Recurring concern

Unreliable radiology processes for communicating findings and initiating required follow-up

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Oct 2014•Latest report 4 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in radiology processes for communicating clinically important findings or recommendations, confirming receipt by the responsible clinical team, enabling or initiating recommended additional investigations, and providing required radiologist reporting arrangements when these failures can delay diagnosis or follow-up care.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to interpretation of images where communication or follow-up is not deficient.
  • Excludes generic referral, appointment or investigation delays without a direct radiology finding, recommendation or reporting-process connection.
  • Excludes failures in the clinical management of a condition after the radiology finding and required follow-up have been reliably communicated and initiated.
  • Excludes generic information-system, staffing or commissioning deficiencies unless they directly impair the radiology communication or follow-up process.
  • Excludes the separate abdominal-aortic-aneurysm concern when the assertion is specifically about detection and management of that named condition rather than the radiology follow-up process itself.
Reports
16

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
16

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
23

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS England2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Homerton University Hospital1
Medica Reporting Services Limited1
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust1
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board1
NHS Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group1
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health1
Royal College of Radiologists1
Royal London Hospital1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Viviana-Ray Winnie Elsie Wendy Butnaru · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Viviana-Ray Winnie Elsie Wendy Butnaru attended the Children’s Emergency Department on 24 October 2024 and died at Basildon Hospital on 25 October 2024 after cardiac arrest. The stated cause of death was myocarditis caused by Parvovirus, contributed to by bronchiolitis and bronchopneumonia. Concerns included delayed reporting of chest X-rays showing cardiomegaly, incomplete exploration of metabolic acidosis, failures in escalation and review processes, and incomplete documentation and handovers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in official radiologist reporting of chest X-rays showing cardiomegaly

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Chest X rays which showed cardiomegaly were not reported officially by a radiologist until several days later. ”

    Source location

    Viviana-Ray Winnie Elsie Wendy Butnaru · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and formalise the radiology policy review to document how clinical teams can expedite imaging reports for clinical concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Radiology Department identified that guidance for clinical teams on how to expedite an imaging report due to clinical concern was not documented in Trust radiology policies and procedures. As such, the Director of Nursing has confirmed that a review of the Trust’s policy, Guide for making the best use of a Radiology Department (MSEGL23134) will be completed by 1 June 2026 to ensure an updated version is formalised to include this guidance going forward. The Trust will be able to share a copy of this updated policy with you in due course if it is of assistance.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the updated radiology escalation guidance with paediatric teams and publish it on the Trust intranet.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of these guideline changes, targeted sharing of the changes will be undertaken with the Paediatric teams across our sites within MSEFT, alongside the updated guideline being available on the Trust's intranet page, which is accessible for all staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formal chest X-ray reporting delays lie outside the respondent’s control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Chest X ray reporting. This lies outside of our control but we recognise that there is often some delay between images being taken in the context of an emergency and a formal report being issued. All clinicians have some training in interpreting chest X rays.”

    Source location

    Response from The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne, who had vascular dementia and was extremely frail, died at her care home on 18 December 2024 after deterioration following a fall, a neck of femur fracture, surgery and discharge back to the care home. Concerns included poor communication with the family and power-of-attorney holder, misunderstandings about her baseline and mobility affecting discharge planning, failure to arrange follow-up, and doubts about the quality and accuracy of outsourced radiological reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of reporting radiologists for discussion of radiological findings

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The treating consultant physician expressed considerable doubt as to the quality and accuracy of radiological reporting provided by the outsourced out of hours service (which is understood to be outside the UK) and accepted that this issue, amongst others, contributed to his doubt that the deceased had sustained a fracture. The Inquest heard that there was no ability to discuss the findings with the reporting radiologist. ”

    Source location

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate and share a flow chart setting out escalation contacts for difficult out-of-hours radiologist communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges that there may be occasions when contacting the out-of-hours radiologist proves challenging. In such cases, the duty radiologist should be contacted as the next point of escalation. To ensure all clinical teams are fully informed of this protocol, a flow chart detailing the contact process has been circulated. This has also been shared directly with the orthopaedic consultants to support consistent application across relevant departments.”

    Source location

    Response from County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    George Barry Broadhurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Barry Broadhurst sustained a vertebral fracture in an accidental fall, which was not identified on an initial x-ray review. He later deteriorated with a collapsed lung, pulmonary embolism and an infected fractured vertebra, and died in hospital on 10 October 2023. The principal concerns were delays in radiology reporting and review, and insufficient recognition and escalation of concerning pain and deterioration in the community.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in specialist reporting of X rays

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that the delay in reporting of X rays by radiologists is not unique to Tameside but is a national picture caused by a shortage of radiologists and trained reporting radiographers. The impact of the shortage is that ED doctors are interpreting x rays in highly pressured situations without specialist input and with a consequential risk of missing more subtle fractures. This means that patients are discharged with fractures rather than appropriate treatment or conversely are given unnecessary treatment that then has to be reversed once a specialist review takes place. ”

    Source location

    George Barry Broadhurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand Clinical Radiology specialty training places to increase the trained reporting workforce.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following additional investment through spending review settlements in 2021/22 and 2022/23, the NHS has observed a significant and sustained expansion in recruitment to specialty training places. Clinical Radiology recruitment increased from an average of 234 trainees per year (between 2016 and 2020) to an average of 328 (between 2021 and 2022), meaning an expansion of around 100 specialty trainee places per year.”

