Recurring concern

Failure to reliably communicate with and listen to families of mental health patients

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 11 Jul 2017•Latest report 12 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures by mental-health assessment, treatment or related care services to contact, receive, listen to, understand or meaningfully consider safety-relevant information and concerns from a patient's family or friends, including failures to provide an accessible route for families to communicate concerns.

Not included

  • Excludes family or carer involvement in care planning, discharge or treatment decisions when the specific concern is participation in the decision process rather than communication and listening about the patient's safety; that narrower concern has its own parent.
  • Excludes generic patient, family or inter-agency communication failures without a mental-health-care context.
  • Excludes failures to act on family information after it was reliably received and understood when the communication and listening process itself was adequate.
  • Excludes ordinary complaints or dissatisfaction without safety-relevant information about the patient's mental health, risks, deterioration or care.
  • Excludes communication with patients, professionals or agencies where family or friends are not the relevant source or recipient.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
11

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2017–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
27

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3
Department of Health and Social Care2
NHS England2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
HCRG Care Services Ltd1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
Legal Services Lincolnshire1
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust1
Livewell Southwest1
LPFT Legal Services1
Ministry of Justice1
NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board1
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board1
North East London NHS Foundation Trust1
Recipient name withheld1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY, who had a history of mental health issues and significant cocaine misuse, was remanded to HMP Chelmsford on 27 January 2024 after expressing an intention to end his life. He was found suspended in his cell about seven hours after arrival and died at Broomfield Hospital on 1 February 2024; the medical cause of death was hanging and the jury concluded suicide. The principal concerns included failures in mental-health care, communication and risk documentation, failure to share information about his extreme suicide risk, inadequate assessment and supervision in prison, and the accessibility of cell-window ligature points.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate with families and gather collateral information

    Wider context from the report

    “CONCERN: During Mr Berry’s inquest, once again, many of the continuing failings under precisely the themes identified in the 2024 ‘Thematic Review’ and in PFDR responses prior to that review as well as in the period since that Review, have been identified as having informed the causative features contributing to the death of a patient under EPUT’s care. In my opinion, the actions taken by EPUT to date to address the acknowledged failings reflected under the themes and issues referred to above have been, and remain, inadequate and incomplete, specifically: (a) Failures in the performance of the CMHT and the allocated Care Coordinator as required under the Care Programme Approach (CPA) and as mandated by EPUT policy. These failures indicated significant human error not detected by an insufficiently robust system and not therefore corrected prior to the death: (b) Failures in Care Planning: specifically, a failure to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to Mr Berry’s Care Plan consistent with Trust policy. (c) Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to Mr Berry’s risk assessment consistent with Trust policy. (d) Failures in Documentation: in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy. (e) Failure of joint working internally: the CC did not attempt to escalate or consult with EPUT colleagues via the regular weekly MTD meeting or any other type of Professionals’ Meeting. (f) Failure of joint working externally: the CC did not liaise at all with the external specialist substance misuse team, even though the cocaine misuse was a central aspect of his presentation and mental health deterioration. (g) Failures in Communication within and between teams as above but also, crucially, including a failure to appropriately liaise with the deceased’s Family to gather collateral information and to provide a carer’s assessment and/or support to Mr Berry’s family. ”

    Source location

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly, a 34-year-old mother of two experiencing post-natal depression, died on 12 November 2024 after intentionally harming herself, causing fatal blood loss. The report identified concerns about inadequate perinatal mental-health training, limits on urgent specialist visits, insufficient engagement with her parents, and wider failings in professional curiosity, escalation, decision-making and risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to demonstrate professional curiosity and obtain relevant information from family members

