Recipient

Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust

First report 29 May 2018•Latest report 6 Mar 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · NHS trust. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
3

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
7

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
26

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
26stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Andrea Denise MANN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrea Denise MANN was discovered hanging at her home on 10 February 2024 and died in hospital the following day after invasive medical care was withdrawn and palliative care was provided. The inquest identified concerns about limited Community Mental Health Trust involvement, the absence of a requested psychiatric appointment, delays in psychological therapy, and the lack of an overarching tool to scrutinise and measure the care provided.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an overarching management tool for scrutinising and measuring care

    Wider context from the report

    “2) That no evidence of any overarching management tool existed to provide scrutiny of the care given to the deceased, or measure the success or efficacy of such care, and as such there were many lost opportunities to provide to the deceased and her family sufficient, consistent, controlled and bespoke care. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in access to psychological therapy

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That during the period of her involvement with the Community Mental Health Trust between the period 25/04/2023 and 04/12/2023 the care given to the deceased was limited to 2 appointments only within which she was referred back to her GP for medication adjustment which had been seen to be ineffective, and referral to Psychological therapy sessions which had a waiting period of 6 months despite an earlier private consultation having been proved ineffective, That the frequent requests of the deceased and her family for a Psychiatric appointment had not been provided to her, with the result that the deceased had to seek a private consultation. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide requested psychiatric appointments

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That during the period of her involvement with the Community Mental Health Trust between the period 25/04/2023 and 04/12/2023 the care given to the deceased was limited to 2 appointments only within which she was referred back to her GP for medication adjustment which had been seen to be ineffective, and referral to Psychological therapy sessions which had a waiting period of 6 months despite an earlier private consultation having been proved ineffective, That the frequent requests of the deceased and her family for a Psychiatric appointment had not been provided to her, with the result that the deceased had to seek a private consultation. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient mental healthcare appointments

    Wider context from the report

    “1) That during the period of her involvement with the Community Mental Health Trust between the period 25/04/2023 and 04/12/2023 the care given to the deceased was limited to 2 appointments only within which she was referred back to her GP for medication adjustment which had been seen to be ineffective, and referral to Psychological therapy sessions which had a waiting period of 6 months despite an earlier private consultation having been proved ineffective, That the frequent requests of the deceased and her family for a Psychiatric appointment had not been provided to her, with the result that the deceased had to seek a private consultation. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have the administration team book consultant psychiatrist appointments for assessed referrals, using urgent slots when risk-based assessment indicates greater urgency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. For those referrals that have been assessed as requiring an appointment with a consultant psychiatrist, this will be booked by the admin team. At present, routine appointments are being booked 4-6 weeks in advance however the urgency of the appointment is based on the formulation of risk based on the assessment findings and a Multi-Disciplinary Team discussion. If it is felt that the individual needs to be seen more urgently, medics have urgent appointment slots for this purpose.”

    Source location

    Response from Bradford District Care NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a timebound recovery plan addressing assessment waits through demand-and-capacity analysis, additional staffing and administration, and streamlined clinical processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Improvement activities were agreed and a timebound recovery plan created to stabilise, mitigate and improve waits into the Community Mental Health Assessment Team. This included:”

    Source location

    Response from Bradford District Care NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a continuous-improvement programme to enable access to a meaningful intervention within four weeks of referral.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. We are committed to continuous improvement utilising BDCFT quality improvement methodology to improve the timeliness of support available, and a programme of work has been established, commencing April 2025, to ensure that people are able to access a meaningful intervention within four weeks of referral.”

    Source location

    Response from Bradford District Care NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2025

    Open published response
  2. West Yorkshire (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Miles Glynn Naylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Miles Glynn Naylor, a patient detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983, died in his room on the Oakdale Ward after suspending himself from a ligature made from his trouser belt and wedged in the door hinge side. The inquest jury raised concerns about the management of ligature risks from personal items and the design of the ward doors, including access to the hinge pin side.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Doors permitting access to the hinge pin side

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The jury formally recorded their opinion as part of the conclusion to the inquest that the Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust should carry out a review of its management of its ligature risks from personal items. (2) During the course of evidence, questions were raised about the design of the doors on Oakdale ward, and whether access to the hinge pin side of the doors might be prevented by the use of covers similar to the finger guards in use in children’s nurseries and similar premises). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adequately manage ligature risks from personal items

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The jury formally recorded their opinion as part of the conclusion to the inquest that the Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust should carry out a review of its management of its ligature risks from personal items. (2) During the course of evidence, questions were raised about the design of the doors on Oakdale ward, and whether access to the hinge pin side of the doors might be prevented by the use of covers similar to the finger guards in use in children’s nurseries and similar premises). ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review ligature assessments and new ligature incidents through the monthly Ligature Environmental Risk and Safety group to identify learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All ligature risk assessments are reviewed and monitored by the monthly Ligature Environmental Risk and Safety group. The group also assesses all new ligature incidents that are with or without an anchor point to consider any learning requirements.”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing processes for managing patients’ personal belongings and associated ligature risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust continues to review the processes which are in place regarding personal belongings. In doing this the Trust recognise there is a balance to be struck of ensuring a patient’s safety against taking steps that may be seen as negatively impacting on a patient’s improvement in their mental health.”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and submit a business case for environmental improvements and high-specification full-door alarms on identified bedrooms across eight high-risk wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges the concerns raised during the inquest and a need to review the design of the doors in our in-patient wards. In June 2019, a business case was developed and submitted to the Trust Board which included environmental improvements and the introduction of high specification full door alarms on identified bedrooms on 8 high risk wards, including Oakburn. Work has begun installing these doors in designated rooms on high risk wards as part of phase 1 development and is due to be completed by April 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement standard multidisciplinary ligature-risk assessments using the Manchester Audit Tool, with documented mitigations, staff access, induction materials, visual aids and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2019 the Trust undertook a review of how ligature risks are assessed and managed in our in-patient areas. A new approach has been introduced (Manchester Audit Tool) which grades ligature risk based on four factors. The four factors are:”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replacing all inpatient doors is constrained by significant capital expense, so improvements are being delivered through the ongoing capital programme in stages.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges the concerns raised during the inquest and a need to review the design of the doors in our in-patient wards. In June 2019, a business case was developed and submitted to the Trust Board which included environmental improvements and the introduction of high specification full door alarms on identified bedrooms on 8 high risk wards, including Oakburn. Work has begun installing these doors in designated rooms on high risk wards as part of phase 1 development and is due to be completed by April 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Potential ligature items are not routinely removed; individual risk assessment, care planning and increased observations are used where clear clinical risk exists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust continues to review the processes which are in place regarding personal belongings. In doing this the Trust recognise there is a balance to be struck of ensuring a patient’s safety against taking steps that may be seen as negatively impacting on a patient’s improvement in their mental health.”

