Recipient

Docklands Light Railway Limited

First report 29 May 2020•Latest report 29 May 2020

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Urban transport operator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Docklands Light Railway Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Flora Shen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Flora Shen died on 6 January 2020 at Lime House station after falling from the platform and being struck by a train. The report raised concerns about the reliance on members of the public to notice hazards and activate alarms, and about limited CCTV coverage and the response process on the driverless DLR system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Docklands Light Railway Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Dependence on multiple manual actions to activate the emergency brake

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) If a member of the public on the train sees a person or hazard on the track ahead they have to go to one of the doorways to activate the passenger alarm. The Passenger Services Assistant then goes to the telephone which is accessed by a key to ask why the passenger alarm has been activated. In order to stop the train the Passenger Services Agent then needs to replace the phone, lock the phone compartment and use a key to activate the emergency brake. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Docklands Light Railway Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Dependence on train passengers to notice hazards and contact the Passenger Services Agent in time

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The ability to respond to a danger or hazard on the line seems sometimes to be dependent on this being noticed by a member of the public on a train and them being able to contact the Passenger Services Agent in time for the train to be stopped. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Docklands Light Railway Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability of the central CCTV monitoring system to watch all stations simultaneously

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The central DLR CCTV monitoring system cannot watch all stations at the same time and the safety of persons slipping, falling or collapsing on to a line on the DLR system seems to rely on ability of members of the public to notice the hazard and activate the alarm on either the platform or the train. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Docklands Light Railway Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Dependence on members of the public to notice hazards and activate alarms

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The central DLR CCTV monitoring system cannot watch all stations at the same time and the safety of persons slipping, falling or collapsing on to a line on the DLR system seems to rely on ability of members of the public to notice the hazard and activate the alarm on either the platform or the train. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026