Recurring concern

Unsafe overtaking controls on hazardous road sections

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Oct 2014•Latest report 2 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in road layout, road markings or other controls specifically intended to prevent, restrict or safely manage overtaking on a hazardous road section.

Not included

  • Excludes generic road-layout inadequacy not tied to overtaking control.
  • Excludes speed-limit, pedestrian-crossing, visibility, lighting or other road-safety deficiencies unless they are specifically dedicated to preventing or managing overtaking.
  • Excludes driver education, enforcement or generic inspection failures that are not explicitly tied to this overtaking-control concern.
Reports
9

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
10

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
14

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

National Highways2
Cheshire East Council1
Cheshire East Highways Department1
Cornwall Council1
Department for Transport1
Durham County Council1
Family1
Lincolnshire County Council1
Moss Farm1
Newport City Council1
North and Mid Wales Trunk Road Agent1
Office of the Chief Coroner1
Powys Highways Department1
Wiltshire Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Nathan Thomas CYSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nathan Thomas Cyster died at the scene on 29 March 2025 after his motorcycle collided with a BMW X5 on the A5 Watling Street. The report identifies concerns about the hazardous right-turn layout at the Moss Farm Shop exit, the absence of left-turn-only signage, ineffective road markings against prohibited overtaking, and ambiguity in legal guidance about right turns across double white lines.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of road markings to prevent prohibited overtaking and right turns

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Ineffectiveness of Road Markings in Preventing Prohibited Overtaking Although the road markings at this location—including double solid white lines and hatched areas—are intended to prohibit overtaking by vehicles (including motorcycles) travelling from Cannock and the Turf Island towards the Moss Farm junction, available evidence demonstrates that these markings are not effective in practice. CCTV analysis from the day of the collision and a separate 3-hour review period revealed that, within that window, 31 vehicles (28% of all vehicles exiting) turned right out of the Moss Farm Shop, and 7 motorcycles and 1 car overtook on the prohibited section prior to the junction. ”

    Source location

    Nathan Thomas CYSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a site visit and discuss observed traffic movements and overtaking at the A5 location.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Road markings on the A5 All Purpose Trunk Road (APTR) – National Highways Road Safety engineers conducted a site visit to this location on 9th February 2026 to observe traffic movements, particularly any occurrences of overtaking in contravention of the double white line system. Further to this site visit engineers have undertaken an initial discussion of the results of the site observations on the 10th February 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from National Highways
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate road markings, signing and carriageway layout on the A5 within National Highways’ jurisdiction to identify potential overtaking mitigation measures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will investigate the location to establish if any measures can be identified to reduce the occurrence of injudicious overtaking by drivers in contravention of the double white line system. This investigation will be restricted to the A5 within our jurisdiction and will cover road markings, signing and carriageway layout.”

    Source location

    Response from National Highways
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install a no-right-turn sign at the Moss Farm shop car-park exit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have taken away from the report that it is probably best if drivers leaving Moss Farm shop are advised not to turn right.”

    Source location

    2026-0051- Response Moss Farm Shop
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staffordshire Police is responsible for enforcing the double white line system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The responsibility for enforcement of the double white line system sits with Staffordshire Police.”

    Source location

    Response from National Highways
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enforcement of the road layout and guidance to road users is outside the respondent’s authority.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having read the report I can see that I can do very little to enforce the road layout and the guidance given to road users, as this is down to the highways department and the police to prevent motorists from breaking the rules of the road that are signed and have the appropriate road markings.”

    Source location

    2026-0051- Response Moss Farm Shop
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enforcement of signed road rules and road markings is assigned to the highways department and police.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having read the report I can see that I can do very little to enforce the road layout and the guidance given to road users, as this is down to the highways department and the police to prevent motorists from breaking the rules of the road that are signed and have the appropriate road markings.”

