Recipient

Gloucestershire County Council

First report 27 Jun 2016•Latest report 24 May 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English county council. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
4

Naming this recipient

Published responses
75%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
3

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

75%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Gloucestershire County Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Ahmed Hassam Motala · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ahmed Motala was cycling to work on the A38 in Gloucester on 29 November 2018 when he collided with a lorry; the injuries he sustained resulted in his death. The report raised concern that the cycle lane was in very poor condition, requiring cyclists to swerve or cycle close to the traffic lane, and that cyclists’ lives could be put at risk if it remained unrepaired.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Gloucestershire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain the cycle lane in a safe condition

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence of the Police Collision Investigator and the evidence of witnesses who were motorists on the day (one who regularly used the cycle lane himself) describe the state of the cycle lane as being in very poor condition and cyclists have to swerve in the cycle lane to avoid the defects. Moreover I heard that to avoid the defects they cycle very close to the white line separating the lane with the traffic. This is obviously very dangerous. At the time of the impact, Mr Motala was not in a cycle lane, what is more the weather on that day was described as “diabolical”. Therefore I do not consider that the state of the cycle lane itself contributed to his death. However, I am concerned that lives of cyclists in the future may be put at risk if the cycle lane stays in the current state of repair. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Resurface Cole Avenue, including planing and replacing the tarmac surface and cycle-lane surfacing, through the 2020/21 programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Safety Inspection Team have been out and assessed the site using our Safety Defect Criteria. At present there are no actionable safety defects, however the red surfacing that is sometimes used in cycle lanes to highlight their presence is starting to strip away. There is no quick fix for this issue and the lanes have to be planned out and fully resurfaced.”

    Source location

    2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspect Cole Avenue monthly and apply footpath-defect criteria to cycle lanes, with qualifying defects attended to.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Cole Avenue is currently in our resurfacing programme for the next financial year 20/21, this will involve the tarmac surface and cycle lanes being planed out and new tarmac put in its place. Until this time, Cole Avenue will continue to be inspected as part of our key route inspections once a month and any defects that are present will be attended to. I have stressed the importance of picking any issues up in this location and the inspectors will now pick up any defects that meet the criteria for a footpath defect within the cycle lanes. This criteria is different to that of a carriageway and will highlight smaller defects.”

    Source location

    2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The site currently has no actionable safety defects under the applicable safety defect criteria.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Safety Inspection Team have been out and assessed the site using our Safety Defect Criteria. At present there are no actionable safety defects, however the red surfacing that is sometimes used in cycle lanes to highlight their presence is starting to strip away. There is no quick fix for this issue and the lanes have to be planned out and fully resurfaced.”

    Source location

    2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monthly key-route inspections and attendance to qualifying defects are considered sufficient until planned resurfacing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Cole Avenue is currently in our resurfacing programme for the next financial year 20/21, this will involve the tarmac surface and cycle lanes being planed out and new tarmac put in its place. Until this time, Cole Avenue will continue to be inspected as part of our key route inspections once a month and any defects that are present will be attended to. I have stressed the importance of picking any issues up in this location and the inspectors will now pick up any defects that meet the criteria for a footpath defect within the cycle lanes. This criteria is different to that of a carriageway and will highlight smaller defects.”

    Source location

    2019-0168-Response-by-Gloucestershire-County-Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 July 2019

    Open published response
  2. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Ray Ronald Westlake and Barry Malcolm Clow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 9 December 2018, Barry Malcolm Clow lost control of his car on the A424 near Upper Rissington and collided with another vehicle; Ray Ronald Westlake, a passenger in the other vehicle, and Mr Clow died at the scene from their injuries. The concern was that standing and running water regularly overwhelmed roadside drainage on this stretch of road, with no warning signs for the potential for flooding, putting future motorists' lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Gloucestershire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide flood-warning signs for motorists

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence that I heard was that it had been raining on that day and there were large areas of standing water and running water throughout this stretch of the A424. I am told that there are features in the side of the road (grips) which are dug out to encourage the water to run away but these are regularly overwhelmed. The evidence from other motorists and local residents is that this is a significant problem for motorists, especially those who do not know this stretch of road. Whilst it may not be possible to ensure that the water runs away I was surprised as was the Police Collision Investigator that there were no signs warning motorists for the potential for this area to flood. I am concerned that if this situation continues, future lives will be put at risk in the same way. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Gloucestershire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of roadside drainage to prevent standing and running water on the A424

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence that I heard was that it had been raining on that day and there were large areas of standing water and running water throughout this stretch of the A424. I am told that there are features in the side of the road (grips) which are dug out to encourage the water to run away but these are regularly overwhelmed. The evidence from other motorists and local residents is that this is a significant problem for motorists, especially those who do not know this stretch of road. Whilst it may not be possible to ensure that the water runs away I was surprised as was the Police Collision Investigator that there were no signs warning motorists for the potential for this area to flood. I am concerned that if this situation continues, future lives will be put at risk in the same way. ”
    Open source report
  3. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Anielka Agnes Grace Marie Jennings · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anielka Agnes Grace Marie Jennings, aged 17, was found hanging from a banister at home on 5 February 2015 and was pronounced deceased at 1510 hours. The principal concern was that, when numerous agencies care for a child transitioning to adult services, the absence of a lead or key professional can lead to communication breakdown between agencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Gloucestershire County Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an identified lead professional for individuals receiving care from numerous agencies

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) When an individual is being cared for by numerous agencies, in particular when said individual is a child transitioning to adult services, there is no lead/ key professional identified, which can result in a breakdown of communication between the agencies. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

75%
75%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%67%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026