    Wider context from the report

    “Abigail was known to the community mental health services for just a few weeks. She had been living with her parents immediately before she died and they had attended medical appointments with her. Abigail’s parents were not spoken to by mental health professionals about their daughter’s circumstances when they would have been able to provide valuable information about her research into and planning around ending her life. It was accepted that there was a lack of professional curiosity shown by professionals both in Abigail’s case and generally and I am concerned that there is a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with involved teams to improve professional curiosity when caring for patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There was also a lack of professional curiosity in working with Abigail, and this has been worked on with the teams involved.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response
  3. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Samantha Kate YOUNG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samantha Young died at home on 20 November 2023 after intentionally taking her own life by hanging. She had a history of mental health difficulties, previous suicide attempts, and worsening condition amid significant stress. The concerns included insufficient training for agency staff in risk assessments and inadequate contact and communication with patients’ families and friends.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to effectively communicate with and listen to families and friends of mental health patients

    Wider context from the report

    “B. Wider family and friends of the deceased perspective were not contacted.. A patient's family and friends are clearly an invaluable resource for learning more about a patient's mental health and specifically risk to life, the support available to the patient and the potential for synergistic support with the NHS Trust. This PFD is not the first time that the issue has been raised with Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust: in 2023 the Senior Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton issued a PFD on similar grounds arising out of the inquest into the death of Kirsty Taylor. The Senior Coroner observed in the PFD that "I remain concerned (as it is a matter I have raised on many occasions at inquest and again as a result of the experiences of the family in this case), that communication with the families of patients with mental health difficulties is still not being effectively achieved. Nor are such families being sufficiently, effectively and meaningfully listened to or understood when they voice concerns, based on their experience of the patient outside of a treatment or assessment environment. Consequently, I am concerned that such matters are not being reflected sufficiently or frequently enough in the onward treatment of those patients or in the clinical curiosity afforded to their conditions." Moreover, in 2021 a report commissioned by NHS England into Southern Health Foundation Trust similarly reported on shortfall in communication with families. ”

    Source location

    Samantha Kate YOUNG · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the Triangle of Care framework and updated co-produced training across Isle of Wight and legacy Solent teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “support recovery, and sustain the wellbeing of both the service user and their carer. Having rolled out the programme to legacy Southern Health staff over a number of years, we are now introducing the Triangle of Care framework to our staff in Isle of Wight and Legacy Solent teams (who merged with Southern Health last year to become Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare). Much of this training is co-delivered with carers, carers leads and a former service user with their carer. The training has recently been updated in coproduction with carers.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain an organisation-wide ESTHER ambassador network and provide ESTHER coaching courses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of Esther coaching has further enhanced and reinforced the Triangle of Care principles. Esther Improvement Coaches are specially trained dedicated members of staff who support the development of other staff to create a culture of continuous improvement to ensure person-centred care. User involvement is integral to the model, building a network around the patient including family, friends, and key staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Carers Champions in teams and honorary champions across the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Carers Champions (Carers Leads)”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Carer Information Plan in the electronic patient record with consent, privacy and family-centred information fields.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new Carer Information Plan officially launched in May 2025, and is available for all services, replacing the previous Carer Communication Plan. Carers were involved in the development of our new plans and the response has been overwhelmingly positive.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand carer feedback routes and fund or support carer groups, reporting feedback through governance groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has increased the number of ways that people can give feedback and opportunities to share their experience. This includes Carers groups, storytelling events, carers forums, surveys etc. We have a number of carers groups across the Trust, as well as supporting external groups. Most recently, the Trust has funded and supported the setting up of a BAME carers group in Southampton and continue to fund an adult mental health carers group from diverse communities. Feedback and issues highlighted from these different platforms is reported to the services involved, the Carers, Family and Friends group and the Patient Experience and Caring group as part of our business-as-usual reporting. As we develop our new Trust, an overarching Experience of Care group will be established and an unpaid carers group will report into the Experience of Care group.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission and complete an independent audit of arrangements for involving and listening to carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In continuing recognition of the importance of carer engagement, the Trust last year commissioned an independent audit of this area. Specifically, the purpose of the audit was to review the adequacy of the Trust’s arrangements for involving and listening to carers in order that the Trust learns from their feedback and experiences. This was undertaken by our Internal Auditors—an external professional organisation specialising in governance and assurance. Their involvement reflects the seriousness with which the Trust approaches this issue.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission and complete an independent audit of arrangements for involving and listening to families and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In recognition of the importance of engagement with families and carers, the Trust last year commissioned an independent audit of this area. Specifically, the purpose of the audit was to review the adequacy of the Trust’s arrangements for involving and listening to families and carers so that the Trust learns from their feedback and experiences. The findings of the audit underline the Trust’s commitment to ensuring”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve the Triangle of Care initiative to support family and carer involvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “that patients’ families feel heard, respected, and involved in the care of their loved ones. The findings also outline the programmes of work that are in place as the Trust seeks to embed a culture of compassionate, inclusive care across all of its services, which include improved collaboration with partners and other organisations; improvements to its Triangle of Care initiative; and upskilling staff coaches supporting the development of colleagues to create a culture of continuous improvement and ensure person-centred care.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response
  4. East London

