Recurring concern

Unclear and unreliable GP access and referral pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 8 Aug 2013•Latest report 20 Apr 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of GP access and referral arrangements, including unclear access policies, inadequate instructions for making referrals, and other dedicated controls that leave patients or practices unable to identify or use the appropriate GP-related pathway.

Not included

  • Excludes failures in specialist or mental-health referral pathways where the GP access or referral process is not itself deficient.
  • Excludes generic communication, training, staffing or governance deficiencies unless they directly impair GP access or referral arrangements.
  • Excludes failures in clinical assessment or treatment after a patient has successfully accessed the appropriate GP or referral pathway.
  • Excludes neutral descriptions of GP services or referral destinations without an identified unsafe access or pathway condition.
Reports
17

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
19

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
28

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
NHS England2
Black Country Family Practice1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Family of Richard Parkes1
Fountain Medical Centre1
George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust1
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board1
NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care Board1
NHS Leeds West Clinical Commissioning Group1
NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care Board1
NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Guy Robert Harries · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Guy Robert Harries was diagnosed with an abdominal aortic aneurysm and was subsequently lost to follow-up after missing a surveillance scan. He later died at home in Brighton on 9 October 2024 from a ruptured AAA while awaiting an outpatient appointment. Concerns included the handling of missed appointments, the downgrading and delayed booking of an urgent referral, reliance on separate referral systems, and failure to consistently report significant incidental emergency-department findings to the GP.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to translate GP-expressed urgency into accurate urgent booking codes

    Wider context from the report

    “Although I accept that a system of audits is now under way, these are evidently retrospective and the changes made do not appear to fully resolve the observed weaknesses and risk of differences apparent in the inquest within the GP-Consultant surgeon-Careflow booking chain whereby the urgency expressed by the GP does not successfully translate into an urgent booking, because there remains the risk of manual coding error and/or that there is no express reason given or reported back to the GP as to why their patient is or will be afforded the proposed urgency. ”

    Source location

    Paul Guy Robert Harries · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Educate triaging Consultants to use e-RS accurately for referral categorisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The function of e-RS allows for identification of urgent or routine patients providing referring GPs and triaging Consultants use this function accurately and convert referrals from one category to another when clinically appropriate. Internally, this has resulted in education for the triaging Consultants to ensure that they are aware of the functions of e-RS and are able to use it accurately. It has also resulted in regular audits to check the categorisation of referrals against the narrative provided by the triaging Consultants.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit referral categorisation against triaging Consultants’ clinical narratives.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The function of e-RS allows for identification of urgent or routine patients providing referring GPs and triaging Consultants use this function accurately and convert referrals from one category to another when clinically appropriate. Internally, this has resulted in education for the triaging Consultants to ensure that they are aware of the functions of e-RS and are able to use it accurately. It has also resulted in regular audits to check the categorisation of referrals against the narrative provided by the triaging Consultants.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2026

    Open published response
  2. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ethan Michael Hanson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ethan was assessed by his GP and then at hospital for abdominal pain, vomiting and concern about appendicitis, but was discharged without senior review after abnormal observations and the GP’s concerns were not transferred to the hospital assessment. He later collapsed, suffered cardiac arrest, and died after imaging confirmed perforated appendicitis, peritonitis and sepsis. The principal concerns include inaccurate or incomplete observations and pain assessment, pathway and escalation arrangements that did not align with guidance, inadequate support for assessing neurodivergent children and parents, and loss of critical information during transfer from primary to hospital care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP awareness of referral-route implications for local hospital triage and assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “Critical GP information not carried forward into the hospital assessment The GP identified the possibility of appendicitis or another serious underlying cause and recorded abnormal observations. The absence of an ambulance conveyance or written referral letter meant this information was not transferred to the hospital. As a result, Ethan entered a different clinical pathway, and the assessing clinician was unaware of the GP’s concerns. There is a wider risk that GPs may not be aware of the implications of referral route on triage and assessment in local hospitals, and that critical deterioration indicators can be lost at the point of transfer. ”

