Recurring concern

Unreliable safety monitoring and guidance for clozapine treatment

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Sep 2014•Latest report 14 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures or unresolved safety deficiencies in controls specifically dedicated to clozapine treatment, including evidence and guidance on serious adverse effects, blood and physical-health monitoring, cardiac monitoring, detection of blood cancers or cardiomyopathies, missed-test tracking, care plans, audit, toxicity warnings and communication to patients, families or staff.

Not included

  • Excludes medication-safety concerns involving medicines other than clozapine unless the report explicitly ties them to the clozapine safety system.
  • Excludes generic clinical training, communication, record-keeping or monitoring deficiencies that are not specifically dedicated to clozapine treatment.
  • Excludes prescribing, administration, supply or adherence failures where clozapine-specific safety monitoring or guidance is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes treatment of an established blood cancer, cardiomyopathy or other adverse effect after the clozapine safety-monitoring process has operated adequately.
  • Excludes general oncology, cardiac-screening or antipsychotic-treatment concerns without a material clozapine connection.
Reports
17

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
25

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
52

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care7
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency4
NHS England3
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Royal College of Psychiatrists2
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
BNF Publications1
Britannia Pharmaceuticals Limited1
Cardiff & Vale University LHB1
Care Quality Commission1
Croydon University Hospital1
Devon Partnership NHS Trust1
Edgware Community Hospital1
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Turner was a 63-year-old man who was found deceased at his home on 18 April 2025; a postmortem identified citalopram toxicity as the cause of death. The concern raised was that there was no local or national guidance on what steps to take when a high serum level is returned in patients monitored while taking clozapine.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on steps to take when high serum clozapine levels are returned

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That when a high serum level is returned in patients being monitored as they are taking clozapine, there is no guidance, locally or nationally as to what steps should be taken. ”

    Source location

    Mr Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to all Mental Health Chief Pharmacists requesting local clozapine clinics review and update plasma-level monitoring information and support materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to this case, NHS England has written to all Mental Health Chief Pharmacists in England to ask them to work with their local clozapine clinics to review the information and support materials that they use. This is to help ensure the safe and appropriate use of plasma level monitoring within their Trusts, and ensure these are up to date and embedded locally.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a clozapine standard operating procedure covering prescribing, monitoring, administration, supply and assessment of serum levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Midlands Partnership University Hospitals Trust does have a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in place relating to clozapine. We are sorry that the evidence heard at inquest contradicted the actual position. The SOP sets out the criteria which need to be adhered to when using clozapine to ensure safe and effective practice and includes information and support to clinicians in relation to the prescribing, monitoring, administration and supply of clozapine. The current version of the SOP has been in place since July 2024 and was in place at the time of Mr Turner’s death in April 2025. A copy of the SOP is attached for ease.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recirculate the clozapine standard operating procedure to all Integrated Mental Health Team prescribers in Burntwood and Lichfield.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SOP is readily available for all staff to access on the Trust’s intranet site. Since the inquest the SOP has been recirculated to all prescribers in the Integrated Mental Health Team in Burntwood and Lichfield. The application of this SOP has also been discussed with the team.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing national and local guidance is considered sufficient to support decisions on high clozapine plasma levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the majority of NHS trusts clozapine treatment will be undertaken though a dedicated clozapine clinic where the overall safe prescribing and associated monitoring will be undertaken.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Interpretation of clozapine plasma levels is assigned to individual trusts, based on general guidance and local clinical circumstances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary, the interpretation of clozapine plasma levels should be individualised at trust level, based on the general guidance contained in all the above information.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A Trust SOP already provides local guidance on assessing high clozapine serum levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “That when a high serum level is returned in patients being monitored as they are taking clozapine, there is no guidance, locally or nationally as to what steps should be taken.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Guidance cannot be more prescriptive because individual toxicity, clinical response and mental-health risks require clinician-specific decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SOP contains what is considered to be guidance to support clinical decision making. There are a number of patient variability factors that would need to be taken into account when clinical staff are making decisions, for example, the clinician would need to consider if the patient is displaying any signs of toxicity and if there would be any potential impact on the patient’s mental health if clozapine were to be reduced or stopped, ahead of making a decision and for that reason guidance is not more prescriptive.”

    Source location

    2026-0065 - Response from Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Luke John Chatterton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Luke John Chatterton had a history of Clozapine-related constipation and developed vomiting, severe pain and suspected intestinal obstruction. He was discharged from the emergency department after an X-ray, later deteriorated and suffered a cardiac arrest, with delays in advanced life support before he died. The principal concerns were the safety and timeliness of resuscitation for detained mental health patients and the identification and escalation of risks associated with suspected obstruction in patients taking Clozapine.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify the risks of deterioration and death from suspected acute obstruction in patients chronically on Clozapine

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The acute Trust has taken a number of steps to facilitate identifying the risks of a patient who is referred with suspected obstruction. Outstanding is the development with the mental health Trust of an educational package and guidelines for managing suspected acute obstruction, including pseudo-obstruction (a complication of Clozapine) and recognizing the rare but potentially fatal risks of anti-psychotics. There is currently no national formal guideline on management of bowel obstruction. Given the rarity of antipsychotic induced acute obstruction, there seems to be merit in alerting national professional bodies to enable consideration to be given to the development of a guideline, which might identify the use of red flags to escalate and investigate those at most risk. ”

    Source location

    Mr Luke John Chatterton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. London South