    AI-generated summary

    George Kenneth Fraser · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Kenneth Fraser, aged 37, was found deceased at his home after mental health services had been unable to contact him and his family had last contacted him several weeks earlier. The cause and date of death were uncertain. Concerns included the absence of a clear care plan and robust risk assessment, and inadequate action and communication following failed contact and concerns raised by a friend and family.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain meaningful family contact about concerning loss of contact

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The Mental Health and Wellness Team had been unable to reach Mr Fraser from the 16 July 2024. On the 18 July 2024 a friend contacted the mental health team to raise concern about his lack of contact with Mr Fraser. No action was taken at this time to review the risk of harm to Mr Fraser or to determine whether the Trust’s missing person procedure should be activated. There was no meaningful contact with the family to report the concerning lack of contact with Mr Fraser, until the 29 July 2024. ”

    Source location

    George Kenneth Fraser · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and finalise the Missed Appointments Policy with stronger guidance for disengagement, unsuccessful contact and escalation of concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Missed Appointments Procedure”

    Source location

    Response from North East London Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response
  5. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR, aged 33, was found dead in the garage at her family home on 25 June 2022 after taking her own life by hanging in the early hours. The report identified concerns about fragmented mental and physical health services, insufficiently developed personality disorder provision, inadequate communication with and listening to families, and insufficient information and support for families of patients with neurodiversity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate effectively with and listen meaningfully to families of patients with mental health difficulties

    Wider context from the report

    “3. I remain concerned (as it is a matter I have raised on many occasions at inquest and again as a result of the experiences of the family in this case), that communication with the families of patients with mental health difficulties is still not being effectively achieved. Nor are such families being sufficiently, effectively and meaningfully listened to or understood when they voice concerns, based on their experience of the patient outside of a treatment or assessment environment. Consequently, I am concerned that such matters are not being reflected sufficiently or frequently enough in the onward treatment of those patients or in the clinical curiosity afforded to their conditions. There remains an over-focus on patient centric assessments and patient only responses. It is recognised that patients can present quite differently to and in the presence of their families, who know them intimately, to how they may (or may be able to) present to assessing clinicians - with or without the intent to mask their condition. Whilst consent to share is an understandable barrier in some cases, there should not be a bar to listening to or to actively encouraging feedback and input from families, especially where a family's concerns are heightened by any sudden or marked changes in the behaviours, mood or presentation of their relative outside of the clinical/assessment environment - particularly in the case of neurodiversity. Unless all concerns are heard and considered and all available information is taken on board, holistically, there is a continuing risk that the masking of mental health conditions and the deterioration of them may occur or that significant red flags are missed. In this case, the family's increasing desperate concerns voiced about their daughter's evident mental health deterioration in her final days went un-responded. ”