    Source location

    2026-0051- Response Moss Farm Shop
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National Highways is responsible for deciding appropriate road markings and signing at the specific site on its strategic road network.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department’s role is to set the overarching legal and policy framework, and to provide guidance to local highway authorities on how to provide various traffic management measures. National Highways is a government-owned company, established under the Infrastructure Act 2015, and operates at arm’s length from ministers. It is responsible for the day-to-day operation, maintenance and improvement of the strategic road network.”

    Source location

    2026-0051 - Response from Department of Transport
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The prescribed double white line marking and its inclusion in the Highway Code are considered sufficient for drivers to understand its meaning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to your comments on the double white line markings’ effectiveness to prevent overtaking in practice, the road marking has been prescribed in the”

    Source location

    2026-0051 - Response from Department of Transport
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The evidence does not necessarily show that drivers misunderstand the double white line marking; a site-specific factor may explain non-compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department believes that the meaning of this marking is well understood by drivers. Regarding the evidence provided, this does not necessarily translate to a lack of understanding of the road marking. There could be a specific site factor that causes the prohibition not to cross the white line marking to be disregarded.”

    Source location

    2026-0051 - Response from Department of Transport
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    KAIUS JOHN PAUL TUTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kaius John Paul Tutt died from multiple injuries after the motorcycle he was riding collided with a car on the A391 near St Austell on 14 October 2022. The principal concerns were faded or missing road-marking deflection arrows, visibility issues at the collision location, and the limited benefit of the downhill overtaking opportunity. The report also records a recommendation to amend the road layout, with no funding then available to facilitate it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Downhill overtaking section remaining at the location

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The court found that Cormac has made a recommendation to Cornwall Council that the road layout is amended to remove the downhill overtaking section at this location at the first reasonable opportunity, but that currently no funding is available to facilitate this recommendation. ”

    Source location

    KAIUS JOHN PAUL TUTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove the relevant downhill overtaking section as an independent safety measure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am pleased to confirm that the Highway Authority has arranged for the relevant downhill overtaking section to be removed at the earliest opportunity, which is likely to be around the end of June 2023. This will be carried out as an independent measure, rather than delayed to coincide with planned surfacing works later in the financial year. This is in line with the recommendation of our own investigation process as well as the subsequent inquest.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 June 2023

    Open published response
  3. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Darren WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren WILSON died at the scene after his car collided with vehicles during an overtaking manoeuvre on 20 April 2019. The inquest heard concerns that the collision location was a known accident hotspot and lacked traffic-calming measures, including a reduced speed limit and double white lines to prevent overtaking.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to deploy double white lines at the hazardous location

    Wider context from the report

    “i.        The Inquest heard from a Forensic Collision Investigator and a local resident who was also a former Highways Officer who both confirmed that the location of the collision was a notorious accident "hotspot", in that whilst there had been no previous fatalities, there had been innumerable "near misses" as well as non-fatal road traffic collisions; ii.       The inherent danger of the location arose because of a lack of traffic calming measures such as a reduction of the speed limit at this location as well as deployment of double white lines to inform drivers of the potential hazard and to prevent overtaking; ”

    Source location

    Darren WILSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Gareth John Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gareth John Williams died at 08.30 on 19 April 2018 from injuries sustained when his motorbike collided with a car while he was overtaking traffic on the A468 near Machen. The report identified travelling in excess of the speed limit and overtaking as contributing to the collision, and raised concern about whether extending double white lines could restrict overtaking on that stretch of road.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of double white lines restricting overtaking on the A468

    Wider context from the report

    “Gareth John Williams died when the motorcycle he was riding was in a collision with a BMW. He was travelling along the A468 in the direction of Newport and overtaking a line of traffic. ████████ the driver of the BMW was turning out of the junction which leads to Lower Ocherwyth. This area of road is known as the Machen mile, or Mad Mile and anecdotally I heard that it is a straight length of road where motorists are inclined to drive at speed. I determined that Mr Williams was travelling in excess of the speed limit and his overtaking a number of vehicles along this road contributed to the collision I consider, having taken evidence from the collision Investigator, that safety along this stretch of road would be improved if consideration was given to extending the range of double white lines to this area of the A468 to restrict overtaking. ”

