Recurring concern

Unreliable completion of admission documentation

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Sep 2014•Latest report 28 Aug 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated admission-documentation process, including unclear or inadequate completion protocols, missing or delayed care plans, risk assessments and other required admission records, and failures to complete or update those records during admission.

Not included

  • Excludes general clinical or care-record deficiencies that are not specifically connected to admission documentation.
  • Excludes failures in the substantive clinical admission assessment where the admission documentation process is not deficient.
  • Excludes discharge, transfer and post-admission documentation processes unless the assertion specifically concerns completion of required admission documentation.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair completion of admission documentation.
Reports
15

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
15

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
22

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Aden Court Care Home1
Amplius Living1
Avery Healthcare Group1
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust1
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Devon Partnership NHS Trust1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
East Surrey Hospital1
Elvy Court Care Home1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust1
Stepping Hill Hospital1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Somerset

    AI-generated summary

    Edwin Everett Milne Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edwin Everett Milne Price, who lived in a nursing home and required hoisting for transfers, was admitted to hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis and fell out of bed the following day. He sustained a fractured humerus and a retroperitoneal bleed, which was recorded as the cause of his death. The principal concerns were that his falls risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours, relevant information was not obtained from the nursing home, and mitigation measures were not put in place.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete falls risk assessments within the first 24 hours of ward admission

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The falls risk assessment was not completed within the first 24 hours of admission to the ward. 2. Had it been completed, the risk assessment would have involved obtaining information from the nursing home as Mr Price was unable to communicate. 3. A risk assessment would have identified Mr Price’s specific risk of falling out of bed. 4. The lack of a risk assessment meant that mitigation measures were not in place. 5. The lack of mitigation measures made a more than minimal contribution to the extent of Mr Price’s injuries and therefore to his death. 6. No subsequent action has been taken by the ward to address the gaps in the falls risk assessment and management process when patients are admitted from care homes. ”

    Source location

    Edwin Everett Milne Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require falls risk assessments within 12 hours of admission, with weekly or condition-triggered reviews, and display patient risk status at the bedside.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2023 Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (SFT) and Yeovil District Hospital (YDH) merged organisations to become one Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, and there has been a period, ongoing, where there has been alignment of policies and guidance across the new Somerset NHS FT organisation. At the time of Mr Price’s fall, colleagues in YDH were still working to the legacy policy in place which did not have a time frame in which a Falls Risk assessment was to be completed. The legacy Somerset FT policy and the newly merged one organisational Somerset FT policy both state that an individual must have a Falls Risk Assessment within 12 hours of admission to an inpatient ward, and that this is reviewed if the person moves to another inpatient ward / has a fall / their condition changes.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor falls risk assessment compliance through monthly Core Nursing Metrics audits and additional spot audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Deputy Associate Director of Patient Care (ADPC), Matron and Ward Managers are monitoring compliance with the completion of the falls risk assessments and although these are audited monthly through our Core Nursing Metrics, additional spot audits are also being undertaken. These have shown an increase in compliance, however further strengthening in this area is required to ensure an embedded and sustained process of compliance with the expected 12-hour target.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use an acute medical unit admission checklist to contact families, care homes or community hospitals and gather baseline information for risk mitigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to this incident, our acute medical unit (AMU) has introduced a checklist to be completed on admission which involves contacting the patient’s family, care home or community hospital to gather more detailed information about the patient (see appendix 1). The guidance on the patient’s baseline function and the usual mitigations that are in place in their usual residence to reduce the risk of harm”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve Intentional Rounding through role modelling, a patient-centred real-time documentation tool and rollout of the new form across the acute medical unit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge also that an appropriate risk assessment on admission would have assisted us to identify Mr Price’s risk more clearly and put sufficient mitigations in place to reduce the risk of harm to him. In addition to the risk assessment, to help us reduce risk to patients, we use an Intentional Rounding tool to assist with care planning and patient involvement. At a minimum a patient is seen two hourly and engaged with, this is in addition to physical observations. From our recent reviews, including learning from Mr Price’s case, it has become clear that there has been a lack of clarity around the purpose and process associated with the meaningful delivery of Intentional Rounding across the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2025

