Recurring concern
Unreliable recording and follow-up of clinical escalations
First reported 4 Apr 2024•Latest report 20 Jan 2026
What this concern includes
Includes failures in recording, completing, communicating, assigning or tracking clinical escalations and their resulting actions, including Nerve Centre escalation records and escalation-related handovers where the deficiency can leave follow-up unclear or incomplete.
Not included
- Excludes generic clinical-record, handover or documentation failures where no clinical escalation or resulting action is involved.
- Excludes failures in the clinical assessment or decision that prompted an escalation when the escalation-record and follow-up process itself is not deficient.
- Excludes failures to implement actions after they have been clearly recorded, assigned and tracked through a reliable escalation process.
- Excludes non-clinical operational escalations and generic incident-reporting processes unrelated to patient-care escalations.
- Reports
- 2
- Individual concerns
- 3
- Date range
- 2024–2026
- Stated actions
- 4
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised2
Failure to follow up Nerve Centre system escalation triggers
Failure to properly complete Nerve Centre system escalation records
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Action
Reinforce Nerve Centre escalation procedures so triggers are actioned, followed up and fully documented, including the receiving clinician’s name and role.
Stated by Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to produce clear action plans and allocated tasks from handovers and escalations
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Require paediatric triage documentation to confirm SBAR verbal handover and monitor compliance through monthly audit.
Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Use designated Tier 3-or-above doctors to oversee children’s care, reducing handovers and improving continuity.
Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Review and circulate the Children and Young People escalation tool, including triage-time triggers and required escalation actions.
Stated by Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Data last updated 7 September 2026