24 Jun 2026 Nola-Reign Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report Gwent
View report summary
Concerns raised 6 Delays in transferring patients between antenatal and HDU wards View source Failure to identify causes of transfer delays and take steps to avoid unnecessary delay recurring View source Insufficient training to enable obstetric and midwifery teams to identify the risk of chorioamnionitis and ensure adequate monitoring View source Lack of specific guidance for identifying and treating chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers View source Lack of national antenatal guidance establishing when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used, especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected View source Failure of local antenatal monitoring guidance to address chorioamnionitis, transfer times and consideration of continuous fetal monitoring View source See 3 more concerns
Responses linked to these concerns
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statements No action or position from this recipient is clearly linked to the concerns in this report.
×
AI-generated summary
Nola-Reign Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Nola-Reign Morgan was born prematurely on 5 February 2024 after her mother developed suspected chorioamnionitis, and died three days later despite resuscitation and neonatal care. The report identified delays in transferring her mother to the labour ward and high dependency unit, a period without fetal monitoring, and gaps in national and local guidance and staff training on monitoring and managing suspected chorioamnionitis in pre-term pregnancies.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Delays in transferring patients between antenatal and HDU wards
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure to identify causes of transfer delays and take steps to avoid unnecessary delay recurring
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Insufficient training to enable obstetric and midwifery teams to identify the risk of chorioamnionitis and ensure adequate monitoring
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of specific guidance for identifying and treating chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of national antenatal guidance establishing when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used, especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives; that does not assign responsibility.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure of local antenatal monitoring guidance to address chorioamnionitis, transfer times and consideration of continuous fetal monitoring
Wider context from the report “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place.
2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring.
3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular:
4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future.
” Open source report
Pin
Request correction
Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations