Recurring concern

Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 2 Jul 2014•Latest report 24 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to assessing, monitoring, recording, providing or reviewing patients' food and fluid intake and nutritional or hydration needs, including risk assessments, nutrition or fluid charts, prompting, prescribed nutritional support and escalation of inadequate intake.

Not included

  • Excludes medication, electrolyte or disease-specific treatment concerns unless the asserted deficiency directly concerns nutrition or hydration needs.
  • Excludes generic clinical record-keeping, staffing or care-planning deficiencies unless they directly impair the nutrition and hydration process.
  • Excludes food-service or dietary provision failures where no patient-specific nutrition or hydration safety need is identified.
  • Excludes malnutrition-only concerns that do not materially involve the broader nutrition and hydration management process.
  • Excludes isolated fluid-balance recording failures where the concern is limited to fluid records and does not support the wider nutrition and hydration condition.
Reports
39

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
44

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
80

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission5
Department of Health and Social Care3
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
A & B Healthcare Limited1
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges1
Amberley Hall Care Home1
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Athena Care Homes (UK) Limited1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Cardinal HC Limited1
Care Outlook Ltd1
Care UK1
Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd1
Caring UK Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Patrick Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patrick Griffin died on 17 August 2025 at the Stamford Unit, Tameside General Hospital, from bronchopneumonia against a background of Alzheimer’s disease. He had been admitted from residential care, where it was recognised that he needed support with dietary and fluid intake and full assistance with hygiene and personal care. On admission, he was dehydrated and had not opened his bowels for seven days; the inquest found that a number of his basic care needs had not been met.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate dietary and fluid intake support

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Griffin lived with advanced dementia and moved into Moss Cottage on temporary basis on 18 July 2025 to afford his wife and main carer a period of respite. I am concerned that, despite it being recognised that Mr Griffin needed support with dietary and fluid intake, and full assistance with hygiene and personal care, when admitted to hospital on 6 August 2025, he was noted: 1) To be dehydrated; and 2) Not to have opened his bowels for 7 days. ”

    Source location

    Patrick Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train all care staff and nurses in communication, documentation, reporting, nutrition, malnutrition and dehydration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The leadership team at Moss Cottage were placed on a performance plan and provided with additional training and mentoring to strengthen their skillset and address the issues identified. All Care Staff and Nurses have been allocated and completed the following training:”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate relevant record-keeping, care, nutrition, hydration, bowel-care, accountability, delegation and leadership policies through the quality compliance software reading list.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All Care Staff and Nurses have received the following policies and procedures via a reading list on the quality compliance software programme that is in use:”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise daily handovers to record dietary intake, fluid consumption and elimination for earlier intervention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The daily handover has been reviewed, and we have added additional sections, which include dietary intake, fluid consumption and elimination, to aide early intervention.”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add fluid-balance charts and bowel activity to the manager’s daily walk-round checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, a new Management Team is now in place at Moss Cottage, and the Manager is spot checking and auditing that documentation is robust throughout the week and the Senior Governance Manager is auditing monthly. Fluid balance charts and bowel activity have been added to the Managers daily walk round.”

    Source location

    2026-0114 - Response from Caring UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield died at Trafford General Hospital on 19 August 2025 from complications arising from coronary artery disease, against a background including an acute on chronic subdural haematoma requiring surgery, hypertension and frailty. Concerns included the delay between a family member requesting medical review and the review taking place, whether nursing practices ensured vulnerable patients received adequate hydration and nutrition, and whether measures relating to communication about sitting-out recommendations were in place across the Trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of intentional rounding and nursing practices to ensure adequate hydration and nutrition for vulnerable ward patients

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Having considered all of the evidence before the inquest with the utmost care, I am concerned that the approach to intentional rounding at Wythenshawe hospital in conjunction with other relevant nursing practices is insufficient to ensure vulnerable patients (such as those with cognitive impairment or the inability to eat or drink without assistance) receive adequate hydration and nutrition whilst on the wards; ”

