Recurring concern

Insufficient staffing cover for mental health services during absences

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 Sep 2016•Latest report 27 Sep 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in staffing cover, absence resilience, replacement arrangements or deployment within mental health services where sickness, holidays or comparable absences leave service users without adequate care, engagement, supervision or other required service functions; includes the anchor's insufficient cover during sickness and holidays and the supporting mental-health-service capacity failure during staff absence.

Not included

  • Excludes general mental health service capacity or funding shortages where the specific unsafe condition is not inadequate staffing cover during personnel absence.
  • Excludes staffing deficiencies outside mental health services.
  • Excludes generic staff training, communication, documentation or clinical-quality failures unless they directly cause insufficient absence cover.
  • Excludes isolated individual absence where the service maintains adequate cover and no continuing staffing-resilience deficiency is asserted.
Reports
8

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
8

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
16

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust1
Gray's Inn Road Medical Practice1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust1
NHS Kent and Medway Integrated Care Board1
North London Mental Health Partnership1
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
Ysbyty Gwynedd1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Maria Patricia Kelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maria Patricia Kelly, who lived alone and was in poor health, was found deceased at home by police on 15 May 2024 after concerns were raised by neighbours and a housing officer. The report identifies prolonged lack of contact with primary care and mental health services, numerous failed encounters, and no welfare check until the neighbours’ concerns were raised; the inquest determined natural causes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delay in allocation of a replacement mental health care coordinator

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Kelly’s medical records show that she suffered from a large number of medical conditions including steatosis of the liver, hydronephrosis, left anterior fascicular block, chronic kidney disease, iron deficiency anaemia, gastro-oesophageal reflux, hyperlipidaemia, simple schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder, recurrent depressive disorder and anorexia nervosa (possibly in remission). She had been also diagnosed with Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma in the past. She was prescribed repeat medications of Atorvastatin and Lansoprazole for her physical health problems, and Flupentixol (as directed by her consultant) and Mirtazapine for her mental health. A prescription appears to have been last issued by her GP on 1 August 2024. From 23 August 2023 until the practice was notified of her death, her GP summary showed 31 failed encounters for mental health reviews, as well as failed encounters for blood tests and bowel screening. Her last medical (mental health) review with South Camden Rehabilitation of Recovery Team (SCRRT) was on 7 March 2023. Ms Kelly’s care coordinator went on leave in September 2021. Ms Kelly was placed onto the waiting list for allocation of a new care coordinator on 29 December 2023 after a review of the team’s patient list found that there had been no contact with her since 11 August 2023. It was recorded that were “many attempts” (not quantified) to contact her. After a review on 29 December 2023 there were then 12 unsuccessful home visits and 6 failed telephone attempts. Despite this, no welfare check was undertaken, nor any request for a welfare made to her housing officer or police, until neighbours raised concerns on 14 May 2024. ”

