Recipient

Boat Safety Scheme Limited

Pin Request correction

First report 11 Jul 2024•Latest report 11 Jul 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Company limited by guarantee. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
2stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Boat Safety Scheme Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Richard DOLAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Richard Dolan died in a fire on his canal boat on the Bridgewater Canal on 8 March 2024. The likely ignition source was hot embers from a solid fuel stove, and there was no evidence that a smoke alarm had been fitted. The report raises concern that smoke alarms are not required on all boats, which may increase the risk of fatalities from smoke inhalation or burns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Boat Safety Scheme Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a smoke-alarm requirement for boats not used for overnight hire

    Wider context from the report

    “Peter Dolan lived on a narrowboat which caught fire during the early hours of 8th March 2024. An investigation by Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service revealed that the likely ignition source was hot embers ejected from a solid fuel stove, and that there was no evidence of any smoke alarm having been fitted within the boat. The position of Peter's body indicated that he was lying on a sofa when he died. It is presently a legal requirement that of BSS that boats be fitted with carbon monoxide alarms, but there is no requirement that boats be fitted with smoke alarms (unless it is a hire boat for overnight accommodation). Any equivalent requirement for all other boats may reduce the likelihood of further fatalities arising from smoke inhalation and/or burns. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Secure agreement with the National Fire Chiefs Council to share fire-incident data for evidence on smoke-alarm protection and fire-spread risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We can see the theoretical routes aimed at reducing the risk of boat fires spreading (one of our roles), but finding tangible examples to support the theories is difficult as Fire and Rescue Services are not routinely providing such information, albeit we have sought and had agreement from the National Fire Chiefs Council for the sharing of fire incident data. In case you harbour a question, the introduction of the mandatory BSS requirement for carbon monoxide alarms on boats in 2019 was grounded on evidence of carbon monoxide produced on one boat potentially entering adjacent boats and so third parties were at risk.”

    Source location

    Response from Boat Safety Scheme
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a public consultation on researching evidence for a mandatory smoke-alarm requirement for boats participating in the Boat Safety Scheme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notwithstanding all of the above, and more aligned to your recommendation, the BSS is committed to a public consultation by the end of this year on the commendation to research if evidence exists to introduce a mandatory requirement for all boats on waterways participating in the BSS, to be fitted with a smoke alarm.”

    Source location

    Response from Boat Safety Scheme
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for the safety of people aboard privately owned boats rests with the boat owner, rather than the Boat Safety Scheme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The difference is that Boat Safety Standards exist to support the duties of care of the navigation authorities and in regard to boats in private ownership and use, those duties are to ‘third parties’, i.e. people and property beyond the confines of the boat such as other visitors to the waterways, neighbours of the waterways, and the staff and volunteers working on our waterways. Ultimately, on private boats, it is the boat owner who bears the responsibility for the safety of those aboard. Conversely, following the principles of the Visitor Safety Group and National Water Safety Forum, people aboard a boat let out for hire fall within that third-party category and thus hired craft must meet several higher standards, including having suitable working smoke alarms.”

    Source location

    Response from Boat Safety Scheme
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The consultation on mandatory smoke alarms cannot yet be finalised because sufficient, supportable evidence of protection is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notwithstanding all of the above, and more aligned to your recommendation, the BSS is committed to a public consultation by the end of this year on the commendation to research if evidence exists to introduce a mandatory requirement for all boats on waterways participating in the BSS, to be fitted with a smoke alarm.”

    Source location

    Response from Boat Safety Scheme
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 July 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
50%50%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026