    Source location

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue enhanced auditing of appropriate food-chart commencement for three months to assure consistent nutrition monitoring across WTWA hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following His Honour’s admission to Doyle Ward on 23 July 2025, he was placed on food charts on 24 July 2025. This measure allowed staff to track his nutrition status closely and respond promptly to any emerging concerns. An audit of 49 patient records at Wythenshawe Hospital, completed in February 2026, found that 89% of relevant patients had food charts commenced appropriately. This enhanced audit will continue for the next three months to provide further assurance of consistent practice across WTWA hospitals. As part of His Honour’s nutrition and hydration management, he was placed on the ‘red tray system’ on 24 July 2025. The red tray is a visible prompt for staff, indicating that the patient is at high risk of malnutrition and requires assistance with eating or drinking. During his admission, His Honour required encouragement and support with both eating and drinking.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional nutrition and hydration monitoring through quality and safety walk rounds led by nursing directors, with real-time feedback.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional monitoring is being provided through quality and safety walk rounds led by the Director or Deputy Director of Nursing with feedback provided in real time.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formalise Ward Manager and Matron walkarounds to increase assurance of mealtime preparedness and real-time patient feedback.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Ward Manager and Matron walk arounds are in place and are now being formalised as part of increased assurance mechanisms to focus on mealtime preparedness and patient feedback in real time.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase the volume and frequency of peer dining audits from March 2026, reporting results through senior nursing and nutrition governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Increased volume and frequency of peer audits from March 2026 reporting into the weekly Senior Nurse Huddle chaired by ████████ and oversight into the WTWA Nutrition and Hydration Group.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust considers its comprehensive care approach, including nutrition and hydration support for vulnerable patients, sufficient to address the concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you may be aware, ‘intentional rounding’ is a term used to describe a practice in care delivery to patients during their hospital admission; it is a structured proactive nursing process where staff check on patients at regular intervals to address any key needs such as pain, communication and placement of items such as a call bell. Although the terminology ‘intentional rounding’ was used with regards to care provided on Doyle Ward, it is not a term that is widely used across WTWA Hospitals to describe what is a more comprehensive approach to care delivery, which includes assessment and implementation of care. This approach is provided to all patients, including those patients who require support with nutrition and hydration, and those patients with a cognitive impairment.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response
  3. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    David Joseph DUGDALE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Joseph Dugdale was admitted to hospital in January 2024, sustained bilateral hip fractures and developed a pressure sore, before undergoing surgery and dying on 19 May 2024. Concerns included inadequate pain management, insufficient nutritional support, deterioration of the pressure sore to grade 4, and poor nursing care, including soiled dressings and the sore being left exposed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient nutritional support for inpatients

    Wider context from the report

    “2. David lost 3kgs in weight during the first month of his admission to EDGH. He was not eating nor drinking. There seemed to be little nutritional support available to David in the early stages of his admission causing him to lose almost 30kgs in total. ”

    Source location

    David Joseph DUGDALE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require admission and weekly MUST screening, real-time monitoring, automatic Dietetics referral for high risk or poor intake, and multidisciplinary review of repeated nutrition or hydration refusal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Completing the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), a tool used to identify adults who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition, is now required on admission and weekly as a minimum. These should be monitored by ward Matrons and Heads of Nursing using the LiveFlo system, if a MUST score is 2 or above or there is documented poor oral intake for more than 48 hours this will trigger an automatic referral to Dietetics. In addition, nutritional plans must be clearly referenced within daily nursing documentation and where patients repeatedly refuse nutrition or hydration, this will trigger a multidisciplinary review (MDT) involving Dietetics and the Learning Disability Nurse, ensuring that barriers to intake are explored and addressed promptly. These measures are designed to ensure that nutritional concerns are escalated early and managed proactively.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue quarterly audits of MUST compliance, referral timeliness, and weight monitoring, with results reported through governance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure improvements are maintained and monitored over time, quarterly audits will review MUST compliance, referral timelines, and weight-monitoring practices. LiveFlo monitoring by Matrons and Heads of Nursing will continue to support real-time oversight, and audit results will be reported through the IGM. Immediate reinforcement of these expectations has already taken place, audit results from 2025 are already available and outlined below but we will continue an audit cycle within three to six months.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a BETU nutrition-improvement pilot using additional Dietetic staffing, equipment review, and strategies to improve nutrition, then roll learning out across the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following these results, a pilot project has recently commenced on BETU to look at improving nutritional standards on this ward. This involves additional Dietetic staffing to improve training, review of the equipment available for measuring nutritional status and trialling strategies to improve provision of high-quality nutrition on the ward. Learning from this project will be rolled out to the wider Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response
  4. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Elaine Jean GRIFFITHS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elaine Jean Griffiths died at Northampton General Hospital on 7 October 2022 from COVID pneumonitis, with congestive cardiac failure and a fall resulting in a fractured neck of femur also recorded. Concerns included incomplete fluid and diet charts, uncertainty about her gluten and dairy intolerance, limited suitable food options, and family-provided food not being recorded; the report states these matters were not causative of death in this case.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately and completely record fluid and food intake

