Recipient

High Meadows

First report 3 Nov 2025•Latest report 3 Nov 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Residential care home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
13

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
13stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from High Meadows linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Brian Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Lloyd died in hospital on 18 July 2025 from an infection following an injury caused by the insertion of a urethral catheter after unsuccessful catheterisation attempts at his care home. The substantive concern was that after two unsuccessful attempts to insert a replacement catheter, arrangements should be made to take the patient to hospital without delay.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to High Meadows; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange prompt hospital transfer after two unsuccessful replacement catheter insertion attempts

    Wider context from the report

    “Where there are two attempts at inserting a replacement catheter, either the same catheter, or a second catheter and both these are unsuccessful the patient will need to be taken to hospital and arrangements for this should be made as without delay. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute a quick-reference escalation flowchart to team leads.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Distribution of a Quick Reference Flowchart for team leads (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limit replacement-catheter insertion to two attempts, stop sooner for resistance, pain, or bleeding, and call 999 after two failures or earlier if sepsis is suspected.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary in future the home will ensure that protocol is followed and there will be a maximum of 2 attempts at inserting a replacement catheter. The attempts will immediately cease in the event of resistance, pain or bleeding and 999 will be called immediately after 2 failed attempts or sooner if sepsis is suspected.”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record each 999 call reference number and assign a staffed phone to respond promptly to emergency-service return calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, in all future emergencies, once the home contacts 999, a 999 call reference number will be recorded, and a designated staff member with an allocated phone will remain available to respond promptly to any return calls from emergency services.”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement an escalation protocol.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Creation and implementation of an Escalation protocol (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement a full clinical protocol for catheterisation emergencies and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Creation and implementation of a Catheterisation Emergency & Escalation full clinical protocol (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide face-to-face refresher training in catheterisation for all nurses and team leads.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We provided a face to face refresher training session for all nurses and team leads in catheterization 12.11.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute a quick-reference catheterisation emergency poster to all nursing stations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Distribution of a Quick Reference Poster to all nursing stations for immediate guidance in urgent situations (See enclosed) 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clinical documentation and escalation procedures to improve clarity and accountability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of clinical documentation and escalation procedures to ensure clarity and accountability. 23.10.25”

    Source location

    Response from High Meadows Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
77%8%15%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026