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia and was taking Clozapine, developed persistent vomiting, dehydration and an ileus before suffering a ruptured oesophagus and dying in hospital on 2 January 2021. The report identified concerns about clinical staff failing to recognise the potentially fatal gastrointestinal side effects of Clozapine and about the inappropriate use of a community treatment order instead of continued detention under a mental health section. The inquest narrative also described failures to recognise the need for face-to-face psychiatric assessment after his deterioration following discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clinical staff awareness of Clozapine's potential fatal side effects

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of awareness by a series of clinical staff of the potential fatal side effects of Clozapine ”

    Source location

    Mr Luke Alexander Worrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raised clinician awareness of clozapine side effects by communicating associated risks to mental health chief pharmacists and health communities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has undertaken considerable work to highlight to clinicians and colleagues the importance of keeping people safe from the side effects of Clozapine, which are well-recognised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clozapine product information and consider whether warnings for healthcare professionals, patients and carers can be clarified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continuously review the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, we are reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year, and we will inform you of the outcome.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage relevant stakeholders during the clozapine product-information review to ensure regulatory documents meet patients’ and prescribers’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continuously review the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, we are reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year, and we will inform you of the outcome.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commenting on clinical decisions in specific cases, including those concerning clozapine, is outside the respondent’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have considered the evidence provided and the circumstances leading to Mr Worrell’s death and acknowledge that your concerns relate to lack of awareness of clinical staff of the potentially fatal side effects of clozapine, and clinical decisions. Unfortunately, we cannot directly address these points, as it is not within our remit to comment on the clinical decisions in specific cases.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2025

    Open published response
  4. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Antony Northcott, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia, was found deceased on 13 July 2021 after suffering a sudden fatal cardiac arrhythmia. The report raised concerns about the adequacy and consistency of information on clozapine side effects and cardiac warning signs, the detection of cardiomyopathies in patients taking clozapine, and communication between agencies and care teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely detect Clozapine-associated cardiomyopathies

    Wider context from the report

    “The risk of myocarditis is reasonably well explained in Devon Partnership NHS Trust's policy documentation, but there is less of a focus on cardiomyopathies which would include left ventricular hypertrophy. I understand that the Trust's guidance is based on national guidance. Annual ECGs are required for patients prescribed Clozapine and questions about cardiac function will now be asked at monthly Clozapine clinics. However, I understand that ECGs are not a diagnostic tool used to assist in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies such as left ventricular hypertrophy and that left ventricular hypertrophy can be asymptomatic. I also understand that an echocardiogram may be able to identify such cardiomyopathies, but that this is not currently required on initiation of Clozapine or routinely at any other time whilst a patient is taking Clozapine. I am concerned that these cardiomyopathies could therefore go undetected in patients prescribed Clozapine and leave them at unknown increased risk of fatal cardiac arrhythmias, as occurred in William's case. Given that the Trust's guidance is based on national guidance I am concerned this may be a national issue. ”

    Source location

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited provision of Clozapine side-effect and red-flag information to patients attending GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Currently around 60% of the cohort of patients prescribed Clozapine who are under the care of Devon Partnership Trust have access to these clinics. The other 40% will attend their GP surgery for their monthly Clozapine phlebotomy service. The phlebotomy service provided at a GP practice is usually an appointment with a non-qualified member of staff, who will not have been specifically trained in the side effects of Clozapine. I am therefore concerned that the level of care provided to patients attending Clozapine clinics on a monthly basis, is likely to be superior to the care provided to those patients who attend their GP practice. In particular, I am concerned that any discussion and repetition of information surrounding red flags and side effects associated with Clozapine, and advice about when to seek medical attention, will be significantly more limited for those patients attending their GP practice than for those attending the monthly Clozapine clinics. I am also concerned that this limitation is likely to extend further than the 40% of patients in receipt of Clozapine under the care of Devon Partnership NHS Trust and that this may be a national issue. ”

    Source location

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add questions about recent physical illness, palpitations, chest pain, breathlessness and dizziness to monthly Clozapine clinic appointments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At these appointments healthcare professionals will specifically ask patients about their smoking habit, caffeine intake, bowel movements, hypersalivation, sedation, nausea, incontinence, heartburn, infection, and medication changes, in addition to open questions about any other side effects a patient might be experiencing. I am also assured that Devon Partnership NHS Trust will be including additional questions to be discussed at this appointment surrounding recent physical illnesses, palpitations, chest pain, breathlessness and dizziness.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue seeking expert opinions on screening unsuspected patients for Clozapine-associated cardiomyopathy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following your concerns we have reviewed the evidence based regarding Clozapine physical health monitoring and will be continuing seeking expert opinions as regarding the screening for cardiomyopathy in unsuspected patients to decrease the risk of harm.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure clinicians conducting clozapine monitoring appointments are aware of relevant physical effects and side effects.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Health Care Assistant appointment, there is a follow-up In Person or telephone call with a GP or trained clinician who reviews the results and undertakes a review of their Mental Health care plan. The Practice has ensured that all GPs and clinicians carrying out these appointments are made aware of the physical effects of clozapine/side effects to look out for.”

