Recurring concern

Unreliable management of urinary catheters

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 May 2015•Latest report 2 Apr 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated management of indwelling or postoperative urinary catheters, including drainage configuration, flushing and monitoring, catheter-care bundles, duration and removal instructions, trials without catheter, postoperative guidance, staff training and escalation when catheter function or complications are abnormal.

Not included

  • Excludes catheter insertion or general vascular-access procedures where ongoing urinary-catheter management is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes failures involving chest drains, nasogastric tubes or other non-urinary drainage devices.
  • Excludes generic fluid-balance monitoring, continence care or clinical-record failures unless they directly impair urinary-catheter management.
  • Excludes medication, staffing or discharge failures that are not specifically part of the urinary-catheter management process.
Reports
8

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
12

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust3
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Lower Clapton Group Practice1
Milestones Trust1
Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk1
Princess Royal Hospital, Haywards Heath1
Swansea Bay University Local Health Board1
Ty Nant Nursing Home1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Peter PETTITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter PETTITT, aged 86, died on 11 September 2023 after developing sepsis due to bronchopneumonia and acute pyelonephritis. The report raised concerns about inadequate care records, gaps in medication and catheter support, and insufficiently assured training and management arrangements for the commissioned care provided to him.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate catheter management support

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr. PETTITT’s catheter management, both in terms of day-time changing and support to fitting of a night time catheter, were part of the services Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk were commissioned to provide. The Inquest heard evidence that catheter management for Mr. PETTITT was poor, with periods of days, possibly longer, where there was an absence of catheter support provided to Mr. PETTITT. It is possible that Mr. Pettit did not receive support in relation to his night-time catheter changes for several months. ”

    Source location

    Peter PETTITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update catheter-care policies and procedures for safe, consistent practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Multi-Care also reviewed and updated its catheter care policies and procedures to ensure safe and consistent practice across the organisation.”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide mandatory catheter-care training and competency assessment covering procedures, infection recognition, output monitoring, escalation and documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mandatory catheter care training has been provided to all relevant staff and includes:”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain regular catheter-care competency oversight through supervision, observational checks, refresher training, spot checks and monthly supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Competency assessments are conducted following training and reviewed regularly through supervision and observational practice checks.”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Darren Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren Jones, who had severe learning disabilities, a long-term catheter and chronic kidney disease, was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital after unsuccessful catheter changes in the community and Emergency Department. He deteriorated despite treatment for sepsis and died at the hospital on 22 October 2021. The concerns included pressures on community district nursing services, insufficient recognition of his learning difficulties and support needs in hospital, a dispute between Local Authorities affecting respite care and catheter-care training, and the absence of a commissioned LeDeR review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish responsibility for catheter-care training

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Inquest heard that there was a dispute between two Local Authorities regarding training in catheter care. This impacted the provision of respite care and his health and wellbeing; ”

    Source location

    Darren Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The dispute between local authorities over catheter-care training and respite provision is for those local authorities to address.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The inquest heard that there was a dispute between two local authorities in relation to training re catheter care and that this impacted on the provision of respite care and the health and wellbeing of Mr. Jones This is a matter for the local authorities involved to address; what can be confirmed is that the District Nursing Team are trained in catheter care”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 September 2022

    Open published response
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Macaulay WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Macaulay Wilson had a long-term indwelling urinary catheter that was not changed for almost a year, despite the catheter reportedly needing replacement every 12 weeks. The inquest determined that the failure to change it caused urosepsis. Concerns included failures by the hospital urology department to risk assess and arrange appropriate catheter changes, district nurses not enquiring about catheter changes, and unclear communication by the GP practice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use specific language distinguishing catheter change from catheter care in requests

    Wider context from the report

    “The Homerton University Hospital urology clinical nurse specialist wrote to your practice on 18 February 2019, and included within the letter a request that you arrange for district nurses to change Mr Wilson’s indwelling catheter in 12 weeks. A doctor from your practice did consider the letter, did action it and did write to the district nurses, but did not include a specific request for catheter change (as opposed to catheter care, which does not include change of the catheter). It seems that your doctors’ use of language in this situation would benefit from further consideration. ”

    Source location

    Macaulay WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highlight instructions for other clinical teams and send the original correspondence with onward referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lower Clapton Group Practice has introduced a system to ensure that when the practice receives correspondence containing instructions directed towards other members of the wider clinical team involved in a patient’s care, such as district nursing, the relevant instructions will be clearly highlighted and a copy of the original letter will accompany any onward referral to ensure there is no loss of information or message clarity. We are undertaking an audit of all patients who have catheter products on their prescriptions. We will ensure that we clearly record in their notes how frequently their catheter should be changed and which service is responsible for doing this. We have written an electronic template within our clinical system to aid us in capturing the above data.”

    Source location

    2021-0146-Response-from-Lower-Clapton-Group-Practice-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate the revised processes to the team and incorporate them into the induction programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have communicated the above to all members of the team including the person responsible for coding incoming patient related correspondence and these processes have been incorporated into our induction program. We have informed our local medicines management team about this case to ensure they can disseminate this risk within their monthly newsletter so that other practices can ensure a similar event does not occur. We have reported the incident via the National Reporting and Learning System and have informed the CCG. We are amending the City and Hackney wide EMIS template which is used when visiting housebound and vulnerable patients to include parameters such as catheters and catheter change as well as other issues which may increase patient risk such as pressure sores and falls.”

    Source location

    2021-0146-Response-from-Lower-Clapton-Group-Practice-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response
  4. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth George Alfred WHITTINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth George Alfred Whittington died following an operation, but the supplied text does not provide further circumstances of his death beyond referring to the Record of Inquest. The principal concerns included inadequate instructions and handover about management of his urinary catheter after bladder repair, failure to check a disconnected epidural despite increasing pain, incomplete blood transfusion and discharge documentation, and a delay to the initial operation because no Junior Doctor was present.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the postoperative pathway to provide safe urinary catheter removal guidance

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Following the operation Mr. Whittington’s last contact with his Consultant was immediately post operatively. Due to the system operated at the Royal Sussex County Hospital (along with many other hospitals as I understand it) the situation is that the operative surgeon will not see the patient again unless there is some specific reason to do so. Instead the patient will be seen by the on call surgical team for that particular day or part of the day. Mr. Whittington therefore saw a Consultant who did not know him and who did not understand either the condition that Mr. Whittington had come in to hospital with (Colovesical Fistula) or the fact that he needed an operation which had included a bladder repair as I have already pointed out (2 above). The surgeon wanted the urinary catheter to remain in situ for at least two weeks to allow the bladder repair that had been made at Mr. Whittington’s operation to heal. This was absolutely crucial and yet no specific instructions were given and the post-operative pathway which was being followed gave very little help in that respect either, save to suggest that the catheter should always be removed early, well prior to discharge. Had there been post-operative instructions and had there been a checklist for the Consultant picking up the ward rounds following the operation, the catheter would not have been removed and Mr. Whittington would not have died. If the Trust is insistent on perpetuating this lack of continuity between the Surgeon and the post-operative Consultant care there must be sufficient handover and sufficient clear instructions from the Surgeon doing the operation as to the post-operative care so as to protect the patient. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth George Alfred WHITTINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of postoperative urinary catheter management instructions

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Most importantly post operation ‘paperwork’ contained no instructions regarding the management of his urinary catheter or how long it was to remain in situ. ████████ said that he had expected to be in place for at least two weeks post operatively and very likely longer because at the operation he had had to make a bladder repair and therefore did not want to remove the urinary catheter until such time as the bladder had healed. Had he made this requirement clear I have no doubt that this matter would not have come to Inquest. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth George Alfred WHITTINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the Enhanced Recovery Programme booklet to include post-operative urinary-catheter management guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Division of Surgery have reviewed the Enhanced Recovery Programme booklet and have amended this to include a section on the management of post operative urinary catheters. An order for the amended booklets has been placed with the printers. When the new booklets have been printed we will roll these out for use.”

