer Mr Longley to Cardiology in light of Dr Chambers’ letter or in light of the reported echocardiogram results. Further, no action was taken by any GP to review Mr Longley as requested. The concern is that there is a risk of future deaths if similar lack of action occurs in the future. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth Longley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rachal Marie Murphy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rachal Marie Murphy died at home on 8 September 2015 after taking medication prescribed to other family members; the medical cause of death was recorded as acute hypoxia due to morphine overdose, and the conclusion was that she had taken her own life. The report identified concerns about fragmented inter-agency care, failures and delays in referrals and investigations, overlooked CAF documentation, and delays in Early Help case allocation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP involvement in inter-agency case handling

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The CAF documentation was completely overlooked and simply placed in the medical records as read only which led to no GP involvement in the inter-agency framework and handling of this case. ”

    Source location

    Rachal Marie Murphy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Norman Arthur BEARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Norman Arthur BEARD suffered a fall, was admitted to hospital, and later transferred to Daisy Bank Nursing Home, where he developed serious pressure sores, dehydration and significant weight loss. He died at Abbey Court Nursing Home on 14 February 2015. Concerns included delayed referral and inadequate treatment of pressure sores, shortages of staff and essential supplies, incomplete care records, inadequate response to weight loss and minimal GP involvement.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Minimal GP involvement

    Wider context from the report

    “(7) The involvement of the GP was minimal and there was no follow up when blood tests revealed an abnormality. ”

    Source location

    Norman Arthur BEARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026