First report 20 May 2018•Latest report 18 Jun 2024
Recipient record
Reports, concerns and published responses
Local government · English metropolitan district council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.
Reports
10
Naming this recipient
Published responses
50%
Found for named reports
Concerns addressed
8
Across all linked responses
Stated actions
26
Described in responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports naming this recipient by issue year.
Evidence profile
Report topics
Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.
50%published responses found
26stated actions described
Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.
Concerns and recipient responses
Statements from Calderdale Borough Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
South Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised3
Lack of adequate mental health training
Lack of a clear escalation route for mental health concerns or disclosures
Failure to pass on suicidal ideation information to foster carers or other relevant people
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.5
Action
Provide Mental Health First Aid training to Independent Visitor volunteers where necessary.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
Action
Add suicide-prevention information and warning signs to the Independent Visitor induction training programme.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
Action
Require Independent Visitor volunteers to follow a safeguarding code and health-and-safety procedure specifying when concerns must be reported or disclosed.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
Action
Deliver comprehensive safeguarding, confidentiality, disclosure, welfare and mental-health training to Independent Visitor volunteers.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
Action
Review Independent Visitor volunteer performance every six months and identify and address further training needs.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 June 2024.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.2
Position
Relevant information was promptly passed to the Pathways Team, and no imminent risk justified sharing it with the foster carer.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
Position
Existing training and safeguarding procedures sufficiently cover volunteers’ roles and when confidential information must be disclosed.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
West Yorkshire, Western
Concerns raised1
Failure of safety measures on the bridge and surrounding area to deter such activities
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised1
Ineffective suicide prevention measures at a known location for suicide attempts
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.6
Action
Install anti-climb mesh and steeple coping on the bridge parapet.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
Action
Seek suitable funding for installing the final bridge-protection design.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
Action
Operate a multi-agency suicide prevention group to identify interventions reducing suicide attempts at the location.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
Action
Progress the agreed design for further bridge protection.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
Action
Complete the final design and calculate its final costs.
Stated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
Action
Install temporary Heras fencing to increase the height of bridge protection.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 September 2021.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised2
Severe drop adjacent to a public footpath near a frequently used viewing spot
Lack of safety-related signage warning members of the public of the danger
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised1
Road traffic collision hazard at the junctions of Cooper Lane and Carr House Road and the Cooper Lane and Carr House Lane mini-roundabout
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised2
Potential illegibility of painted road markings
Potential motorist confusion caused by road layout
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised2
Failure to ensure CAMHS referral pathways remain operable where school psychology services are unavailable
Failure to provide consistent referral advice between health and education professionals
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements
No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised2
Unavailability of prominently displayed CCTV cameras overlooking the bridge
Delay in implementing anti-climbing mesh at the location
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.6
Action
Complete feasibility, CCTV coverage and temporary fencing reviews for North Bridge safety measures.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
Action
Finalize drawings for the preferred anti-climb mesh and steeple coping option.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
Action
Install an additional CCTV camera providing coverage of North Bridge.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
Action
Obtain Cabinet approval for planning and listed-building applications and make funding available for the preferred option.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
Action
Submit and progress planning and listed-building consent applications for the anti-climb mesh and steeple coping works.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
Action
Prepare the contract and tender process for the North Bridge anti-climb works.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 February 2019.
West Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised1
Risk of further fatal falls from North Bridge
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something this recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.5
Action
Make approximately £200,000 available to fund the preferred bridge safety works.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
Action
Complete the review of CCTV coverage identifying a blind spot on the bridge.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
Action
Continue checking the feasibility of installing an additional CCTV camera to address the bridge blind spot.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
Action
Progress the preferred anti-climb mesh and steeple-coping works for North Bridge, including drawings, approvals, procurement and site construction.
Stated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
Action
Complete the feasibility study identifying suicide-prevention options for North Bridge.
Stated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 July 2018.
Respondent positions A position is what this recipient says about the concern when it does not describe a specific action.1
Position
The 3.35-metre parapet option was disregarded because the existing parapets’ strength could not be determined and might fail under loading.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
Pin
Request correction
Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations