Recurring concern

Inadequate anaphylaxis safety education for patients, parents and schools

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 10 May 2019•Latest report 20 Aug 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of education, safety advice, practical instruction or structured support specifically intended to help people with anaphylaxis or allergy, their parents or carers, and schools understand anaphylaxis risks and safely carry or use adrenaline auto-injectors.

Not included

  • Excludes clinical recognition, diagnosis or emergency treatment failures where the deficient control is not an education or safety-information arrangement.
  • Excludes general allergy or anaphylaxis service-management deficiencies where no education, advice or practical safety-information failure is identified.
  • Excludes medication-packaging and product-labelling deficiencies, including missing instructions on EpiPen packaging, unless the report also identifies a patient-, parent- or school-facing education failure.
  • Excludes generic school safeguarding, health education or parental-support deficiencies without a direct anaphylaxis safety-education connection.
Reports
5

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2019–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
21

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care4
NHS England3
Department for Education2
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust2
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health2
The British Society For Allergy & Clinical Immunology2
Advanced Health And Care Limited1
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives1
Bausch & Lomb U.K. Limited1
General Dental Council1
General Pharmaceutical Council1
London Central & West Unscheduled Care Collaborative Limited1
London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust1
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Miss Hannah Enola Angela Ayomipo Jacobs · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Jacobs, aged 13, died on 8 February 2023 after consuming a dairy milk hot chocolate despite having severe dairy allergies and developing anaphylaxis. She and her mother were not carrying an adrenaline auto-injector, and the available paediatric injector at the pharmacy was an insufficient dosage. The report identified concerns about arrangements for carrying auto-injectors between home and school and the need to educate schools, patients and parents about carrying them.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of an appropriate structure to educate schools, patients and parents about carrying adrenaline autoinjectors during journeys to and from school

    Wider context from the report

    “• Hannah was regularly prescribed Epi-pens (AAI) and had 2 at home and 2 at school. There was no consideration about how to contain the risk of anaphylaxis on the journey to and from school. • Her paediatrician gave evidence at the inquest and acknowledged it was a difficult issue as the pens can be misused, lost, forgotten, leaving an absence of pens at home at the weekend. However, the largest cause of mortality in anaphylaxis is the absence of a readily available adrenaline autoinjector. • The risk of future deaths in the context of anaphylaxis remain in the absence of an appropriate structure to educate the school, patients and the parents of the importance of carrying an AAI on their way to and from school. ”

    Source location

    Miss Hannah Enola Angela Ayomipo Jacobs · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain guidance on school use of adrenaline auto-injectors under review, including access during travel to and from school.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “forgets to bring the AAIs to school each day. Where this occurs, the guidance states that the pupil must still have access to an AAI when travelling to and from school.”

    Source location

    Joint response from DHSC & DfE
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish guidance enabling schools to obtain and use spare adrenaline auto-injectors in emergencies, including advice on carrying two devices and access during travel.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2017, the Department of Health published non-statutory guidance to accompany a legislative change to allow schools to purchase spare AAIs from a pharmacy, without a prescription and for use in an emergency situation. This guidance gives clear advice to schools on the recognition and management of an allergic reaction and anaphylaxis, and outlines when and how an AAI should be administered for pupils in schools. The guidance states that children at risk of anaphylaxis should have their prescribed AAIs at school for use in an emergency, and in line with MHRA advice, those prescribed AAIs should carry two devices at all times. The guidance also states that depending on their level of understanding and competence, children and particularly teenagers should carry their AAIs on their person at all times or they should be quickly and easily accessible at all times.”