    Open published response
  2. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Gambles was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and was later found to have sustained a brain bleed in an unwitnessed in-patient fall. She died on 27 January 2025, and the report states that the head injury more than minimally contributed to her death. The principal concerns were failures to complete and implement falls assessments and prevention measures, delay in medical review, inadequate communication with her family, failure to report and investigate the fall, and omission of the fall from the discharge letter.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record lying and standing blood pressure on admission

    Wider context from the report

    “There are several areas of concern around failures in documentation and failures to follow Trust policy, namely: 1. Lying and standing Blood Pressure was not recorded on admission. 2. There was no documentation of any falls prevention measures at the time of the first falls assessment. 3. There is no evidence of falls prevention measures being put in place following the first falls assessment. 4. There was no falls assessment done at the time of transfer to ward B4. There should have been a falls assessment within six hours of transfer but that did not happen. The assessment took place some 23 hours after admission to the ward, by which time Mrs Gambles had already fallen. 5. Following the in-patient fall there was a delay of over 5 hours before a medical review took place. The note recording the request for medical review is not timed. 6. There was no discussion with Mrs Gambles' family explaining the findings of the CT scan and they were not told about the bleed on the brain. 7. No Datix report was done following the in-patient fall leading to a delay in investigation. 8. The in-patient fall is not mentioned on the Discharge letter. I am concerned that these failures suggest a lack of awareness of, and lack of compliance with, the Trust’s processes on falls assessment and record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign a falls champion to each ward to educate staff and check completion of required lying and standing blood pressures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lying and standing blood pressure is part of the falls risk assessment and should be completed each time the risk assessment is re-done. To mitigate the risk of this being missed, there is now a falls champion on each ward and part of their responsibility is to educate the team around the importance of risk assessments. The falls champions are also tasked with completing checks to ensure that lying and standing blood pressures have been completed for those who need it.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign a healthcare assistant on every shift to ensure required lying and standing blood pressures are completed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is also now a healthcare assistant assigned on every shift and part of their role is to ensure that those patients who require a lying and standing blood pressure, have had this undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response
  3. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Jacqueline GREEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacqueline GREEN was admitted to Bedford Hospital after a fall and was found to be very weak, frail, cachectic and dehydrated. She received paracetamol at a dose intended for patients weighing over 50 kg despite weighing 33.6 kg, subsequently developed paracetamol-induced liver injury and died from liver failure. The concerns included inadequate safeguards for prescribing paracetamol to low-weight adults, unexplained variation in the administration of doses, and incomplete implementation of relevant safety measures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of practical arrangements to ensure patients are weighed on admission and the information documented

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Despite the PSII report referencing the 2022 HSSIB report and recommending that this should be shared with staff, relevant Safety Observations made in the HSSIB Report appear to have been insufficiently addressed: (a) Although Bedford Hospitals NHS Trust are now using the Nevercentre electronic record system which, since 28th February 2024, has included the height and weight of patients and prevents a prescribing doctor from prescribing without a patient’s weight having first been entered, staff are still able to enter a estimated weight and there do not appear to be any alerts on this system to advise of the need for weight accuracy in the prescription of oral paracetamol and consideration of the risk of liver toxicity in those weighing under 50 kg (as advised in Safety Observation 02/2022/151); (b) Whilst the PSII report states as an Action that “Patients should be weighed on admission and the information documented”, other than the provision of a ‘pat slide’, no other practical actions are planned for actually achieving this outcome, particularly in respect of those adults at risk of an unintentional paracetamol overdose, such as an alert aimed at those administering medication as well as those prescribing it (as advised in Safety Observation 02/2022/151). ”

    Source location

    Jacqueline GREEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and trial a cross-site live dashboard showing ward compliance with timely patient weighing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “What the Trust are trialling is a live dashboard that shows the patient weight compliance for all wards across both hospital sites. Once completed it will be directed towards ward managers and matrons, who at any time will be able to see how many patients have been weighed on a particular ward.”

