Recipient

Coventry City Council

First report 11 Nov 2014•Latest report 19 Mar 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English metropolitan district council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

50%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Coventry City Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Valerie WALTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Valerie WALTON was struck by a bus while using a Zebra crossing on Remembrance Road, Coventry, on 29 September 2014. Evidence was heard that the crossing’s position on the apex of a sharp bend was contributory, and that a crossing on the straight section or controlled by traffic lights might have prevented the death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Coventry City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsafe positioning of a crossing on the apex of a sharp bend

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from PC ████████ of the Regional Collision Investigation Unit that the positioning of the crossing on the apex of a sharp bend was contributory to this death. He opined that had the crossing been on the straight section of the road the death may not have occurred or alternatively whether the crossing should be controlled by traffic lights. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enhance zebra-crossing conspicuity by managing vegetation and street furniture, realigning the crossing, and installing additional illuminated Belisha beacon equipment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Enhance the existing zebra crossing conspicuity”

    Source location

    2015-0107-Response-by-Coventry-City-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the crossing site and assess options for improving its safety and conspicuity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is impossible to make a highway where vehicles and pedestrians mix completely safe; we can only make it safer. In view of your recent comments we have reviewed again the site to consider what measures might be implemented to improve the safety. Four options have been considered:-”

    Source location

    2015-0107-Response-by-Coventry-City-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Council does not propose relocating the crossing because relocation could reduce visibility, disrupt bus services, or encourage unprotected pedestrian crossings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Middle of the straight from Robin Hoods Road to the bend. To do this we would have to remove most of the on street parking. ‘Due to the current level of demand for on-street parking in the local vicinity it is considered that under this option it would increase the likelihood that drivers would park illegally, including on the zig zag markings, thus restricting visibility between drivers and pedestrians using the crossing.”

    Source location

    2015-0107-Response-by-Coventry-City-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2015

    Open published response
  2. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Amar MAJID · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amar Majid was found dead in a disabled toilet at the Public Library, Coventry, with a syringe in his hand and material believed to be heroin. The principal concern was that no one checked on his well-being for over five hours despite evidence that the toilets were cleaned hourly; the report also noted possible confusion about procedures for checking a toilet occupied for a considerable period.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Coventry City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of disabled library toilets by individuals abusing drugs

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from ████████ (Business Improvement Manager) of Coventry City Council (CCC) that the disabled toilets in the library are used by individuals abusing drugs. Mr Majid was present in the toilet from 10.00am and heard to be making noises. I was concerned that no-one checked on his well-being for over 5 hours, despite what I understand to be hourly cleaning of the toilet. Earlier intervention may have prevented his death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Coventry City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check the well-being of people occupying toilets for prolonged periods

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from ████████ (Business Improvement Manager) of Coventry City Council (CCC) that the disabled toilets in the library are used by individuals abusing drugs. Mr Majid was present in the toilet from 10.00am and heard to be making noises. I was concerned that no-one checked on his well-being for over 5 hours, despite what I understand to be hourly cleaning of the toilet. Earlier intervention may have prevented his death. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Coventry City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Confusion about procedures for checking toilets occupied for considerable periods

    Wider context from the report

    “Also I invite you to review your procedures concerning checking the toilets as it seems there was confusion as to the correct procedure to follow when a toilet was occupied for a considerable period of time. Mr Majid was in the toilet from about 10.00am to the door being opened at about 3.00pm. That delay may have contributed to his death although I was unable to make firm findings on that point. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

50%
50%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
67%33%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026