Recipient

Alternative Futures Group Limited

First report 1 Jul 2022•Latest report 10 Mar 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company limited by guarantee. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
13

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
19

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
19stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Alternative Futures Group Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruariri Thomas Stewart, aged 29, died from fatal cocaine toxicity at Weaver Lodge Independent Hospital on 31 July 2025 after a period of unescorted leave during which he probably obtained cocaine. The report identifies concerns about failures in documentation, communication, information sharing, leave decision-making, substance-misuse management, record keeping, and the quality of post-incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fragmented storage of clinical records without a central access point

    Wider context from the report

    “11. Over the course of the inquest there were multiple, serious, disclosure issues relating to non-disclosure of medical records. It appears that at the time medical records were kept across a variety of locations and programmes, electronic and in paper. Staff therefore would not have had a central place to go to find all relevant clinical information about a patient. I am informed that there are plans to implement an electronic record keeping system but I do not have information about the nature, scope or timeframes for this. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify the CQC of periods of absence without leave

    Wider context from the report

    “10. The CQC were not notified of periods when the patient went absence without leave ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigations failing to identify and report safety issues

    Wider context from the report

    “12. The post event reflective practice report from AFG does not identify any of these issues. The "summary of issues / concerns highlighted" are wholly positive. Post incident reflection and investigation is an important tool to improve practices and prevent future deaths. Similar concerns about the quality of investigations by AFG were raised in a Regulation 28 report issued by the Manchester City Coroner in 2022 in relation to a death in 2019 (Shona Campbell). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include recent drug-use information in shift handovers

    Wider context from the report

    “6. On multiple occasions information about recent drug use was not part of the shift handover notes ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to hand over information about intended continued cocaine use

    Wider context from the report

    “8. Information from the patient that he intended to carry on taking cocaine was not handed over to the staff who made the final decisions about leave and checked the patient on return ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assign individual accountability for planned drug testing

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The MDT made plans for a patient to have drug tests. These were not allocated to an individual to be accountable and were instead allocated to "staff". These tests were not carried out as planned. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to fully consider recent substance misuse history in unescorted-leave decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Decisions were made to grant unescorted leave to a patient with a known and recent history of cocaine use whilst on unescorted leave, without a full appreciation of their recent substance misuse history ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document and formalise leave reinstatement decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “4. When the responsible clinician was away for an extended period, leave was managed by a non s12 doctor. There is no contemporaneous documentary evidence of the decision making process by that doctor to reinstate leave as decisions were made outside the formal s17 MHA framework. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Leave management by a non-s12 doctor during responsible-clinician absence

    Wider context from the report

    “4. When the responsible clinician was away for an extended period, leave was managed by a non s12 doctor. There is no contemporaneous documentary evidence of the decision making process by that doctor to reinstate leave as decisions were made outside the formal s17 MHA framework. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to create and complete required care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “9. Care plans that should have been in place were either not created at all or were not fully completed. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to investigate suspected drug use during leave suspension

    Wider context from the report

    “5. On at least one occasion leave was suspended due to suspected drug use but no drug test was taken and no search carried out, and there was no documentation indicating that consideration had been given to undertaking these acts. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to disclose relevant medical records

    Wider context from the report

    “11. Over the course of the inquest there were multiple, serious, disclosure issues relating to non-disclosure of medical records. It appears that at the time medical records were kept across a variety of locations and programmes, electronic and in paper. Staff therefore would not have had a central place to go to find all relevant clinical information about a patient. I am informed that there are plans to implement an electronic record keeping system but I do not have information about the nature, scope or timeframes for this. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enable named-nurse participation in MDTs

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The timing of the shifts of the named nurse for the patient meant that she was not able to attend any MDT for the patient over many months and her input was therefore only in writing ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate named-nurse reporting to MDTs

