Recurring concern
Insufficient resourcing of prison self-harm prevention functions
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 3
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 3
What this concern includes
Includes staffing, resource and capacity deficiencies in prison functions specifically responsible for preventing or managing prisoner self-harm, including Safer Custody and officer resources for self-harm prevention duties, where the deficiency limits the function's ability to identify risk and provide protective action.
What is not included
- Excludes general prison staffing or regime-capacity deficiencies that are not specifically tied to prisoner self-harm prevention functions.
- Excludes failures in ACCT, observation, risk assessment, training or information sharing where resourcing of the self-harm prevention function is not the shared unsafe condition.
- Excludes healthcare staffing shortages unless they directly concern a prison self-harm prevention function.
- Excludes individual self-harm incidents or outcomes without an identified continuing resourcing or capacity deficiency.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to maintain an appropriately staffed and resourced Safer Custody function
This report raised 5 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
- HM Prison and Probation Service
- Lowdham Grange Prison
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
HM Prison and Probation Service and Lowdham Grange Prison
Complete and ringfence the Safer Custody Safety team to maintain consistent visibility and support for vulnerable prisoners.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient operational prison staffing for safe custody and officer safety
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient resourcing for officers’ duties to keep prisoners safe from self-harm
This report raised 5 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
- Glen Parva Young Offender Institution
- Ministry of Justice
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
-
Glen Parva Young Offender Institution and Ministry of Justice
Consider increasing Glen Parva’s benchmark operating level by 12 prison officers through the submitted business case.
-
Glen Parva Young Offender Institution and Ministry of Justice
Employ over 400 additional prison officers in ten particularly challenging prisons by March 2017 to provide dedicated regular one-to-one support.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026