Recurring concern

Unsafe allocation and competence of specialist sexual-offences investigators

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 19 Nov 2019•Latest report 6 Oct 2020

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated specialist sexual-offences investigation process involving pre-deployment specialist training, experience or competence requirements, allocation of cases to appropriately qualified officers, and related assurance that investigators can safely handle allegations.

Not included

  • Excludes generic police recruitment, training or staffing deficiencies not specifically tied to specialist sexual-offences investigation competence or allocation.
  • Excludes investigation-quality failures unrelated to investigator competence or case allocation, such as evidence handling or victim communication, unless they are directly part of the specialist investigator competence control.
  • Excludes child sexual-assault investigation failures where specialist sexual-offences investigator competence or allocation is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes failures involving other specialist investigative functions, such as domestic-abuse or general public-protection investigations, unless the assertion explicitly concerns specialist sexual-offences investigator arrangements.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
2

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2019–2020

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
0

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

College of Policing1
Department for Education1
Department of Health and Social Care1
South Yorkshire Police1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Emily Greene · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily Greene was found hanging from a tree in fields at the rear of Doghill, Shafton, Barnsley, on 16 November 2018, and the evidence was that she took her own life. The inquest identified concerns including inadequate specialist training, deficiencies in the sexual-assault investigation, unclear referral handling, failure to sensitively explain the decision not to pursue the allegation, unsuitable facilities for recording victim video, and mishandling of the missing-person report.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide specialist training before officers start work in a specialist sexual offences unit

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was employment of an officer into a specialist sexual offences unit without the officer being given specialist training before he started work ”

    Source location

    Emily Greene · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Katie Croft · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katie Croft was a vulnerable child who had reported abuse and later disclosed thoughts of self-harm. She was found suspended from a ligature at home, sustained catastrophic brain damage, and died in hospital on 15 January 2019. Concerns included shortcomings in the police and social-care responses, failures to fully hear Katie’s voice and share relevant information, and uncertainty about guidance for schools teaching material involving suicide to vulnerable pupils.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to allocate appropriately experienced specialist officers to alleged sexual offences

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest was told that GMP followed their own guidance which accorded with that of the College of Policing into the level of expertise of the officer allocated to investigate Katie’s allegations. As a result of this the case was not dealt with by an experienced Public Protection or specialist sexual offences trained officer. It was allocated to a probationary police constable with approximately 6 months experience. The officer did not seize the phone which contained key social media contents until her third visit on the initial evening the offence was disclosed. The allocated officer was not experienced in joint working with social services or familiar with the concept of the voice of the child and what it would mean in such a case. At the time the decision was made by police to NFA matters there was no discussion about whether there could be a victimless prosecution; it was not established if the initial account was recorded on body worn footage or the extent of the social media contact by the suspect and the nature of any offences that could be revealed by those messages. No attempt was made to have a further face to face conversation with Katie; ”

    Source location

    Katie Croft · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026