    Wider context from the report

    “Given the importance of accurately monitoring both fluid and food intake in this context, I have the following concerns albeit I did not find that these matters were causative of death in the present case:- A) The Ward Sister said in her evidence that “on occasional days, the fluid and diet charts were only partially completed”. B) There was confusion about whether or not Mrs G was gluten and dairy intolerant. A Mental Health Nurse recorded on 31.08.22 “she was eating and drinking poorly as she follows a gluten and dairy free diet and reported the ward only give her lentil casseroles”. However, the Consultant/Orthogeriatric said in his evidence “.she had very poor oral intake and family were insisting she had an allergy to gluten and lactose despite Mrs Griffiths denying this”. C) The family say that the choice of options for those with gluten and dairy intolerance and also requiring bite sized food was very limited, which disproportionately affects the elderly. D) The family say that the fluid and diet charts were not accurate as the family were bringing in food and this was not being recorded. As the charts were inaccurate, this would also have made it more difficult for the dietician to offer meaningful advice. ”

    Source location

    Elaine Jean GRIFFITHS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use electronic fluid-balance charts in Nevercentre to improve accessibility, calculation and documentation accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since June 2025, the fluid balance charts are available on Nerovcentre (NC), which is an electronic patient record (EPR). This has improved oversight of our patient documentation and enhanced accessibility for consulting teams. Fluid consumption is now electronically calculated and inputted, so that consulting teams can easily access the correct quantities.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out updated food-and-fluid charts across both hospitals, including prompts for chart commencement, visitor-provided food and oral nutritional supplements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2025 our teams updated the Food and Fluid Charts used at NGH and plan to implement these at both NGH and Kettering General Hospital (KGH), the two acute hospitals within University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group. The improvements include the addition of prompts to indicate:”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit MUST completion and the accuracy of food-and-fluid charts through Nutrition Nurses and use findings to monitor compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our ongoing audit process, staff complete the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST) and compliance with this is audited by our nutrition nurses. This also encompasses reviewing the accurate completion of the patient food and fluid balance charts as well as assessing whether appropriate actions have been followed based on the patient’s MUST score. A key finding from these audits is that the transferring of the fluid balance charts to NC has resulted in an improvement in timely and accurate completion of the MUST scores.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver evaluated monthly nutrition and hydration training through the Clinical Skills Nursing Programme, including documentation standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are ensuring that our team of Dietitians and Nutrition Nurses continue to work collaboratively in order to develop and deliver monthly training sessions as part of the ongoing Clinical Skills Nursing Programme. These evaluated sessions, in place since January 2026, provide education on essential nutrition and hydration principles, including correct completion of documentation such as the food and fluid balance charts. In addition to this, the Trust appointed a Specialist Catering Dietitian in March 2025, who as part of their remit, they also deliver training for health care assistants and catering staff on nutrition and hydration standards.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2026

    Open published response
  5. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    June Violet FINDLAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Violet Findlay fell at home on 23 October 2024, fracturing her hip and wrist, and later died at Thames Hospice on 11 December 2024 after her health deteriorated. Concerns included substantial weight loss and sub-optimal management, monitoring, recording, and auditing of the risk of malnutrition during her hospital admission.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor and record malnutrition-risk interventions

