Recipient

Ashfield House Surgery

First report 1 May 2015•Latest report 1 May 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
13stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Ashfield House Surgery linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jayne Jowett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jayne Jowett, who was resident in a low secure and locked rehabilitation mental health facility, became unwell with intermittent respiratory difficulties, low oxygen saturations, dizziness, breathlessness and episodes of collapse before she died of a pulmonary embolus on 23 September 2014. The report identified concerns about staff training and response to National Early Warning Scores, understanding of significant clinical signs, and the lack of clear arrangements for sharing physical-health information between the facility and the GP surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ashfield House Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of National Early Warning Score training to improve patient assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. PIC Staff Training in National Early Warning Scores: Training in both interpretation of scores, and response to escalation in scores has not to date demonstrated improvement in assessment of a patients clinical condition. The impact of training on patient assessment requires ongoing audit and monitoring. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ashfield House Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Low PIC staff understanding of significant clinical signs and oxygen requirements

    Wider context from the report

    “2. PIC staff at Annesley House have low levels of understanding of the significance of clinical signs such as cyanosis, pallor, breathlessness, and the significance of a patient needing oxygen treatment. There are no plans currently in place to address this ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ashfield House Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance for communicating patients’ physical condition to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There remains no clear current service level agreement regarding how best for PIC to work with the local GP surgery to provide high quality joint care. There is no clear guidance that ensures all information regarding a patient’s physical condition is communicated to a GP when seeing a patient. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ashfield House Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of ongoing audit and monitoring of training impact on patient assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. PIC Staff Training in National Early Warning Scores: Training in both interpretation of scores, and response to escalation in scores has not to date demonstrated improvement in assessment of a patients clinical condition. The impact of training on patient assessment requires ongoing audit and monitoring. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Ashfield House Surgery; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear service level agreement for PIC and GP joint care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There remains no clear current service level agreement regarding how best for PIC to work with the local GP surgery to provide high quality joint care. There is no clear guidance that ensures all information regarding a patient’s physical condition is communicated to a GP when seeing a patient. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
62%23%15%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026