    Source location

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Triangle of Care training to staff and include it in Healthcare Support Worker induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are delivering a ‘Triangle of Care’ training package (launched by the Carers Trust) to frontline staff with more than 2000 staff having completed this training since 2019. Much of this training is co-delivered with Carers, Carers Leads and a former service user with their carer. Triangle of Care training is ongoing and available weekly for all staff. 17 Carers Leads and 14 nurses/practice development nurses have been trained to facilitate the training package.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress Triangle of Care accreditation from Star 2 toward Star 3.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In June of this year we were delighted to be awarded Triangle of Care Star 2 accreditation and we are now working towards Star 3 to complete the process. In order for a mental health trust to achieve star 2 status, it must not only have completed the self-assessment for inpatient wards and crisis services, but also provision of support within community mental health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce Esther Improvement Coaches to reinforce person-centred carer and family engagement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of Esther coaching this year will further enhance and reinforce the Triangle of Care principles. Esther Improvement Coaches are specially trained dedicated members of staff who support the development of other staff to create a culture of continuous”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ carer leads, honorary carer leads and dedicated Carer Support Workers across the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are 152 carer leads in teams across the Trust with an additional 63 honorary Carers Leads – influencers and ambassadors. These are members of the team with a responsibility to champion family and carer engagement as part of their wider clinical role. We have also employed 22 staff in the roles of Carer Support Workers across the Trust. These are paid roles exclusively for working with carers.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide carer information and support through booklets, a public website and community-based Carers and Patient Support Hubs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Carer information is now readily available through booklets and also via a dedicated section of our public facing website. A new Carers and Patient Support Hub was also set up in January 2022 and this is a listening service available to family members/carers who need additional advice, information or support. In order to ensure that this service is accessible to all we have set up hubs in community settings as well as our clinical areas. For example, we have hubs in areas such as Totton, Romsey, Lymington, Southampton and one in development in the North of Hampshire.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand feedback routes through carer groups, forums, storytelling events, surveys and a funded BAME carers group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has increased the number of ways that people can give feedback and opportunities to share their experience. This includes Carers groups, storytelling events, carers forums, surveys etc. We have a number of carers groups across the Trust, as well as supporting external groups. Most recently, the Trust has funded and supported the setting up of a BAME carers group in Southampton. Feedback and issues highlighted from these different platforms is reported to the Carers, Family and Friends group and the Patient Experience and Caring group as part of our business-as-usual reporting.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and run an expanded Family Connections programme for families of people with complex emotional needs, including neurodiversity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we were initially only able to offer this in the Trust to a small sub-set of families whose relative was receiving a particular combination of interventions, we have sought to expand this. A new Family Connections model has been developed and has been run by Clinical Associates in Psychology (part of our new workforce expansion described in 2 above) for other family members with good outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain an ongoing focus on improving engagement with families and carers using learning from this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst there is more to be done to ensure that feedback from families and carers is heard and acted on and informs the delivery of care and decision-making for those in receipt of services, the trust has demonstrated its commitment to deliver continuous improvements in this area.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 December 2023

    Open published response
  6. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Lee, aged 22, died by hanging at a disused quarry on 16 September 2021, with the intention to end his life; the inquest concluded that his death was suicide. The report identified concerns about superficial risk assessments, the absence of a key worker, communication with the armed forces and family, and uncertainty about risk-based information sharing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Superficiality of communication with the family

    Wider context from the report

    “5.1 While acknowledging Daniel’s high level of contact with the IHBBT team, the evidence was that no one was taking responsibility for his care in a ‘key worker’ type role. The large number of people seeing Daniel did not make deep professional relationships with him which would allow his needs and risks to be addressed in a person centred and properly risk sensitive way. The relationships with Daniel were superficial and this infected the risk assessment process. The large number of mental health professionals in contact with Daniel inhibited him establishing deep relationships of trust. 5.2 The risk assessments themselves were therefore superficial, often relying uncritically on self-reporting without meaningfully engaging in suicide risk prevention. The initial risk assessment on first contact on 16.07.21 was flawed in that, despite the presenting context being an attempt at suicide by hanging, the risk assessment was ‘low risk of suicide’. 5.3 Daniel was a serving soldier and there was a failure to meaningfully communicate and engage with his Regiment and the medical staff attached to it. 5.4 Communication with the family was superficial and the evidence was that their perception was that they couldn’t fully share issues and concerns because of perceived barriers in information sharing. This may not have been the team’s intention, but it was the reality felt by the family. This inhibited their engagement with the team in Daniel’s best interests. The evidence of ████████ was that engagement with the family was important because they were the people who knew Daniel best and who would be the first to identify any risks or concerns. 5.5 There was evidence that staff in the team struggled with decision making around information sharing. For example, on 15.09.21, the day before he died, Daniel’s girlfriend called to share concerns about his wellbeing. The person taking the call indicated that Daniel’s lack of knowledge of her referral placed the team in difficulty in sharing the information. In the event, a practitioner saw Daniel for a visit only a few minutes later and correctly identified his need for an urgent psychiatric review. Notwithstanding this, I considered that this was evidence of a failure to understand the basics of risk-based information sharing. 5.6 In summary, therefore, I considered that there was evidence that a failure to address these issues could create a risk of further deaths: • Superficiality of risk assessments • Lack of a key worker approach • Lack of communication with the armed forces, army in this case • Superficiality of communication with the family • Anxiety about appropriate risk sharing ”