    Source location

    2019-0049-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Print and roll out the amended Enhanced Recovery Programme booklets for use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Division of Surgery have reviewed the Enhanced Recovery Programme booklet and have amended this to include a section on the management of post operative urinary catheters. An order for the amended booklets has been placed with the printers. When the new booklets have been printed we will roll these out for use.”

    Source location

    2019-0049-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a pre-printed urinary-catheter prompt to daily ward-round sheets.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To strengthen awareness and recording, the daily ward round sheets now include a pre printed prompt on urinary catheters. An audit is underway of documentation in surgery measured against National Guidelines. ████████ is leading on this audit.”

    Source location

    2019-0049-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require documented medical instructions before nursing staff remove urinary catheters on surgical wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our practice has changed and Nursing staff no longer remove urinary catheters on the Surgical wards, without clear documented instruction in the records from the doctors to do so.”

    Source location

    2019-0049-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response
  5. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Ms. Sandra Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms. Sandra Miller, who had multiple health conditions and required a urinary catheter, became unwell with sepsis and was admitted to hospital on 15 June 2016. The catheter had been left open to drain, with its end in or near faecal matter, and was found to be dirty and blocked. She died in hospital on 21 June 2016; the medical cause of death was pneumonia, with E. coli septicaemia due to a urinary tract infection and heart failure also recorded. The concerns were that open-ended catheter drainage had continued, and that safe catheter-care procedures and staff training were inadequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent open-ended urinary catheters from draining freely

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Urgent action must be taken to ensure the practice of allowing open ended urinary catheters to drain freely is stopped in all homes and facilities under the management and control of Milestones Trust. (2) Proper procedures must introduced with regard to the safe care and management of urinary catheters with the assistance of specialist advice if necessary. (3) All relevant staff must be properly trained in the care and management of urinary catheters. ”

    Source location

    Ms. Sandra Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of proper procedures for the safe care and management of urinary catheters

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Urgent action must be taken to ensure the practice of allowing open ended urinary catheters to drain freely is stopped in all homes and facilities under the management and control of Milestones Trust. (2) Proper procedures must introduced with regard to the safe care and management of urinary catheters with the assistance of specialist advice if necessary. (3) All relevant staff must be properly trained in the care and management of urinary catheters. ”

    Source location

    Ms. Sandra Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly train relevant staff in urinary catheter care and management

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Urgent action must be taken to ensure the practice of allowing open ended urinary catheters to drain freely is stopped in all homes and facilities under the management and control of Milestones Trust. (2) Proper procedures must introduced with regard to the safe care and management of urinary catheters with the assistance of specialist advice if necessary. (3) All relevant staff must be properly trained in the care and management of urinary catheters. ”

    Source location

    Ms. Sandra Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Hedley Greenland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hedley Greenland, who was residing in a nursing home and had prostate cancer requiring permanent catheterisation, became acutely unwell on 17 December 2016 and died in hospital on 20 December 2016. The inquest concluded that he died from the effects of a urine infection in circumstances where fluid input and catheter output were not adequately monitored for over nine hours. Concerns included the absence of fluid balance monitoring and written handover, inadequate catheter-care training and knowledge, and the absence of evidence that the Catheter Care Bundle was being used.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to flush indwelling catheters when required

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A fluid balance chart should have been used by nursing staff to monitor fluid intake and urine output. There was no evidence that one had been thus rendering it impossible to measure urine output which might have indicated a blockage and/or infection. It was apparent during the course of the evidence that the nurse in charge of Mr Greenland's care did not consider actively monitoring his urine output, neither did she consider flushing the catheter. There was no written handover, as the evidence showed is normally the practice, to the incoming nursing team the following morning. There was no clear evidence that the lack of urine output had been noted by the night shift with a view to escalating his care. The evidence revealed that there was no urine output for at least 9 hours but probably substantially more than that. ”