    Source location

    Response from NHSE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue international recruitment of radiologists to support diagnostic capacity, with demand planning underway for further recruitment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A programme of international recruitment also ran in 2023/24 to enable Community Diagnostic Centres (CDCs) to deliver diagnostics and achieve the benefits in access, recovery and transformation of care. During 2023/24, 21 Radiologists were appointed through the programme. Further international recruitment is planned for 2024/25, with demand planning currently underway.”

    Source location

    Response from NHSE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the Long Term Workforce Plan, including expanded domestic education, training and recruitment and workforce retention measures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also working at a national level to deliver the Long-Term Workforce Plan. This is a robust and effective strategy to ensure we have the right number of”

    Source location

    Response from NHSE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS Trusts are responsible for ensuring safe staffing levels in hospitals’ current day-to-day operations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “people, with the right skills and support in place, to be able to deliver the kind of care people need. It heralds the start of the biggest recruitment drive in health service history, but also of an ongoing programme of strategic workforce planning. It includes ambitious commitments to grow the workforce by significantly expanding domestic education, training and recruitment, as well as actions aimed at improving culture, leadership and wellbeing so that more staff are retained in NHS employment over the next 15 years. These actions will aim to close anticipated staffing shortfalls in the NHS in the long term, however NHS Trusts have a responsibility to ensure safe staffing levels in the current day to day operation of their hospitals.”

    Source location

    Response from NHSE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local A&E procedures require follow-up of X-ray reports because general X-rays may not receive 24/7 imaging-service reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments are required to have local procedures in place to ensure that they follow up X-ray reports, based on the formal report being finalised, as pathologies can be missed via A&E routes and imaging services do not support/deliver 24/7 reporting of general X-rays.”

    Source location

    Response from NHSE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response
  4. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Akash Dinesh Bhudia · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Akash Bhudia had a persistent cough and was treated for presumed pneumonia before a follow-up chest X-ray showed worsening and new lung consolidation. He later coughed and vomited blood, could not be resuscitated, and a post-mortem examination found a pulmonary abscess most likely caused by tuberculosis. The principal concern was that significant X-ray findings suggestive of tuberculosis were not highlighted to the referring clinician, and that no alert process appeared to be in place to ensure timely action.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to highlight significant, unexpected, and important radiological findings to the referring clinician

    Wider context from the report

    “The X ray on the 28 February 2022, which was carried out following treatment for pneumonia, showed an obvious progression in lung consolidation and was highly suggestive of tuberculosis (a new clinical diagnosis). Akash was not an in-patient in hospital at the time of the follow-up X ray. He had been discharged and was therefore not under the active management of a clinical team. The inquest heard that such significant, unexpected, and important changes should have been highlighted to the referring clinician. This was not done. There does not appear to be a process in place for an alert to be added to the normal communication method to ensure that such significant, unexpected, and important findings are acted upon in a timely manner. The inquest also heard that the incidence of TB is rising in certain areas of the UK and that it is important that radiologists recognise TB changes and that these are duly highlighted to the referrer. ”

    Source location

    Akash Dinesh Bhudia · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Medica Alerts policy to require urgent notification of referrers for potential new TB diagnoses and advise that treatment changes may be needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the inquest Medica have edited the Medica Alerts policy to include a potential new diagnosis of TB as a reason to raise an urgent notification to referrers. The alert and the report should advise the referrer that a change of treatment may be required.”

    Source location

    Response from Medica Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate the updated Medica Alerts policy to all reporters.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This new policy has been circulated to all reporters and a communication from me has highlighted the findings of the inquest to all reporters.”

    Source location

    Response from Medica Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with clients to enact the 2022 Academy of Royal Colleges and RCR Alerts guidelines within local processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Medica will work with Clients to enact the Academy of Royal College/RCR Alerts guidelines 2022 as Clients wish to/are able to integrate the process locally. I note the Academy of Royal Colleges advice that ‘open TB’ should receive a Critical Alert. This is not a process in place in any NHS Trust to my knowledge at this time. Medica will raise Urgent Findings until Clients adjust their internal processes.”

