Hull City Council

Local government · English unitary authority

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Mar 2023•Latest report 3 Dec 2024

Reports, concerns and published responses

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Reports
2

Naming this recipient

Published responses
50%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Hull City Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Gary Stephen DUNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gary Stephen DUNN died instantly after his bicycle collided with a left-turning LGV while he was cycling through the Stoneferry Road/Ferry Lane roundabout in Kingston Upon Hull. Concerns were raised about insufficient signage explaining the changed lane arrangements and inadequate signage informing cyclists of an alternative shared pedestrian and cycle path and Toucan Crossing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hull City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient road signage for navigating the roundabout

    Wider context from the report

    “I appreciate it has been almost a year before this inquest was concluded so the change in road layout may now be more known to regular drivers, however people unfamiliar with the road may also need to navigate the roundabout. The Officer in the Case, an experienced Serious Collision Investigation Officer, raised concerns regarding the signage of 2 aspects of this area of road: • Firstly, although the road markings which indicate the centre lane can also be used for left hand turning vehicles was regarded as clear, the officer felt there was insufficient actual road signage to assist road users in how the roundabout can be navigated. This was of particular concern as this is a busy roundabout with a build up of traffic and so markings on the road are often obscured. • Secondly, there is a dual use path for both pedestrians and cyclists as well as the availability of a Toucan Crossing. This provides cyclists with an alternative to using the road. Again, evidence was heard that there was inappropriate signage to instruct cyclists that this route was available. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hull City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inappropriate signage informing cyclists of the available alternative route

    Wider context from the report

    “I appreciate it has been almost a year before this inquest was concluded so the change in road layout may now be more known to regular drivers, however people unfamiliar with the road may also need to navigate the roundabout. The Officer in the Case, an experienced Serious Collision Investigation Officer, raised concerns regarding the signage of 2 aspects of this area of road: • Firstly, although the road markings which indicate the centre lane can also be used for left hand turning vehicles was regarded as clear, the officer felt there was insufficient actual road signage to assist road users in how the roundabout can be navigated. This was of particular concern as this is a busy roundabout with a build up of traffic and so markings on the road are often obscured. • Secondly, there is a dual use path for both pedestrians and cyclists as well as the availability of a Toucan Crossing. This provides cyclists with an alternative to using the road. Again, evidence was heard that there was inappropriate signage to instruct cyclists that this route was available. ”
    Open source report

  2. Addressed to: Public Transport Department, Hull City Council.

    East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Lisa KIRBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Lisa KIRBY died after being struck by a vehicle while crossing Lowgate, Hull, on the evening of 27 August 2021. The report raised concerns about the road remaining open to traffic in a busy area where pedestrians, including people who had been drinking, had to cross among vehicles, taxis and limited crossing facilities. It also expressed concern that the danger in the area had been underestimated and that further incidents could occur without appropriate action.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hull City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adequately restrict through traffic during Friday and Saturday nights

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) On a Friday and Saturday night the Lowgate area of Hull city is exceptionally busy with people enjoying the night time economy. As such many are in drink. The area of Lowgate is open to traffic, it is also the location of a taxi rank. There is only one crossing facility (aside from at either end of the road), the road narrows significantly at one end. (2) Police raised concerns as follows: - The road remaining open during a Friday and Saturday night. - The number of pedestrians using the area. - Many people in drink in the area having to cross the road. - The road is a 30 mph. - Lights of vehicles are distracting. - The location of the taxi rank, pedestrians having to navigate around the parked taxis, some with lights on, to enter the road. Taxis do 3 point turns in the road and any vehicle doing this is a danger to pedestrians. (3) Evidence was heard one doorman working in the area who stated “Having worked at the same location for some time, the area where the bars are on Lowgate is an accident waiting to happen. Members of the public are leaving the bars in a drunken state and they just wander into the road to cross, many of them not even looking for traffic on the road. Some vehicles travel down Lowgate far too fast given the evening activity” and another doorman stated “the road and both the footpaths at the location of the collision occurred on Lowgate are both very narrow. There is also a taxi rank outside O’Leary’s which doesn’t help as taxis were parked there at the time of the collision. I have seen numerous near misses over the years I have worked in the area. It is no exaggeration to say that there are between six to twelve incidents each night between cars and pedestrians, one thing which does not help and is also dangerous are taxis which do U turns in the road once they have collected their fare”. (4) The police had previously made recommendations and further felt that closing Lowgate to all through traffic on a Friday and Saturday evening, making Lowgate a total no stopping zone on an evening between certain hours, moving the location of a taxi rank onto nearby Alfred Gelder Street. (5) I note the statement from the local authority listed - They have erected 2 speed signs since the incident. Bearing in mind that this incident occurred with a vehicle travelling well within the limits, traffic is the concern not limited to the speed of vehicles. - The council was looking at developing a document that reviewed speed limits for the whole of the city centre. Lowgate has a special reason for being an area of concern and should be looked at as a priority and not in conjunction with all other city centre streets. - That engagement with the councils public transport department has commenced with the intention to relocate the taxi rank to Alfred Gelder street “but this requires consultation with the Hackney Carriage Association”. No indication was given regarding what was being done to facilitate this. - The council say that there are no resources to manage the road closure, despite acknowledging it is their responsibility. The fact the road is open at this time is a danger and I am concerned given the comments of the doormen that the danger is being underestimated. - Crossing facilities had been looked at but could not be positioned within a suitable distance. (6) I am concerned that inappropriate weight has been given to the danger arising in this area and that without appropriate action further incidents will occur. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hull City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to safely manage the taxi rank and taxi manoeuvres on Lowgate