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of Mrs Findlay’s 9-10 days at Frimley Park Hospital she lost at least 5.3kg from an already low weight. She had been assessed as being at high risk of malnutrition shortly after her admission. The care planning records were inconsistent about the interventions required and the level of risk. The record keeping of the actual interventions used on a daily basis to address this risk were absent or largely incomplete and I found that the ward staff did not properly follow the dietician’s advice or the care plans. I am concerned that ward staff are not: 1. Properly recognising the risk of malnutrition to patients, even after completing the MUST2 assessments; 2. Correctly utilising care planning tools to address the risks of malnutrition; 3. Properly monitoring and recording the interventions undertaken to address the risk. This places patients at risk due to unclear information and also means that the hospital cannot learn from mistakes or pick up near misses. No evidence was forthcoming from the Trust at inquest that these shortcomings at Frimley Park Hospital had been acted upon despite the court hearing that 100% of the ward staff had received MUST training and records were audited on a monthly basis. This gives rise to a further concern: 4. The auditing of records does not seem to have identified the repeated failures to record required information. ”

    Source location

    June Violet FINDLAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Divisional Directors of Nursing to provide assurance that patients’ nutrition and hydration needs are assessed, met and accurately recorded.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Divisional Directors of Nursing (DDONS) within the new Divisional Structure will be required to provide assurance to the Chief of Nursing and Midwifery that the nutrition and hydration needs of patients cared for in their division are being assessed and consistently met and accurately recorded.”

    Source location

    Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deliver updated nutrition and hydration training covering documentation, mealtimes, trays, diets and supplements, with area-level compliance monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. A thorough review/map of all the education programmes/study days that are provided for both registered nurses and healthcare support workers is underway. The aim is to ensure that the training we are providing all staff is fit for purpose. The new education programme will address the following key concerns: documentation to ensure accurate recording of food consumption, protected mealtimes, tray colours and ensuring the patient receives the correct diet for example soft, and when supplements should be given. All staff will be given the updated training and compliance for each clinical area will be monitored by the NHSSG.”

    Source location

    Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend Epic care flowsheets to capture food and fluid intake in greater detail and disseminate supporting safety communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Review of how Food & Fluid intake can be documented on Epic (Trust Electronic Patient Record) - the daily care flowsheets have been amended to allow for nutritional intake to be documented in more detail. Safety message and electronic patient record (EPR) bulletins have gone out to clinical staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a weight-loss flag that triggers a multidisciplinary swarm huddle and individualised care planning, with compliance monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Implement a new system to flag patients with a concerning weight loss which triggers a swarm huddle. A swarm huddle is designed to start as soon as possible after a patient safety incident occurs so in this case significant weight loss is identified. The purpose of the swarm-based huddle is to identify learning from patient safety incidents; this is in line with the National Patient Safety Framework (PSIRF). Immediately after an incident this identified the multidisciplinary staff ‘swarm’ to the ward to quickly analyse what happened and how it happened and decide what needs to be done to reduce risk. Swarms enable insights and reflections to be quickly sought and generate prompt learning. It will be expected that the swarm is attended by the Ward Matron and a member of the Patient Safety Team.”

    Source location

    Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run the Harm Free Care audit programme to monitor food-chart completion, nutritional care and significant-weight-loss escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Audit – There will be an altered focus on the audit to provide assurance that patients are adequately fed according to their need and that any significant weight loss is appropriately escalated to the Ward Matron to ensure that high risk patients are highlighted and appropriate action is taken and documented in line with the new weight loss SOP.”

    Source location

    Response from Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 December 2025

    Open published response
  6. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily died at Bassetlaw DGH on 6 May 2024 after developing unrecognised dehydration, acute kidney injury, ileus and sub-acute small bowel obstruction following bowel surgery for Crohn’s disease. She experienced vomiting, aspiration pneumonitis and cardiac arrest, with the report identifying concerns about inadequate hydration assessment, fluid-balance recording, recognition of deterioration, clinical assessment and escalation, and response to family concerns. The report also raises concerns about clinical assessment in the Emergency Department before mental health referral or discharge home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate assessments of hydration status for ward patients

