Recipient

Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS)

Pin Request correction

First report 27 Jan 2022•Latest report 27 Jan 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS) linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Adam Marshall Elliot STONE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adam Marshall Elliot Stone became distressed, agitated and paranoid after using cocaine, displayed signs of acute behavioural disturbance, and died after his condition deteriorated during restraint, ambulance transfer and hospital treatment. The report raised concern that the ambulance-service system did not allow a category 1 response for severe acute behavioural disturbance where restraint was taking place, which it stated was putting lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System (AMPDS); that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to allow a category 1 ambulance response for severe ABD involving restraint

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The continuance of a system which does not allow a category 1 response in severe case of ABD where restraint is taking place is putting lives at risk. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026