    Source location

    Ethan Michael Hanson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and disseminate an EMIS and laminated referral protocol covering paediatric pathways, hospital selection, advance contact, documentation and clinically appropriate ambulance transfer.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this event, we have implemented a new protocol within our EMIS clinical system and also laminated the protocol and displayed in all clinical rooms. This protocol prompts all clinicians, at the point of referral, to:”

    Source location

    Response from Old Mill Surgery GP
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a joint statement calling for improved primary-care access to specialist advice and expanded same-day emergency care options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work on the interface between primary and secondary care included a joint statement between RCGP, RCP, SAM and Royal College of Emergency Medicine calling for secondary care to improve primary care access to specialist advice via dedicated telephone lines and urgent expansion of SDEC options for primary care and 111 services. GP awareness of impact of referral letter and ambulance conveyance on clinical pathways within Emergency care, opportunities to communicate this to GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate referral-route risks and Prevention of Future Deaths learning to members through a generic educational webinar.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I intend to communicate this issue to members alongside learning from Prevention of Future Death Reports in a Webinar format for dissemination of learning, ensuring principles being highlighted are generic and not attributable to individual cases, nor impacting ongoing proceedings that follow each coronial review.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Directory of Services with system partners to improve awareness of local adult and paediatric services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is undertaking a review of the Directory of Services with system partners to ensure an awareness of services delivered across all local hospitals for both adults and paediatrics. It is envisaged that this will be completed by the end of July 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Evaluate an electronic interface with the Directory of Services for General Practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust will undertake an evaluation of an electronic interface with the Directory of Services for General Practice, with the aim of ensuring that the most current and accurate information is consistently accessible to all GPs. This work is scheduled for completion by the end of July 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and disseminate coordinated communications describing GEH and SWFT services to referral partners and the public.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust is developing a coordinated communications programme to clearly articulate the range of services provided across GEH and SWFT. This will be”

    Source location

    Response from George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Alan Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Alan Hughes, who had a history of anxiety and was assessed as at high risk of self-harm and suicide, died after taking codeine and morphine and stabbing himself during the night of 22–23 June 2025. The report raised concerns that urgent referrals from general practice could not be made directly to the Home Based Treatment Team in South Trafford, resulting in a delay over the weekend before assessment or onward referral could occur.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to allow direct referral from general practice to the HBTT for urgent high-risk referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. In evidence, it was accepted on behalf of the CMHT that there are occasions when a nurse associated with a general practice, or a general practitioner, may need to refer directly to the HBTT; but that the formal procedure does not allow for this. 8. Therefore, at the time of Mr Hughes’s death, such a referral could not be made. It still cannot be made, notwithstanding the availability of this course in other boroughs and the findings of the After Action Review. 9. Had it been possible for the nurse who assessed Mr Hughes on behalf of the general practice to refer him direct to the HBTT, the delay occasioned by the system of referral to the HBTT operated by South Trafford CMHT would have been avoided. 10. It was explained in evidence on behalf of the CMHT, that had the HBTT been able to assess Mr Hughes, it was unclear whether they would have accepted the referral. However, what the HBTT would or would not have decided is unknown: nor does this obviate the concern raised. 11. The concern is that in South Trafford, a service user cannot be referred directly to the HBTT from a general practice where: i. there is an urgent referral arising from a high risk of self-harm and / or suicide; ii. where this referral is considered necessary by the general practice professionals; and, iii. where such a referral could be made were it to take place in other boroughs within the area covered by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. ”