    Source location

    Hedley Greenland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding, knowledge and training in long-term indwelling catheter management

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The evidence given by two nurses involved in Mr Greenland's care revealed a clear lack of understanding, knowledge and training as to how to manage a long term indwelling catheter. ”

    Source location

    Hedley Greenland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a central electronic booking and attendance diary for community catheterisation training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this incident a review has been undertaken. The Health Board have now implemented a booking and attendance system at community training which is to be recorded using an electronic central booking diary. This will ensure that accurate records are maintained of those who have attended training. It will also highlight areas where staff have not attended training.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign community catheterisation training to the Community Continence Service and secondary-care training to secondary care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, where training for catheterisation was shared previously between all Continence Assessors, the Community Continence Service will now take responsibility for training community staff and secondary care will train staff in the secondary care setting.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share catheterisation training dates with the Long Term Care Team to monitor attendance by care home and identify non-participating homes for closer monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training dates for catheterisation have been shared with Long Term Care Team to ensure the Health Board are able to monitor attendance from each care home. The Long Term Care Team work in partnership with Local Authority to monitor standards within the care home setting, part of this process is to review each care homes training register. Care homes that are not participating in training will be identified and monitored closely to improve compliance.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train Health Board nursing-home assessors in urinary-catheter management and documentation, enabling practice measurement against agreed standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Health Board’s Nursing home assessors will receive training from the Community Continence Service regarding the management of urinary catheters including documentation. This will provide an opportunity for Health Board Nursing Home assessors to share good practice and to measure practice within the Care home setting against agreed standards of practice.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Care-home staff are not obliged to attend training, and attendance depends on providers releasing staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Health Board also offers this training to registered nurses within the nursing home setting, however they are not obliged to attend. The Health Board encourages providers to nominate staff to attend the various training sessions offered, unfortunately the Health Board is reliant on the provider being able to release staff to attend.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Because of the region’s large care-home workforce, only general continence training can be offered to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Long Term Care Team will explore the feasibility of setting up a network of ‘Continence Champions’ where additional training could be provided by the Community Continence Service to cascade in all homes. Due to the large number of care home staff in the region the Health Board can offer a general level of continence training to care home staff, however, Continence Champions will be provided with a more intense programme of training to ensure they can support and advise their colleagues. Additionally, a continence e-learning link will be shared with Long Term care team for dissemination to Nursing/Care home staff.”

    Source location

    2017-0235-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 October 2017

    Open published response
  7. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Anthony Geerts sustained a fractured neck of femur, underwent surgery and was transferred for rehabilitation before being moved to a nursing home. He later returned to hospital with hospital-acquired pneumonia and a possible urinary tract infection, and died on 21 November 2014. The concerns included inadequate rehabilitation, incomplete records and monitoring, poor communication and discharge planning, and failures in managing his continence, fluid restriction and possible chest infection; the inquest concluded that neglect at Princess Royal Hospital contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to manage trials without catheter safely

