Recipient

National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health

First report 18 Mar 2022•Latest report 18 Mar 2022

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · University research centre. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    James Forryan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Forryan died aged 29 after deliberately taking a poisonous quantity of pentobarbital medication at a London hotel. Evidence indicated that he had accessed an internet forum promoting suicide, which provided information about drugs, methods and obtaining medication. The principal concerns were the accessibility of suicide-promoting websites and forums and the apparent lack of sufficient regulation or enforcement action against them.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Easy accessibility of websites and forums openly promoting and advertising suicide methods

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) There are websites and forums which openly promote and advertise methods of suicide which are easily accessible; (b) Suicide is the largest cause of death for individuals in the UK under the age of 35 and James Forryan is within that age bracket; (c) There does not appear to be sufficient regulation or enforcement action against such websites which promote criminal offences and/or harmful content. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient regulation or enforcement action against websites promoting criminal offences or harmful content

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) There are websites and forums which openly promote and advertise methods of suicide which are easily accessible; (b) Suicide is the largest cause of death for individuals in the UK under the age of 35 and James Forryan is within that age bracket; (c) There does not appear to be sufficient regulation or enforcement action against such websites which promote criminal offences and/or harmful content. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026