    Source location

    Mark Alan Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a Practice Note clarifying that primary care mental health practitioners can directly refer patients to HBTT across all Trust boroughs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To confirm mental health practitioners based in general practice, such as PCN’s, can refer directly into HBTT in all boroughs of the Trust, following an assessment of the persons mental health.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include direct HBTT referral guidance in the Trust Patient Safety Newsletter distributed electronically to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This information has been shared with urgent care staff and our PCN colleagues via a Practice Note issued on 28th April 2026 and will be included in the May edition of the Trust Patient Safety Newsletter that is shared with all staff across the Trust electronically by 28th May 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold an urgent-care away day to review and confirm the HBTT SOP and reinforce referral pathways and operational expectations, including direct referrals by primary care networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, a planned away day is scheduled to take place on 6th May 2026 lead by the clinical service managers for urgent care, during which senior operational leads will meet to review and confirm the HBTT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The SOP that went live in February 2026 has a list of services that can refer into HBTT and states that this is not an exhaustive list and that GMMH operate an inclusive referral process to support all GMMH internal teams. This session will be used to clearly outline referral pathways and operational expectations across all GMMH HBTT services.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise the Referral and Assessment hub SOP by the end of May 2026.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the transformation of community mental health services GMMH are implementing a Referral and Assessment hub who will triage all external referrals and direct to the most appropriate service. These hubs are already in place in some areas of the Trust; the SOP will be finalised by the end of May 2026 and there will be a Referral and Assessment hub functioning in all areas of the Trust by the end of August 2026 enabling GP’s and other professionals to have a single point of referral.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a functioning Referral and Assessment hub in every Trust area by the end of August 2026 to provide a single external referral point.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the transformation of community mental health services GMMH are implementing a Referral and Assessment hub who will triage all external referrals and direct to the most appropriate service. These hubs are already in place in some areas of the Trust; the SOP will be finalised by the end of May 2026 and there will be a Referral and Assessment hub functioning in all areas of the Trust by the end of August 2026 enabling GP’s and other professionals to have a single point of referral.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mental health practitioners in general practice can directly refer to HBTT across all Trust boroughs after assessing the person’s mental health.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To confirm mental health practitioners based in general practice, such as PCN’s, can refer directly into HBTT in all boroughs of the Trust, following an assessment of the persons mental health.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response
  4. Hampshire, Portsmouth Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Shre Kumar CHATTERJEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shre Chatterjee developed a sudden severe headache in August 2023 and died at University Hospital Southampton on 12 October 2023 from an acute on chronic subdural haematoma. The report identifies repeated unsuccessful attempts to obtain timely face-to-face medical assessment, including missed opportunities to refer him for hospital assessment and a CT scan. It also raises concern that out-of-hours and 111 doctors could not directly book urgent appointments with some GP surgeries.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Blocking of direct booking with a patient's own GP for face-to-face assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “During the Course of the Inquest it became clear that whilst OOH/111 Doctors should be able to access direct booking with a patient's own GP in cases requiring a face to face assessment ,this facility is being blocked by some GP surgeries. This means that if a patient requires an urgent assessment the OOH Doctor can only refer them to contact the GP surgery. or direct to an Urgent Care Centre which is supposed to treat minor injuries and where they may still not be examined by a Dr, and blood tests imaging are not available. In the deceased's case despite numerous attempts to access a GP appointment he did not actually see a Doctor from 23rd August 2023 until he was eventually admitted to hospital with a then fatal brain bleed on 10th October 2023. It was agreed by witnesses that if a Dr had seen the deceased face to face sooner , particularly one who knew him, then the seriousness of his condition would have been diagnosed more swiftly and he was likely to have survived. ”

    Source location

    Shre Kumar CHATTERJEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Costas CHRYSOSTOMOU · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Costas Chrysostomou died in hospital on 14 December 2024 after developing cardiac failure and acute renal failure linked to pacemaker-mediated cardiomyopathy, described as a rare but known complication. The report raised concerns about ambiguity in the use of “urgent” referrals, differing understandings of cardiology pathways between GPs and hospital consultants, and the need for clearer guidance for complex cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of overarching guidance directing GPs to the appropriate cardiology pathway for complex cases

