Recipient

Harrogate District Hospital

Pin Request correction

First report 4 Aug 2014•Latest report 4 Aug 2014

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Harrogate District Hospital linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Lynne Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Lynne Walker died at home on 19 November 2013 after developing a pulmonary thromboembolism due to deep vein thrombosis following a left ankle fracture treated with a plastercast. The report raised concerns that chemical thromboprophylaxis and formal venous thromboembolism risk assessments were not routinely provided for conservatively treated lower-limb injuries immobilised in casts that were considered low risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Harrogate District Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely administer chemical thromboprophylaxis to conservatively treated lower-limb injury patients in immobilising casts considered at low risk of venous thromboembolism

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I understand that at the time it was not standard practice in either the Orthopaedic Department or the Emergency Department at Harrogate District Hospital to routinely administer Chemical Thrombo Prophylaxis to patients with conservatively treated lower limb injuries immobilising cast considered to be at low risk of venous thromboembolism. 2. Nor was it standard practice in the Trust for a formal venous thromboembolism risk assessment to be undertaken in this patient group. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Harrogate District Hospital; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake formal venous thromboembolism risk assessments for patients with conservatively treated lower-limb injuries in immobilising casts

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I understand that at the time it was not standard practice in either the Orthopaedic Department or the Emergency Department at Harrogate District Hospital to routinely administer Chemical Thrombo Prophylaxis to patients with conservatively treated lower limb injuries immobilising cast considered to be at low risk of venous thromboembolism. 2. Nor was it standard practice in the Trust for a formal venous thromboembolism risk assessment to be undertaken in this patient group. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026