    Source location

    Response from Bedford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust cannot currently provide more costly weighing equipment because it lacks the available financial resources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Additional actions related to monitoring weight to reduce risk”

    Source location

    Response from Bedford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 April 2025

    Open published response
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Nimo OSMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nimo Osman was in state detention under a Hospital Order and receiving psychiatric inpatient care when she collapsed on the ward on 21 April 2022. She was unresponsive for over half an hour before an ambulance was called and died in hospital on 23 April 2022 from hypoxic ischaemic brain injury. The principal concerns were delays in recognising the emergency and calling an ambulance, whether learning had been embedded among staff, completion of venous thromboembolism assessments, and ambiguity in the Trust’s venous thromboembolism policy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete VTE risk assessments on admission to the in-patient unit

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from Nurse A, in the absence of the jury, about East London NHS Foundation Trust’s ‘Patient Safety Serious Incident Review Report’ (the SI Report). I was taken through the detailed ‘Action Plan’ that was devised as a result of the various ‘service delivery problems’ (SDP), ‘care delivery problems’ (CDP), and ‘additional lessons learned’ (ALL) that were identified as a result of the SI Report. Not all of the SDPs, CDPs or ALLs are of such seriousness that I consider that they create a risk of future deaths unless action is taken. However, some of them do, in my opinion, reach that threshold. While the evidence of Nurse A and the accompanying Action Plan did provide prima facie reassurance that action has been taken, the evidence of Nurse B (who, as previously stated is relatively senior and experienced) has significantly undermined what I heard from Nurse A. The undermining of that evidence and reassurance from Nurse A, leads me to conclude that there is, at the very least, a realistic possibility that the learning and apparent changes put in place have not necessarily been fully embedded with all relevant personnel within East London NHS Foundation Trust. As such those concerns and risks persist. For this reason, I consider that further reassurance is required in relation to the following matters of concern: (a) CDP2 – ‘Staff should consider whether patients’ behaviour might be due to being physically unwell and not assume that this is due to their mental health condition.’ This concern relates, in part to the delay in calling for an ambulance (as per (1) above), but in my view it also has potentially wider implications for other patients. (b) CDP3 – ‘As per Physical Healthcare Policy, v.14.1, Feb 2021, 7.6, all patients should have a VTE risk assessment form completed and a VTE assessment on admission to the in-patient unit.’ While in Ms Osman’s case the expert evidence from a consultant histopathologist was that pulmonary thromboembolism was not a causative factor in her death, I consider that this matter does raise potentially significant risks for other patients. ”

    Source location

    Nimo OSMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce the importance of completing VTE assessments through staff communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. I understand that the BLN’s oral evidence was that VTE assessments form part of the two-day physical health training outlined in paragraph 8 above. Additionally, both the BLN and Clinical Director for Tower Hamlets circulated an email in January 2023 about the importance of undertaking VTE assessments. This was resent on 1 October 2024 to ensure that staff remain aware of the importance of these assessments.”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review admissions daily or during weekend huddles to confirm VTE risk assessments, and audit those assessments fortnightly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. Additionally, all service user admissions are reviewed every morning between Monday-Friday. The Ward Manager or Matron in attendance confirms that a VTE risk assessment is completed. During the weekend and bank holidays, the weekend huddle will consider any admissions and a doctor clerks the patients in. These assessments are audited bi-weekly as part of the service’s physical health assessment audits.”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a mandatory VTE-risk screening question to the Observations and Measurements form, preventing electronic-record completion until answered.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “12. Since August 2024, the nurses’ Observations and Measurements form incorporates a screening question for VTE risk. It is a mandatory box to complete on the form and cannot be saved on RiO (the Trust’s electronic record system) until the question has been responded to.”

