Recipient

Independence Homes LimitedIncludes reports addressed to a minister or senior office-holder acting for this organisation.

Pin Request correction

First report 26 Jul 2016•Latest report 26 Jul 2016

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Independence Homes Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Addressed to: ████████ Medical Director and Co-Founder of Independence Homes Limited..

    Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Gilbank · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Gilbank, a 25-year-old woman with severe myoclonic epilepsy and significant learning difficulties, was found unresponsive in bed at Clareville Lodge during the early hours of 12 May 2015. Staff were unable to obtain an outside telephone line from the office landline and used a personal mobile phone to call emergency services, while CPR was unsuccessful. The principal concerns were that a required 1.30am check had been missed because staff were attending to other service users, and that staff did not know how to obtain an outside line to emergency services, causing a delay of unknown duration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Independence Homes Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out required checks when staff are occupied with other service users

    Wider context from the report

    “Lack of check at 1.30am on 12 May 2015 Evidence at inquest revealed that the check was not carried out because the two members of waking night staff were busy dealing with other service users. The court heard evidence that this was not an isolated occurrence and that checks had been missed on other occasions in circumstances in which staff were dealing with other service users. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Independence Homes Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff knowledge about obtaining an outside telephone line to emergency services

    Wider context from the report

    “Lack of knowledge about how to obtain an outside telephone line Evidence at the inquest revealed that the staff on duty did not know how to obtain an outside line to emergency services and, after trying, had to rely on a personal mobile phone. This resulted in a delay of unknown duration. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026