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The named nurse written reports provided inaccurate information to the MDT, giving a reassuring picture of compliance which is not reflected by the written records ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor task completion during daily handovers, escalate outstanding work and audit compliance monthly through a senior practitioner.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Task completion by the assigned individual is monitored daily during shift handovers by oncoming staff, with any outstanding action either being completed by the incoming staff or escalated to senior management. Ongoing compliance is monitored via monthly handover form audit by a senior practitioner, which also enables early identification of trends and implementation of remedial action where appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Allocate every clinical task to a named individual and record the allocation in the DSR system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All clinical tasks are now clearly and unequivocally allocated to a named individual and recorded within the DSR system, to ensure clear accountability and ownership.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Document all clinical and Mental Health Act decisions in patient files, the DSR system and relevant meeting minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All clinical decision-making, including that relating to MHA matters, is now documented within each patients’ file, both within the DSR system as well as additionally in any relevant minutes – for example within MDT meeting minutes, where a clinical decision has been taken during the course of that meeting.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement MDT scheduling that enables named-nurse attendance or requires an appropriate alternative clinician to attend and prepare with the patient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An updated standard operating procedure has been implemented requiring MDT scheduling to take account of named nurse availability.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record named-nurse or alternative-clinician MDT attendance and monitor compliance through monthly senior-practitioner audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Attendance at MDTs by a patient’s named nurse, or an alternative in their place, is formally recorded, with ongoing compliance monitored through routine monthly audits by a senior practitioner.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a monthly clinician-led quality and practice development forum to coach and mentor nurses in care-plan best practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is also a clinician-led quality and practice development forum in place to coach and mentor nurses on care plan best practice, which meets monthly.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise MDT documentation to include a current risk summary and the patient’s perspective, informed by review of patient documentation and interactions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• MDT documentation has been revised and updated to require inclusion of a clear and current risk summary, and staff have been reminded to consider all the patient’s documentation including interactions with the patient. The patient’s perspective is included as part of the MDT preparation documents.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require relevant patient information, including externally generated clinical documents, to be recorded, stored and uploaded through the expected DSR process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff have been reminded that relevant person/patient information, including externally generated clinical documents received by a property, must be recorded, stored and uploaded in line with the expected DSR process.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require admission care plans, 72-hour manager review, at least monthly named-nurse updates, and monthly audits of care-plan reviews and accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Before a new service user is accepted into a service, an admission care plan is carried out, and this is uploaded to the DSR system. Within 72 hours of admission, the registered manager reviews the admission care plan to ensure that the correct care plan is in place and meets the individual’s needs. Following admission and initial review, the DSR system creates a prompt, assigned to a patient’s named nurse, to review and where necessary update the care plan on an at least monthly basis. Care plans will also be updated on a shorter timescale if there is a clinical need, for example an adverse event or change in a patient’s presentation/ risk profile. Care plan reviews and updates are audited on a monthly basis to ensure continuing compliance, so that any remedial actions can be taken swiftly if required.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a structured Disclosure Control Toolkit and governance process for mapping, searching, collating, reviewing and disclosing records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In response to the Coroner’s concern, AFG has reviewed its approach to record collation and disclosure and has taken action to strengthen the consistency and auditability of this process.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the search policy, document required searches and drug tests in DSR, and provide refresher search training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The search policy has been updated and where a search or drug test is required, this is documented within the DSR system. Staff have received refresher training in conducting searches as part of the compliance process, and reminded of the importance of documenting all such actions.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Submit general safeguarding concerns to the CQC and clarify staff statutory reporting requirements, including safeguarding duties.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following the Inquest, a safeguarding submission was made by AFG to the CQC as regards the general concerns raised at the hearing, and AFG has in addition clarified and reminded all staff of their statutory reporting requirements, including in respect of safeguarding.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a standardised DSR MDT reporting template completed before meetings, with automated compliance checks and senior-practitioner clinical supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A standardised MDT reporting template has been introduced into the Digital Support Record (DSR) system, AFG’s electronic patient record software. The named nurse (or an alternative individual, as detailed in response to Concern 1) is sent the template attached to the MDT invite, and is required to complete this form seven days prior to the MDT meeting. The completion of this form triggers other processes within the DSR system, including monthly compliance checks and clinical supervision by a senior practitioner.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require material disclosures in handovers and MDTs, using an updated handover template with monthly senior-practitioner and registered-manager audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff are required, and have been reminded to record in handover notes and MDT meetings, all material disclosures. To help with this process, the handover template has been reviewed and updated, to ensure it adheres to national standards and guidance. The adequacy of handover notes, and sufficiency of information provided, is reviewed monthly by a senior practitioner, and are also audited by a service’s registered manager to ensure appropriate completion and provision of information.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review all future serious incidents in accordance with the PSIRF framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All future serious incidents will be reviewed in accordance with PSIRF framework.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reissue section 17 guidance and use separate escorted/emergency and unescorted leave forms for each patient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Specifically in respect of s.17 MHA decision-making, AFG has updated and reissued to staff guidance as to the process to be followed. In addition, AFG has moved to a system of two leave forms for each patient: one that covers all escorted and emergency arrangements; and a second which covers unescorted leave, to minimise the impact to restriction and recovery.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medical information may legitimately remain across multiple appropriate sources; a structured collation and disclosure process can address this without a single central record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the course of the inquest there were multiple, serious, disclosure issues relating to non-disclosure of medical records. It appears that at the time medical records were not kept across a variety of locations and programmes, electronic and in paper. Staff therefore would not have had a central place to go to find all relevant clinical information about a patient. I am informed that there are plans to implement an electronic record keeping system but I do not have information about the nature, scope or timeframes for this.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    AFG was not legally required to report unauthorised absences to the CQC because Weaver Lodge did not meet the prescribed security-unit categories.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CQC were not notified of periods when the patient went absence without leave.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Shona Christine Michaela Campbell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shona Christine Michaela Campbell, a detained psychiatric patient with a history of self-harm and repeated ligature incidents, was found in cardiac arrest after using a ligature on 12 January 2019 and died in hospital on 14 February 2019. The principal concerns included incomplete and inaccurate clinical and observation records, inadequate communication, patients’ access to ligatures, insufficiently developed risk-management plans, training and staffing deficiencies, and shortcomings in the serious incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of serious incident investigations to obtain relevant information and make additional enquiries

    Wider context from the report

    “10. The opportunities missed by the Safety Matters Ltd Serious Incident Investigation report process to obtain other relevant information and/or make additional enquiries which could affect the overall findings and recommendations for learning, improving practice and procedures as well as patient safety. This will also help improve other investigations that the authors of the report may do in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Patient access to ligatures and other objects usable for self-harm or against others

    Wider context from the report

    “5. That patients could obtain ligatures and other objects that could be used for self-harm/suicide and/or used against other patients and staff members. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent repeated access to and use of ligatures

    Wider context from the report

    “9. The lack of a clear clinical assessment and plan to investigate and deal with repeated self-harm attempts that could result in serious injury or death as well as the repeated access to and use of ligatures. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate contemporaneous clinical record keeping by support workers

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The lack of appropriate contemporaneous clinical record keeping by the Support Workers. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate clinical supervision of nurses and support workers

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The need for appropriate clinical supervision of nurses and support workers. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear clinical assessment and plan for repeated self-harm attempts

    Wider context from the report

    “9. The lack of a clear clinical assessment and plan to investigate and deal with repeated self-harm attempts that could result in serious injury or death as well as the repeated access to and use of ligatures. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an auditing process for care plans and risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Completion and updating of all care plans including risk assessments after MDT meetings/Ward rounds as well as an auditing process. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate communication of self-harm information, observation completion and records between nurses in charge and support workers

    Wider context from the report

    “4. There was inadequate communication between the Nurse in Charge and Support Workers about important clinical information relating to self-harm as well as completion of observations and the records. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete patient observations as directed

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Patient observations were not being completed as directed and accurate records were not being kept. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and update care plans and risk assessments after MDT meetings or ward rounds

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Completion and updating of all care plans including risk assessments after MDT meetings/Ward rounds as well as an auditing process. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep accurate records of patient observations

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Patient observations were not being completed as directed and accurate records were not being kept. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate contemporaneous clinical record keeping by nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of appropriate contemporaneous clinical record keeping by the nurse in charge as well as other nurses. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular training in automated external defibrillator use

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Regular training on all the applicable policies/procedures and use of an Automated Electronic Defibrillator. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Alternative Futures Group Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular training on applicable policies and procedures

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Regular training on all the applicable policies/procedures and use of an Automated Electronic Defibrillator. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
89%11%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026