    Source location

    Response from East London Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2024

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sebastian NOTTAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sebastian Nottage, aged 26, was admitted to hospital for acute pancreatitis and left the ward without telling staff shortly before 8am on 30 June 2020. He subsequently sustained fatal injuries after being hit by a London-bound train. The substantive concerns were a lack of clear guidance on completing the admission/discharge booklet, including the completion timeframe, what to do if it was incomplete, and whether information should be checked directly with the patient.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on the timeframe and steps for completing the Seven-day short stay booklet

    Wider context from the report

    “- There is no clear guidance in place in relation to the timeframe for the full completion of the ‘Seven-day short stay booklet for admission/discharge’ and the steps to take if the booklet has not been fully completed on the day of admission to the unit. The Coroner considers that further guidance and/or training on this matter may be required. - There is no clear guidance in place in relation to the manner in which the ‘Seven-day short stay booklet for admission/discharge’ ought to be completed, and particularly whether it is permissible to rely on information recorded in the Emergency Department without checking it directly with the patient. The Coroner considers that further guidance and/or training on this matter may be required. ”

    Source location

    Sebastian NOTTAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and reprint the seven-day booklet with instructions to complete pages 1–14 within 24 hours, check daily, and explain any gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The booklet is being reviewed and will be reprinted to incorporate enhanced instructions regarding completion of the booklet. Specifically, the wording at the top of each page will be: “Page 1-14 complete within 24 hours and check daily to ensure completion.””

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monthly documentation audits to monitor booklet completion and identify ward or individual training requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has revised the teaching session for “Ward documentation” which is part of the Ward Ready Course. I attach a copy of the revised lesson plan detailing the content provided to all new nursing staff. This training is delivered via the Trust’s Practice Development Team to all new members of the nursing workforce during their induction programme. The current nursing workforce will be reminded of the expectations and importance of completing documentation via the daily Ward Handovers, daily Safety Huddles, and monthly Ward Manager and Matron Meetings. In addition, the Matron’s Monthly Documentation Audit will continue to address compliance with completion of documentation, and any training requirements for wards and individuals.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and deliver a simulation video demonstrating a perfect admission, including patient engagement and completion of the seven-day booklet.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Trust’s teaching programme for all nursing staff, it is planned (completion in August) that there will be a simulation video to demonstrate the “Perfect Admission” which will incorporate engagement with patients, how to extract information to ensure there is completion of documentation and will include the 7-day Short Stay Booklet Admission/Discharge and Daily Evaluation.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out digital documentation incorporating the seven-day booklet content into an electronic record with clinician access and timed completion tasks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In September 2022, the Trust will roll out Digital Documentation (an electronic patient record system). The information from the 7-day booklet will be “built in” to the digital programme, and there will be one record in which all information is accessible to all clinicians. The digital documentation will largely replicate the content of the current paper booklet to ensure that the same information is captured, and it has been reviewed as part of the digital programme to ensure it reflects current best practice. It is envisaged that the electronic patient record will enable all the clinicians to access the patient’s entire record; and it will help clinicians to ensure there is a safer, leaner and “real time” documentation of the care they provide to patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A definitive booklet-completion timeframe cannot be provided because admission pathways, admission times, patient capacity and presentation vary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current 7-day Short Stay Booklet Admission/Discharge and Daily Evaluation outlines the expectation that the nursing staff will complete the information within the booklet during the early stages of the patient’s admission. It is not possible to provide a definitive time frame within which this is completed, as this will be dependent upon the patient’s admission pathway (whether they are emergency or elective) the time of day they are admitted and their capacity and presentation at the time.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 October 2022

    Open published response
  6. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells was found after an unwitnessed fall at her nursing home, later diagnosed with fractures of the left tibia and fibula, and subsequently developed pressure ulcers before dying in hospital on 2 July 2021. The report identified concerns about the absence or documentation of fall-prevention measures, delayed medical referral, inadequate care documentation, handover communications, and wound-management procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate protocols for completion of admission documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review existing protocols governing wound management, completion of admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and the return from hospital form. ”

