Recipient

Cornerstone Family Practice

Pin Request correction

First report 22 Mar 2018•Latest report 22 Mar 2018

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Cornerstone Family Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth Longley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth Longley died at Tameside Hospital on 9 September 2017 after treatment for acute coronary syndrome and severe aortic stenosis led to an upper gastrointestinal bleed. The report identified delays in sending a cardiology referral letter and a lack of action by the GP practice after the letter and echocardiogram results were received.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cornerstone Family Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer patients to Cardiology following relevant clinical findings or correspondence

    Wider context from the report

    “The letter from ████████, which was received by the GP surgery on the 7th August 2017, referred to an echocardiogram on the 16th May 2017 which confirmed severe aortic stenosis. It asked the GP surgery to arrange for Mr Longley for a specialist cardiology opinion and for him to be reassessed by the GP regarding any further syncopal episodes. The concern is that no action was taken by any GP at the practice to either refer Mr Longley to Cardiology in light of Dr Chambers’ letter or in light of the reported echocardiogram results. Further, no action was taken by any GP to review Mr Longley as requested. The concern is that there is a risk of future deaths if similar lack of action occurs in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cornerstone Family Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in sending specialist clinical letters

    Wider context from the report

    “The letter from Doctor████████to Mr Longley’s GP was sent out on the 7th August 2017, nearly 3 months following the echocardiogram on the 16th May 2017. This appears to be a significant delay████████explained in evidence that there had been a delay in obtaining the medical records needed for████████to write the report to the GP but the cause of that delay was not known. It was not clear why the letter was only written on the 29th July 2017 and then not sent out until the 7th August 2017. Mr Longley had severe aortic stenosis. The evidence suggested that cardiac surgery would have been offered to Mr Longley and would have taken place within 3-6 months. In this case, it was not possible to determine whether the outcome would have been different for Mr Longley had the letter been sent out in a timely fashion. The concern is that there is a risk of future death if there is a delay in sending out similar letters in the future. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cornerstone Family Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct requested GP reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “The letter from ████████, which was received by the GP surgery on the 7th August 2017, referred to an echocardiogram on the 16th May 2017 which confirmed severe aortic stenosis. It asked the GP surgery to arrange for Mr Longley for a specialist cardiology opinion and for him to be reassessed by the GP regarding any further syncopal episodes. The concern is that no action was taken by any GP at the practice to either refer Mr Longley to Cardiology in light of Dr Chambers’ letter or in light of the reported echocardiogram results. Further, no action was taken by any GP to review Mr Longley as requested. The concern is that there is a risk of future deaths if similar lack of action occurs in the future. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026