Recipient

Information Commissioner's Office

First report 18 Dec 2024•Latest report 18 Dec 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Information rights regulator. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Information Commissioner's Office linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa Savage died on 25 April 2023 at the University Hospital of North Durham from bronchopneumonia, following a fall from her bed at Redwell Hills Care Home on 18 March 2023 and subsequent injuries and decline in health. The concerns included unclear fall-reporting arrangements, ineffective monitoring of her mobilisation, inadequate post-fall medical assessment, missing or insufficient care records, and failure to promptly reassess her care plan after falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear and timely internal and external fall reporting

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was I heard no clear definition of when to report falls externally & internally - this to me is perhaps the reason why the fall Mrs Savage suffered on 1/2/23 was not recorded internally, all be it CQC were notified on this occasion. The fall on 18/3/23 was not reported to CQC and whilst I understand staff at the care home did not know the outcome of Mrs Savage's treatment in hospital - she left the home by ambulance and did not return. This seems an occurrence worthy of reporting – It strikes me some clearer reporting structure is necessary - timely and accurate reporting both internally and to regulators allows for those concerned to assess the care home and decide on whether there are risks/issues that need addressing and protect residents. I would suggest over reporting is preferable to under reporting. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly document medical advice obtained after resident falls

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Mrs Savage's fall in February 2023 was it appears reported to her GP by her daughter and that led to a nurse attending the home to examine her. Staff at the home do not appear to have done so themselves. It is of concern that after a fall the staff within the home should have a mechanism to ensure medical advice is obtained in a timely fashion and that it is documented clearly and not be reliant on family members summoning help for residents themselves when they have become aware of an incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to promptly re-evaluate and amend care plans after significant events

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The evidence I have heard is after Mrs Savage's fall on 1/2/23 and when it became clear the sensor mat was not working as intended - this should have prompted staff to return to the care plans and re-evaluate them - it did not. Indeed one care home witness stated as Mrs Savage had not had 3 falls in 3 months no change to her plan was needed. Given the second fall Mrs Savage had some weeks later gave her injuries that led to her death this approach appears flawed. Whilst I acknowledge work is ongoing in this area it appears that prompt re-evaluation of the care plans after events such as a fall are necessary to prevent injury and death - I would ask for some reassurance that significant events are captured by staff and in turn their significance is carefully considered and if necessary changes made to care. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide effective, individually tailored monitoring measures for residents at high risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence is clear that the provided sensor mat was not an efficient way of monitoring Mrs Savage when she attempted to mobilise. It was well known in the home that Mrs Savage defeated it's purpose by moving or unplugging it. There seems to have been a lack of thought as to an alternative measure. The wall mounted sensor, for example was seen by the expert as a reasonable measure - the home manager said he could consider them and the regional manager indicated they were used in the company, but not at the care home where Mrs Savage was residing. It seems to me the council should have an armoury of measures to pick from to tailor to the needs of the individual resident not just limited to one particular measure. The risk of death is obvious to others if persons at high risk of falls are not known to be moving by those charged with looking after them. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain timely medical advice after a resident fall

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Mrs Savage's fall in February 2023 was it appears reported to her GP by her daughter and that led to a nurse attending the home to examine her. Staff at the home do not appear to have done so themselves. It is of concern that after a fall the staff within the home should have a mechanism to ensure medical advice is obtained in a timely fashion and that it is documented clearly and not be reliant on family members summoning help for residents themselves when they have become aware of an incident. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Information Commissioner's Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain accessible and retained resident records

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The absence of records has hindered my investigation into Mrs Savage's death. The expert in her evidence made it clear - good recording keeping allows staff to monitor changes in condition, allows new staff or those returning from time off to reacquaint themselves with residents condition and allows clinicians to make diagnosis - without access to good records I can see a clear risk to the care of residents. It is also surprising to me the complete reliance on paper records which in Mrs Savage’s case have been lost. I would have expected to see electronic recording of information and electronic storage of it. I note the roll out of this in the company has been paused whilst the company is awaiting sale and my concern is whether the electronic recording and storage will be implemented - to me immediate access to records of a resident or the absence of them creates a concern. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026