    Source location

    Response from The Pembroke Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share discussion outcomes and relevant national policy changes concerning Clozapine cardiac monitoring within local systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: NHS Devon is aware that clinical leads from Devon Partnership NHS Trust are in active discussions with the Royal College of Psychiatrists to consider new and emerging national evidence, including the findings set out in The Williams Protocol. NHS Devon will ensure that the outcomes of these discussions, and any changes to national policy, are shared and implemented within local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement relevant changes arising from national policy developments within local systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: NHS Devon is aware that clinical leads from Devon Partnership NHS Trust are in active discussions with the Royal College of Psychiatrists to consider new and emerging national evidence, including the findings set out in The Williams Protocol. NHS Devon will ensure that the outcomes of these discussions, and any changes to national policy, are shared and implemented within local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish specialist Clozapine clinics providing monthly side-effect screening and patient discussions during phlebotomy appointments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) The inquest heard evidence that there should be regular repetition of information to patients suffering from treatment resistant schizophrenia about the risks and red flags associated with the side effects of taking Clozapine. Since William's death Devon Partnership NHS Trust has set up Clozapine clinics which provide the opportunity for staff who are familiar with the side effects associated with Clozapine to discuss these with patients attending for their monthly phlebotomy appointments (required for the purpose of monitoring their white blood cell count).”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a business case to increase resources for dedicated specialist Clozapine clinics across Devon.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Trust we have developed a business case in order for the organisation to increase resources and to bring all the patients receiving Clozapine onto dedicated Specialist Clozapine clinics across Devon in Barnstaple, Exeter and Torquay (excluding Plymouth where Livewell provide mental health services) to receive the Gold Standard in Physical health monitoring and side effects screening.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bring patients receiving Clozapine under Trust care onto dedicated specialist clinics across Devon, excluding Plymouth.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are around 230 patient that attend the DPT lead specialised Clozapine clinics where physical monitoring and side effects screening occurs in accordance to the regularity of when blood test is required. This varies between weekly, two weekly or every 4 weeks. However, the 40% that accounts for 160 patients that attend GP surgeries where the side effect monitoring and screening does not occur. For this group we will be implementing the following”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clozapine product information and consider improving its clarity for healthcare professionals, patients, families and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA continuously reviews the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, the MHRA is reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage relevant stakeholders during the clozapine product-information review to ensure regulatory documents meet patients’ and prescribers’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA continuously reviews the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, the MHRA is reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Withdraw from the agreement to provide clozapine phlebotomy services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We share the concerns of the Coroner in that patients attending Clozapine clinics could receive a higher standard of care than those attending their GP practices. For this reason, the Practice has withdrawn from the agreement with DPT to provide phlebotomy services (see letter dated 27/3/24). As stated in our previous correspondence, we had concerns that the psychiatric oversight provided by Devon Partnership NHS Trust for this cohort of patients fell below the service standard we would consider safe. We had concerns regarding the number of agencies involved in the monitoring and prescribing of clozapine, without sufficient responsibility being taken by one team. Clozapine clinics can give continuity of care for these patients and ensure that regular education and appropriate checks are undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from The Pembroke Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade additional funding to support more Clozapine clinics and increase access to specially trained professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: In the 2025/26 financial year, NHS Devon will be cascading additional funding to Devon Partnership NHS Trust to support the implementation of more Clozapine clinics. This will increase capacity and allow more patients to receive their care from specially trained professionals. The clinics provide vital opportunities to reinforce education around Clozapine side effects and risks, including red flags and when to seek urgent medical attention. We believe this will reduce variability in patient care and improve overall safety for individuals receiving Clozapine.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine echocardiography is not adopted for Clozapine cardiomyopathy screening because evidence does not support it and its cost is excessive.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However the screening for cardiomyopathy for unsuspected patients is significantly difficult. The current evidence based does not support the use of echocardiography as a pre-monitoring requisite given the excessive cost that this will bring. The incidence of cardiomyopathy in people taking Clozapine has been cited as 0.02% of patients in the USA and 0.1% in Australia. This is 1 in 1000 to 1 5000 patients taking Clozapine.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinical discussions with prescribers and care delivered by the Trust fall outside the regulator’s remit, so it cannot directly address them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have considered the evidence provided and the circumstances leading to Mr Northcott’s death and acknowledge that most of your concerns relate to clinical discussions between a patient and their prescriber or via the clinical care delivered by the Trust. Unfortunately, the MHRA cannot directly address these points, as it is not within our remit to comment on the clinical care in specific cases.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Primary care cannot undertake echocardiography for clozapine monitoring because it does not have echocardiography facilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have noted the comments by the Coroner that an ECG is not as helpful a diagnostic tool as echocardiography to assist in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. We agree that the use of echocardiography for monitoring of patients on clozapine could be explored, as this is used in some other countries. Again, this is something that could not be undertaken in Primary Care as we do not have echocardiography.”

    Source location

    Response from The Pembroke Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cardiac monitoring changes depend on updates to national clinical guidance, with local implementation following any such changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: NHS Devon is aware that clinical leads from Devon Partnership NHS Trust are in active discussions with the Royal College of Psychiatrists to consider new and emerging national evidence, including the findings set out in The Williams Protocol. NHS Devon will ensure that the outcomes of these discussions, and any changes to national policy, are shared and implemented within local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Sasha Drysdale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sasha Drysdale died on 28 March 2023 in hospital as a consequence of acute myeloid leukaemia transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome. She had previously been prescribed clozapine for treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder and was detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 at the time of her death. The concern raised was that further research is needed to establish whether clozapine materially increases the risk of certain blood cancers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Potential increased risk of certain blood cancers among patients taking Clozapine

    Wider context from the report

    “The court heard evidence as to a small number of studies conducted internationally which, whilst having small sample sizes, could be read as suggesting an increased incidence of certain forms of blood cancer amongst those taking Clozapine. I am concerned that further research is needed to either refute or confirm whether or not taking Clozapine materially increases the risk of a patient developing certain blood cancers. ”

    Source location

    Sasha Drysdale · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct routine pharmacovigilance, including case-report monitoring, literature review, signal assessment, regulatory reporting and periodic safety updates, with continued safety-profile assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Viatris has a robust pharmacovigilance system in place in respect of all of its products, including Clozaril®. All reported suspected adverse reactions to the Product are evaluated by Viatris’ pharmacovigilance team (PV team). Viatris undertakes routine and continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the Product.”