    Source location

    Maria Patricia Kelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen staff re-allocation and handover using a standardised handover template and clear successor contact information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Re-allocation and Handover Process We have reviewed and strengthened our re-allocation and handover processes to ensure continuity of care during staff transitions. A new handover template is now in use, standardising the transfer of key information when a staff member leaves. This ensures that service users and carers are promptly informed of any changes and are provided with clear contact details for their new care coordinator.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit to address team vacancies, including targeted recruitment activity and continuing recruitment to remaining posts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Staffing Challenges and Recruitment Between May and September 2023, there were a number of vacancies within the team (South Camden Rehabilitation and Recovery Team). This resulted in cases being added to the waiting list, impacting service continuity. The Trust has been actively recruiting to address this shortfall, including organising targeted recruitment events.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase staffing capacity through experienced agency staff, permanent social workers, a Band 7 supervisory role and a nursing Team Manager.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All substantive social work posts have now been recruited to. We have successfully recruited into three nursing vacancies and put long term experienced agency staff in place to address current shortfall. Additionally, we have introduced new roles, such as a Band 7 position to supervise Band 4 Assistant Practitioners, reducing the reliance on harder-to-recruit Band 6 nurse posts. Recruitment to these posts will continue.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mobilise locality teams to collaborate with Integrated Community Teams and provide flexible staffing from February 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new locality teams, set to be mobilised from February 2025, will work in collaboration with Integrated Community Teams to offer more flexible staffing options. This will enable us to manage resources more effectively during periods of reduced staffing, ensuring continued care for service users. We have also replaced two locum social workers with permanent social workers, ensuring greater stability in the team. A nursing Team Manager has been put in place to ensure effective nursing management and support.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff and implement the MaST tool for real-time caseload tracking and prioritisation of high-risk service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MaST tool will play a key role in improving caseload management and prioritisation. Staff training is currently underway, with sessions delivered throughout October to enable the implementation of MaST. A MaST Champion has been appointed to guide the team through the implementation process. Training will be completed by November 2024, after which MaST will enable real-time tracking and prioritisation of high-risk service users. This will ensure close monitoring of service users on the waiting list, and timely follow-up.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use RAG case tracking, weekly allocation meetings and interim manual audits to prioritise and follow up high-risk cases.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reinforced our case tracking procedures using the RAG-rating system which identifies levels of risk (Red, Amber, Green). Weekly allocation meetings are held to ensure that high-risk cases are prioritised for follow-up. While we await MaST full implementation,”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2024

    Open published response
  2. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Leigh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Leigh was found dead at home on 7 February 2022, having suspended himself by a ligature attached to a loft beam. The report identifies missed mental-health appointments, a lack of interim cover and a lack of resilience arrangements during the absence of his Care Coordinator as substantive concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appoint interim Care Coordinator or Community Psychiatric Nurse cover

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: - i. During the period from the 25th of October 2022 to the 4th of January 2023 there were no visits from a Care Coordinator, or a Community Psychiatric Nurse, and all the 2-week planned visits did not take place, so that 4 or 5 visits were missed. ii. There was no appointment of an interim Care Coordinator or a Community Psychiatric Nurse to cover the 2 weekly planned appointments following the absence of YL. iii. There was no responsibility on a Duty officer to review planned appointments during the absence of a Care Coordinator and to arrange for a Community Psychiatric Nurse to attend any planned appointments. iv. There were no resilience plans in place to cover the absence of a Care Coordinator, either in relation to short term or long-term absences. ”

    Source location

    Robert Leigh · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a Care Coordinator handover sheet for planned absences, identifying required follow-up and accountable staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr Leigh’s inquest, the team has now implemented a handover sheet, which is completed by the Care Coordinator prior to any planned absence, such as annual leave or a planned medical intervention. This ensures the Care Coordinator has considered any follow up for service users that is required during their period of absence and identifies who will carry out any planned interventions such as administration of depot medications, undertaking face to face visits, and making telephone contacts. If specific follow up is not required during the period of planned absence, the service user, and their families or carers will be provided with the contact details for the team, should they require additional support. The Team Manager or Senior Practitioner have oversight and hold responsibility to ensure any actions required are undertaken by the team.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish manager-led review and coverage arrangements for unplanned, short-term and long-term Care Coordinator absences, including prioritised visits, duty-officer follow-up and caseload reallocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For unplanned absences such as sickness, it is expected that the Care Coordinator, at the point of contacting the Team Manager or Senior Practitioner to advise of their absence, will provide a detailed handover of any work that is required to be covered.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Older Adult Community Mental Health Team Standard Operating Procedure to reflect the absence-cover arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Service Manager will ensure that the Older Adult Community Mental Health Team Standard Operating Procedure is updated to reflect these changes by the end November 2023. The Operational Manager will undertake an audit in three months’ time to ensure the process outlined in this response is embedded and being adhered to.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit the absence-cover process after three months to verify that it is embedded and being followed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Service Manager will ensure that the Older Adult Community Mental Health Team Standard Operating Procedure is updated to reflect these changes by the end November 2023. The Operational Manager will undertake an audit in three months’ time to ensure the process outlined in this response is embedded and being adhered to.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 November 2023

