Recipient

Featherstone Prison

Pin Request correction

First report 14 Jul 2014•Latest report 14 Jul 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Justice · Prison or young offender institution. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Featherstone Prison linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Adam Amos Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adam Amos Williams, a serving prisoner aged 29, collapsed at HMP Featherstone on 5 March 2013 and died at New Cross Hospital on 6 March 2013 from a sub-arachnoid haemorrhage. The concerns raised related to communication between prison healthcare staff during emergencies, whether dynamic assessments considered the need for restraint, and the possible benefit of additional CCTV in prison common areas.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Featherstone Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient CCTV coverage in prison common areas

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Although I accept that resource factors must be taken into account in this, I wonder if it may be beneficial for there to be more CCTV in common areas of the prison such as the gym or CV rooms. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Featherstone Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate communication between healthcare staff during emergencies

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Picking up on recommendation 2 from the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman’s report I wonder if there is a training need for nursing staff at the prison regarding communication between healthcare staff in the event of an emergency. Can it be improved be it face to face, over the radio or otherwise? ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Featherstone Prison; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of dynamic assessments to account for the need for prisoner restraint

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Picking up on recommendation 3 in the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman’s report I wonder if the “dynamic assessment” referred to does specifically take into account the need for a prisoner to be restrained at all. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026