    Source location

    Response from Viatris UK Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a signal-validation and assessment exercise on potential associations between clozapine and haematological malignancies, including literature and safety-data analysis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3.9 As part of Viatris’ pharmacovigilance activities for the Product, if any new safety information (showing potential correlation between the Product and a potential safety issue) is identified from any of the activities listed in paragraph 3.3, it triggers a process whereby Viatris will undertake a signal validation and assessment exercise in accordance with GVP module IX. This exercise involves a thorough analysis of ICSR data available in Viatris’ global safety database, data from clinical studies, worldwide scientific literature, review of major health authorities websites and their publicly available safety database globally to collect as much information to evaluate any potential evidence supporting any association between the Product and a potential safety issue.”

    Source location

    Response from Viatris UK Healthcare Ltd
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue pharmacovigilance activities, including collecting and evaluating safety information and monitoring Zaponex’s safety profile.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Leyden Delta, as the marketing authorisation holder for Zaponex, has a pharmacovigilance and risk management system in place with processes for the continuous collection and evaluation of safety information. Leyden Delta takes proactive steps in conjunction with the regulatory authority when changes to the benefit/risk profile emerge.”

    Source location

    Response from Leyden Delta
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage and carefully review further research into clozapine and acute myeloid leukaemia.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Leyden Delta will continue to comply with its pharmacovigilance obligations and operating procedures for monitoring the safety profile of Zaponex. In particular we encourage, and will carefully review, any further research into clozapine (and indeed, AML) and we will not hesitate to take appropriate action should changes to the medicine’s safety profile emerge.”

    Source location

    Response from Leyden Delta
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MHRA, rather than NICE, should lead surveillance and investigation of clozapine’s safety and haematological malignancy risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to the main issue that you have asked us to respond to, you may be aware that NICE is not the regulator for medicines and medical devices in the UK; this is the role of the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The MHRA is responsible for issuing the marketing authorisation for medicines (also known as the licence) and has ongoing responsibility for monitoring their safety.”

    Source location

    Response from NICE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NIHR, rather than NICE, is responsible for clinical research into clozapine and related safety risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, NICE does not have a direct role in clinical research the UK; this is the role of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). You may wish to contact them directly regarding any upcoming research on this subject area.”

    Source location

    Response from NICE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Available evidence does not establish that clozapine increases the incidence of haematological malignancies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3.11 As part of Viatris’ signal validation and assessment exercise, Viatris reviewed the literature and analysed the safety data that was relied upon in these two articles, and concluded that no causal relationship between haematologic malignancies and clozapine could be established by either study. This is consistent with the conclusions reached by the authors in both studies. When assessed holistically against the adverse event and safety information contained in Viatris’ safety database and the fact that there are no regulatory documents available on this topic, the signal was not validated (i.e. the “signal”: a potential link between an increased incidence of haematological malignancies and clozapine use, was not proven).”

    Source location

    Response from Viatris UK Healthcare Ltd
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ongoing pharmacovigilance and routine safety monitoring are considered sufficient, so no additional action is required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3.12 Viatris’ assessment remains unchanged by the ongoing pharmacovigilance since the signal validation and assessment exercise in 2022. Accordingly no action is proposed.”

    Source location

    Response from Viatris UK Healthcare Ltd
    Page 6 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A causal relationship between clozapine and blood cancer has not been established or confirmed by current evidence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A causal relationship between Clozapine therapy and blood cancer (leukaemia) is at the current state of scientific knowledge not established and therefore not referenced in the SmPC.”

    Source location

    Response from Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The slightly increased blood-cancer risk associated with clozapine is outweighed by its overall reduction in mortality.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A statistically calculated slightly increased risk of Blood Cancer in Clozapine patients is outweighed by the overall reduction in mortality by Clozapine treatment.”

    Source location

    Response from Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There is no convincing evidence that clozapine causes acute myeloid leukaemia, and pharmacovigilance has identified no causal link.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In respect of the concern raised, concerning a potential for clozapine to cause AML, it is the considered position of Leyden Delta that there is no causal link between clozapine and AML. Neither we, nor the MHRA have identified such a link through pharmacovigilance. Upon receipt of your letter, Leyden Delta has additionally sought the expert opinion of their Consultant Haematologist,”

    Source location

    Response from Leyden Delta
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response
  6. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sean Benjamin CRAWFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sean Benjamin CRAWFORD died on 18 December 2020 in Darlington from the combined toxic effect of alcohol and clozapine, neither being individually at toxic levels. The principal concern was that available guidance and medication packaging warned about alcohol, sedation and potentially dangerous side effects but did not advise that death could result from this combination.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of clozapine packaging and leaflets to warn that combined use with alcohol may cause death

