Recipient

Cowes Week LimitedIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

First report 28 Mar 2019•Latest report 28 Mar 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
5

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
7stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Cowes Week Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: ████████, Regatta Director, Cowes Week Ltd.

    Isle of Wight

    AI-generated summary

    Wayne Andrew ROGERS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wayne Andrew ROGERS, aged 62, died after being thrown from a racing yacht and dragged through the water when a spinnaker sheet became caught around his ankle during Cowes Week. He was rescued, received CPR, and was pronounced dead at hospital; the medical cause of death was drowning. The report raised concerns about ambulance capacity and emergency response arrangements, safety equipment, race abandonment criteria, and the use of continuous sheets on boats.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cowes Week Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor and record safety channels for incident response

    Wider context from the report

    “4) A review needs to be carried out of the Crisis Management Plan, with an emphasis on monitoring and recording of safety channels and manpower coordination for incident response. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cowes Week Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to coordinate manpower for incident response

    Wider context from the report

    “4) A review needs to be carried out of the Crisis Management Plan, with an emphasis on monitoring and recording of safety channels and manpower coordination for incident response. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cowes Week Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient ambulance capacity for emergency incidents during major events

    Wider context from the report

    “1) I was informed that during the course of Cowes Week Sailing Festival that there are approximately 7,000 competitors who travel to Cowes on the Isle of Wight to participate in the various events. In this instance, it was fortunate that an ambulance was available to convey the casualty to the hospital as an emergency. However, there are a finite number of ambulances on the Isle of Wight, and they are often overstretched to carry out routine work, without the possibility of an incident happening during this Sailing Festival. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cowes Week Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate criteria for abandoning racing during a major incident

    Wider context from the report

    “6) A review needs to be carried out of the criteria for abandoning racing in the event of a major incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Cowes Week Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omission of readily accessible safety knives from mandatory safety equipment requirements

    Wider context from the report

    “5) A review needs to be carried out of the published list of mandatory safety equipment, including mention of readily accessible safety knives. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement safety-channel monitoring and recording arrangements with independent safety radio monitors and race radio operators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4) I can confirm that we have fully taken on board all of the recommendations in the investigative report with regards to monitoring and recording safety channels as well as the manpower requirements.”

    Source location

    2019-0105-Response-by-Cowes-Week-Limited
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss additional ambulance support internally and report back on the proposal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1) With regards to the additional ambulance support proposal, this is something that we are discussing internally and on which I will revert to you on.”

    Source location

    2019-0105-Response-by-Cowes-Week-Limited
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review strong-wind and incident race-abandonment criteria, including alternative mainland casualty drop-off points.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6) We are reviewing again the criteria for abandoning racing in the case of strong winds and / or an incident. We feel this worked well in 2018 but further work is being undertaken in this regard to ensure that any lessons learned are taken on board. In particular we are looking at alternative drop off points for casualties on the mainland, if that is nearer to an incident location or is an easier location to reach in certain wind conditions. This was not the case in this instance.”

    Source location

    2019-0105-Response-by-Cowes-Week-Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensuring all boats carry suitable knives is outside the organiser’s control, although recommendations will be communicated to competitors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5) Some of the recommendations are outside our control in terms of delivery (as an example the fact that all boats should carry suitable knives) but despite that being the case we will be making the recommendations known to our competitors, both through our sailing instructions (where appropriate) and our safety booklet where appropriate. There are no accepted standards for how many knives should be carried, in what locations, on what size of boat, so we think it would be difficult for Cowes week to lead the way in trying to define that. Nonetheless the necessity to have a sharp knife on board, whilst being known to most sailors, is something that we will reinforce.”

    Source location

    2019-0105-Response-by-Cowes-Week-Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Without accepted standards for knife numbers, locations or boat sizes, defining suitable requirements is difficult for the organiser.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5) Some of the recommendations are outside our control in terms of delivery (as an example the fact that all boats should carry suitable knives) but despite that being the case we will be making the recommendations known to our competitors, both through our sailing instructions (where appropriate) and our safety booklet where appropriate. There are no accepted standards for how many knives should be carried, in what locations, on what size of boat, so we think it would be difficult for Cowes week to lead the way in trying to define that. Nonetheless the necessity to have a sharp knife on board, whilst being known to most sailors, is something that we will reinforce.”

    Source location

    2019-0105-Response-by-Cowes-Week-Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
14%43%43%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026