    Source location

    Gareth John Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Liyakat Ali SIDAT and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 4 November 2018, Liyakat Ali Sidat was driving on the A34 Melrose Way when he overtook two vehicles on a bend and collided with an oncoming vehicle. He, his wife Salma Bibi Sidat and their daughter Hajra Bibi Sidat sustained fatal injuries; concerns focused on the danger of the bend, the absence of a continuous white line to prevent overtaking, and the risk posed by overtaking on that stretch of road.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a continuous white line at the Melrose Way bend to prevent overtaking

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The A34 bypass (Melrose Way Bend) presents a danger to life. (2) The Melrose Way section has no continuous white line at the bend section preventing overtaking. It is dangerous to overtake on that stretch of road witness evidence referred to how dark it was and lives are at risk if overtaking is allowed to continue there. ”

    Source location

    Liyakat Ali SIDAT and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Danger to life at the A34 bypass (Melrose Way Bend)

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The A34 bypass (Melrose Way Bend) presents a danger to life. (2) The Melrose Way section has no continuous white line at the bend section preventing overtaking. It is dangerous to overtake on that stretch of road witness evidence referred to how dark it was and lives are at risk if overtaking is allowed to continue there. ”

    Source location

    Liyakat Ali SIDAT and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Road Safety Assessment for the A34 Melrose Way.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to your letter dated 16th January 2020 we can advise that the meeting of 15th November 2019 has taken place and reviewed the Road Safety Assessment report for the A34 Melrose Way prepared by the Council’s Senior Road Safety Engineer. The report recommended that the existing hazard centreline marking is replaced with a hatched hazard centreline. This will give a visual carriageway narrowing effect and put greater distance between the traffic travelling in both directions and may help heighten driver awareness when considering overtaking manoeuvres. This recommendation has been accepted by the Council and the works are programmed to be carried out in March.”

    Source location

    2019-0370-Response-from-Cheshire-East-Highways
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace the existing hazard centreline marking with a hatched hazard centreline.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to your letter dated 16th January 2020 we can advise that the meeting of 15th November 2019 has taken place and reviewed the Road Safety Assessment report for the A34 Melrose Way prepared by the Council’s Senior Road Safety Engineer. The report recommended that the existing hazard centreline marking is replaced with a hatched hazard centreline. This will give a visual carriageway narrowing effect and put greater distance between the traffic travelling in both directions and may help heighten driver awareness when considering overtaking manoeuvres. This recommendation has been accepted by the Council and the works are programmed to be carried out in March.”

    Source location

    2019-0370-Response-from-Cheshire-East-Highways
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a road safety assessment of A34 Melrose Way, considering options in consultation with Cheshire Constabulary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Item 1 The A34 Bypass (Melrose Way Bend) presents a danger to life As advised on 25th February 2020 a road safety assessment report for A34 Melrose Way was prepared by the Council’s Senior Road Safety Engineer. A number of options were considered in consultation with Cheshire Constabulary. The report recommended that the existing centre line marking is replaced with a hatched hazard centreline and red surfacing. The recommendation was accepted by the Council and works were scheduled and completed in March 2020.”

    Source location

    Response-from-Cheshire-East-Highways-Team_Published-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace the existing centre line with a hatched hazard centreline and red surfacing to discourage overtaking.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Item 1 The A34 Bypass (Melrose Way Bend) presents a danger to life As advised on 25th February 2020 a road safety assessment report for A34 Melrose Way was prepared by the Council’s Senior Road Safety Engineer. A number of options were considered in consultation with Cheshire Constabulary. The report recommended that the existing centre line marking is replaced with a hatched hazard centreline and red surfacing. The recommendation was accepted by the Council and works were scheduled and completed in March 2020.”