    Source location

    Joint response from DHSC & DfE
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Current MHRA guidance is considered sufficient to address advice on carrying two adrenaline autoinjectors and using them promptly; no revision is planned.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In June 2023, the MHRA launched new guidance to highlight the latest safety advice from the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM)’s working group on the safe and effective use of AAIs. The guidance included advice for healthcare professionals to provide to patients and carers and reinforces the importance of carrying 2 AAIs at all times, and using AAIs without delay if anaphylaxis is suspected, even if in doubt about the severity of the event. The guidance can be accessed at the following link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/adrenaline-auto-injectors-aais-safety-campaign/adrenaline-auto-injectors-aais”

    Source location

    Joint response from DHSC & DfE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing school duties and guidance are considered sufficient to require allergy arrangements and access to adrenaline autoinjectors during travel to and from school.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Section 100 of the Children and Families Act 2014 places a legal duty on schools to make arrangements for supporting pupils at their school with medical conditions. The accompanying statutory guidance - Supporting Pupils at School with Medical Conditions - is not voluntary; schools are legally required to have regard to this guidance when carrying out their section 100 duty.”

    Source location

    Joint response from DHSC & DfE
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response
  2. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Hannah Enola Ayamo Jacobs · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Enola Ayamo Jacobs, aged 13, developed anaphylactic symptoms after being served a dairy hot chocolate despite her reported dairy allergy and later died following cardiac arrest. The concerns included dental staff not recognising excessive salivation as inability to swallow and a sign of anaphylaxis, possible misunderstanding of symptoms by her mother, and the availability and use of adrenaline auto-injectors during shortages.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient education of parents and patients on safe AAI use when in doubt

    Wider context from the report

    “• The risk of future deaths in the context of anaphylaxis remains in the absence of further consideration of what constitutes an anaphylactic reaction as opposed to a mild reaction, and the education of parents and patients of the safety of using AAIs (adrenaline auto injectors) IF IN DOUBT. ”

    Source location

    Hannah Enola Ayamo Jacobs · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and maintain allergy action plans distinguishing mild or moderate reactions from anaphylaxis and advising adrenaline if in doubt.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BSACI Allergy Action Plans have two boxes that clearly list the symptoms and signs of firstly a mild or moderate reaction and secondly anaphylaxis. These were developed with a wide range of healthcare professionals and patient groups. Additionally, plans state “if in doubt, give adrenaline”.”

    Source location

    Response from BSACI
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop an online allergy education platform covering anaphylaxis recognition, symptoms and management for healthcare and non-healthcare professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BSACI Allergy Action Plans do state that difficulty swallowing is a manifestation of anaphylaxis. These plans were developed with allergy healthcare professionals and patient representatives. The BSACI is developing an online allergy education platform for all healthcare professionals and non-healthcare professionals which will include anaphylaxis. This will include the signs and symptoms and management approach for mild, moderate and severe allergic reactions. This will be rolled out extensively to a wide range of stakeholders. We would welcome the involvement of healthcare professionals across tertiary, secondary and primary care (e.g. Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Nursing) in this activity, and healthcare leadership (e.g. NHS England, devolved nations heath boards, Integrated Care Boards).”

    Source location

    Response from BSACI
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop anaphylaxis guidelines and patient information leaflets with patient organisations, including an accessible leaflet explaining anaphylaxis signs and symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “BSACI has collaborated with patient organisations to develop guidelines and information leaflets. This includes an Anaphylaxis patient information leaflet which can be viewed here. This clearly states the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis and is accessible to all patients.”

    Source location

    Response from BSACI
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with professional bodies to agree and support allergy standards of care and education.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The RCP will work with Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Royal College of Pathologists, British Society for Immunology – Clinical Immunology Professional Network, British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, dental and pharmacy professional groups, to agree and support standards of care and education related to allergy. This will include updating standards for allergy accreditation, including the adoption of the BSACI adult allergy action plan where many of the aspects related to this case are addressed including carrying adrenaline autoinjectors, and difficulty in swallowing is an indication for the use of adrenaline.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Physicians
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 August 2024

    Open published response
  3. Newcastle and North Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    James Stuart Atkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Stuart Atkinson, who had a known peanut allergy and asthma, died of anaphylaxis after eating a Chicken Tikka Masala pizza containing peanuts from Dadyal Takeaway Restaurant on 10 July 2020. The report identified concerns about the lack of allergen information from the takeaway, the absence of regular allergy reviews, and the failure to locate his Epi-pen during the reaction.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an appropriate structure to educate and manage people diagnosed with allergies and anaphylaxis