    Source location

    Response from Medica Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise Urgent Findings for relevant cases until clients adjust their internal alert processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Medica will work with Clients to enact the Academy of Royal College/RCR Alerts guidelines 2022 as Clients wish to/are able to integrate the process locally. I note the Academy of Royal Colleges advice that ‘open TB’ should receive a Critical Alert. This is not a process in place in any NHS Trust to my knowledge at this time. Medica will raise Urgent Findings until Clients adjust their internal processes.”

    Source location

    Response from Medica Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2023

    Open published response
  5. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sara Anest JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sara Anest Jones died at Royal Stoke University Hospital on 2 April 2021 from complications of a bowel injury sustained in a road traffic collision on 30 March 2021. The concerns included delayed and unconfirmed delivery of a CT radiology report between hospitals, failure to follow up signs of possible bowel injury, and the absence of a protocol for prompt and secure delivery of radiology reports in such circumstances.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow up on radiological signs of possible bowel injury

    Wider context from the report

    “A CT scan of the deceased was undertaken at Ysbyty Gwynedd late on the evening of 30th March 2021. The deceased was then transferred to the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent by air ambulance before the radiologist's report on the CT scan was available. Because of this the patient was transferred without the radiologist's report. The radiologist's report became available shortly before 1:00am on 31st March 2021, but was not sent to the Royal Stoke University Hospital until 5:35am that day. It was not clear that safe receipt of the report in Stoke-on-Trent was ever confirmed. Doctors in Stoke-on-Trent then failed to follow up on signs of a possible bowel injury which were indicated in the radiologist's report on the CT scan. During the inquest I was told that the circumstances of this case were unusual and that there was not a protocol in place to ensure the prompt and secure delivery of radiology reports in circumstances like this. ”

    Source location

    Sara Anest JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Redefine the Major Trauma Service so the Major Trauma Consultant leads whole-patient review and liaises with specialty teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to fulfil this, an internal recruitment process has already been initiated. One additional consultant is now in post, and negotiations are underway with a further three consultants which will fill our Monday-Friday rota. We intend to have this rota staffed by the beginning of August 2023. Approval for the development of a business case is under consideration for the expansion of the Major Trauma service, to include weekend and out of hours cover. We intend to remove any potential confusion around team responsibilities by redefining the Major Trauma Service. This will mean that the Major Trauma Consultant is primarily responsible for the whole patient review and will liaise with specialty teams as appropriate. The timescale for this redesign is within the next 12 months.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 April 2023

    Open published response
  6. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Alan Hodgson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Alan Hodgson died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 14 January 2021. The report describes failures to recognise the severity of his condition, delays in acting on and reporting imaging, failures to follow the vascular pathway, inadequate communication and continuity of care, and an insufficient review of the circumstances leading to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to report CTA findings urgently to requesting doctors

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Poor communication between medical and radiology doctors resulting in: a) delays in CTA being performed; b) inadequate imaging being performed; and c) a complete lack of urgency in reporting the findings of the CTA to the requesting doctors. ”

    Source location

    Mr Alan Hodgson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Robert Collins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Robert Collins died at Whipps Cross Hospital on 4 April 2018 as a result of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The report describes delays and errors in identifying, communicating, and acting on the aneurysm, which required ongoing monitoring. Concerns were also raised about the CERNER system not reliably sending results to the appropriate clinician and about the limited visibility of radiology reports for unexpected significant findings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make report receipt by the appropriate clinician apparent to the reporting radiologist

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Inquest heard evidence that the current CERNER system does not always ensure that results are sent through to the referring clinician. The Inquest heard evidence of a “quirk” in the system whereby results will be sent through to doctors who have no involvement in the patient's care. 2. The Inquest heard evidence that radiologists can now drop reports into a folder where there are unexpected and significant radiological findings. There is a specific folder relating to the finding of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The radiologist however raised a concern at the Inquest that it is not easily apparent to the reporting radiologist that the report has reached the appropriate clinician. ”

    Source location

    Michael Robert Collins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Scully · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Scully became unwell with sudden abdominal pain and vomiting and attended Tameside General Hospital on 9 February 2020. A radiologist initially reported another patient’s scan in error, and the correct diagnosis of hollow viscus perforation was made after her condition had deteriorated so severely that she could not withstand emergency surgery; she died in hospital on 10 February 2020. Concerns included variations in radiologists’ access to systems and equipment for out-of-hours reporting, the absence of a formal investigation into her care, and the lack of a Rapid Assessment and Treatment Model for walk-in emergency patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited remote access to relevant systems for urgent out-of-hours imaging reporting

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The court heard evidence that the Consultant Radiologist on-call for the Trust and reporting on urgent out-of-hours imaging from home, had more limited remote access to relevant systems than radiologists working for remote reporting companies and had been provided with less equipment than such an individual. Given the importance of effective out-of-hours reporting of imaging to emergency care, it is considered authoritative guidelines as to requisite access and recommended equipment could assist in reducing such variations. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Scully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revisit radiology informatics guidance to verify that imaging equipment specifications are clear and unambiguous.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Royal College of Radiologists already has comprehensive guidelines available to all services detailing the minimum system specifications needed to review and report imaging investigations both on and off site. I have enclosed two relevant sets of guidelines which will assist all services in ensuring that the appropriate standards for the provision of IT equipment are met. These guidelines are publically available on our website and communicated to all our members and Fellows upon publication. In light of the concerns you have raised we have invited our Radiology Informatics Committee to revisit its guidance to double check that it is clear and unambiguous in its specifications, which the Committee has agreed to do.”