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That patients on the wards at Bassetlaw DGH will have inadequate assessments of hydration status, and have inaccurate and inadequate completion of fluid balance charts ”

    Source location

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver ongoing education and training on fluid balance and hydration assessment through Medicine and Quality Improvement teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Ongoing education and training initiatives led by the Division of Medicine in collaboration with the Quality Improvement team.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Host a multidisciplinary Gastroenterology Masterclass addressing comprehensive nutrition and hydration assessment and fluid-intake monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, the Division of Medicine are hosting a Gastroenterology Masterclass on 7 October 2025, focusing on multi-disciplinary training. A key component was the importance of comprehensive nutrition and hydration assessments for patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), including accurate fluid input/output monitoring.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response
  7. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Marina Lorraine Waldron · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marina Lorraine Waldron was admitted to hospital on 17 December 2023 with gastrointestinal bleeding caused by angiodysplasia and died on 15 February 2024 despite appropriate treatment. During her admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed, including failures to respond to family concerns, monitor dietary intake, act on a low albumin level, and consider dietary advice and parenteral feeding promptly. The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to formally monitor dietary intake

    Wider context from the report

    “During the 8 ½ weeks of MW’s hospital admission, her nutritional needs were poorly considered or managed. Examples of this include: 1. An ongoing failure to heed the family’s concerns that from admission to hospital, MW was not eating or drinking adequately 2. A failure to formally monitor MW’s dietary intake 3. A failure to respond to a low Albumin level which is a sign of malnutrition 4. Dietary advice and parenteral feeding were not properly considered until 29/1/2024 (6 weeks after admission) The medical staff who gave evidence agreed that malnutrition contributed to MW’s death. ”

    Source location

    Marina Lorraine Waldron · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed strengthened nutrition documentation and compliance monitoring within the Quality Management System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of this governance framework has already supported the implementation of key improvement actions at pace, including enhanced monitoring of fluid balance, improved escalation protocols for malnutrition risk, and strengthened documentation and compliance monitoring. These initiatives are being embedded within our Quality Management System and have enabled a more responsive and accountable approach to preventing avoidable harm.”

    Source location

    Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deploy a Gold Standard food chart with a supporting staff briefing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

    Source location

    Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce red trays and visual identifiers for patients requiring dietary monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

    Source location

    Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use AMaT data to assess and improve ward-level compliance with food-chart use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

    Source location

    Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore environmental barriers to dietary monitoring, including early tray clearance and single-room isolation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve compliance and accuracy in monitoring nutritional intake, Recommendation 2 of the action plan focuses on:”

    Source location

    Response from Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 May 2025

    Open published response
  8. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Brown Townend · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Brown Townend, who had diabetes and other comorbidities, developed an infected foot wound that progressed to sepsis despite hospital treatment, and she died on 15 October 2023. Concerns arose about the care provided by carers, including brief visits, failure to escalate poor nutrition, sickness and early warning signs, inaccurate records, and failure to follow up or escalate refusals of care and medical intervention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate concerns about reduced food intake

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the evidence a number of concerns arose as to the level of care Ms Townend received from the carers employed by A&B Healthcare. These include: a) Carers at times spent no more than 15 minutes, on one occasion 8 minutes, with Ms Townend. Bearing in times the tasks, document keeping and care to administer and considering Early Warning Signs have there was no attention to detail; Their duties when there included to prepare meals, conduct personal care if required and talk to the service user. 8 to 15 minutes is not an adequate time to conduct these tasks; ; b) Carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was not eating. As Ms Townend had comorbidities and was at risk of infection nutrition was very important; c) Carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was unwell with sickness. There were a number of times Ms Townend presented with having been sick and this was not considered as a concern; d) Carers did not accurately record concerns regarding Early Warning Signs (EWS) or escalate when they were present. The EWS were always recorded as no concerns. This was not correct as there were occasions where Ms Townend was displaying signs that were Early Warning Signs which should have been escalated; e) Carers did not follow up with Ms Townend when she had indicated she was seeking GP support as she was feeling unwell. This was recorded in the Observation Log that Ms Townend said she would contact her GP however the proceeding carers did not enquire whether this had been done; f) Although Ms Townend was deemed to have capacity carers did not escalate any concerns when Ms Townend was making unwise decisions to refuse personal care, decline food and decline medical intervention. This meant that she was sitting at times in her own faeces and becoming weak and it was not considered whether she needed to be reassessed regarding her capacity. ”