    Wider context from the report

    “The circumstances in which Sean came by his death, the combined effects of clozapine with alcohol, seems to be, statistically, very rare. None of the professionals who gave evidence in this case could cite a death with the same cause of death as that suffered by Sean. This said, clozapine is a well-established medication whose side effects are well known. It was originally developed in the 1960s. It is well-known that it requires careful management and monitoring. The side effects are recognised ones and widely known. None of the professional witnesses expressed any lack of familiarity with it or its side effects. One of these side effects is sedation. Likewise, obviously, alcohol is a recognised central nervous system depressant. This is a death from Central Nervous System Depression, consequent to a comparatively high level of clozapine and a comparatively high level of ethanol in the blood – neither individually fatal. It is evident that there is no guidance in any academic literature, British National Formulary, or NICE or MHRA advices on the dangers of death in this scenario. It is noticeable that the leaflet that comes with the Clozaril (clozapine) packages clearly states that it must not be taken with alcohol, and the evidence to me was that the medication comes with a further label, in a similar vein, on the packaging. Neither, however, advises of death being a possibility. All the literature advises that sedation is a potentially dangerous side effect of clozapine. Death from Central Nervous System Depression, over-sedation, is not uncommon. It is often associated with alcohol, and other substance, use. ”

    Source location

    Sean Benjamin CRAWFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on the risk of death from combined clozapine and alcohol use

    Wider context from the report

    “The circumstances in which Sean came by his death, the combined effects of clozapine with alcohol, seems to be, statistically, very rare. None of the professionals who gave evidence in this case could cite a death with the same cause of death as that suffered by Sean. This said, clozapine is a well-established medication whose side effects are well known. It was originally developed in the 1960s. It is well-known that it requires careful management and monitoring. The side effects are recognised ones and widely known. None of the professional witnesses expressed any lack of familiarity with it or its side effects. One of these side effects is sedation. Likewise, obviously, alcohol is a recognised central nervous system depressant. This is a death from Central Nervous System Depression, consequent to a comparatively high level of clozapine and a comparatively high level of ethanol in the blood – neither individually fatal. It is evident that there is no guidance in any academic literature, British National Formulary, or NICE or MHRA advices on the dangers of death in this scenario. It is noticeable that the leaflet that comes with the Clozaril (clozapine) packages clearly states that it must not be taken with alcohol, and the evidence to me was that the medication comes with a further label, in a similar vein, on the packaging. Neither, however, advises of death being a possibility. All the literature advises that sedation is a potentially dangerous side effect of clozapine. Death from Central Nervous System Depression, over-sedation, is not uncommon. It is often associated with alcohol, and other substance, use. ”

    Source location

    Sean Benjamin CRAWFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a further assessment of clozapine product information on drug-drug interactions and consider improvements for healthcare professionals, patients, families and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have considered the evidence provided and the circumstances leading to Mr Crawford’s death. We have also recently met with a member of Mr Crawford’s immediate family to discuss their concerns. Some of these relate to clinical discussions between a patient and their prescriber which we are not able to address, as it is not within our remit to comment on the clinical care in specific cases. However, because of the nature of some of the concerns raised, we intend to conduct a further assessment of the information provided within the clozapine product information regarding drug-drug interactions. As part of this assessment, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the British National Formulary as the clozapine assessment progresses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that you have also written to the BNF, and we will work with them as our assessment progresses. In the meantime, we will continue to closely monitor the safety of clozapine, including cases of drug-drug interactions. Should any updates to the product information be required we will issue an article in our bulletin to healthcare professionals “Drug Safety Update” accordingly.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and revise pharmacodynamic interaction wording on sedative and CNS-depressant risks in BNF messages and tables.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address the concerns raised in your report, we plan to review the wording around the use of drugs that cause sedation (including clozapine and alcohol) and drugs with CNS depressant effects (including alcohol) within the pharmacodynamic interaction messages and in the tables. This will further highlight that concurrent use of two or more drugs that can cause sedation and / or CNS depression might increase the risk of CNS depressant effects, such as sedation, unconsciousness, coma, respiratory depression, and cardiovascular depression, and / or enhance the effects of drugs with CNS depressant effects. In addition, the pharmacodynamic interaction tables have now been added to the online versions of the BNF and BNFC ensuring this content is more accessible to users.”

    Source location

    Response from BNF
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add pharmacodynamic interaction tables to online BNF and BNFC versions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BNF includes information on pharmacodynamic interactions, that is interactions between drugs which have similar or antagonistic pharmacological effects or side-effects. This information is present within interaction messages of relevant drug monographs in online versions of the BNF and the BNF app. The same information is presented in tables in print editions of the BNF, but at the time of this death, these tables were not present in online versions of the BNF or in the BNF + BNFC app.”

    Source location

    Response from BNF
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the coroner’s report with NICE for consideration of its findings in published guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “should not be taken due to the potential harm to the patient. Departmental officials, however, have shared your report with NICE, so it can consider the impact of your findings on its published guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MHRA is responsible for assessing and potentially improving clozapine product information about drug interactions and associated safety risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am aware that the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has provided a response in respect of the key concern you raise in the report. As you will be aware, MHRA is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) with responsibility for the regulation of medicinal products in the UK. The MHRA ensures that medicines are efficacious and acceptably safe, and that any possible side effects which have been reported to occur with use of a medicine are appropriately described in the authorised product information. However, MHRA has recognised in the response that none of the authorised product information specifically mention any risk of death because of the interaction with alcohol.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE is responsible for considering whether the report’s findings should affect published guidance on clozapine and alcohol risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is the independent body responsible for developing authoritative, evidence-based guidance on best practice for the health and care system. NICE guidelines are developed by experts based on a thorough assessment of the available evidence and through extensive engagement with stakeholders. Healthcare professionals are expected to take them into full account in their decision making, although it is important to note that NICE guidelines are not mandatory and do not override a clinician’s responsibility to make decisions appropriate to individual patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response
  7. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Sebastian Harry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sebastian Harry Daniels, who had paranoid schizophrenia and was treated with clozapine, developed severe hypertriglyceridemia and necrotising pancreatitis before dying from multiple organ failure on 4 July 2021. Concerns included the failure to escalate abnormal triglyceride results, unclear communication of required GP actions in hospital discharge summaries, delays in addressing identified deficiencies, and the requirement for patients taking clozapine to attend separate appointments for some blood tests.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of clozapine services to provide annual physical-health blood testing