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence in this case unequivocally established that James was not under regular review for his allergy, risk of anaphylaxis and the benefits of automatic adrenaline injectors. The report of ████████ (attached) identifies the need for wider consideration of a systematic approach to improving anaphylaxis awareness and management. The risk of future deaths in the context of allergy/anaphylaxis remains in the absence of an appropriate structure to educate, review and manage those who are diagnosed allergies. ”

    Source location

    James Stuart Atkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the Specialist Allergy Service Specification, including stronger transition, self-care, information and personal management plan requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has a Clinical Reference Group (CRG) that provides clinical advice and leadership for both Specialised Immunology and Specialised Allergy services. The membership includes clinicians, commissioners, public health experts and Patient and Public Voice members. They use their combined knowledge and expertise to advise NHS England on the optimal arrangements for the commissioning of specialised services. This includes developing national standards for services delivering specialised care to patients with allergies in the form of national service specifications and policies. The CRG commenced a review of the current published Specialist Allergy Service Specification in May 2023, which is expected to be complete by Summer 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2024

    Open published response
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Shanté Andrée Marie TURAY-THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shanté Andrée Marie Turay-Thomas ate hazelnuts on 18 September 2018 and died soon afterwards from acute anaphylaxis. The report identifies concerns about inadequate allergy care, advice and training concerning adrenaline auto-injectors, prescribing and clinical communication, and errors in the NHS 111 response and ambulance categorisation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to explain the need for sequential administration of two adrenaline auto injectors in acute anaphylaxis

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Shanté’s GPs knew that she should carry two adrenaline auto injector (AAI) pens at all times, and they may have mentioned this to her, but they failed to record this and they did not emphasise it to her. They failed to emphasise to Shanté and her family that the reason for carrying two pens is primarily because in the event of severe acute anaphylaxis, the very strong likelihood is that both pens will need to be administered, one five minutes after the other, to keep the patient alive until the arrival of an emergency ambulance. The GPs did not explore with Shanté the reason for her erratic requests for a pen. They did not explore with her where she kept her pens. They did not test her understanding of medical advice. ”

    Source location

    Shanté Andrée Marie TURAY-THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record and emphasise the need to carry two adrenaline auto injector pens

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Shanté’s GPs knew that she should carry two adrenaline auto injector (AAI) pens at all times, and they may have mentioned this to her, but they failed to record this and they did not emphasise it to her. They failed to emphasise to Shanté and her family that the reason for carrying two pens is primarily because in the event of severe acute anaphylaxis, the very strong likelihood is that both pens will need to be administered, one five minutes after the other, to keep the patient alive until the arrival of an emergency ambulance. The GPs did not explore with Shanté the reason for her erratic requests for a pen. They did not explore with her where she kept her pens. They did not test her understanding of medical advice. ”