    Source location

    Janet Brown Townend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake an unannounced assessment covering visit duration, nutrition and hydration, health monitoring, escalation, record keeping, governance, safeguarding and decision-making.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both inspections of Bridlington found no concerns regarding the deployment of staff and the published reports include positive feedback from people about the support they received. In response to the concerns raised by the coroner concerning the death of Janet Brown, the CQC has received an action plan from the provider addressing the duration of staff visits. We intend to undertake an unannounced assessment of the service which will include staff having adequate time to meet people’s needs. CQC only neglects the carrying out of personal care, however, adequate”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The January 2020 inspection found no concerns about supporting people with eating, drinking, nutrition or hydration needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The inspection of Bridlington in January 2020 found no concerns regarding the support people received to eat and drink and/or the ongoing assessment and monitoring of people’s needs and support to access other healthcare services. The inspection of Bridlington in April 2023 did not include these areas. In response to the concerns raised by the coroner concerning the death of Janet Brown, the CQC has received an action plan from the provider addressing nutrition and hydration. We intend to undertake an unannounced assessment of the service which will include nutrition and hydration and how staff identify people’s changing needs and escalate concerns. (Appendix 1, Appendix 2).”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2024

    Open published response
  9. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen Frederick DULLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Frederick Dulling, who had Parkinson’s disease, symptoms of dementia and swallowing problems, was admitted to York District Hospital and choked while eating toast, subsequently dying from aspiration pneumonia. Concerns included the response to reported risks before admission and multiple nursing-care lapses during his hospital admission, including the appropriateness of his diet, nutritional monitoring, response to choking and incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure the recorded and implemented diet reflects identified nutritional needs

    Wider context from the report

    “4. I heard evidence of a number of omissions and lapses in the care afforded Mr Dulling by registered nurses during his admission to York District Hospital. My concerns relate to the following findings – a) No evidence of any direct inquiry being made of Mr Dulling’s primary carer in respect of his nutritional needs, despite Mr Dulling being deemed to lack capacity; b) It being recorded and acted upon that a regular diet was appropriate for Mr Dulling, despite a) above; c) No food chart being implemented and maintained despite the outcome of Mr Dulling’s malnutrition risk assessment; d) No assessment or escalation of Mr Dulling’s refusal of intravenous fluids; e) Evidence of a delayed response by a staff nurse to the information that Mr Dulling was choking; f) The absence of a de-brief of staff involved in the choking incident by a nurse of the requisite level within the period of 72 hours after the event. This, together with the subsequent delay in undertaking and completing the patient safety investigation review, resulted in important gaps in the evidence supplied both to the review and the inquest. 5. My concern is that the above reflects a series of lapses in basic nursing care identified in respect of a single patient, a repetition of any of which could present a risk of future deaths to others. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Frederick DULLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement and maintain food charts after malnutrition risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “4. I heard evidence of a number of omissions and lapses in the care afforded Mr Dulling by registered nurses during his admission to York District Hospital. My concerns relate to the following findings – a) No evidence of any direct inquiry being made of Mr Dulling’s primary carer in respect of his nutritional needs, despite Mr Dulling being deemed to lack capacity; b) It being recorded and acted upon that a regular diet was appropriate for Mr Dulling, despite a) above; c) No food chart being implemented and maintained despite the outcome of Mr Dulling’s malnutrition risk assessment; d) No assessment or escalation of Mr Dulling’s refusal of intravenous fluids; e) Evidence of a delayed response by a staff nurse to the information that Mr Dulling was choking; f) The absence of a de-brief of staff involved in the choking incident by a nurse of the requisite level within the period of 72 hours after the event. This, together with the subsequent delay in undertaking and completing the patient safety investigation review, resulted in important gaps in the evidence supplied both to the review and the inquest. 5. My concern is that the above reflects a series of lapses in basic nursing care identified in respect of a single patient, a repetition of any of which could present a risk of future deaths to others. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Frederick DULLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consolidate eating, drinking and nutrition assessments into one Nucleus section.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is accepted that the assessment of Mr Dulling’s nutritional needs on admission was not detailed enough and that a food chart was not instigated/completed when it should have been. The Trust’s Food, Nutrition and Hydration Policy (available if required) was updated in November 2024. There are currently several assessments, relating to eating and drinking and nutrition, that nursing staff undertake when a patient is admitted. These assessments are not all located in the same place and not as intuitive as they could be. We recognise that this is”