    Open published response
  3. Central and South East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Benjamin James HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Benjamin Hart, aged 25, died by hanging at his mother’s home after contacting the Crisis team three times in the preceding two days and expressing hopelessness and suicidal feelings. The report describes limited contact with the community mental health team, a breakdown in his care-coordinator relationship, and no attempted contact before his death despite the team being notified. A principal concern was severe nursing-staff shortages, which left no capacity to allocate him a replacement care coordinator.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient nursing staffing capacity and resilience in the community mental health team

    Wider context from the report

    “The Trust had a shortfall of nursing staff in the Dover and Deal area at the time that Benjamin Hart was under the community mental health team such that although 16 nurses were required to run the service, the Trust only had 8 nurses employed at the time, 2 of whom were long term sick. This left a working complement of 6 nurses to cover the whole area, which required them to take on additional duties. There was no resilience within the team and therefore when the relationship between Ben and his care coordinator broke down there was no capacity within the team to allocate him another care coordinator. Although the Trust has regrouped, reorganised and there has been some limited recruitment the shortfall endures; the evidence given at the inquest being that this is a national issue but it is particularly difficult to recruit within this area of Kent ”

    Source location

    Benjamin James HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Jayne Flint · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Flint was under the care of the Trafford Community Mental Health Team and was found at home on 7 September 2020. The report raised concerns about inconsistent Care Coordinator roles between Trusts and limited Community Mental Health Team resources, including the absence of cover when a Care Coordinator was unavailable.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of alternative Care Coordinator cover during staff absence

    Wider context from the report

    “From the evidence I heard, the Care Coordinator’s role is to assess the patient’s care needs and to plan and review those needs across the broad spectrum of physical and mental health and social needs within the multi-disciplinary team within the Mental Health Trust. The Care Coordinator is the individual who has the closest contact with the patient and, as the title suggests, is the liaison link for every other professional and agency. From the evidence, it is clear that an enormous burden of responsibility and reliance is placed on the individual Care Coordinator as they are expected to be the conduit of information to other professionals and to continuously review and assess all areas of the patient’s needs and to call in others as required. I concluded that the only person who had the ability to have a comprehensive view of Ms Flint’s mental health was the Care Coordinator and the quality of the information provided to others within the multi-disciplinary team and other agencies was entirely dependent on the ability, availability, resources, experience, training and skills of the Care Coordinator. (1) From the evidence, it appeared that the precise job description and requirements of Care coordinators differs between local Trusts so that there is no consistency as to the way in which individual Care coordinators are expected to fulfil their role. (2) It also emerged that the resources available to the Community Mental Health Teams are limited so that in the absence of a Care Coordinator during periods of annual leave or sickness, there was no other Care Coordinator who could fulfil the role. ”

    Source location

    Rebecca Jayne Flint · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Living Well model across all ten Greater Manchester localities, including multidisciplinary community mental-health teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Across GM, we are continuing to implement a place-based approach to mental health care with all ten GM localities implementing the Living Well model. Living Well will increase access to care and support for people with serious mental illness and high levels of complexity who are seeking help and advice with their mental health. Access will be at a neighbourhood level within primary care networks with close connections to a local network of community groups and voluntary organisations. People will be able to access redesigned community mental health services and multidisciplinary teams including: mental health practitioners, social care staff, voluntary sector staff and peer workers.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and embed multidisciplinary key-worker roles to strengthen community mental-health care and reduce reliance on individual care coordinators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In line with the Long Term Plan and the Community Mental Health Framework for Adults and Older Adults, the CPA framework is being replaced nationally. As a result, the role of care coordinators will be replaced by the development of key workers with a clearer multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to both assess and meet the needs of service users, to reduce the reliance on care co-ordinators and to increase resilience in systems of care, allowing all staff to make the best use of their skills and qualifications, and drawing on new roles including lived experience roles.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    GMMH’s existing systems maintain oversight, contact and risk responses when care coordinators are absent, so additional cover arrangements are not identified as necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All CMHTs in the GMMH footprint have systems and processes in place to ensure that the service is able to maintain oversight of all individuals under the care of the team in the absence of a care coordinator during periods of leave or sickness.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    PCFT’s existing duty systems, care plans, caseload oversight and risk-based reallocation provide support during planned or unplanned clinician absence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “PCFT confirmed that when any of the trust’s clinicians are on a period of planned leave, patients are usually kept updated and advised of how to contact the service if needed, usually via a duty worker.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for local mental health staffing, operations and specific Care Coordinator role requirements lies with the relevant NHS trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report raises concerns about the Care Coordinator role within community mental health services, how this role may differ across trusts, the level of responsibility placed on Care Coordinators to ensure effective multi-disciplinary working, and the resourcing of the Care Coordinator role. The government is not able to comment on specific role requirements, or staffing levels locally, as responsibility for the staffing and operations of mental health services lies with the relevant trust. However, we do recognise the wider need to increase capacity in NHS mental health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response
  5. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Joan Hoggett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Hoggett died in Sunderland Royal Hospital on 5 September 2018 after being attacked and stabbed multiple times at her place of work. Concerns included insufficient engagement by the Mental Health Trust with the perpetrator’s family, missed opportunities for more proactive engagement, and challenges associated with staff capacity and absence.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing capacity to cover required engagement work