    Source location

    Response-from-Cheshire-East-Highways-Team_Published-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Solid double white lines cannot be installed because Melrose Way does not meet Department for Transport criteria.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Item 2 The Melrose Way Section has no continuous white line at the bend section preventing overtaking There are strict regulations set by the Department for Transport for the use of solid double white lines. Melrose Way was assessed but did not meet the criteria for such lines. However, the works recommended in the road safety assessment report were implemented in March 2020 (shown in the attached photo) to discourage overtaking.”

    Source location

    Response-from-Cheshire-East-Highways-Team_Published-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2019

    Open published response
  6. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Shaun David Neal · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shaun David Neal was killed in a road traffic collision while riding his motorcycle on the A68 near Tow Law, County Durham, on 2 September 2017. An oncoming vehicle struck him after overtaking in the opposing lane, causing fatal injuries. Concerns related to the use of broken hazard white lines at the collision location and expert evidence that double solid white lines might have prevented the overtaking manoeuvre.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide double solid white line markings to prevent overtaking at the collision location

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence heard at inquest confirms only ‘broken’ white line hazard road markings were present on the road surface at the location of the collision 2. Durham County Council Traffic Section have surveyed the scene and found no requirement to change the road markings from broken hazard white lines to double solid white lines as it was thought a short section of double white lines may confuse drivers. 3. Expert evidence from a police collision investigator believed the presence of double white solid line markings would, in a driver obeying the restriction prevent such a manoeuvre that led to the collision, by removing the option to overtake on that section of road. ”

    Source location

    Shaun David Neal · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Order recovery of worn road markings near Hermitage Bridge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “No. | Observation / Recommendation | Action 1 | As part of the general maintenance programme, at the earliest | An order was placed for the recovery of road markings in the vicinity of Hermitage Bridge.”

    Source location

    2019-0009-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Survey visibility to determine whether additional double white lines were justified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3 | Given the observations made in the visibility at junctions and bends section, determine the requirement for additional highway infrastructure such as supplementary road markings and upright signing. | A visibility survey was undertaken to determine whether a system of double white lines was required. Such a system was not identified as being justified.”

    Source location

    2019-0009-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Double white lines were not justified because visibility and accident-history criteria were unmet; the existing hazard marking was considered appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• It is concluded that the criteria for the provision of a system of double white lines has not been met and there is no previous history of overtaking accidents associated with impaired forward visibility at this location. Therefore, there is no”

    Source location

    2019-0009-Response-by-Durham-County-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response
  7. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Elijah Oluwagbenga Shotade · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 31 August 2018, Elijah Oluwagbenga Shotade died after his vehicle crossed into the eastbound carriageway on Britannia Bridge and collided with a heavy goods vehicle. The concerns identified were the road layout, which may leave westbound motorists unable to return to their nearside lane, and sat-nav directions telling motorists to bear right and encouraging entry into the eastbound lane.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Road layout preventing westbound motorists from returning to the nearside lane after overtaking

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That the layout of the road is such that motorists driving in a west bound direction will remain the east bound lane after overtaking and are unable to return to their nearside lane. ”

    Source location

    Elijah Oluwagbenga Shotade · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review traffic signing and road markings across Britannia Bridge to identify recommended safety improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notwithstanding the outcome of these investigations the Welsh Government decided to carry out a review of the traffic signing and road markings across the A55 Britannia Bridge and implement any recommended improvements as soon as possible in the 2017/18 financial year.”

    Source location

    2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend double white lines across Britannia Bridge and install lane arrows reinforcing the direction of travel.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The extension of the double white lines prohibiting overtaking over the whole length of Britannia Bridge and lane arrows to reinforce the direction of travel has now been completed. Improvements to the signing, which will affirm that vehicles should keep left, will follow before the end of the financial year.”

    Source location

    2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve signing to reinforce that vehicles should keep left.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The extension of the double white lines prohibiting overtaking over the whole length of Britannia Bridge and lane arrows to reinforce the direction of travel has now been completed. Improvements to the signing, which will affirm that vehicles should keep left, will follow before the end of the financial year.”