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Understanding of Pathways a. I heard evidence from cardiology consultants and a GP. It was clear that understanding of the operation of the Pathways differs considerably. One example was that some GPs consider that by custom and practice, if following a routine cardiology referral new clinical information comes to light requiring a patient’s referral to expedited or made ‘urgent’, this can be done by emailing the hospital team concerned and adding the information. However, the view of the hospital consultants is that this is not the case and that if an expedited or urgent referral becomes necessary then the referral process requires re-starting as a new and entirely separate referral. In my opinion, this confusion has the potential to create significant risk. b. I also heard evidence more generally that with more complex specialisms/cases GPs could be assisted with overarching guidance that helps direct them to the most appropriate Pathway. At present, I was told, that the system relies on the GP being confident as to which Pathway is appropriate, which is understandably not always the case. ”

    Source location

    Costas CHRYSOSTOMOU · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the suspected heart failure pathway to clarify urgent referral routes and align them with two-week and two-to-six-week clinic provision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An NCL pathway already exists for Suspected Heart Failure assessment and diagnosis on the NCL GP professional website. However, we recognise that there was a lack of clarity in referral pathways for urgent assessment in a patient with heart failure at the Royal Free whereby the GP referral was being sent in through the (Clinical Assessment service) CAS triage system- however the service was unable to guarantee that the urgent echo investigation would be reviewed within 2-6 weeks. We have since contacted the Royal Free Heart Failure Lead and in line with the service provision for urgent 2 week and 2-6 weeks clinic provision, changes have now been updated on the NCL Pathway for Suspected Heart Failure Download: Heart Failure Diagnosis and Assessment in Adults - NCL ICB General Practice Website.”

    Source location

    Response from North Central London Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote the updated suspected heart failure assessment and diagnosis pathway through primary care bulletins, the website and a GP webinar.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NCL ICB will be promoting the updated Suspected Heart Failure assessment and diagnosis pathway via established NCL primary care channels including the NCL ICB General Practice Weekly bulletin, NCL General Practice Website and the NCL GP webinar on 26 March 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from North Central London Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2026

    Open published response
  6. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Robert ELLSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Robert ELLSON was found deceased in a wooded area on 16 July 2022 after sustaining a fatal self-inflicted wound. He had been experiencing anxiety and insomnia and had presented with suicidal ideation shortly before his death. The concerns identified were that GP access to urgent mental health reviews was unclear and unsafe, that patients in crisis were expected to initiate contact with mental health practitioners, and that GPs were not fully aware of how to request an urgent psychiatric review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of GP awareness of how to request urgent psychiatric reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The GP caring for Dr Ellson on 13/07/22 was unaware that she could make a request for a psychiatric review of the patient. The inquest heard how this was not well known by local GPs. My concern is that GPs should be fully aware how to request an urgent psychiatric review for patients. ”

    Source location

    Carl Robert ELLSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the Medical Leadership Forum to reiterate the urgent referral process and address concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of striving for continuous improvement our Medical Leadership Forum (which includes the ICB, Trust and General Practice) will also take this issue forward, to reiterate the process and ensure any concerns are addressed.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate information to GPs about urgent psychiatric review routes through direct communications, Teamnet and primary care network meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s investigation did identify that the GP in this case would have liked to refer directly to a psychiatrist. We understood that they were reassured that the Trust follows the national model. Within our process the patient can see a consultant psychiatrist if they were taken on by the Home Treatment Team, as medical reviews are an integral part of how that team operates. The action from the investigation was therefore to ensure that local GPs were supported and provided with this information going forward. Again, this was achieved by sending all GPs direct communications with a reminder of this information on 31st December 2022. In addition, we have ensured that the relevant information is on Teamnet and also regularly discussed in the local primary care network meetings between GPs and their local mental health teams.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The established urgent-access process, including Single Point of Access, Home Treatment, Crisis Team and out-of-hours arrangements, is considered sufficient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s current process for enabling urgent access to mental health services is longstanding and we thought well recognised. GPs can contact the Single Point of Access (SPA) who pass the referral on to the relevant/local Home Treatment Team (HTT) who then triage the referral and either allocate themselves or the Crisis Team dependent on risk and clinical presentation. If a call comes through out of hours, it goes straight to the Crisis team which is a 24/7 service.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Home Treatment or Crisis clinicians, rather than GPs, determine and arrange urgent psychiatric medical review following assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust follows a national model which allows GPs to refer for an urgent psychiatric assessment in terms of a psycho-social assessment by a Home Treatment or Crisis Clinician, and within that they can provide an opinion that they believe a medical review from a psychiatrist is required. However, the gatekeeping for this, as well as the responsibility to arrange it, falls on the Home Treatment and/or Crisis Clinician completing the subsequent assessment. GPs can also refer to the Neighbourhood Mental Health Team for a review from a psychiatrist although this route is not intended for urgent referrals.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 December 2022

