Recipient

Collaborative Mobility UK

Pin Request correction

First report 11 Jul 2023•Latest report 11 Jul 2023

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Registered charity. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Collaborative Mobility UK linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    MUSTAFA NADEEM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 6 December 2022, 12-year-old Mustafa Nadeem was fatally injured after colliding with a pedestrian while riding a hire e-scooter to school and falling into the path of a bus. The principal concern was that children could easily use hire e-scooters illegally, and that existing precautions and education were ineffective in preventing this.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Collaborative Mobility UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a regulatory body for hire e-scooter providers

    Wider context from the report

    “Hire e-scooters are only available as part of a national pilot scheme. The scheme is implemented locally. Guidance to the providers of hire e-scooters is currently limited to Department for Transport guidance. There is no regulatory body. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Collaborative Mobility UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability of hire e-scooter providers to detect use of children’s bank accounts for rides

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that the providers of hire e-scooters have no ability to detect if a child’s bank account is being used to pay for rides. In this case, had the provider been able to detect the use of a child’s bank account it would have alerted them to illegal use on the account and action would have been taken. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Collaborative Mobility UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct age and identity checks when hire e-scooter accounts are transferred between devices

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that Department for Transport guidance requires a driving licence, age and identity check when an account is created on a mobile device. However, users can easily transfer the account to another device and no further identity and age check is required. In this case the account was originally created on an adult’s mobile phone, but quickly and easily transferred to a child’s mobile phone and payment switched to an under 16s bank account. Department for Transport guidance did not require the e-scooter provider to undertake any age or identity checks at the point of transfer. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Collaborative Mobility UK; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ineffective education and information for preventing children from illegally using hire e-scooters

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from the head teacher of the deceased’s school that from the outset of the hire e-scooter pilot scheme pupils riding e-scooters illegally was instantly problematic. Upon it being known the school would seize e-scooters pupils would simply abandon them at the end of the road. Despite education and the facts of this death being known, children from the same school and other schools continued to use hire e-scooters illegally. I heard evidence that education is paramount to safe use of hire e-scooters and this requires a collaborative approach. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026