Recipient

North East Lincolnshire Council

Pin Request correction

First report 30 Dec 2013•Latest report 30 Dec 2013

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Local government · English unitary authority. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
2

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
2stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from North East Lincolnshire Council linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Lincolnshire and Grimsby

    AI-generated summary

    Lynne Dring · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lynne Dring was crossing A1098 Taylors Avenue at Hewitts Circus, Cleethorpes, when she was struck by a car exiting the roundabout. Concerns included a central illuminated bollard potentially obstructing motorists’ views and non-prescribed white lines at an Elephant crossing potentially leading pedestrians to believe they had priority.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North East Lincolnshire Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of non-prescribed Elephant crossing lines creating misleading pedestrian priority indications

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) White lines indicating an Elephant crossing are non-prescribed and may induce pedestrians to believe they have priority. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to North East Lincolnshire Council; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obstruction of motorists view by street furniture

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Street furniture, notably a central illuminated bollard may obstruct/interfere with motorists view. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove WBM 294 elephant-footprint road markings from the ten priority sites, including Hewitt’s Circus roundabout.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the WBM 294 (elephants footprints) road markings, all sites where these have been installed have been identified; some 17 sites in total. A program of removal has been compiled with the intention of removing markings at 10 sites being the priority. The Hewitt's Circus roundabout is in this “top 10” priority listing.”

    Source location

    2013-0360-Response-by-Balfour-Beatty
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 December 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace the roundabout’s illuminated bollards with non-illuminated bollards, positioning them to improve driver guidance without restricting pedestrian visibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can inform you that it is intended to replace the illuminated bollards at the roundabout with non-illuminated bollards. These are not significantly smaller than the bollards currently present but in replacing them a location within the central refuge will be chosen so as to offer the best guidance to motorist whilst avoiding restricting visibility to or of a pedestrian attempting to cross the roads.”

    Source location

    2013-0360-Response-by-Balfour-Beatty
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 December 2013

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
100%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026