    Open published response
  7. London (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Bathsheba Shepherd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bathsheba Bianca Kay Shepherd, known as Kay, was fatally stabbed by her housemate at some point between 10 and 11 November 2015 and was pronounced deceased on 11 November 2015. The report identified concerns about her being housed with a dangerous and vulnerable housemate, failures in risk assessment and rehousing, and her lack of GP registration and associated support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of GP registration processes to enable registration without relevant documentary proof

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I was concerned by evidence in the course of the Inquest that the disengagement of a person with known psychological illness from the process of registration with a GP by her failure to obtain relevant documentary proof to enable registration meant that she could not be registered. Registration with a regular GP would in my mind have provided additional support to her. This may have enabled her to raise concerns or fears relating to her accommodation and housemate. ”

    Source location

    Bathsheba Shepherd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    William John Callis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William John Callis, who was suffering from depression and had sought help from his GP surgery, died by hanging himself at his home on 28 March 2017. The inquest identified that there was no specific instruction on the correct procedure for a GP practice to follow when referring a patient to the Urgent Care and Assessment team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of specific instructions for GP practices making referrals to the Urgent Care and Assessment team

    Wider context from the report

    “1) During the inquest it became clear that there was no specific instruction as to the correct procedure for a GP practice to adopt when making a referral to the Urgent Care and Assessment team. ”

    Source location

    William John Callis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Christopher Ian Fairhurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Ian Fairhurst, aged 26, was found deceased on a footpath near Spotland Bridge, Rochdale, on 5 December 2016, with empty alcohol bottles and paracetamol packets nearby. The report identified concerns about shortages of GPs, lack of continuity and accessibility of care, inadequate appointment times and GP training, and increasing demand and referral thresholds for adult and children’s Autism and ADHD/ADD services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays and unavailability in access to GP appointments

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Patients frequently find themselves held in long telephone queues when trying to get appointments. When they eventually get through (often after half an hour or so of waiting), they are told that all appointments for that day have already gone. When they ring the following day, the situation is repeated. Patients often give up or spend days trying before they eventually get a GP appointment. At peak times (Monday/Friday mornings) surgeries can have as many as 300 incoming calls first thing. ”

    Source location

    Christopher Ian Fairhurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Dean Mark Rowland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dean Mark Rowland, who had a history of two recent self-harm attempts and depression, was found hanging from a bannister on 21 March 2017, and the inquest concluded that his death was suicide. Concerns included his inability to obtain a GP appointment or telephone consultation for nine days when he wished to discuss increasing his antidepressant medication, and his discharge from the community mental health team after one consultation without a follow-up plan beyond returning to primary care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in access to a GP for medication discussions

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The deceased wished to discuss an increase in his antidepressant medication with a doctor. He was unable to get an appointment or speak to a GP on the telephone for nine days. ”

    Source location

    Dean Mark Rowland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a duty-doctor and telephone-triage system providing prompt callbacks and same-day clinical assessment when routine appointments are unsuitable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have instituted a duty doctor and telephone triage system in the practice. If the patient attends or phones the practice requesting an appointment they are told when the next routine appointment is available for the doctor of their choice and for any doctor. If they feel they need to be seen that day or that their condition will not wait until the next available routine appointment they are offered a “callback”. They will be called as soon as possible by one of the duty team who will either deal with the problem over the telephone or make them an appointment that day to see a doctor or a nurse practitioner - whichever is the most appropriate for the problem. This means that everyone who needs to be seen will be seen on the same day.”

    Source location

    2017-0208-Response-by-Peel-Medical-Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 September 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026