Recipient

Black Country Family Practice

Pin Request correction

First report 26 Feb 2016•Latest report 26 Feb 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Black Country Family Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Richard Parkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Richard Parkes collapsed and died on 28 December 2015 after developing deep vein thrombosis with associated pulmonary thromboembolism. Concerns included poor record keeping, unavailable records from an August appointment, and the practice policy of not seeing patients more than ten minutes late, including on an occasion when Mr Parkes was not seen because he was late.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Black Country Family Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor record keeping and unavailability of patient appointment records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was evidence of poor record keeping at The Black Country Family Practice. Specifically records of the August appointment were not available and there was a policy of not seeing patients who were more than ten minutes outside their appointment time. Evidence emerged during the inquest that the GP who had seen Mr Parkes initially on the 12 October 2015 and arranged a further appointment on the 23 October 2015 and crucially, was aware of his medical history had decided not to see him on the latter date when he was late for his appointment. 2. Continuity of care and knowledge of medical history is extremely important in the management of patient care and this GP Practice may wish to consider reviewing their policy and management of record keeping. 3. In addition they may wish to consider reviewing the systems in place for excluding patients who are more than ten minutes or more late for appointments. There are inherent risks in adopting this policy and each case should be considered on a case by basis based on risk assessment. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Black Country Family Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess the risks of excluding patients who are late for appointments on a case-by-case basis

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was evidence of poor record keeping at The Black Country Family Practice. Specifically records of the August appointment were not available and there was a policy of not seeing patients who were more than ten minutes outside their appointment time. Evidence emerged during the inquest that the GP who had seen Mr Parkes initially on the 12 October 2015 and arranged a further appointment on the 23 October 2015 and crucially, was aware of his medical history had decided not to see him on the latter date when he was late for his appointment. 2. Continuity of care and knowledge of medical history is extremely important in the management of patient care and this GP Practice may wish to consider reviewing their policy and management of record keeping. 3. In addition they may wish to consider reviewing the systems in place for excluding patients who are more than ten minutes or more late for appointments. There are inherent risks in adopting this policy and each case should be considered on a case by basis based on risk assessment. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026