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) On a Friday and Saturday night the Lowgate area of Hull city is exceptionally busy with people enjoying the night time economy. As such many are in drink. The area of Lowgate is open to traffic, it is also the location of a taxi rank. There is only one crossing facility (aside from at either end of the road), the road narrows significantly at one end. (2) Police raised concerns as follows: - The road remaining open during a Friday and Saturday night. - The number of pedestrians using the area. - Many people in drink in the area having to cross the road. - The road is a 30 mph. - Lights of vehicles are distracting. - The location of the taxi rank, pedestrians having to navigate around the parked taxis, some with lights on, to enter the road. Taxis do 3 point turns in the road and any vehicle doing this is a danger to pedestrians. (3) Evidence was heard one doorman working in the area who stated “Having worked at the same location for some time, the area where the bars are on Lowgate is an accident waiting to happen. Members of the public are leaving the bars in a drunken state and they just wander into the road to cross, many of them not even looking for traffic on the road. Some vehicles travel down Lowgate far too fast given the evening activity” and another doorman stated “the road and both the footpaths at the location of the collision occurred on Lowgate are both very narrow. There is also a taxi rank outside O’Leary’s which doesn’t help as taxis were parked there at the time of the collision. I have seen numerous near misses over the years I have worked in the area. It is no exaggeration to say that there are between six to twelve incidents each night between cars and pedestrians, one thing which does not help and is also dangerous are taxis which do U turns in the road once they have collected their fare”. (4) The police had previously made recommendations and further felt that closing Lowgate to all through traffic on a Friday and Saturday evening, making Lowgate a total no stopping zone on an evening between certain hours, moving the location of a taxi rank onto nearby Alfred Gelder Street. (5) I note the statement from the local authority listed - They have erected 2 speed signs since the incident. Bearing in mind that this incident occurred with a vehicle travelling well within the limits, traffic is the concern not limited to the speed of vehicles. - The council was looking at developing a document that reviewed speed limits for the whole of the city centre. Lowgate has a special reason for being an area of concern and should be looked at as a priority and not in conjunction with all other city centre streets. - That engagement with the councils public transport department has commenced with the intention to relocate the taxi rank to Alfred Gelder street “but this requires consultation with the Hackney Carriage Association”. No indication was given regarding what was being done to facilitate this. - The council say that there are no resources to manage the road closure, despite acknowledging it is their responsibility. The fact the road is open at this time is a danger and I am concerned given the comments of the doormen that the danger is being underestimated. - Crossing facilities had been looked at but could not be positioned within a suitable distance. (6) I am concerned that inappropriate weight has been given to the danger arising in this area and that without appropriate action further incidents will occur. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Hull City Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate provision of suitable pedestrian crossing facilities on Lowgate

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) On a Friday and Saturday night the Lowgate area of Hull city is exceptionally busy with people enjoying the night time economy. As such many are in drink. The area of Lowgate is open to traffic, it is also the location of a taxi rank. There is only one crossing facility (aside from at either end of the road), the road narrows significantly at one end. (2) Police raised concerns as follows: - The road remaining open during a Friday and Saturday night. - The number of pedestrians using the area. - Many people in drink in the area having to cross the road. - The road is a 30 mph. - Lights of vehicles are distracting. - The location of the taxi rank, pedestrians having to navigate around the parked taxis, some with lights on, to enter the road. Taxis do 3 point turns in the road and any vehicle doing this is a danger to pedestrians. (3) Evidence was heard one doorman working in the area who stated “Having worked at the same location for some time, the area where the bars are on Lowgate is an accident waiting to happen. Members of the public are leaving the bars in a drunken state and they just wander into the road to cross, many of them not even looking for traffic on the road. Some vehicles travel down Lowgate far too fast given the evening activity” and another doorman stated “the road and both the footpaths at the location of the collision occurred on Lowgate are both very narrow. There is also a taxi rank outside O’Leary’s which doesn’t help as taxis were parked there at the time of the collision. I have seen numerous near misses over the years I have worked in the area. It is no exaggeration to say that there are between six to twelve incidents each night between cars and pedestrians, one thing which does not help and is also dangerous are taxis which do U turns in the road once they have collected their fare”. (4) The police had previously made recommendations and further felt that closing Lowgate to all through traffic on a Friday and Saturday evening, making Lowgate a total no stopping zone on an evening between certain hours, moving the location of a taxi rank onto nearby Alfred Gelder Street. (5) I note the statement from the local authority listed - They have erected 2 speed signs since the incident. Bearing in mind that this incident occurred with a vehicle travelling well within the limits, traffic is the concern not limited to the speed of vehicles. - The council was looking at developing a document that reviewed speed limits for the whole of the city centre. Lowgate has a special reason for being an area of concern and should be looked at as a priority and not in conjunction with all other city centre streets. - That engagement with the councils public transport department has commenced with the intention to relocate the taxi rank to Alfred Gelder street “but this requires consultation with the Hackney Carriage Association”. No indication was given regarding what was being done to facilitate this. - The council say that there are no resources to manage the road closure, despite acknowledging it is their responsibility. The fact the road is open at this time is a danger and I am concerned given the comments of the doormen that the danger is being underestimated. - Crossing facilities had been looked at but could not be positioned within a suitable distance. (6) I am concerned that inappropriate weight has been given to the danger arising in this area and that without appropriate action further incidents will occur. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026