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The family of the perpetrator were not as engaged by the Trust as much as they could have been in terms of: - sharing information with them; and - acting upon information provided by them. I acknowledge that this must take into account the Service User’s capacity and consent and also respecting confidentiality, but in this case these matters did not seem to be an issue. 2. A more proactive approach may have been appropriate. I am concerned that the opportunities to engage more were not taken. Engagement with the perpetrator was influenced to some extent by the capacity of the Mental Health Trust and its personnel to meet the competing demands of the Service with the resources at their disposal. This was more challenging at times of staff absence and the ability of the Trust to sufficiently cover the work needed with the perpetrator and others. ”

    Source location

    Joan Hoggett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase staff time available for service users and carers through Quality Priority 3 patient-care improvement work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is planning further improvement work in 2022/23 through their delivery of Quality Priority 3: Patient Care, which will increase the time staff are able to spend with service users and carers. This will include engagement with stakeholders and reviews to measure the use of the Getting to Know You documentation. This work has been delayed due to the Covid19 pandemic however, as acknowledged in the final Niche investigation report (published on 29 June 2022), this issue as a whole has been significantly progressed.”

    Source location

    Response from CNTW NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase the NHS mental health workforce to expand service capacity and support safer care delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may wish to know that the mental health workforce increased by 5,900 full-time equivalent staff in December 2021 compared to December 2020, and by over 11,800 compared to December 2010. We know there is more to do to ensure we have sufficient numbers of healthcare staff to deliver our aims for high quality, accessible mental health services. Our aim, as set out in the Mental Health Implementation Plan, is to expand the mental health workforce by an additional 27,000 healthcare professionals by 2023/24 (compared to 2019/20).”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invest at least £2.3 billion annually to expand and transform NHS mental health services and increase treatment capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To enable this increase in workforce, through the NHS Long Term Plan, we are investing at least £2.3 billion additional funding a year from 2019/20 to expand and transform mental health services in England by 2023/24. This will enable an extra two million people to be treated by NHS mental health services by 2023/24. This includes new integrated community models for adults with severe”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for hospital staffing and operations lies with the relevant NHS Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You raised concerns about the capacity of the Mental Health Trust, and its workforce, to engage with the perpetrator and to meet the competing demands of the service within the resources at its disposal. Responsibility for the staffing and operations of a hospital lies with the relevant Trust. However, the Department does recognise the need to increase capacity in NHS mental health services due to the increasing demand for services.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response
  6. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    John Ashley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Ashley took his own life while suffering a deterioration in his mental illness, according to the inquest conclusion. The report identified concerns about failures to update his care and treatment plan, record and share key information, review his deterioration and medication non-compliance, and provide adequate clinical oversight and cover arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of practitioner cover and formal handover arrangements for Lead Practitioner caseloads during leave

