Recipient

Kingkabs Limited

First report 13 Nov 2024•Latest report 13 Nov 2024

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Private limited company. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
4stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Kingkabs Limited linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Howat · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Howat was intoxicated and left by a taxi in an unlit layby on the A483 dual carriageway, where there was no easy means for a pedestrian to leave. Concerns included the driver’s decision to leave him in an unsafe location, the failure to contact police, and a lack of corroborating evidence that drivers were trained in the relevant protocol.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Kingkabs Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of driver training to ensure passengers are not left in unsafe locations

    Wider context from the report

    “Oral testimony was given by a representative of Kingkabs that appropriate training was being provided to drivers seeking to balance the risk to themselves with their duty of care to their passengers, however the taxi driver stated in his evidence that if similar circumstances arose, he would do nothing different and would still be prepared to leave a passenger in an unsafe location. Furthermore, the firm’s representative advised that usual practice would be to contact the police in circumstances such as these, but this was not done on this occasion and no evidence or documentation was available to corroborate that staff were being trained in respect of this protocol. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Kingkabs Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to contact the police in circumstances requiring police assistance

    Wider context from the report

    “Oral testimony was given by a representative of Kingkabs that appropriate training was being provided to drivers seeking to balance the risk to themselves with their duty of care to their passengers, however the taxi driver stated in his evidence that if similar circumstances arose, he would do nothing different and would still be prepared to leave a passenger in an unsafe location. Furthermore, the firm’s representative advised that usual practice would be to contact the police in circumstances such as these, but this was not done on this occasion and no evidence or documentation was available to corroborate that staff were being trained in respect of this protocol. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Kingkabs Limited; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of evidence or documentation of staff training on the police contact protocol

    Wider context from the report

    “Oral testimony was given by a representative of Kingkabs that appropriate training was being provided to drivers seeking to balance the risk to themselves with their duty of care to their passengers, however the taxi driver stated in his evidence that if similar circumstances arose, he would do nothing different and would still be prepared to leave a passenger in an unsafe location. Furthermore, the firm’s representative advised that usual practice would be to contact the police in circumstances such as these, but this was not done on this occasion and no evidence or documentation was available to corroborate that staff were being trained in respect of this protocol. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update DR18 Driver Information & Advice with clearer duty-of-care, incident-response and confrontation-management guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The driver’s decision to discharge the passenger at an unsafe location is deeply regrettable and we acknowledge that their actions on this occasion fell short of the standards we would expect. While drivers are trained to balance their own safety with their duty of care to passengers, we recognise that this tragic outcome signals a need to reinforce and clarify our procedures with drivers.”

    Source location

    Response from KingKabs
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute the enhanced DR18 guidance to approximately 1,300 drivers across KingKabs and the wider group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 3rd January 2025, using our document sharing feature, we have updated all our drivers with the enhanced clearer guidance. As a Company we have taken this opportunity to reach out to all our c. 1,300 drivers covering not just KingKabs but to the wider group, ensuring consistency and firm commitment in our message.”

    Source location

    Response from KingKabs
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute the updated CC002 Call Centre Procedures to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The updated version of CC002 has been sent to all staff on 3rd January 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from KingKabs
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Document new Driver Incident Procedures in CC002 Call Centre Procedures, specifying when and how staff should escalate incidents to police and emergency services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On review, the process followed by ████████ was not adequately documented and the procedures within it could be made more robust. As such and in tandem with the driver”

    Source location

    Response from KingKabs
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026