    Wider context from the report

    “3. In relation to the blood tests required under the clozapine guidelines I was informed that Southern Health take the monthly blood tests and run these in the clozapine clinic. However the blood tests required of the annual physical health checks are not taken by the Southern Health staff but rather patients are required to attend phlebotomy services elsewhere for the blood to be taken. I heard evidence during the inquest that Mr Daniels had missed some of these blood test appointments which meant his full tests were not carried out when expected. Clozapine is prescribed only to patients suffering from an enduring mental health condition for whom other medication has not been effective which indicates that they may be at risk of having difficulty managing appointments. I heard evidence from the consultant psychiatrist responsible for Mr Daniel’s treatment that they were not permitted to take the blood samples and submit them to the local laboratory for testing. I was informed that the Southern Health staff had requested to be able to do this to avoid the patient having to attend another appointment. I have reviewed further information provided after the inquest by the Clinical Director of Southern Health. She has explained that they lack the facilities to complete the full blood tests and the lack the resources to take and deliver samples to the laboratories; noting that no community mental health teams in their trust routinely provide phlebotomy services. She has advised that they are focussed on better communication with primary care and assertive outreach where necessary. I remain concerned that patients on high risk medication, who by the nature of their mental health condition may struggle to attend appointments, are required to arrange or attend separate blood tests. I note that clozapine clinic staff also blood monthly and that the physical health reviews are carried out by doctors all of whom should be capable of taking a blood sample for submission to a laboratory. ”

    Source location

    Sebastian Harry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operationalise blood sampling in Mid and North Hampshire Clozapine clinics using equipment, blood transport arrangements and a staff rota.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mid and North area have volunteered to operationalise this as an early adopter and since receipt of the Regulation 28 report have identified the equipment needed, made arrangements to have bloods transported to Andover War Memorial Hospital lab and have developed a rota of who would be able to take blood in each clinic. They are now working through how best to identify which patients need which bloods when, how to record when these have been taken and how to optimise or supplement current patient record systems to be able to track and follow up on results.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop systems to identify required blood tests, record completed samples, optimise patient records and track results for Mid and North Hampshire Clozapine clinics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mid and North area have volunteered to operationalise this as an early adopter and since receipt of the Regulation 28 report have identified the equipment needed, made arrangements to have bloods transported to Andover War Memorial Hospital lab and have developed a rota of who would be able to take blood in each clinic. They are now working through how best to identify which patients need which bloods when, how to record when these have been taken and how to optimise or supplement current patient record systems to be able to track and follow up on results.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review variation in service provision across Clozapine clinics and use the findings to inform improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mid and North area have volunteered to operationalise this as an early adopter and since receipt of the Regulation 28 report have identified the equipment needed, made arrangements to have bloods transported to Andover War Memorial Hospital lab and have developed a rota of who would be able to take blood in each clinic. They are now working through how best to identify which patients need which bloods when, how to record when these have been taken and how to optimise or supplement current patient record systems to be able to track and follow up on results.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish consistent principles across Clozapine clinics for annual health-check capacity, preferred onsite blood sampling and robust results-review systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mid and North area have volunteered to operationalise this as an early adopter and since receipt of the Regulation 28 report have identified the equipment needed, made arrangements to have bloods transported to Andover War Memorial Hospital lab and have developed a rota of who would be able to take blood in each clinic. They are now working through how best to identify which patients need which bloods when, how to record when these have been taken and how to optimise or supplement current patient record systems to be able to track and follow up on results.”

    Source location

    Response from Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN was found collapsed on the bathroom floor at his home on 28 November 2022 and was confirmed deceased shortly afterwards. The medical cause of death was determined to be sudden cardiac death in schizophrenia. Concerns included inadequate systems for monitoring, communicating and acting on high clozapine levels and medication changes, as well as deficiencies in internal investigation, understanding of clozapine and pharmacy resourcing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding of clozapine level monitoring, interpretation and response

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Understanding of clozapine: I heard evidence that there was a lack of understanding of when to measure clozapine levels, how to interpret high clozapine levels and then how to respond to a high level. ”

    Source location

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to highlight high clozapine results in routinely used clinical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “3. How to record high clozapine levels: The clozapine and nor clozapine levels are recorded in the pharmacy section of the records. There was no system for highlighting high clozapine results in the rio notes which are routinely used by all clinicians. ”

    Source location

    Mohammed Khalid HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue safety advice recommending clozapine blood-concentration monitoring in specified clinical situations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA has previously been alerted to a fatal case involving clozapine toxicity. This issue was reviewed and considered by our expert advisory committee. In August 2020, the MHRA issued a Drug Safety Update article advising monitoring of blood concentrations of clozapine for toxicity in certain clinical situations (Clozapine and other antipsychotics: monitoring blood concentrations for toxicity - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)). These include when: a patient stops smoking or switches to an e-cigarette; concomitant medicines are prescribed which may interact to increase blood clozapine levels; a patient has pneumonia or other serious infection; reduced clozapine metabolism is suspected, or toxicity is suspected.”

    Source location

    Response Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to marketing authorisation holders to investigate further thresholds for clozapine toxicity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “under close review, including reviewing Yellow Card cases and we will be writing to the marketing authorisation holders to investigate further thresholds for clozapine toxicity.”