    Source location

    Shanté Andrée Marie TURAY-THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend and release the Distance Learning Pack with stronger anaphylaxis guidance, second-dose adrenaline advice and accurate images of adrenaline autoinjectors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Digital welcomed the evidence given by the expert witness, Professor Fox, at the inquest and immediately recognised that the distance learning pack could be improved, assuring the Coroner (in evidence and in the supplementary second witness statement dated 20th December 2019) that a review would be undertaken, in consultation with Professor Fox, to address the points raised during his evidence.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-Digital_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend NHS Pathways guidance so a second adrenaline autoinjector is advised after five minutes without improvement, through Release 20.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Pathways has always prompted call handlers to give instructions in respect of a second administration of AAI if there is no improvement, as NHS Digital stated in the PFD submissions, dated 17 January 2020. This is NHS Pathways content and is not affected by the system into which NHS Pathways is embedded (e.g. Adastra in this case).”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-Digital_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate prescribing, dosing, device-change and training guidance for adrenaline auto-injectors through safety bulletins, newsletters, intranet updates, scriptswitch messages and practice events.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The narrative verdict was discussed at the NCL Medication Safety Officer (MSO) Local Network on 17th January 2020. The network agreed that a Medicines Safety Bulletin on Adrenaline Auto Injectors (AAIs) would be distributed to GPs and other primary care healthcare professionals. The NCL Medicines Safety Bulletin on Adrenaline Auto Injectors (AAI) dated 24th January 2020 is attached as appendix 1. The bulletin was approved virtually by one NCL Medication Safety Officer (MSO) Local Network following the meeting on 17th January 2020 and distributed to Enfield GP practices on 30th January 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Follow up practices through meetings and training, and collate records confirming patient device training and dosage reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “CCG pharmacists to check what action they have taken regarding the NCL Medicines Safety Bulletin on Adrenaline Auto Injectors (AAI) have contacted all GP practices. This is being followed up with individual practice meetings, training meetings for GPs, training sessions for Primary Care Network pharmacists, and by CCG pharmacists working in practices. A record is in the process of being collated to capture actions by individual practices to ensure all patients regularly receive appropriate training in the use of their device and dosages have been reviewed. This process is due to complete by 30th April 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Process AAI prescriptions as acute prescriptions and provide device-specific safety instructions covering appropriate dosing, carrying two pens and emergency action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. All prescriptions for AAIs are now dealt with as acute prescriptions, as opposed to repeat prescriptions. This ensures that each prescription is scrutinised in detail to ensure that the type of pen and dose of adrenaline is appropriate for the patient. On the face of any AAI prescription, it is expressly stated for the avoidance of any doubt that a patient should carry two AAI pens on their person at all times and ensure that they are familiar with the use of the pen. There is also some safety netting advice in the event of an emergency. We have enclosed a sample prescription to illustrate this change. In addition, each prescription is accompanied by an AAI brand specific letter to the patient providing the most important details about the AAI pens to enable a patient to use it safely and effectively. We have also enclosed a copy of a standard letter in this regard.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train clinical staff on the three common AAI devices and maintain sample pens for patient demonstrations and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The Practice has taken significant steps to ensure that it is up to date with anaphylaxis management and the use of AAI pens. It arranged in-house training for all clinical staff on 9 December 2019, which was delivered by a Nurse, ████████. This training included demonstrations as to how to use the three most common AAI pens, namely Emerade, JEXT and EpiPen, advice as to the different dosages available, instructions and demonstrations as to the different methods of administration for each brand. This was all based on the respective brands’ advice/instruction on their own explanatory posters and the demonstrations were done by Nurse ████████. She has since confirmed that she has also seen a few patients who have attended the Practice to obtain some training on the use of their AAI.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver enhanced anaphylaxis content within mandatory basic life-support training, including symptom recognition, carrying two pens and device-specific administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. In addition to the in-house training, mandatory basic life support training was held at the Practice on 27 February 2020. This was delivered by an external provider, Mr ████████ of ████████ and Associates Healthcare Training and Education. The basic life support training always includes a segment on anaphylaxis management. However, the Practice contacted the training provider prior to the course in order to emphasise that a more extensive section was required on anaphylaxis management. We enclose a copy of the e-mail in this regard. The basic life support training lasted two and a half hours in duration. It included a 40 minute section on anaphylaxis management which encompassed recognising symptoms, the imperative of carrying two pens at all times and the different administration of the three types of pens available.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit an in-house pharmacist to provide current AAI guidance and patient training during prescribing and dispensing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. The Practice recruited an in-house pharmacist who commenced work in December 2020. This appointment will prove conducive in ensuring that both patients and clinicians have up to date information in relation to AAI awareness. The pharmacist is also on hand to provide training to any patients in relation to the correct use of an AAI. There is accordingly now two layers of protection in that guidance is offered to a patient when prescribing the AAI as well as when dispensing it.