Recipient

All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group

First report 18 Oct 2013•Latest report 18 Oct 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Ad-hoc advisory group. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    ELIZABETH AURORA KERR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elizabeth Aurora Kerr died after carbon monoxide from a malfunctioning basement boiler entered the residential flat where she lived, and she was found unconscious several hours after the Fire Service had attended the building. The report identified concerns about the movement and detection of carbon monoxide in buildings, the absence and use of carbon monoxide alarms and gas safety controls, and Fire and Rescue Service equipment, guidance and responses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of carbon monoxide detection equipment on Fire and Rescue Service frontline appliances

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The use and availability of CGI meters by Fire and Rescue Services and having suitable training in their operation as well as the use of personal protective equipment CO alarms. GMFRS did some research in the use of such equipment by all Fire and Rescue Services. Please see the attached. It is suggested that if all Fire and Rescue Services carried such equipment on front line appliances and used them on both emergency responses and preventative work that would reduce the risk of death to Fire Fighters and the public. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of a statutory Fire and Rescue Service role in carbon monoxide safety, regulation and enforcement

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Role of Fire and Rescue Services in Carbon Monoxide Safety: The Fire and Rescue Services currently have no statutory role in Carbon Monoxide safety, regulation and enforcement. This could be reviewed and considered by the Department for Communities and Local Government. It is appreciated that this is far from straight forward and wider issues would need to be taken into account. For example Fire and Rescue Services have no statutory role in other gases or substances which can cause death. This may require a more detailed analysis and assessment of issues and complications which may then come to light. In the absence of a statutory role, and possibly through the Chief Fire Officers Association “Blue Watch” initiative, Fire and Rescue Services could be encouraged to voluntarily engage in local and national Carbon Monoxide campaigns. Such campaigns may benefit from closer working at a local level with relevant CO charities and at a national level between the Gas Safety Trust, the Gas Safe Charity and the Chief Fire Officers Association. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of suitable training in the operation of carbon monoxide detection equipment

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The use and availability of CGI meters by Fire and Rescue Services and having suitable training in their operation as well as the use of personal protective equipment CO alarms. GMFRS did some research in the use of such equipment by all Fire and Rescue Services. Please see the attached. It is suggested that if all Fire and Rescue Services carried such equipment on front line appliances and used them on both emergency responses and preventative work that would reduce the risk of death to Fire Fighters and the public. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear oversight of gas-supplier steps to raise awareness of danger

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Piped Gas Suppliers: It is understood that there are specific conditions of a licence to supply gas as summarised below. It is not clear how gas suppliers define and determine who is a ”vulnerable and priority” customer and how it is established that they have been offered a free annual gas safety check, and have taken advantage (or not) of such an offer ? Nor who actually checks what steps a gas supplier takes in practice to raise the awareness of danger and who judges the reasonability of the steps? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear gas-supplier criteria for identifying vulnerable and priority customers

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Piped Gas Suppliers: It is understood that there are specific conditions of a licence to supply gas as summarised below. It is not clear how gas suppliers define and determine who is a ”vulnerable and priority” customer and how it is established that they have been offered a free annual gas safety check, and have taken advantage (or not) of such an offer ? Nor who actually checks what steps a gas supplier takes in practice to raise the awareness of danger and who judges the reasonability of the steps? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify incomplete flue piping during routine inspections

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The Chief Fire Officers Association “Blue Watch Initiative” This is a voluntary initiative to be encouraged and supported. It offers an independent safety validation service for landlords and letting agents. http://www.bluewatch.co.uk/. The investigation established that incomplete flue piping had not been identified on routine inspection visits despite the regulatory regime created by The Gas Safety (Installation and Use ) Regulations 1988. At present there is no duty imposed on the owner of a boiler or a gas supplier ( who makes a profit from the supply ) that in the case of a multi occupancy building to allow the other occupants , through recognised engineers , to inspect the boiler and be warned to install CO alarms. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding and detailed guidance on the movement of carbon monoxide within buildings

