Recipient

Goldies Bar

Pin Request correction

First report 2 May 2024•Latest report 2 May 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Venue. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Goldies Bar linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Teesside and Hartlepool

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Lee DALKIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Lee DALKIN was socialising in Stockton on 26 December 2019 and the early hours of 27 December, where he was involved in an incident at Goldie’s Bar involving an empty glass and off-duty door supervisors. He collapsed outside the venue and died in an ambulance. The principal concerns related to the use and recording of door supervisors, including an unlicensed supervisor and inaccurate information about the number of operational and effective supervisors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Goldies Bar; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of a designated premises supervisor as a part-time door supervisor

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The use of the SIA registered designated premises supervisor as a part time door supervisor. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Goldies Bar; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Holding out an SIA-registered manager as a door supervisor despite not performing door-supervisor duties

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The use of an SIA registered manager who was not carrying out the role of a door supervisor but was held out to be a door supervisor. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Goldies Bar; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of an unlicensed door supervisor

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The use on an unlicensed door supervisor. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Goldies Bar; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    SIA registration information failing to reflect the actual number of operational and effective door supervisors

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Completion of SIA registered with information that did not reflect the real number of operational and effective door supervisors ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026