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Save for the duty scheme there appears to be no procedure in place for another practitioner to cover a Lead Practitioner’s case load or any formal handover when they are on leave. Therefore there was no single person who has up todate knowledge of a patient who may be in need or whose mental health was deteriorating. ”

    Source location

    John Ashley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate leave handover arrangements, particularly for vulnerable patients, into staff risk assessment training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I acknowledge that in this case, it was a specific concern that a Lead Practitioner when returning from leave should be aware of important developments regarding his/her patient. It is the responsibility of a Lead Practitioner and other members of staff returning from leave, to review their caseload and establish if there were any concerns during their absence and I understand that Mr Ashley's Lead Practitioner did make himself aware of events when he returned from leave (he addressed this in his addendum report at the Inquest). Nevertheless, I wish to reassure you, that I agree that it is important that there should be a handover following a leave of absence, particularly in the case of the most vulnerable patients and staff are actively encouraged to ensure that this takes place and this will become part and parcel of staff risk assessment training.”

    Source location

    2020-0071-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The team-wide duty system is considered safer and sufficient than assigning leave cover to one individual practitioner.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This concern was addressed in my letter of 20 December 2019 wherein I sought to convey that Mr Ashley was treated as part of a team, and that a plan was in place (as part of his overall care plan), to ensure that there was adequate support when his Lead Practitioner was not available. Prior to going on leave, I understand that Mr Ashley's Lead Practitioner visited to discuss cover arrangements and his crisis/contingency plan. It is apparent that Mr Ashley understood the arrangements as he attended his planned appointments at the Wellbeing Café and Clozaril Clinic, and he accessed the duty system and the Mental Health Liaison Team for further support.”

    Source location

    2020-0071-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response
  7. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Lewis Daryl COLGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lewis Colgan died immediately at Princes Risborough Station on 15 September 2017 after jumping onto the track in front of a northbound passenger train. Concerns included the robustness of supervision of care coordinators and care teams, continuity of mental health care during staff changes and sickness, the process for overdue Care Programme Approach meetings, and the robustness of the investigation and resulting actions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain continuity of engagement and care during key staff changes and sickness absence

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Lewis’ mental health care revealed issues with regard to management of staff changes and sickness and particularly coordination of continuity of engagement and care in the context of Lewis’ care plan in the absence of key participants in his care on long term sick leave, notably the roles of care coordinator and psychologist and, notwithstanding evidence indicating steps being taken to address staffing issues, there remains a concern that, given the personal nature of the mental health care provided to individuals and the significance of regular engagement with specific individuals, that provision of care in compliance with specified care plans may be compromised. ”

    Source location

    Lewis Daryl COLGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Christopher Glyn Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Glyn Jones died after placing himself into collision with a train while under the care of the Community Mental Health Team. The inquest identified delays in treatment plans and risk assessments, failures in providing intended treatments, and inadequate escalation of concerns during a significant decline in his mental health; it also identified possible service deficiencies in staffing cover.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing cover during sickness and holidays

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Furthermore evidence indicated that although additional resources were currently being made available and deployed for Mental Health within BCUHB, there was also an increasing demand on the service and as a result there may still be deficiencies of service, for example in providing acceptable levels of cover for staff at times of sickness/holidays etc. ”

    Source location

    Christopher Glyn Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing local arrangements are relied upon to provide CTP review cover during staff absence, with capacity difficulties escalated to senior management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to your second area of concern relating to the need to provide acceptable levels of cover for staff at times of sickness/holidays etc. the Division has produced a multi-agency document “The Role of County Wide Mental Health Teams in Delivering Community Mental Health Services”, which is a supporting document to the MHM Code of Practice, and sets out the local requirements. This first became operational in August 2013 and has been reviewed regularly. A recent addendum to this protocol reminds staff that “Care and Treatment plans are the responsibility of the CTP coordinator or their associate. In the absence of a CTP coordinator, or associate, it is the Deputy County Manager’s responsibility to ensure that any CTPs which are due for review are appropriately updated.”

    Source location

    2016-0319-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 September 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026