    Source location

    2020-0005-Response-from-Bradford-District-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 February 2020

    Open published response
  3. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Brian Leonard Bicat · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Leonard Bicat sustained severe burns at home on 22 September 2017 when his dressing gown caught fire while he was smoking a cigarette. He died later that day from his extensive cutaneous burns, with evidence indicating that paraffin-based emollient creams and ointments increased the speed and intensity of the fire. The principal concerns were that low-paraffin emollients may pose a fire hazard, that warnings were not displayed consistently on packaging or communicated by healthcare professionals, and that related prescribing alerts and incident data were inconsistent or incomplete.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of verbal fire-risk warnings from healthcare professionals for retail and online purchases

    Wider context from the report

    “Members of the public are able to purchase such products in retail outlets and online where verbal warnings from healthcare professionals are not given ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of accurate national data on fire incidents involving paraffin-based skin products

    Wider context from the report

    “Consider a review of the current effectiveness of obtaining fire incident reports involving paraffin based skin products since there is currently a lack of accurate national data involving paraffin based skin products ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent fire-risk alerts and warnings across NHS prescribing systems

    Wider context from the report

    “The NHS prescribing systems (system One and Optimise) appear to be updated by individual CCG’s resulting inconsistent alerts and warnings. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of healthcare professional awareness of the fire hazard from low-paraffin emollient creams

    Wider context from the report

    “Health care professionals in both hospital and community setting may not be aware of the potential fire hazard poised by emollient creams which contain a low level of paraffin ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to display fire-risk warnings on all product packaging

    Wider context from the report

    “Warnings of such risks are not displayed on all product packaging ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fire hazard from paraffin-based ointments and low-paraffin emollient creams

    Wider context from the report

    “Paraffin based ointments and emollient creams which contain a low level of paraffin pose a potential fire hazard risk ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display emollient risk messages on Trust screens and repeat the messages twice yearly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. The message regarding the risks of using emollients have been shown on the Trusts computer screens on Screen savers. This will be repeated on a bi-annual basis within BDCFT to ensure that the risk of emollients remain paramount.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise staff awareness of emollient risks and include the issue in all fire training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Awareness has been raised with all staff within Bradford District Care Foundation Trust and this issue is included in all fire training.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce and disseminate a patient safety leaflet on paraffin-based products and laundering clothing and bedding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Trust has produced a safety information leaflet for patients in relation to using paraffin-based products, in particular regarding the laundering of clothing and bedding. This leaflet has been disseminated locally across all Bradford Clinical Commissioning Groups and A cute Trust providers and Leeds Community Services.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct annual community nursing audits of leaflet distribution and documented discussions of emollient hazards with patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. A yearly audit will be undertaken within all community nursing services within BDCFT to demonstrate that staff distribute the safety leaflets on initial contact of patients who are prescribed emollients. The audit will also demonstrate that there is documented evidence of discussion by staff with patients regarding the hazards of emollients.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Repeat staff awareness surveys every six months to identify concerns about emollient hazards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The Trust has undertaken a survey of staff’s awareness of the hazards of emollients. This survey will be undertaken six monthly and any areas of concern will be addressed following the results”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide existing community nursing patients with safety leaflets and advice about emollient risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. A piece of work has been completed by the community nursing services to ensure that all existing patients have the relevant patient information leaflet and advice has been given by staff to patients regarding the risks of using emollients.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a SystmOne alert identifying patients at risk when emollient treatment is entered in the clinical record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. An alert has been created on our clinical records system, SystmOne. This is an electronic icon indicating that a patient is at risk when emollient is entered into the clinical record.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce and disseminate a fire hazard poster on paraffin-based products across clinical service areas and organisational communication channels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The Trust has produced a fire hazard poster in relation to using paraffin-based products, which has been disseminated for display throughout clinical services areas and this has also been communicated electronically across the organisation.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain liaison with the Fire Service to update teams on laundering evidence and ongoing emollient hazards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. The fire officer for BDCFT will continue to liaise with the Fire service to ensure all teams are updated on the most recent evidence regarding the laundering of clothes and the ongoing hazards of emollients.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upload the leaflet and poster to the NHSI improvement hub and disseminate them nationally through NHSI.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The leaflet and poster have been uploaded onto the NHSI improvement hub website under the heading of patient safety. Communication has been undertaken with the Trust’s lead for CCG and NHSI. Work has been undertaken to disseminate this information nationally through NHSI.”

    Source location

    2018-0277-Response-by-Bradford-District-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 October 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
73%19%8%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026