    Source location

    Response from York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry out quality-improvement work addressing poor compliance with nutritional assessment and food-chart requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “not optimal and are in the process of bringing these assessments together into one section of Nucleus (electronic digital nursing record) and this is due to go live in January 2025. We are confident that this will significantly reduce the risk of essential information being overlooked. The Trust recognises the previous poor compliance in this area, as identified in Mr Dulling’s case, and this is a focus of current quality improvement project work. The Trust has completed a Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) cluster review of Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) and swallow related incidents. This was presented to the Trust’s Serious Incident Group in December 2024 with an associated action plan.”

    Source location

    Response from York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 October 2024

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    James Astley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Astley had dementia, was immobile, and became increasingly frail following worsening nutrition, fluid intake, and swallowing difficulties. He was admitted to hospital with urosepsis and dehydration and died there on 22 January 2024. The concerns included incorrectly completed MUST documentation, poor-quality fluid and nutrition charts, and limited, insufficiently detailed documentation at the care home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of fluid and nutrition charts

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that Mr Astley was at significant risk due to poor nutrition and fluid intake. However the MUST documentation was not correctly completed and the overall quality of fluid and nutrition charts was poor. As a consequence he became increasingly frail and the risk to his overall wellbeing and physiological reserves continued. 2. Overall documentation at the home was limited and lacked detail ”

    Source location

    James Astley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an assessment and inspection of Downshaw Lodge to verify required changes, including staff training, accurate needs assessment, care planning, and documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Subsequent to the Regulation 28 preventing future death report CQC have commenced an assessment at Downshaw Lodge to ensure the required changes have been made, especially in regard to ensuring staff have received the training and support needed to complete accurate assessment of people’s needs, take appropriate action and following care plans in line with people’s needs to ensure all care needs are met, and maintain accurate and contemporaneous needs. This assessment was commenced on 16 October 2024. Once this has been completed a report will be published on the CQC website with our findings. This can be found on the link”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 5 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete an IMPACT audit of documentation, nutrition and fluid-recording practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “By way of background, the Registered Manager commenced employment at the Home in early December 2023 following an induction into the service. In December 2023, the Regional Manager identified a need for improvement in the completion of documentation by staff, and an action plan was developed. Due to the concerns identified, a Quality Manager subsequently completed an internal IMPACT audit in January 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Downshaw Lodge
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff in MUST, fluid and nutrition care, documentation, record-keeping and dietary-risk escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “MUST Training and Competency:”

    Source location

    Response from Downshaw Lodge
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular management spot checks and dip-sampling of care records to verify documentation compliance and identify training needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the death of Mr. Astley, we have introduced further improvements to enhance The Home’s performance:”

    Source location

    Response from Downshaw Lodge
    Page 4 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor fluid and food intake charts and provide detailed handovers at every shift change.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Fluid and food intake charts are closely monitored, and detailed handovers take place at every shift change so as to ensure no gaps in communication.”

    Source location

    Response from Downshaw Lodge
    Page 4 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing provider actions, multi-agency oversight and available documentation processes were considered sufficient to address identified care and recording risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “CQC first became aware of the death of Mr Astley on 30 January 2024 when a statutory notification of death was submitted by the provider. This was assessed by an inspector at the time who sought further information due to the notification indicating that a safeguarding referral had been raised against the care home. The safeguarding investigation records were reviewed and although areas of learning were noted for the provider, CQC was assured that the necessary actions were already in progress. These actions included ensuring all people living at the home had up to date and relevant care plans as well as training for staff around the use of the digital health service in order to effectively escalate health concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 September 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026