    Source location

    Daniel Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use home-visit progress-note prompts and caseload audits to ensure regular family and carer feedback, involvement and offers of carer assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Assurance is currently gained in respect of communication with, and involvement of, families and carers as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership
    Page 5 · response
    Published 25 November 2022

    Open published response
  7. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emma Jane SIMKIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emma Jane SIMKIN, also known as Emilie Zukiard AFFIN, died on 20 February 2021 after standing in front of a freight train at Railway Lineside, Spitalgate Hill, Grantham, and receiving non-survivable injuries. The report raises concern that people may mask mental illness in front of professionals, who may accept what they are told without sufficiently considering evidence from families, and asks whether policies and training addressing this issue are adequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider primary evidence from families alongside patients’ accounts when assessing masked mental illness

    Wider context from the report

    “Families are repeatedly advising their perception is that loved ones are successfully "masking" their mental illnesses in front of professionals who are perceived to accept at face value what they are told rather than looking at other primary evidence more often than not from the families themselves. which in turn leads the families to believe they are being ignored and lives lost. Can you reassure me that policies are in place that focus upon how to identify "masking" and adequate training to the appropriate professionals is up to date and consider if policies are in need of review. ”

    Source location

    Emma Jane SIMKIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete mandatory suicide and risk training for AMHPs, emphasising assessment of all case factors including family views.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “AMHPs must demonstrate competence in the application of knowledge of mental disorders, including the implications for patients, their relatives and their carers (2008 Regulations, para 3(c)). AMHP training highlights that those self-reporting mental health conditions may be motivated by factors such as a desire not to receive any further mental health support. For example, in 2021 AMHPs undertaking assessments on behalf of Lincolnshire County Council completed mandatory suicide and risk training which outlined specifically that whilst the person’s views were an important part of the assessment process, the evidence for risk in suicide should be based on a review of all the factors of the case, including the views of the family. AMHPs must demonstrate that they are competent in recognizing, assessing and managing risk effectively in the context of their role (2008 Regulations, para 4(f)),”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review policies to consider adding and strengthening references to masking where appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst there is no specific policy about masking due to the comprehensive nature of the code, the ongoing mandatory training and the robust measures in place to ensure that AMHPs remain competent to practice, it is the Council’s intention to review its policies with a view to adding in and strengthening its general policies to incorporate references where appropriate to masking. The Council also intends to put on the agenda of the next AMHP Forum the topic of "Masking" so that it can appraise all the AMHPs of the coroner’s general concerns about masking and to ensure that discussion and good practice issues can be explored with the AMHP group as a whole on that day. The Next AMHP forum is due to take place on Tuesday 10th January 2023 between 9.30 and 1.30pm.”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present masking at the next AMHP Forum to disseminate the coroner’s concerns and explore discussion and good-practice issues with AMHPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst there is no specific policy about masking due to the comprehensive nature of the code, the ongoing mandatory training and the robust measures in place to ensure that AMHPs remain competent to practice, it is the Council’s intention to review its policies with a view to adding in and strengthening its general policies to incorporate references where appropriate to masking. The Council also intends to put on the agenda of the next AMHP Forum the topic of "Masking" so that it can appraise all the AMHPs of the coroner’s general concerns about masking and to ensure that discussion and good practice issues can be explored with the AMHP group as a whole on that day. The Next AMHP forum is due to take place on Tuesday 10th January 2023 between 9.30 and 1.30pm.”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Masking was not relevant to this case because the AMHPs did not see the deceased.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lincolnshire County Council’s only involvement in this case was through its provision of Approved Mental Health Professionals. (AMHP). The Council did not attend the inquest, was not an interested party but did provide two statements from two AMHPs who were not required to give evidence. The AMHPs did not see the deceased at any point during their involvement. The issue therefore of “Masking” (hiding or suppressing symptoms of a mental health condition) was not relevant to the AMHP’s on the specific facts of this particular inquest. We further understand there is a no criticism of the local authority in this case.”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A separate masking policy is not currently considered necessary because statutory guidance, mandatory training and competency controls address the issue.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Council does not have a separate masking policy. However the AMHP is required to act in accordance with the Mental Health Act 1983 and in particular in accordance with the Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice. This Code of Practice is statutory guidance on how the AMHPs should carry out their functions under the Act. Furthermore, the council is required to test the competencies of the AMHPs it is responsible for approving in accordance with the Mental Health (Approved Mental Health Professionals (Approval) (England) Regulations 2008 as detailed in schedule 2.”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response
  8. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Clive Cooke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Clive Cooke died at his home on 9 July 2019 after hanging himself by a ligature fashioned from a grey wiring cable. The principal concern was the absence of national guidance on engaging with the families of mental health patients to obtain as full a picture as possible.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national guidance on engaging the families of mental health patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That there is no national guidance regarding engagement with the family of a Mental Health patient to gain as full a picture as possible. ”