    Source location

    Response Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver and record a clozapine training webinar for clinical staff, with intranet access for those unable to attend.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A number of training elements are being planned:”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop clozapine e-learning modules and take them to the Learning and Development team for approval.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Development of a series of e-learning modules on the trust e-learning platform form the Learn It Online resource www.learnitonline.co.uk. Clinical staff will be able to access these as part of their on-going training to improve knowledge around clozapine. This is anticipated that the team will be able to take this to the Learning and Development team by September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a specialist Pharmacy Clozapine Team to support assay follow-up, staff training and clozapine prescribing practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The Trust has multidisciplinary experts on the subject of clozapine. There is also expertise in the Pharmacy Clozapine Team; to support follow up of raised clozapine plasma assays but more importantly to support all teams involved with the use of clozapine with training in the handling of clozapine and promotion of the trust clozapine prescribing guidelines and procedures. This team is expected to be established by September 2023. All these colleagues will be made known to staff for any advice that is needed. Staff can also ask for help through their manager, who can signpost them accordingly. This will help improve the skills and experience in responding to results on clozapine levels appropriately with the care of the patient at the centre of all decisions.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Put support processes in place to guide clinicians who are new to the Trust when clozapine prescribing advice is needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where a clinician may be new to the Trust there will be clear instructions to ask for support at the time of need and the line manager, team managers and clinical director will have processes in place to guide them to ensure they have the right advice.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Email prescribers about documenting care decisions and clinical review following out-of-range clozapine results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Training is aimed to be in place to ensure that staff are confident in the use of clozapine and its monitoring in the future. We have sent an email to all prescribers about the need to record about decisions of care following a clozapine result that may be out of range, the need to ensure there is clinical review and this is documented.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an urgent clozapine learning session and provide future training and development to refresh staff knowledge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the last PFD in August 2020 the Trust made significant changes to the processes and procedures surrounding clozapine and its use. However this case has highlighted areas of learning. Consequently, the Trust has now put into place an urgent learning session along with future planned training and development to ensure staff keep up to date with this and learning is refreshed, alongside other additional support systems that have previously been introduced.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing ICE access, abnormal-result indicators and pharmacy reporting provide the strongest safeguards for recording and responding to high clozapine levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All blood test results are made available to staff in the ICE system, which is provided to us by our pathology service provider. This system is used both for ordering tests and reviewing results. It is accessed from within Rio and in patient context, so all staff have ready access to results. In common with most other systems, abnormal results are indicated within the system along with the normal reference range.”

    Source location

    Response Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response
  9. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Allen collapsed suddenly at the nursing home where he resided on 31 December 2019 and died soon after arriving at hospital. The medical cause of death was clozapine toxicity. Concerns included a high clozapine blood level not being acted upon, inadequate monitoring and dose adjustment after smoking cessation, and the absence of a system to escalate blood test results to the consultant.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear national guidance on clozapine monitoring frequency and blood test type

    Wider context from the report

    “4. I heard evidence at the inquest that there was a general lack of understanding about clozapine monitoring, which blood test to undertake and the general effect this drug can have on patients. I heard evidence that national guidance was required to clearly set out how frequently clozapine levels should be monitored and what type of blood test should be undertaken. ”

    Source location

    Ian Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding of the importance and frequency of clozapine level monitoring

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was a general lack of understanding at the inquest about the importance of monitoring clozapine levels and how frequently these levels should be monitored. ”

    Source location

    Ian Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on high clozapine blood test results through repeat testing and dose adjustment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. In February 2019 a blood test result confirmed that Mr Allen had a high level of clozapine in his blood. This was not acted upon and no further blood test was taken. The clozapine dose was not adjusted as it should have been. ”

    Source location

    Ian Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding of clozapine monitoring, blood test selection and drug effects

    Wider context from the report

    “4. I heard evidence at the inquest that there was a general lack of understanding about clozapine monitoring, which blood test to undertake and the general effect this drug can have on patients. I heard evidence that national guidance was required to clearly set out how frequently clozapine levels should be monitored and what type of blood test should be undertaken. ”