    Source location

    2020-0156-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Radiologists.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Technology access issues are being addressed locally by Tameside General Hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The specific circumstances which gave rise to the matters of concern you raised to us were unclear and as such we sought clarification from Tameside General Hospital. We understand they are locally addressing the technology access issues pertinent to the circumstances of Mrs Scully’s death.”

    Source location

    2020-0156-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Radiologists.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 October 2020

    Open published response
  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Padiben Dullahb · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Dullahb presented to hospital with increasing abdominal pain and was later found to have bowel perforation, hypovolaemic shock and caecal volvulus. She deteriorated and died on 12 October 2017. The substantive concern was that, although out-of-hours reporting arrangements existed for CT and MRI scans, there was no similar arrangement for x-rays.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of out-of-hours radiologist reporting arrangements for x-rays

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Whilst the Hospital has arrangements in place to obtain out of hours reports from radiologists in relation to CT and MRI scans, there is no similar arrangement for x-rays. ”

    Source location

    Padiben Dullahb · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide the surgical department with a designated laptop for the on-call Consultant to securely review imaging remotely and provide advice or attend when necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Should the doctors still require assistance out of hours with x-ray imaging, the surgical department will now have a designated lap top within the department that will be taken home by the on-call Consultant. They will have access to all Trust systems including imaging and therefore, if a second opinion is required, the Consultant can review this securely at home and provide advice, or attend if necessary.”

    Source location

    paliben-dullabh-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 December 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing clinician training and access to on-call consultant radiologists were considered sufficient to identify and manage abnormal out-of-hours x-rays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is correct that the out-of-hours provider is not contracted to review x-rays. However, this was a deliberate decision taken by the Trust because it was felt that measures were already in place to ensure that any abnormal x-rays could be identified. These measures are as follows:”

    Source location

    paliben-dullabh-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 December 2018

    Open published response
  10. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Susan Joan Elliott (Sue) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Susan Joan Elliott died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 14 September 2017 after a fall, an initially unconfirmed suspected hip fracture, subsequent readmission and surgery. Concerns included that the 4 August x-ray was reportedly ignored, no CT scan was undertaken before discharge, and surgery may have been possible earlier.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on reported x-ray findings

    Wider context from the report

    “The orthopaedic surgeon in his evidence confirmed that the x-ray of 4th August 2017 was “reported on and ignored” ”

    Source location

    Ms Susan Joan Elliott (Sue) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the Emergency Department Injured Elderly NWB Guideline in junior doctor induction and stress discussion of referrals at trauma x-ray meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the inquest, the same witness also made reference to new protocols about the treatment of patients presenting with similar conditions such as Ms Elliott, but did not produce any documents. I would like to assure you that we do have an “Emergency Department Injured Elderly Non-Wight Bearing (NWGB) Guideline” which was developed in 2015. This guideline provides clear recommendations for cross sectional (CT) imaging and reporting, where pain or dysfunction suggests an occult fracture. I have provided a copy of this guideline.”

    Source location

    2018-0275-Response-by-City-Hospital-Sunderland-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and relaunch the injured elderly non-weight-bearing pathway across the Trust to raise clinicians’ awareness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guideline is now included in the T&O junior doctor induction programme and the importance of all referrals being discussed at the trauma x-ray meeting is also stressed within this training. Our internal investigation has acknowledged that we need to review and relaunch this pathway across the Trust in order to raise clinicians’ awareness and this has been addressed within the action plan.”

    Source location

    2018-0275-Response-by-City-Hospital-Sunderland-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The radiograph and report were viewed by three medical staff and were therefore not reported and ignored.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You will recall that one of the witnesses in his evidence at Ms Elliott’s inquest, suggested that Ms Elliott’s radiograph of 4th August 2017 was “reported and ignored”. I would like to reassure you that following a thorough internal investigation, I can confirm that both the radiograph and the associated radiology report were viewed on our electronic system (Meditech) between 4th and 5th August 2017 by three different members of medical staff who considered the report alongside Ms Elliott’s clinical presentation and status.”

    Source location

    2018-0275-Response-by-City-Hospital-Sunderland-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026