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appoint a Practice Anaphylaxis Champion to oversee staff awareness, training, prescribing surveillance, protocol adherence and patient reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. The Practice has undertaken a rigorous review of all patients that have been prescribed AAI pens so as to ensure that the correct dose and pen is being prescribed. The Practice has nominated one of the Pharmacists to act as the ‘Practice Anaphylaxis Champion.’ This role will include ensuring staff awareness, training and regular surveillance of appropriate prescribing practices and adherence to practice protocols. The Pharmacist will also contact all patients prescribed AAIs to undertake regular reviews of their condition, treatment and training.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the ScriptSwitch message with AAI availability, prescribing, dose-checking, counselling, training and allergy-action-plan requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. The Practice has shared learning with the CCG medicine management team and the message on scriptswitch has been amended as follows:”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have commissioning teams liaise with relevant organisations to facilitate uptake of new guidance and resources supporting management of severe allergies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• I will ensure your report is sent to HEE and the Royal College of General Practitioners. Our commissioning teams will liaise directly with all relevant organisations to facilitate uptake of any new guidance and resource that would support better management of people with severe allergies.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-England_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider whether communication routes or commissioning levers can support uptake and embedding of new allergy guidance and resources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are deeply saddened by Shante’s death. We are grateful to have had the opportunity to respond to your concerns relevant to NHSEI. We will continue to work with HEE, the professional Royal Colleges and the other organisations addressed in your report to keep abreast of any new guidance or resources that they produce that would support better management of people with severe allergies. We will consider whether any of our communication routes or commissioning levers can help with their uptake and embedding.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-England_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Initiate discussions with MHRA about adding advice to outer packaging that patients should carry two adrenaline auto-injectors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With respect to information on the labelling of medicinal products, this is controlled by the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 and the addition of any text must be approved by the competent regulatory authority before it can be implemented. When considering the addition of information not specified in the regulations, it is necessary to take into account whether this can be included on the packaging in legible form without adversely impacting the essential information already required to be present.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Bausch-Lomb_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider how best to clarify in CG134 that two adrenaline auto-injectors should be prescribed and carried at all times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We do not consider it appropriate for us to duplicate the BNF advice referred to above. However, we will consider how best to make clear in CG134 the advice that 2 adrenaline auto-injectors should be prescribed, which patients should carry at all times.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NICE_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Matters of concern 1–14 and 20 do not concern NHS Pathways and fall outside its remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HM Coroner raised matters of concern numbered 1 - 20 in the PFD report. Matters of concern 1 – 14 and 20 are not applicable to NHS Pathways. We set out below our response to matters of concern 15 to 19.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-Digital_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine twin-pack supply cannot replace single-pen dispensing or patient education about carrying two auto-injectors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Emerade, like other adrenaline auto-injectors is authorised for supply as twin-packs as well as single auto-injectors.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Bausch-Lomb_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing BNF and BNFc advice sufficiently covers adrenaline auto-injector doses, quantities and training, so NICE will not duplicate that advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having reviewed your concerns, we consider that the British National Formulary (BNF) and the BNF for Children (BNFc) already contain detailed advice on these aspects of care, including the following pieces of MHRA/CHM advice from 2017 and 2019, in the section on Adrenaline/Epinephrine (https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/adrenalineepinephrine.html):”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NICE_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA, a pupil at William Perkin High School with multiple food allergies and asthma, went into anaphylactic shock after another pupil threw cheese at him on 28 June 2017 and died. Concerns included inadequate awareness of his allergies, insufficient checking and availability of EpiPens, an out-of-date EpiPen, failures in sharing and standardising allergy action plans, a cancelled follow-up appointment, and shortcomings in emergency response guidance and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of school pupil understanding of allergies and the consequences of allergen exposure

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The pupils at Karanbir’s school had a patchy understanding of his allergies, what they were and the consequences of exposure to allergens. Targeted education about this would improve safety. ”

    Source location

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026