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Guidance on the potential movement of CO within a building: There appears to be a lack of understanding and detailed guidance on the potential movement of CO within a building from its original source and how it can penetrate and move within it. The HSE could provide more information on its web site and provide specific guidance or warnings. There is no HSE guidance to landlords and letting agents as to what independent validation has taken place of the gas and other fuel safety equipment provided in rented property may be appropriate. Such information could also be disseminated to and within all Fire and Rescue Services. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of established monitoring of offers and uptake of free annual gas safety checks

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Piped Gas Suppliers: It is understood that there are specific conditions of a licence to supply gas as summarised below. It is not clear how gas suppliers define and determine who is a ”vulnerable and priority” customer and how it is established that they have been offered a free annual gas safety check, and have taken advantage (or not) of such an offer ? Nor who actually checks what steps a gas supplier takes in practice to raise the awareness of danger and who judges the reasonability of the steps? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a duty to warn other occupants to install carbon monoxide alarms

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The Chief Fire Officers Association “Blue Watch Initiative” This is a voluntary initiative to be encouraged and supported. It offers an independent safety validation service for landlords and letting agents. http://www.bluewatch.co.uk/. The investigation established that incomplete flue piping had not been identified on routine inspection visits despite the regulatory regime created by The Gas Safety (Installation and Use ) Regulations 1988. At present there is no duty imposed on the owner of a boiler or a gas supplier ( who makes a profit from the supply ) that in the case of a multi occupancy building to allow the other occupants , through recognised engineers , to inspect the boiler and be warned to install CO alarms. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regulatory coverage for ongoing maintenance and inspection of existing solid fuel appliances

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The installation , use , maintenance and correct positioning of fixed hard wired or battery operated CO alarms. From October 1st 2010 Building Regulations Approved Document J “Combustion appliances and fuel storage systems” sets out a number of legal requirements in England and Wales. For the first time carbon monoxide (CO) alarms were made mandatory “where a new or replacement fixed solid fuel appliance is installed in a dwelling, a CO alarm should be provided in the room where the appliance is located.” However Building Regulations only concern the processes used during the ‘building’ or ‘installation’ phases, of a solid fuel appliance and do not have any power to talk about on-going maintenance processes or the inspection of existing appliances. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a duty to allow recognised engineers to inspect boilers in multi-occupancy buildings

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The Chief Fire Officers Association “Blue Watch Initiative” This is a voluntary initiative to be encouraged and supported. It offers an independent safety validation service for landlords and letting agents. http://www.bluewatch.co.uk/. The investigation established that incomplete flue piping had not been identified on routine inspection visits despite the regulatory regime created by The Gas Safety (Installation and Use ) Regulations 1988. At present there is no duty imposed on the owner of a boiler or a gas supplier ( who makes a profit from the supply ) that in the case of a multi occupancy building to allow the other occupants , through recognised engineers , to inspect the boiler and be warned to install CO alarms. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of required audit trails of fuel-supplier carbon monoxide safety steps

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Enforcement and Information: There is no requirement that in the case of a carbon monoxide death, a clear audit trail is available of the steps taken by the relevant fuel supplier to ensure the specific customer in question was aware of the dangers of carbon monoxide poisoning and the benefits of fitting an audible alarm. At the moment there is no specific information that fuel suppliers are required to give. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of HSE guidance to landlords and letting agents on independent validation of gas and other fuel safety equipment in rented property

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Guidance on the potential movement of CO within a building: There appears to be a lack of understanding and detailed guidance on the potential movement of CO within a building from its original source and how it can penetrate and move within it. The HSE could provide more information on its web site and provide specific guidance or warnings. There is no HSE guidance to landlords and letting agents as to what independent validation has taken place of the gas and other fuel safety equipment provided in rented property may be appropriate. Such information could also be disseminated to and within all Fire and Rescue Services. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to All-Party Parliamentary Carbon Monoxide Group; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of required specific carbon monoxide safety information from fuel suppliers

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Enforcement and Information: There is no requirement that in the case of a carbon monoxide death, a clear audit trail is available of the steps taken by the relevant fuel supplier to ensure the specific customer in question was aware of the dangers of carbon monoxide poisoning and the benefits of fitting an audible alarm. At the moment there is no specific information that fuel suppliers are required to give. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026