Recipient

Legal Services Lincolnshire

Pin Request correction

First report 12 Oct 2022•Latest report 12 Oct 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · Local authority service. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Legal Services Lincolnshire linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emma Jane SIMKIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emma Jane SIMKIN, also known as Emilie Zukiard AFFIN, died on 20 February 2021 after standing in front of a freight train at Railway Lineside, Spitalgate Hill, Grantham, and receiving non-survivable injuries. The report raises concern that people may mask mental illness in front of professionals, who may accept what they are told without sufficiently considering evidence from families, and asks whether policies and training addressing this issue are adequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Legal Services Lincolnshire; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider primary evidence from families alongside patients’ accounts when assessing masked mental illness

    Wider context from the report

    “Families are repeatedly advising their perception is that loved ones are successfully "masking" their mental illnesses in front of professionals who are perceived to accept at face value what they are told rather than looking at other primary evidence more often than not from the families themselves. which in turn leads the families to believe they are being ignored and lives lost. Can you reassure me that policies are in place that focus upon how to identify "masking" and adequate training to the appropriate professionals is up to date and consider if policies are in need of review. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026