    Source location

    2018-0290-Response-by-Department-for-Economy-and-ntrastructure
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 January 2019

    Open published response
  8. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Nana Kwabena Boansi BOATENG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nana Kwabena Boansi BOATENG died at the scene on 24 December 2017 from chest trauma with haemorrhage after his car collided with a DAF light goods vehicle on the A429. The principal concern was that severely worn or absent central road markings and non-functioning cats’ eyes on the bend might have contributed to loss of positional awareness and created a road-safety risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain visible central road markings on the sharp left-hand bend

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest the evidence I had been provided with a copy of a collision investigation report prepared by ████████ of Wiltshire Constabulary. In the report I had regard to a number of photographs but in particular I noted a photograph that appeared on page 29 of 39 of his report which showed the approach to the left hand bend where the incident took place at night. As part of any road traffic Inquest I use Google Earth and in particular the “street view” function in order to get a feel for the location where the incident took place. I have included with this report three additional pictures of the location that have been lifted from Google Earth. The imagery was as at May 2017 according to the web browser which of course was some seven months prior to Nana’s death. The photographs show the northern approach to the left-hand bend which is exactly the same path that Nana would have been travelling on that Christmas Eve morning. Whilst the state of the road surface appears to be in good condition what is not in good condition are the road markings. It is clear from the first picture that this section of road being a sharp left-hand bend travelling south is subject to no overtaking restrictions in both directions. Looking at the photographs the white lines that should be present in the centre of the highway have been significantly worn away to the extent that immediately approaching the left-hand bend they are non-existent. I was informed and as can be seen from the photograph in the police collision report, the cats eyes are also not in working condition. I appreciate that one should drive at a speed relative to the road conditions but in this instance, it is clear from the photographs that the road markings effectively suddenly disappear as a result of road wear. Whilst I was not able to make a finding on a balance of probabilities that the absence and the poor state of these central road markings more likely than not contributed to Nana losing positional awareness on the highway and crossing onto the opposite side of the highway where upon a collision then ensued as he attempted to return to his side of the highway, it does remain a possibility hence this report. I am sure you will appreciate road markings provide not only guidance to road users so that they can position their vehicle accordingly on the public highway but also serve to provide information to road users, as in this case, that this section of highway was subject to no overtaking in both directions. I would ask in view of this report that you urgently review this section of highway as its current state in terms of road markings is of great concern to me. ”

    Source location

    Nana Kwabena Boansi BOATENG · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relay road markings on the bend by the end of October.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, it is recognised that road markings can play a significant role in the overall efficiency and safety of the highway network. Unfortunately, due to funding shortfalls in recent years there has been a deterioration of road marking condition on many roads nationally. This has been recognised in Wiltshire and funding has been allocated to address this in the current highways budgets.”

    Source location

    Response from Wiltshire Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highway authorities are not legally required to provide road markings; drivers must adapt their driving to encountered conditions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would firstly advise that there is no obligation upon Highway Authority’s in the United Kingdom to provide any road markings, be this centre lines, edge lines or any other markings. It is for the driver to adjust their driving style to the conditions that are encountered and drive appropriately.”

    Source location

    Response from Wiltshire Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 January 2019

    Open published response
  9. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Derek Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alan Derek Evans died at the scene after losing control of his motorcycle while overtaking on the A489, colliding with an oncoming vehicle and being run over by another vehicle. Concerns included the road’s single broken white line and whether a protruding old-style cat’s eye may have contributed to the loss of control.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate road markings permitting overtaking on a road with a side entrance and obscured visibility

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The road at this particular location is governed by a single broken white line indicating that overtaking is permitted. Given the layout of the road, the existence of a side entrance to it, the impact of hedges obscuring the view of the road consideration, in my opinion, ought to be given to putting double white line markings on this particular stretch of road. ”

    Source location

    Alan Derek Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026