Recipient

National Counter Terrorism Security Office

First report 1 Nov 2019•Latest report 1 Nov 2019

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Other public bodies · Other public body. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
0%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
0

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

0%published responses found
0stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from National Counter Terrorism Security Office linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. London Inner (South)

    AI-generated summary

    Xavier Thomas and 10 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 3 June 2017, three attackers carried out vehicle and knife attacks at London Bridge and Borough Market, killing eight victims: Xavier Thomas, Christine Archibald, Sara Zelenak, James McMullan, Sébastien Bélanger, Alexandre Pigeard, Kirsty Boden and Ignacio Echeverría Miralles de Imperial. The report identifies substantive concerns relating to protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Counter-terrorism investigation concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emergency response concerns for terrorist attacks

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communications concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Protective security concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about locating casualties

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to National Counter Terrorism Security Office; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medical equipment and training concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “The substantive matters of concern are set out throughout the remainder of the Report, including MC1 to MC18, addressed to the relevant public authorities and industry body, concerning protective security, counter-terrorism investigations, emergency response to terrorist attacks, communications, locating casualties, medical equipment and training, and rental vehicles used in terrorist attacks. ”
    Open source report
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

0%
0%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026