    Source location

    Steven Clive Cooke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Louise Henry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Louise Henry attempted to kill herself, was assessed in hospital and discharged as a voluntary patient who was considered not detainable. Later that day, she stood in front of an oncoming train; the principal concern was communication between mental health professionals and close relatives, particularly how confidentiality may limit the sharing of potentially valuable information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate relevant information between mental health care professionals and patients’ close relatives

    Wider context from the report

    “During almost 40 years sitting as a Coroner, Senior Coroner and now Assistant Coroner, I have heard numerous inquests where had there been communication between the doctors, nurses and therapists caring for patients with mental health issues, and the close relatives of those patients, many issues might have been explained and lives saved. The reason given in the present case, as in so many others, is that of patient confidentiality. Whilst the medical authorities are usually right in their interpretation, one wonders whether some form of enquiry/commission might be established to review the law on confidentiality and especially where it interfaces with those patients who have ‘capacity’ but where their relatives have valuable information which could help doctors decide on best care and treatment. ”

    Source location

    Rebecca Louise Henry · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with professional bodies to agree and publish a consensus statement on information sharing and suicide prevention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Suicide Prevention Strategy for England¹, published in 2012, placed a new emphasis on providing better support to those bereaved or affected by suicide. As part of this, the Department of Health worked with a range of professional bodies to agree a consensus view on confidentiality and suicide prevention. Information sharing and suicide prevention: Consensus statement², was published in 2014, alongside the first annual report of the suicide prevention strategy. The statement includes the following passage:”

    Source location

    2019-0288-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  10. Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Glyn Baker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Glyn Baker, who had longstanding mental health difficulties and a history of suicide attempts, died following a prescription drug-related death. The inquest identified concerns about inadequate communication with his family, a shortage of care coordinators, and a risk assessment that did not address his periodic impulsivity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve and inform families in psychiatric care

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It was accepted in evidence that there had been a lack of communication with the family. They had not been involved in any psychiatric reviews instead, on one occassion, a consultant was left to rely upon information provided by a junior healthcare assistant. At inquest I expressed my view that where a patient has signed a consent form authorising discussion of relevant events with the family, the default position should be that there will be involvement of the family in the absence of any good reason not to do so, for example, a patient’s subsequent express instruction not to share something with the family. In this case the family were unaware that Mr Baker had been discharged from psychiatric support and were unaware of what to do in the event of deterioration in Mr Baker’s condition. ”

    Source location

    Martin Glyn Baker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026