Recipient

HT Practice

Pin Request correction

First report 16 Jan 2019•Latest report 16 Jan 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Health and care · Healthcare site. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from HT Practice linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    George Foster Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Foster Thompson, who had multiple chronic health problems and lived in a residential care home, became unwell on 21 August 2018, deteriorated despite receiving antibiotics, and died in hospital on 23 August 2018. The substantive concern was that only one doctor was on duty at the practice, with no resource for a home visit that afternoon even if the doctor considered one indicated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to HT Practice; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient doctor staffing capacity for emergencies, clinical queries and home visits

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence before the court was that, on the afternoon of 21st August 2018, there was only one doctor on duty for the practice as a whole. The evidence of the relevant clinician was that in addition to undertaking a (habitually) busy afternoon surgery, he was the only doctor available to deal with emergencies or clinical queries. In those circumstances and whilst the relevant clinician described his telephone call with the care home in terms of being a “triage” consultation, there was no resource in the practice for a home visit to be undertaken that afternoon even if considered indicated by the doctor. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026