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr. GEERTS went to Princess Royal Hospital to Twineham Ward (the Ward which specialise in Rehabilitation patients coming from The Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton). Mr. GEERTS came with a fractured neck of femur which had been timeously operated. He was determined to return home to his wife who depended on him. He lived in Brighton and Hove and was disappointed to be going to Haywards Heath for rehabilitation as he knew how difficult it would be for his family to visit so regularly. In Brighton he had received physiotherapy and been regularly reviewed. In Haywards Heath he was effectively abandoned from the 6th. His notes give no clue as to how he was cared for. His physiotherapy notes end abruptly with no plan. I was told nurses on this rehabilitation ward had been asked to look after him as (a) There was insufficient physiotherapy staff to do so and (b) Without any or any effective consultation, the decision had been made that he was to be discharged to highgrove Nursing Home as soon as possible after the 6th. Neither Mr. GEERTS nor his family were involved in this decision. Mr. GEERTS had suffered long term mental health issues. These were ignored during his stay at Princess Royal Hospital. His anxieties were not addressed in any meaningful way. He was given no assistance after the 6th. Having been told he was to be transferred for further rehabilitation, Mr. GEERTS remained very anxious about the impending move and about the lack of communication and particularly the lack of physio. For reasons unexplained satisfactorily to this day, he was moved out of Twineham Ward late on the 10th, Bailey Ward was unaware of his needs. He was incontinent of urine. On the 11th he was transferred to the discharge ward from where he contacted his daughter 3 times. He arrived in a poorly state at Highgrove in the mid afternoon. This resulted in him being unable to participate fully in any of the Highgrove activities, nor could he settle in. He was back at The Royal Sussex County Hospital on the 16th with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia and ? urinary tract infection. No more physiotherapy was possible and in spite of ongoing treatment he deteriorated to his death on the 21st. Specifically at Princess Royal Hospital: • Notes not completed. • No nursing notes and no NEWS for 10th or 11th • Fluid chart not completed. Fluid restriction not properly documented. Fluid restriction effectively disregarded. • No plan for physiotherapy • No rehabilitation on Rehabilitation Ward from 6th -10th. Exercise on the 10th not properly documented. • No proper notes of Rationale for transfer to Bailey Ward on 10th/11th. Transfer procedure not followed. Transfer not documented. • No referral of lack of urinary continence. Therefore no plan regarding this. • Failed Trial without catheter on 3rd November 2014. • Bowel monitoring chart not complete • Discharge planning non-existent or inadequate • Communication with patient and family virtually non-existent • No senior review from 4th November 2014; possibility of chest infection not followed up. • Should have had a blood test as requested on 11th November 2014. Did not and therefore unnecessary extra 48 hours on fluid restriction. • Discharge lounge information incorrect. ”

    Source location

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY was an 89-year-old woman who died in hospital on 29 October 2014 after admission following recurrent falls. The inquest concluded that she died of hospital-acquired pneumonia and that her death was probably accelerated by a short time because of the effects of her five-day admission to the Acute Medical Unit. Concerns included incomplete handover and poor personal care, missing identification and risk bands, inadequate monitoring and documentation, missed medication and nutritional support, and failures to escalate clinical deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete the daily catheter care bundle

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Once again my concerns involve the Acute Medical Unit (AMU). (2) Mrs. KENNEDY was transferred from AMU in a chair, not a trolley. (3) Handover was incomplete and unhelpful. (4) She arrived unkempt. (5) She had porridge leaking from her mouth; it took 20 mouth sponges to give her adequate mouth care. (6) She felt cold and said she was cold. (7) She had been incontinent of faeces and had not been cleaned for some time. (8) She had no name wrist band. (9) In spite of known allergies she had no allergy wrist band. (10) In spite of falling regularly she had no falls risk wrist band. (11) She still had an IV cannula in place; this should have been removed after 72 hours. (12) Her daily catheter care bundle had not been completed for 3 days. (13) She had no fluid charts for 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (14) Care plans were not completed for 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (15) Repositioning charts were incomplete or poor for 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th. (16) The handling assessment was not completed for 16th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (17) No food chart was completed for her entire time in AMU. (18) She had pressure damage to her hips and bottom. (19) No daily oral assessment was completed for her entire time on AMU. (20) She was not weighed. (21) The malnutrition tool was not completed. (22) Her bowel movements were not recorded. (24) NEWS scores of 4 to 9 had not been escalated to doctors nor filled in on her drug chart. PLUS (25) No personal care over the weekend of 18th and 19th. (26) No senior review over that weekend. (27) Not written up for her Sertraline, therefore not given (28) Not written up for any food supplements until 21st October. (29) She should have been specialled, but wasn’t. Once again AMU has been found to be chaotic and not fit for purpose. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026