Recipient

Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service

First report 16 Sep 2025•Latest report 16 Sep 2025

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Registered charity. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
9stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Christian Barry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christian Barry, who had recent alcohol withdrawal and worsening mental health symptoms, was found hanging in a bathroom at a respite facility on 6 January 2025 and was pronounced dead at the scene. The principal concern was the lack of a formal system for communication, information sharing and handover between the respite facility and the clinical service responsible for his care, including after a planned 48-hour review was missed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a formal system for communication, information sharing and handover between the respite facility and the Intensive Support Service

    Wider context from the report

    “There remains no system for formal communication, sharing and handover of information about patients who are admitted to the respite facility operated by Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service, but remain under the clinical care of the Intensive Support Service at Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust. It was candidly accepted in evidence that there needs to be an improvement in communication channels and information sharing for the partnership to run efficiently and effectively and to mitigate risk. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor handover-process compliance and effectiveness through audits and feedback mechanisms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Training and Governance”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure CRISS shift coordinators bring Oasis handover information to each locality’s daily multidisciplinary team meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Multidisciplinary Review Meetings”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a standardised daily handover template to capture clinical information, reviews, tasks, incidents, MDT comments and required follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Standardised Daily Handover and implementation of daily ‘huddle’ meeting”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore Oasis staff access to LYPFT’s electronic patient record and discuss the proposal through the operations meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, the CRISS team at LYPFT and Oasis staff are exploring the possibility of Oasis staff having access to LYPFT’s electronic patient record. This will be taken for further discussion through the operations meeting (described below).”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record handover details and required actions in Oasis’s own system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Documentation improvements”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold a daily Oasis–CRISS huddle to discuss handover information and address immediate actions and queries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once completed, the handover sheet is emailed to the appropriate LYPFT Crisis Resolution Intensive Support Service (CRISS) team. There are three locality teams East, South, and West, and the handover is sent to the corresponding area in which the individual is currently receiving care. The shift coordinator within the CRISS team is responsible for accessing this information and ensuring this is taken for discussion in the daily ‘huddle’ meeting as described below.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide training on the handover sheet, including each organisation’s roles and responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Training and Governance”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add Oasis handover notes, MDT discussions and required actions to LYPFT care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• LYPFT adds Oasis handover notes to the patient’s LYPFT care record as well as a full record of the MDT discussion and any required action.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing referral, admission, joint review, interface, operations and governance processes provide formal communication and risk-management arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We would also like to take this opportunity to describe the escalation processes and monitoring we currently have in place to ensure formal communication, risk management, and information sharing for patients admitted to the respite facility:”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds and Yorkshire Partnership Foundation Trust and Leeds Survivor-Led Crisis Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
56%11%33%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026