    Source location

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train nurses and shift leaders on documentation, care plans, wound management, assessments, body maps, consent forms and hospital-return documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, I provided a training session to all the Registered General Nurses and Shift Leaders at Aden Court on 2 July 2021 (see also below). Part of the session covered expectations around documentation and specifically how staff should complete Hill Care’s standard proforma documentation including; admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and return from hospital form. Following the session, all attendees confirmed that they were aware of and understood Hill Care’s policies and procedures in relation to documentation and that they had received training on how documentation must be completed.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review admission documentation and initial care plans to ensure they fully and accurately record service users’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Hill Care’s protocol in relation to the completion and review of admission documentation and care plans is outlined above. The Registered Manager will carry out a full review of the admission documentation and initial care plans to ensure that they are full and thorough and accurately document the service user’s needs. Care plans are then kept under review and monitored through the regular and ongoing care management review process, during the course of a service user’s admission.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 8 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing protocols for wound management and required care documentation are considered sufficient, with compliance monitored through regular audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are clear protocols in place within Aden Court in relation to wound management, admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and the return from hospital form. As outlined above, I provided a training session for all the Registered General Nurses and Shift Leaders on 2 July 2021. The session covered wound management, completion of admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and the return from hospital form to ensure that they were aware of the protocols in place within Aden Court. Compliance is monitored through an ongoing, regular and thorough audit process. I have provided more detail below.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 7 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response
  7. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Catherine Jux died aged 86 on 5 April 2021 while being transported to hospital by ambulance after choking on food at Elvy Court Nursing Home. The substantive concerns were that a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of admission, staff did not identify this omission, and the home lacked an adequate auditing process for completed assessments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete risk assessments within 24 hours of admission

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given by Nursing Home manager and Nursing staff at the Elvy Court Nursing Home that: (1) Due to an oversight by the home a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of the patient being admitted to the home. (2) None of the Care Home staff who attended to the patient and who would refer to this risk assessment to assess a patient’s daily needs and requirements noticed the oversight in respect of this. (3) There is not an adequate process in place for auditing that assessments have been completed particularly given the homes policy that they are completed within 24 hours of admission. ”

    Source location

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Josephine Hoare · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Josephine Hoare died on 16 May 2019 at Queen Elizabeth Hospital from catastrophic injuries sustained after deliberately climbing over the balcony of her second-floor apartment and falling. The report raised concerns that she was accepted into unsuitable independent living accommodation without full information about her recent mental health history, adequate suitability assessment, care planning or risk assessments. It also remained a concern that other applicants might be accepted into supported living settings without being fully assessed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete care plans and risk assessments after admission

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Once Mrs. Hoare was a resident, a care plan and risk assessments were not completed. ”

    Source location

    Mary Josephine Hoare · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Xander Curran-Pass · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Xander Curran-Pass was delivered by category C Caesarean Section on 15 September 2018 after reduced fetal movement, delayed induction of labour, and concerning CTG findings. Resuscitation was unsuccessful and he died; post-mortem examination identified poor placental function associated with chronic villitis and thrombotic vasculopathy. The substantive concerns included delays in review and delivery, inadequate monitoring and documentation, and unclear or inconsistent processes for managing induction of labour and reduced fetal movement.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of admission documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The quality of documentation on admission was poor; ”

    Source location

    Xander Curran-Pass · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rachel Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rachel Morgan, who had post-natal depression with psychotic symptoms and was considered at high risk of suicide, was found with a ligature around her neck on 16 April 2016 and died from severe anoxic brain injury on 24 April 2016. The principal concerns were delays in reviewing her medication, failures to update risk assessments after information about her suicide risk was received, insufficient observation levels, and a lack of clarity about observation procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete medication summaries during admission clerking

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) I am concerned that despite the fact that Rachel Morgan and her family made it clear to the staff at the Medlock Ward from the start of her admission that she wanted her medication to be reviewed as felt that her anti-depressant medication was not working, no steps were taken to begin the review process during the 4 days she was an inpatient before her death. I am concerned that in the knowledge that Rachel was reporting issues with her medication, a medication summary could have been undertaken before the first ward round took place on the 15th April. Please consider whether on admission patients should have a medication summary completed as part of the clerking process, which would allow any medication reviews to be conducted by an appropriate Doctor at the first available opportunity. ”

    Source location

    Rachel Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026