Recurring concern
Failure to reliably recognise respiratory distress in children
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 5
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 3
What this concern includes
Includes failures in paediatric processes for recognising, assessing or escalating respiratory distress, including atypical presentations in children with myopathies, respiratory-rate assessment, oxygen-saturation monitoring and recognition of respiratory red flags such as shortness of breath, chest pain or cyanosis.
What is not included
- Excludes adult respiratory assessment and treatment unless the assertion explicitly supports the same paediatric respiratory-distress recognition process.
- Excludes management of confirmed respiratory distress after it has been reliably recognised and escalated.
- Excludes generic clinical deterioration, staffing, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair recognition of respiratory distress in children.
- Excludes unrelated paediatric conditions or monitoring systems where respiratory distress is not the material safety concern.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Atypical presentation of respiratory distress in children with myopathies weakened by low potassium
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Update paediatric guidelines to strengthen recognition, senior assessment, monitoring and management of children with myopathies and hypokalaemia, including STRS contact indications.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Department of Health and Social Care
NICE considers existing general guidance on assessment, monitoring, and altering care as indicated appropriate.
-
Concerns raised3
Failure to recognise and act on paediatric respiratory red flag markers
Failure to routinely use oxygen blood monitoring in paediatric medicine
Failure to routinely use respiratory rate benchmarks in paediatric respiratory medicine
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to communicate possible signs of respiratory distress between midwives
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
-
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
Embed SBAR communication and escalation across the maternity service and monitor progress through quarterly Quality and Safety Committee updates.
-
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
Participate in the national Sign Up to Safety campaign through a Trust-wide initiative to reduce avoidable harm from failure to identify and act on deteriorating patients.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026