Recipient

Paediatric Critical Care Society

Pin Request correction

First report 29 Jan 2026•Latest report 29 Jan 2026

Recipient record

Reports, concerns and published responses

Private and voluntary organisations · Charitable incorporated organisation. This page brings together reports naming this recipient and response statements clearly connected to concerns raised in those reports.

Reports
1

Naming this recipient

Published responses
100%

Found for named reports

Concerns addressed
1

Across all linked responses

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports naming this recipient by issue year.

Evidence profile

Report topics

Share of this recipient’s reports compared with all other recipients.

100%published responses found
3stated actions described

Topic comparisons are not available in the current evidence snapshot.

Concerns and recipient responses

Statements from Paediatric Critical Care Society linked to the concerns in each report. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Antonio Galisi-Swallow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Antonio Galisi-Swallow died in hospital on 7 October 2021 after developing Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome following continuous propofol sedation after cardiac surgery. The inquest heard that there was no national guidance for short-term propofol sedation in children and young people on PICUs, and an expert witness supported a guideline subsequently developed by Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. The report was sent to Paediatric Critical Care Society; that does not assign responsibility.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national guidance for propofol use for short-term sedation in children and young people on PICUs

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest, the court was told that there is no national guidance for the use of propofol for short term sedation in children and young people on PICU’s. ”
    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce a joint specialist position statement on propofol use in paediatric critical care for publication on participating organisations’ websites.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “PCCS has convened a specialist group including paediatric intensivists, anaesthetists and pharmacists, with representation from PCCS, the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists (APA) and the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group (NPPG). This group is producing a joint position statement on the use of propofol in paediatric critical care. We expect to publish this on our respective websites in the Summer of 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a mandatory PCCS Quality Standards requirement for Level 3 units to maintain an agreed local guideline for propofol use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the scheduled update to the PCCS Quality Standards (Version 7), we will introduce a mandatory minimum standard requiring all Level 3 paediatric critical care units to have an agreed local guideline for propofol use. This revision will be published later this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Paediatric Critical Care Society
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Published response patterns

Compared with other recipients in reports included in PFD Monitor

Describes published response evidence, not performance.

Published responses found

100%
100%All other recipients 58%
0%100%

How actions were described at the time

This respondent
33%33%33%
All other recipients
47%25%27%<1%<1%
  • Completed
  • In progress
  • Planned
  • Unclear
  • Partially completed

Statuses reflect what recipients said at the time. PFD Monitor does not verify whether actions happened.

Types of action described in responses

Percentages use all actions described by each group. An action may have more than one type, so percentages do not total 100%.

Information checked against published PFD reports and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Data last updated 7 September 2026