Recipient

Lapal House and Lodge

Pin Request correction

First report 5 Feb 2015•Latest report 5 Feb 2015

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Nursing home. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Lapal House and Lodge linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Ward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Ward, an 85-year-old care home resident taking warfarin, suffered an unwitnessed fall and head injury on 29 November 2014. He was found unresponsive the following morning and died on 11 December 2014 after a CT confirmed a subdural haematoma. Concerns included staff awareness of the increased bleeding risk associated with head injury while taking warfarin, and the lack of clear policy, training, and escalation procedures for such falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lapal House and Lodge; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care staff to recognise the increased bleeding risk for patients on warfarin after a head injury

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Ward was an elderly patient who was at risk of falling and who was on long term warfarin. There is an increased risk of bleeding to elderly patients on warfarin who sustain a head injury. The care staff who attended to Mr Ward appeared to be unaware of the increased risk of bleeding even though there weren’t visible injuries. (2) During the inquest evidence was given in relation to the fall risk assessment and the policy adopted. However, there was no clear policy or training highlighted in dealing with patients who are on anti-coagulant therapy. In addition, it wasn’t clear the procedure for the escalation and referral of patients to qualified medical staff in the event of a fall. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lapal House and Lodge; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear policy or training for dealing with patients on anticoagulant therapy

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Ward was an elderly patient who was at risk of falling and who was on long term warfarin. There is an increased risk of bleeding to elderly patients on warfarin who sustain a head injury. The care staff who attended to Mr Ward appeared to be unaware of the increased risk of bleeding even though there weren’t visible injuries. (2) During the inquest evidence was given in relation to the fall risk assessment and the policy adopted. However, there was no clear policy or training highlighted in dealing with patients who are on anti-coagulant therapy. In addition, it wasn’t clear the procedure for the escalation and referral of patients to qualified medical staff in the event of a fall. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Lapal House and Lodge; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear procedure for escalation and referral after a patient fall

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Ward was an elderly patient who was at risk of falling and who was on long term warfarin. There is an increased risk of bleeding to elderly patients on warfarin who sustain a head injury. The care staff who attended to Mr Ward appeared to be unaware of the increased risk of bleeding even though there weren’t visible injuries. (2) During the inquest evidence was given in relation to the fall risk assessment and the policy adopted. However, there was no clear policy or training highlighted in dealing with patients who are on anti-coagulant therapy. In addition, it wasn’t clear the procedure for the escalation and referral of patients to qualified medical staff in the event of a fall. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026