    Source location

    Ian Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver clozapine education for junior doctors through the postgraduate medical education programme, using learning from the regulation 28 report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, we are working with our Post Graduate Medical Education training programme to utilise the learning from the regulation 28 report in the training of junior doctors on the use of clozapine and the importance of acting upon abnormal results where it is deemed necessary.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional clozapine training to pharmacists to promote consistent advice and rapid responses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This guidance will be approved in November 2020 and once this has been completed, this will be disseminated round the Trust as a reminder to other staff to ensure that they are complying with the updated guidance. We have already provided all pharmacists with some additional training on Clozapine so we have more consistent advice and can respond quickly where necessary.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft and send a clozapine safety alert to clinicians to support immediate action where necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, as we set out in response to your first point, further education will be built into the Post Graduate Medical Education programme to address any gaps in knowledge on clozapine. A safety alert is also being drafted and sent to all clinicians so that immediate action can be taken where necessary.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit all patients prescribed clozapine on the identified doctor’s caseload for unconsidered anomalous results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have commenced an audit of all patients prescribed Clozapine on Dr ████████’s caseload to ensure that there are no other patients for whom anomalous results have not been considered. In addition, we are in the process of issuing a practice alert to all of our Doctors reminding them of the importance of review when anomalous results are evident.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a practice alert to doctors reminding them to review anomalous clozapine results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have commenced an audit of all patients prescribed Clozapine on Dr ████████’s caseload to ensure that there are no other patients for whom anomalous results have not been considered. In addition, we are in the process of issuing a practice alert to all of our Doctors reminding them of the importance of review when anomalous results are evident.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen multidisciplinary meeting focus on physical health and include clozapine in quality-improvement checks of testing and abnormal-result actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have existing Multi-Disciplinary team meetings in place across our organisation and are now specifically strengthening the focus on physical health within these meetings utilising a quality improvement approach. This will provide an additional system for checking that periodic tests have taken place, ensuring that they are routinely acted upon when they are abnormal. Clozapine has now been added to this project to increase awareness.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send pharmacy reports of clozapine results above 600 to the Clozapine Lead for direct escalation to the Consultant and Divisional Pharmacist.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a system in place whereby anomalous results received are escalated to the Consultant, for example, via the Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting, the administrative staff in receipt of paper results or by junior medical staff who have checked electronic investigations; however on this occasion it appears that this failed. We have therefore put in place an additional control whereby our Information Team will send a report to the pharmacy Clozapine Lead of any results >600 so that these can be escalated directly to the Consultant and the Divisional Pharmacist so that appropriate action can be taken. This will include discussion and action where appropriate at the Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the Trust clozapine guidelines following the investigation into Mr Allen’s death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you may be aware from the Mr ████████s evidence at inquest; the Trust is currently in the process of reviewing and updating the Trust Clozapine guidelines following the investigation carried out into Mr Allen’s death. We understand that on 26 August 2020, in response to the Prevention of Future death reports from the Coroner there has now been an update in the MHRA guidance in relation to clozapine.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the approved updated clozapine guidance across the Trust as a staff reminder.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This guidance will be approved in November 2020 and once this has been completed, this will be disseminated round the Trust as a reminder to other staff to ensure that they are complying with the updated guidance. We have already provided all pharmacists with some additional training on Clozapine so we have more consistent advice and can respond quickly where necessary.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine blood levels is not required; authorised product information specifies monitoring requirements and toxicity-related exceptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The patient monitoring requirements for clozapine include the measurement of clinical parameters such as regular full blood counts; blood pressure; electrocardiograms; hepatic enzymes; blood sugar, lipids and weight. Therapeutic drug monitoring of blood plasma levels is not currently required under the terms of the clozapine marketing authorisation.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Dept-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE guideline 178 does not require updating because clozapine toxicity risks are detailed in the BNF and authorised product information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NICE advises that while it is recognised that the current recommendations in the NICE guideline may not fully take account of the adverse effects and risks of toxicity associated with the use of clozapine, these are specified in detail in the British National Formulary⁷ and, as already explained, the SmPC for prescribers which contains advice on interactions that can influence blood levels of clozapine.”

    Source location

    2020-0161-Response-from-Dept-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Wayne Lee Millett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wayne Lee Millett, a detained patient at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle, had treatment-resistant schizophrenia treated with Clozapine and died there on 13 February 2019 after escalating abdominal symptoms, collapse and complications including pseudo-obstruction of the small bowel. The report raised concerns that the Care Plan was not followed, that the Priory’s investigation and quality-assurance processes were inadequate, and that care-plan compliance and Clozapine-related monitoring had not been sufficiently reviewed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear care plans for monitoring Clozapine side-effects and directing staff response to suspected serious complications

    Wider context from the report

    “4) It is a matter of concern that, notwithstanding the cause of death identified on Post Mortem Examination and despite nearly a year having passed since Mr Millett’s death, the organisation has yet to formally review the care plans of all patients prescribed Clozapine, with a view to ensuring each relevant patient has in place a clear plan for monitoring of potential side-effects of the medication, which gives clear and authoritative direction to staff as to how to act if serious complications are suspected. It is a particular matter of concern that this step has not been taken, given the evidence heard from the Peripatetic Director of Clinical Services which suggested this would be a straightforward measure to accomplish, and one which could be completed within 28 days. ”

    Source location

    Wayne Lee Millett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to formally review care plans for patients prescribed Clozapine

    Wider context from the report

    “4) It is a matter of concern that, notwithstanding the cause of death identified on Post Mortem Examination and despite nearly a year having passed since Mr Millett’s death, the organisation has yet to formally review the care plans of all patients prescribed Clozapine, with a view to ensuring each relevant patient has in place a clear plan for monitoring of potential side-effects of the medication, which gives clear and authoritative direction to staff as to how to act if serious complications are suspected. It is a particular matter of concern that this step has not been taken, given the evidence heard from the Peripatetic Director of Clinical Services which suggested this would be a straightforward measure to accomplish, and one which could be completed within 28 days. ”

    Source location

    Wayne Lee Millett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue Clozapine guidelines and a care-plan template covering medication side effects and their management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As above, we are very much a learning organisation and we saw the matters raised at the Inquest concerning Mr Millett as an opportunity to review the way in which we manage the prescription and management of Clozapine. We have now allocated a Clozapine learning and development module to all doctors and qualified nurses. We have also issued Clozapine guidelines and an associated care plan “template” which gives clear details on the potential side-effects of the medication and how best to manage those.”

    Source location

    2020-0031-Response-from-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the 2020 formal audit of patient care plans and analyse its results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note there are systems in place which ensure that patient care plans are regularly audited. These systems include Ward Managers and the Director of Compliance at each hospital having a responsibility for undertaking regular “spot-checks” by way of completing the monthly Quality Walk Rounds during which the care records of patients are reviewed and evaluated. Our Healthcare Division Quality Team also undertakes a formal annual audit of care plans. The 2020 audit was unfortunately delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic but was completed last month with the audit results currently being analysed.”

    Source location

    2020-0031-Response-from-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026